Jump to content

Talk:Gastrulation: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Assessment: WikiProject Anatomy: -needs-infobox (assisted)
BattyBot (talk | contribs)
m top: talk page general fixes & other cleanup per WP:TPL using AWB (11894)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject Biology |class=start |importance=high}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|1=
{{WikiProject Anatomy |class=Start |importance=High |field=embryo}}
{{WikiProject Biology|class=start |importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Anatomy|class=Start |importance=High |field=embryo}}
{{WikiProject Animal anatomy|class=start|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Animal anatomy|class=start|importance=high}}
}}


==References needed==
==References needed==

Revision as of 10:59, 21 February 2016

References needed

This article does not cite any references. This should be addressed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.206.37.99 (talk) 14:37, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Epiboly

Epiboly also has a related meaning in the context of wound healing

Epiboly continues after gastrulation has finished; it is therefore considered a separate process

Merger

I agree with the merger of the suggestion of both of the pages Gastrula and Eipo-something. Estridaldrea (talk) 21:59, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Drosophila

A description of gastrulation in the Fruit Fly, Drosophila, is needed. This finely orchestrated process has emerged as powerful and productive model to study some of the molecular mechanisms that underlay epithelial morphogenesis. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.234.204.182 (talk) 07:25, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mammals

Why's the section on mammals smaller than the sections on everything else? Sea Urchins? Who cares aboot sea urchins? Can somebody do some work on the mammalian section or at least mark it for improvement?

I'd do it myself but I'm still learning this stuuf. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.36.19.25 (talk) 11:37, 24 September 2008 (UTC) human[reply]

I care about sea urchins - they're non-chordate deuterostomes, and everything else on the page is a vertebrate. For that matter, why aren't there any protostomes on this page? I came here trying to sort some details of epiboly trends in protstomes vs. deuterostomes. Someone above mentioned fruit flies - that would be a good start. Maybe have something for every phyla, and cut down on the vertebrates a bit? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 154.20.85.215 (talk) 02:43, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mesoderm

In the lede the three layers are named the ectoderm, mesoderm, and endoderm. So, why isn't the diagram labelled that way? There is no mesoderm in the diagram and it is instead labelled blastocoel, a word that appears nowhere else in the article. Cottonshirtτ 07:44, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge from Blastopore

I've taken the liberty of merging Blastopore into this because the two articles are both scanty and a student viewing the two wouldn't have a prayer of figuring out the relationship between them. As it is, this is still terribly incomplete... I ought to do something about that. Wnt (talk) 21:55, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]