User talk:75.72.35.253

May 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Charles Evans Hughes do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia.  
Your edit here to Charles Evans Hughes was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://supreme.justia.com/us/300/379/case.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:32, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Coolidge and Stone

Thanks for adding the law review cites to Calvin Coolidge. Would you mind formatting the links? The {{cite journal}} template would probably work. Thanks! --Coemgenus (talk) 14:53, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, looks great. --Coemgenus (talk) 21:28, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Chewing the fat?

Whatever! Can you at least tell me whether Rashid Rauf is definitely dead? Long War Journal says he's alive. --Zhoban (talk) 12:02, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Infighting in the Gulf Cartel

Thanks for adding the info on Mario's arrest. Cheers. ComputerJA (talk) 21:02, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

September 2012

Hello, I'm Calm As Midnight. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions to NATO bombing of Yugoslavia because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Calm As Midnight 22:49, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Fair enough.

But remember that U.S. officials were "95% certain" that Hakimullah Mehsud was killed in January 2010. Hakimullah appeared one year later in the execution video of a man who was kidnapped two months after Hakimullah's supposed death. Anyway, I can see the mainstream media is not taking the newspaper's claims seriously. Why would the Yemeni official lie about the DNA testing though? I'm slow when it comes to this kind of stuff so please explain.--Zhoban (talk) 16:48, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

It may not have been your intention, but one of your edits, specifically one that you made on Long War Journal, may have introduced material that some consider controversial. Due to this, your edits may have been reverted. When adding material that may be controversial, it is good practice to first discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them, in order to gain consensus over whether or not to include, phrasing, etc. If you believe that the information you added was correct, please initiate that discussion. Thank you. There has been an RfC that came to a consensus that the material does not belong in the article. To put the material back into the article, you'll need to gain consensus on the talk page. GregJackP Boomer! 16:21, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

ANI notice

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents is considered bad practice, even if you meant it well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Haploidavey (talk) 19:30, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

No worries, then, and thanks for your courteous note. Haploidavey (talk) 19:38, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

75.72.35.253 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

did not abuse multiple accounts. I created an account I intended to keep permanently. I did not edit from that account yet and I do not know how to close my previous username. This username is also shared and I don't want other people to get blocked who use it either. The only account I have ever created from this IP was JoetheMoe25 and that new mickey mantle one

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=did not abuse multiple accounts. I created an account I intended to keep permanently. I did not edit from that account yet and I do not know how to close my previous username. This username is also shared and I don't want other people to get blocked who use it either. The only account I have ever created from this IP was JoetheMoe25 and that new mickey mantle one |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=did not abuse multiple accounts. I created an account I intended to keep permanently. I did not edit from that account yet and I do not know how to close my previous username. This username is also shared and I don't want other people to get blocked who use it either. The only account I have ever created from this IP was JoetheMoe25 and that new mickey mantle one |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=did not abuse multiple accounts. I created an account I intended to keep permanently. I did not edit from that account yet and I do not know how to close my previous username. This username is also shared and I don't want other people to get blocked who use it either. The only account I have ever created from this IP was JoetheMoe25 and that new mickey mantle one |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

I would like to point out that shared accounts are forbidden also. GregJackP Boomer! 23:51, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

75.72.35.253 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

GregJackP sent me a comment and I now feel the user and other potentional Long War Journal fans have screwed me. I recently made a clean edit to the Long War Journal and Bill Roggio pages the user did. I did not violate the synthesis policy , as I pointed out on the Roggio talk pages, and I pointed out that Roggio's controversial claims about terrorist deaths needed to be added.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=GregJackP sent me a comment and I now feel the user and other potentional Long War Journal fans have screwed me. I recently made a clean edit to the Long War Journal and Bill Roggio pages the user did. I did not violate the synthesis policy , as I pointed out on the Roggio talk pages, and I pointed out that Roggio's controversial claims about terrorist deaths needed to be added. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=GregJackP sent me a comment and I now feel the user and other potentional Long War Journal fans have screwed me. I recently made a clean edit to the Long War Journal and Bill Roggio pages the user did. I did not violate the synthesis policy , as I pointed out on the Roggio talk pages, and I pointed out that Roggio's controversial claims about terrorist deaths needed to be added. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=GregJackP sent me a comment and I now feel the user and other potentional Long War Journal fans have screwed me. I recently made a clean edit to the Long War Journal and Bill Roggio pages the user did. I did not violate the synthesis policy , as I pointed out on the Roggio talk pages, and I pointed out that Roggio's controversial claims about terrorist deaths needed to be added. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

75.72.35.253 (talk) 23:58, 23 September 2012 (UTC)