User talk:1549bcp

Autopatrolled

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

• This permission does not give you any special status or authority
• Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
• You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
• If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing!HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:47, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Great job on making the original Thirty-Six Immortals of Poetry article. I am glad someone else is also interested in the subject, and willing to put together a nice page on it. Ph0kin (talk) 07:14, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Wikipedia should give you a trophy! Wyclif (talk) 02:12, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

John Fulton (priest) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, John Fulton (priest), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 20:48, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Slovak National Catholic Church

The article Slovak National Catholic Church has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I cannot find any centered reliable secondary source to establish that this alleged organisation meets WP:GNG. There is a clear lack of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Veverve (talk) 17:34, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Slovak National Catholic Church for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Slovak National Catholic Church is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slovak National Catholic Church until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Veverve (talk) 11:54, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of John Walter Lea

The article John Walter Lea has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:NOTE

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mr.weedle (talk) 16:22, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:John Fulton (priest)

Hello, 1549bcp. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:John Fulton (priest), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:03, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Royden Yerkes to draftspace

Hi. As your article on Royden Yerkes has had no references for over 8 years and is largely a list of works he published, I have moved it to draftspace. You will find it at Draft:Royden Yerkes. If you want to improve it with references, ideally as inline citations, and demonstrate that it meets notability, please do so. Thank you. DiamondRemley39 (talk) 19:27, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

I have done the same with the following drafts for similar reasons (articles are low on citations and/or notability):

• Draft:Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences
• Draft:Thomas Topping
• Draft:Woman's Seamen's Friend Society of Connecticut

You probably have access to some good information on these topics and could enhance the articles. Ask for help in the Teahouse if you need assistance.

Have a good day. DiamondRemley39 (talk) 20:14, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

And the same with Draft:Íslenzk fornrit. Both sources were self-published and one was a catalog, this does not indicate notability. DiamondRemley39 (talk) 20:23, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Royden Yerkes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Royden Yerkes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Royden Yerkes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:43, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Kendall Harmon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kendall Harmon, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kendall Harmon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jennifer Tucker

The article Jennifer Tucker has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable academic, no significant coverage, unreferenced article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 05:50, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Andrew Smith (bishop)

The article Andrew Smith (bishop) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 01:58, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of National Council of Churches in Bangladesh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article National Council of Churches in Bangladesh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Council of Churches in Bangladesh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Worldbruce (talk) 14:22, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fellowship of Christian Councils and Churches in the Great Lakes and Horn of Africa

The article Fellowship of Christian Councils and Churches in the Great Lakes and Horn of Africa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Seemingly non-notable organization... of organizations, apparently. Unsourced. Google books and general Google searches are not turning up anything of significance.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Compulsive Researcher (talk) 15:12, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Council of Christian Churches of an African Approach in Europe

The article Council of Christian Churches of an African Approach in Europe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant content; list mostly of redlinks, some redirects and dab pages, only 5 linked articles; single source

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Category:Members of the Fédération Internationale de Philatélie has been nominated for deletion

Category:Members of the Fédération Internationale de Philatélie has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:31, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Roman Catholic Diocese of Patti, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Floresta.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)