Jump to content

User:Genericcitizen: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 99: Line 99:




''' Australian National University Staff page [http://politicsir.cass.anu.edu.au/staff/rhodes/index.htm here]'''
''' Australian National University staff page [http://politicsir.cass.anu.edu.au/staff/rhodes/index.htm here]'''





Revision as of 23:57, 11 May 2010

R. A. W. Rhodes
Alma materUniversity of Essex, Oxford University
SchoolInterpretive Political Science
Main interests
Public policy, Political Institutions; Governance, Core executive, Policy networks, and Public administration
Notable ideas
Decentred theory of governance


work in progress

The following content, to be made live soon, is about a Professor of Political Science

R. A. W. Rhodes

R.A.W. Rhodes is a Professor of Political Science. He currently holds a joint appointment as Professor of Government in the School of Government at the University of Tasmania, Australia, and as Distinguished Professor of Political Science in the Political Science Program at the Australian National University. He is also Professor Emeritus, University of Newcastle (UK). He is the former Director of the UK Economic and Social Research Council’s ‘Whitehall Programme’ (1994-1999); and of the Research School of Social Sciences at the Australian National University (2007-8. He is Treasurer of the Australasian Political Studies Association, life Vice-President of the Political Studies Association of the United Kingdom, and a Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences in both Australia and Britain. He was editor of Public Administration, 1986-2011.

Current Research Interests

Interpretive political science

'Mark Bevir and R. A. W. Rhodes are the authors of Interpreting British Governance (2003) and Governance Stories (2006). They argue that political science must necessarily be an interpretive art. This is because they hold that the starting point of enquiry must be to unpack the meanings, beliefs, and preferences of actors in order to then make sense of understanding actions, practices, and institutions. Political science is therefore an interpretative discipline underpinned by hermeneutic philosophy rather than positivism: there is no ‘science’ of politics, instead all explanations, including those that deploy statistics and models, are best conceived as narratives. Bevir and Rhodes thus provide an elaborate philosophical foundation for a decentred theory of governance woven together by the notions of beliefs, traditions and dilemmas. 'It follows that the role of political scientists is to use (1) ethnography to uncover people’s beliefs and preferences, and (2) history to uncover traditions as they develop in response to dilemmas. The product is a story of other people’s constructions of what they are doing, which provides actors’ views on changes in government, the economy, and society. So, for example, a political scientist may select a part of the governance process, and then explain it by unpicking various political traditions and how actors within these traditions encounter and act to resolve dilemmas. Governance is thus understood as the contingent and unintended outcome of competing narratives of governance.’(Encyclopedia of Governance, pp.194–195)


A decentred theory of governance

'For Bevir and Rhodes, decentered theory revolves around the idea of situated agency: institutions, practices or socialisation cannot determine how people behave, so any course of action is a contingent individual choice. People’s actions are explained by their beliefs (or meanings or desires); any one belief is interpreted in the context of the wider web of a person’s beliefs; and these beliefs are explained by traditions and modified by dilemmas. A tradition (or episteme or paradigm) is the set of theories against the background of which a person comes to hold beliefs and perform actions. It is a first influence upon people – a set of beliefs that they inherit and then transform in response to encounters with "dilemmas" (or problems or anomalies). A dilemma arises whenever novel circumstances generate a new belief that forces people to question their previously held beliefs. Change occurs through encountering such dilemmas: while individual responses to dilemmas are grounded in traditions, they then modify just those traditions.' (Encyclopedia of Governance, pp.194–195)


Selected Publications

Books

Bevir, M. and Rhodes, R. A. W. Interpreting British Governance. (London: Routledge 2003).

Books 1-3 are a trilogy introducing the ‘interpretive turn’ to studying British government. Discussed in a symposium in British Journal of Politics and International Relation 6 (2) 2004: 129-64.


Bevir, M. and Rhodes, R. A. W. Governance Stories (Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2006).

The Australian Political Studies Association (APSA) graded all publishers. Routledge were ranked A. The book was the subject of a symposium in Political Studies Review 6(2) 2008: 143-177.


Bevir, M. and Rhodes, R. A. W. The State as Cultural Practice. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).

OUP is ranked A* by APSA. OUP is the top political science publisher in the UK. Our last theory book on the interpretive turn.


Rhodes, R. A. W., J. Wanna and P. Weller, Comparing Westminster. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).

OUP is ranked A*. Book was ARC funded (DP0811920, 2002-4). It applies the Bevir and Rhodes approach. It is the first post-war comparative study of the Westminster tradition.


Rhodes, R. A. W. Everyday life at the top (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Accepted January, forthcoming September).

OUP is ranked A*. The book completed the decade long interpretive project. It applied the Bevir and Rhodes approach (above). It is the first political anthropology of British government.


Rhodes, R. A. W. (Ed.), Transforming British Government. Volume 1. Changing Institutions. Volume 2. Changing Roles and Relationships. (London: Macmillan, 2000).

The ESRC evaluation praised this original research as ‘a source of provocative ideas’ and ‘stimulating antidote’ while the ideas on governance provided ‘a cogent and widely recognised framework.’


Rhodes, R. A. W. Understanding Governance. (Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press, 1997. Reprinted 1999).

It is the top-cited book by a political scientist working in Australia (REPP, ANU). It also has 2354 Google cites. It is the foundational text for ‘the Anglo-governance school’.


Rhodes, R. A. W. and D. Marsh (Eds.), Policy networks in British government (Oxford Clarendon Press, 1992).

A foundational text from an A* publisher with 863 Google cites. Based on original research by the editors, their postgraduate students and junior colleagues.


Rhodes, R. A. W. Beyond Westminster and Whitehall: The Sub-Central Governments of Britain. (London and Winchester, Mass: Unwin-Hyman/Allen & Unwin, 1988; corrected edition with new Preface and bibliographical addendum, London: Routledge, 1992. Digital edition 2003).

Still in print after 22 years and never been out of print. It introduced the ‘the new orthodoxy’ of Britain as ‘differentiated polity’, a standard discussion topic in text books.


Rhodes, R. A. W. Control and Power in Central-Local Government Relationships. (Aldershot and Brookfield, Vermont: Ashgate, 1999).

Originally published in 1981, reprinted 1983 and 1986, Japanese translation, 1987, reprinted with a new preface and three additional chapters 1999. Four editions and a translation support the claim of major impact. It was the source ‘Rhodes model’ of intergovernmental relations, again a textbook staple.

Sources

Australian National University staff page here


Extended list of publications for R. A. W. Rhodes