Talk:Andrew Callaghan: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 05:56, 11 January 2023

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography C‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Comedy C‑class Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Journalism C‑class Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Media C‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Mackay Radio
Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

YouTube C‑class Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject YouTube, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of YouTube and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YouTubeWikipedia:WikiProject YouTubeTemplate:WikiProject YouTubeYouTube articles

C This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject YouTube To-do:

A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see list.
Assess : Apply the assessment scale on Unknown-importance YouTube articles + Unassessed YouTube articles
Cleanup : See cleanup listing
Maintain : This WikiProject
Stubs : Category:Stub-Class YouTube articles
Other :
- Substitute {{WikiProject YouTube/Invite Members}} on user talk pages
- Check out edit requests on Talk:List of YouTubers

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:07, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Assault Allegations

Over the last week serious accusations against Callaghan have risen to public attention. Several women have come forward, accusing Callaghan of sexual misconduct and assault. Here's a recent video discussing the allegations: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5D1yD-282XE

Callaghan has not yet released a statement, but the accusations seem noteworthy nonetheless.

Maybe this information could be added to the main page in the form of a controversy-section. 2A02:8070:4681:4C00:21D8:A93E:49E:BB1D (talk) 13:29, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I added it to personal life, fdepending on what more info comes out/more reliable sources reporting on it we may want to add a section for it, similar to in Walter Lewin's page. Endated (talk) 14:48, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rolling Stone just released an article covering the allegations https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/andrew-callaghan-hbo-this-place-rules-sexual-misconduct-allegations-1234658336/ perhaps this can be used to source a section regarding the allegations against Callaghan? Dahna2024 (talk) 18:55, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rolling Stone's reporting on anything but culture (music, movies, etc.) is no longer considered reliable on Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources#Rolling_Stone_(politics_and_society,_2011%E2%80%93present) I will go ahead and remove the citation until we can find something more credible. Planetjanet (talk) 01:40, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The A.V. Club is now cited as the source for the sex pest claims, and it's a reliable source as per WP:RSP, but the A.V. Club article itself still cites Rolling Stone, as do all of the other ones I can find on Google News. I'm not sure if this meets Wikipedia's reliability standards. But I'll leave it up because I just don't know. Could someone who is familiar with what to do in this situation please comment?

@@ Line 27: / Line 27: @@
 :Rolling Stone just released an article covering the allegations https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/andrew-callaghan-hbo-this-place-rules-sexual-misconduct-allegations-1234658336/ perhaps this can be used to source a section regarding the allegations against Callaghan? [[User:Dahna2024|Dahna2024]] ([[User talk:Dahna2024|talk]]) 18:55, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
 ::Rolling Stone's reporting on anything but culture (music, movies, etc.) is no longer considered reliable on Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources#Rolling_Stone_(politics_and_society,_2011%E2%80%93present) I will go ahead and remove the citation until we can find something more credible. [[User:Planetjanet|Planetjanet]] ([[User talk:Planetjanet|talk]]) 01:40, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
+The A.V. Club is now cited as the source for the sex pest claims, and it's a reliable source as per WP:RSP, but the A.V. Club article itself still cites Rolling Stone, as do all of the other ones I can find on Google News. I'm not sure if this meets Wikipedia's reliability standards. But I'll leave it up because I just don't know. Could someone who is familiar with what to do in this situation please comment?