Jump to content

Talk:.454 Casull: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)
 
Line 23: Line 23:
== Specs & Parts ==
== Specs & Parts ==
The statement that ...''The new Casull round uses a small rifle primer rather than a pistol primer, because it develops extremely high chamber pressures of over 60,000 CUP (copper units of pressure) (410 MPa), and has a significantly stronger cup than a pistol primer''.... seems to imply that the Casull round uses a small rifle primer because it has ... features of that part. The sentance should be changed to reflect the need, rather than the use because it has. Change '''has''' to read '''needs''' or '''requires'''. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/144.183.224.2|144.183.224.2]] ([[User talk:144.183.224.2|talk]]) 22:58, 25 September 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
The statement that ...''The new Casull round uses a small rifle primer rather than a pistol primer, because it develops extremely high chamber pressures of over 60,000 CUP (copper units of pressure) (410 MPa), and has a significantly stronger cup than a pistol primer''.... seems to imply that the Casull round uses a small rifle primer because it has ... features of that part. The sentance should be changed to reflect the need, rather than the use because it has. Change '''has''' to read '''needs''' or '''requires'''. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/144.183.224.2|144.183.224.2]] ([[User talk:144.183.224.2|talk]]) 22:58, 25 September 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

: In fact, the section does not correctly represent the differences between the SPP and SRP, as described accurately by this engineer with the Sierra Bullet Company: https://www.sierrabullets.com/primer-substitutions/ I think that it is not important in THIS article to go beyond stating that the 454 Casull cartridge is designed to use an SRP.

Latest revision as of 01:42, 17 May 2024

.45 Schofield

[edit]

It is my understanding that the .45 Schofield can be fired in 454 chambers just as the .45 Colt can be. ANy comments?--Counsel (talk) 22:01, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The .45 Schofield article says that it can usually be fired in .45 Colt chambers. There may be a unacceptable difference in rim thickness. YMMV. Safety first, always. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 22:14, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

380 ACP

[edit]

what about the 380 ACP ammo. ur gonna need a new picture Dyl pykle69 (talk) 14:57, 3 May 2010 (UTC)dyl_pykle69[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 13:03, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Specs & Parts

[edit]

The statement that ...The new Casull round uses a small rifle primer rather than a pistol primer, because it develops extremely high chamber pressures of over 60,000 CUP (copper units of pressure) (410 MPa), and has a significantly stronger cup than a pistol primer.... seems to imply that the Casull round uses a small rifle primer because it has ... features of that part. The sentance should be changed to reflect the need, rather than the use because it has. Change has to read needs or requires. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.183.224.2 (talk) 22:58, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, the section does not correctly represent the differences between the SPP and SRP, as described accurately by this engineer with the Sierra Bullet Company: https://www.sierrabullets.com/primer-substitutions/ I think that it is not important in THIS article to go beyond stating that the 454 Casull cartridge is designed to use an SRP.