Jump to content

Talk:Scott Dyleski: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Writing: this article needs to be revamped and updated, it is based on biased media articles that demonized Dyleski unjustly
Line 6: Line 6:


[[User:Cisum.ili.dilm|Cisum.ili.dilm]] 20:06, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
[[User:Cisum.ili.dilm|Cisum.ili.dilm]] 20:06, 13 November 2007 (UTC)


This article uses limited and biased sources not to mention way too many articles (all with biased titles and biased writing is sourced as the authority on the topic, e.g., Lisa Sweeningham article ), most of which are inserted by the same user (Christine Garden). This user also keeps deleting valuable external links and does not appear to be an expert on this case as can be witnessed by comparing the court transcripts and what is now available to the public concerning this case.


==Photo==
==Photo==

Revision as of 08:03, 23 December 2007

WikiProject iconBiography Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Writing

Utterly inadequate.

Cisum.ili.dilm 20:06, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


This article uses limited and biased sources not to mention way too many articles (all with biased titles and biased writing is sourced as the authority on the topic, e.g., Lisa Sweeningham article ), most of which are inserted by the same user (Christine Garden). This user also keeps deleting valuable external links and does not appear to be an expert on this case as can be witnessed by comparing the court transcripts and what is now available to the public concerning this case.

Photo

Could there be a better picture? The Chronicle compilation has been criticized, and it is not as recent as a photo could be. - Emiellaiendiay 20:16, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Artists for Scott Dyleski (talkcontribs) 08:49, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]