User:Jalayer masoud/sandbox1: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
====Deep learning techniques for signal processing based FDI==== |
====Deep learning techniques for signal processing based FDI==== |
||
{{See also|Deep learning}} |
{{See also|Deep learning}} |
||
Recently, by research advances in ANNs and advent of [[deep learning]] algorithms, using deep and complex layers, novel [[Statistical classification|classification models]] are developed to cope with [[signal processing]] problems in FDI.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Lv |first1=Feiya |last2=Wen |first2=Chenglin |last3=Bao |first3=Zejing |last4=Liu |first4=Meiqin |title=Fault diagnosis based on deep learning |journal=2016 American Control Conference (ACC) |date=July 2016 |pages=6851-6856 |doi=10.1109/ACC.2016.7526751}}</ref> Most of the [[machine learning|shallow learning]] models extract a few feature values from signals, causing a [[dimensionality]] reduction from the original [[signal]]. While, by using a [[Convolutional neural network]], the [[continuous wavelet transform]] [[scalogram]] can be directly classified to normal and faulty classes. Such a technique avoids omitting |
Recently, by research advances in ANNs and advent of [[deep learning]] algorithms, using deep and complex layers, novel [[Statistical classification|classification models]] are developed to cope with [[signal processing]] problems in FDI.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Lv |first1=Feiya |last2=Wen |first2=Chenglin |last3=Bao |first3=Zejing |last4=Liu |first4=Meiqin |title=Fault diagnosis based on deep learning |journal=2016 American Control Conference (ACC) |date=July 2016 |pages=6851-6856 |doi=10.1109/ACC.2016.7526751}}</ref> |
||
[[File:Time domain waveform and CWTS of a normal signal comparison.png|thumb|Time domain waveform(top) and CWTS(bottom) of a normal signal]] |
|||
Most of the [[machine learning|shallow learning]] models extract a few feature values from signals, causing a [[dimensionality]] reduction from the original [[signal]]. While, by using a [[Convolutional neural network]], the [[continuous wavelet transform]] [[scalogram]] can be directly classified to normal and faulty classes. Such a technique avoids omitting any important fault message and results in a better performance of FDI.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Guo |first1=Sheng |last2=Yang |first2=Tao |last3=Gao |first3=Wei |last4=Zhang |first4=Chen |title=A Novel Fault Diagnosis Method for Rotating Machinery Based on a Convolutional Neural Network |journal=Sensors |date=4 May 2018 |volume=18 |issue=5 |pages=1429 |doi=10.3390/s18051429}}</ref> |
|||
Also by transforming signals to image constructions a 2D [[Convolutional neural network]] can be implemented for FDI.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Hoang |first1=Duy-Tang |last2=Kang |first2=Hee-Jun |title=Rolling element bearing fault diagnosis using convolutional neural network and vibration image |journal=Cognitive Systems Research |date=March 2018 |doi=10.1016/j.cogsys.2018.03.002}}</ref> |
|||
=== Image Processing based FDI === |
|||
In the past few |
Revision as of 13:01, 14 June 2018
Signal processing based FDI
Machine learning techniques for signal processing based FDI
In signal processing based FDI, mathematical classification models which in fact belong to supervised learning methods are trained on the training set of a labeled dataset to accurately identify the redundancies, faults and anomalous samples. There are numerous different classification and preprocessing models developed and proposed in this research area. k-nearest-neighbors algorithm(kNN) is one of the oldest techniques which have been used to solve FDI problems. Despite the simple logic it has, there are some problems with large dimensionality and processing time in large datasets. Since kNN is not able to automatically extract the features to overcome curse of dimensionality, so often some data preprocessing techniques like Principal component analysis(PCA), Linear discriminant analysis(LDA) or Canonical correlation analysis(CCA) accompany it to reach a better performance. In many industrial cases it is shown that kNN is outperformed by more complex classification models such as Support Vector Machines(SVMs), which is widely used in this field. However SVMs do not have automatic feature extraction themselves and just like kNN, are often coupled with a data pre-processing technique. Another drawback of SVMs is that their performance is highly sensitive to the initial parameters, particularly to the kernel methods, so in each signal dataset a parameter tuning process is required to be conducted firstly.
Artificial Neural Networks(ANNs) are among the most mature and widely used mathematical classification algorithms in signal processing based FDI. ANNs are well-known for their efficient self-learning capabilities of the complex relations (which generally exists inherently in signal processing based FDI problems) and are easy to operate. Another advantage of ANNs is that they perform automatic feature extraction by allocating negligible weights to the irrelevant features, helping the system to avoid dealing with another feature extractor. However, ANNs tend to over-fits the training set, which will have consequences of having poor validation accuracy on validation set. Hence, often, some regularization terms and prior knowledge are added to the ANN model to avoid over-fiting and achieve higher performance. In general, different SVMs and ANNs models (i.e. Back-Propagation Neural Networks and Multi-Layer Perceptron) have shown successful performances in the signal processing based FDI in industries such as gearbox, machinery parts (i.e. mechanical bearings) and steam turbines fault detection.
Deep learning techniques for signal processing based FDI
Recently, by research advances in ANNs and advent of deep learning algorithms, using deep and complex layers, novel classification models are developed to cope with signal processing problems in FDI.[1]
Most of the shallow learning models extract a few feature values from signals, causing a dimensionality reduction from the original signal. While, by using a Convolutional neural network, the continuous wavelet transform scalogram can be directly classified to normal and faulty classes. Such a technique avoids omitting any important fault message and results in a better performance of FDI.[2] Also by transforming signals to image constructions a 2D Convolutional neural network can be implemented for FDI.[3]
Image Processing based FDI
In the past few
- ^ Lv, Feiya; Wen, Chenglin; Bao, Zejing; Liu, Meiqin (July 2016). "Fault diagnosis based on deep learning". 2016 American Control Conference (ACC): 6851–6856. doi:10.1109/ACC.2016.7526751.
- ^ Guo, Sheng; Yang, Tao; Gao, Wei; Zhang, Chen (4 May 2018). "A Novel Fault Diagnosis Method for Rotating Machinery Based on a Convolutional Neural Network". Sensors. 18 (5): 1429. doi:10.3390/s18051429.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link) - ^ Hoang, Duy-Tang; Kang, Hee-Jun (March 2018). "Rolling element bearing fault diagnosis using convolutional neural network and vibration image". Cognitive Systems Research. doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2018.03.002.