He Jiankui affair: Difference between revisions
citation overkill |
restore quartz reference in article body |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
[[File:About Lulu and Nana- Twin Girls Born Healthy After Gene Surgery As Single-Cell Embryos.webm|thumb|right|150px|Dr. He's video about Lulu and Nana's Gene Surgery program<br>(04:43) ([[:File:About Lulu and Nana- Twin Girls Born Healthy After Gene Surgery As Single-Cell Embryos.webm|file details]])]] |
[[File:About Lulu and Nana- Twin Girls Born Healthy After Gene Surgery As Single-Cell Embryos.webm|thumb|right|150px|Dr. He's video about Lulu and Nana's Gene Surgery program<br>(04:43) ([[:File:About Lulu and Nana- Twin Girls Born Healthy After Gene Surgery As Single-Cell Embryos.webm|file details]])]] |
||
The main researcher, [[He Jiankui]] of [[Shenzhen International BT Leadership Summit|Shenzhen]], said he modified about 70% of 31 [[embryo]]s from seven couples during [[fertility treatment]]s, with one [[pregnancy]] giving rise to two live twins, with another pregnancy in progress.<ref name=qzpresentation>{{cite web|url=https://qz.com/1475856/crispr-babies-creator-he-jiankui-says-another-could-be-on-the-way/|title=Crispr babies creator He Jiankui says another could be on the way — Quartz|website=qz.com}}</ref><ref name=sciencemediacentre>{{cite web|url=http://www.sciencemediacentre.org/expert-reaction-to-jiankui-hes-defence-of-his-work/|title=Expert reaction to Jiankui He’s defence of his work|publisher=[[Science Media Centre]]|website=www.sciencemediacentre.org}}</ref><ref name=wapopresentation>{{cite web|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/world/chinese-genomics-scientist-defends-his-gene-editing-research-in-first-public-appearance/2018/11/28/b99b5eba-f2e1-11e8-9240-e8028a62c722_story.html|title=Chinese genomics scientist defends his gene-editing research in first public appearance|authors=Gerry Shih, Carolyn Y. Johnson|date=28 Nov 2018|work=Washington Post}}</ref> Dr. He said he was trying to provide a trait ([[CCR5-Δ32|CCR5 Δ32]]) that few people naturally have — that possibly confers [[innate resistance to HIV]], seen in the case of [[the Berlin Patient]].<ref name="AP-20181126" /> In this instance, the CCR5 gene was targeted. Based on a mechanism described in ''[[Quartz (publication)|Quartz]]'', the CCR5 gene "is responsible for producing a protein that HIV uses to latch on, enter, and infect a human immune cell. If the CCR5 gene were mutated, ... the HIV virus would not be able to infect—and thus the mutation would confer resistance to the disease."<ref name="QZ-20181126" /> |
The main researcher, [[He Jiankui]] of [[Shenzhen International BT Leadership Summit|Shenzhen]], said he modified about 70% of 31 [[embryo]]s from seven couples during [[fertility treatment]]s, with one [[pregnancy]] giving rise to two live twins, with another pregnancy in progress.<ref name=qzpresentation>{{cite web|url=https://qz.com/1475856/crispr-babies-creator-he-jiankui-says-another-could-be-on-the-way/|title=Crispr babies creator He Jiankui says another could be on the way — Quartz|website=qz.com}}</ref><ref name=sciencemediacentre>{{cite web|url=http://www.sciencemediacentre.org/expert-reaction-to-jiankui-hes-defence-of-his-work/|title=Expert reaction to Jiankui He’s defence of his work|publisher=[[Science Media Centre]]|website=www.sciencemediacentre.org}}</ref><ref name=wapopresentation>{{cite web|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/world/chinese-genomics-scientist-defends-his-gene-editing-research-in-first-public-appearance/2018/11/28/b99b5eba-f2e1-11e8-9240-e8028a62c722_story.html|title=Chinese genomics scientist defends his gene-editing research in first public appearance|authors=Gerry Shih, Carolyn Y. Johnson|date=28 Nov 2018|work=Washington Post}}</ref> Dr. He said he was trying to provide a trait ([[CCR5-Δ32|CCR5 Δ32]]) that few people naturally have — that possibly confers [[innate resistance to HIV]], seen in the case of [[the Berlin Patient]].<ref name="AP-20181126" /> In this instance, the CCR5 gene was targeted. Based on a mechanism described in ''[[Quartz (publication)|Quartz]]'', the CCR5 gene "is responsible for producing a protein that HIV uses to latch on, enter, and infect a human immune cell. If the CCR5 gene were mutated, ... the HIV virus would not be able to infect—and thus the mutation would confer resistance to the disease."<ref name="QZ-20181126">{{cite news |last=Rathi |first=Akshat |title=China’s gene-edited babies will push bioethics into a dark new era |url=https://qz.com/1474384/chinas-gene-edited-crispr-babies-push-bioethics-into-a-dark-new-era/ |date=26 November 2018 |work=[[Quartz (publication)|Quartz]] |accessdate=26 November 2018|dead-url=no|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181127022413/https://qz.com/1474384/chinas-gene-edited-crispr-babies-push-bioethics-into-a-dark-new-era/|archive-date=27 November 2018}}</ref> |
||
Dr He recruited [[serodiscordant]] couples (where the father is HIV positive and the mother is HIV negative) though an HIV/AIDS support group on social media. He argues that human germline modification of the CCR5 gene prevents [[HIV and pregnancy#Prevention of mother-to-child transmission|mother-to-child transmission]] of HIV if the mother were to become HIV positive. The father's sperm goes though [[sperm washing]] during the [[IVF]] process. Dr He alleges that serodiscordant couples are at a higher risk of mother-to-child transmission of HIV during the first 18 months of life, and that changing the CCR5 gene may confer genetic resistance. He also argues that the gene editing technology is justifiable in a rural Chinese "AIDS village" where more than 30% of the population has AIDS.<ref name=qzpresentation/> |
Dr He recruited [[serodiscordant]] couples (where the father is HIV positive and the mother is HIV negative) though an HIV/AIDS support group on social media. He argues that human germline modification of the CCR5 gene prevents [[HIV and pregnancy#Prevention of mother-to-child transmission|mother-to-child transmission]] of HIV if the mother were to become HIV positive. The father's sperm goes though [[sperm washing]] during the [[IVF]] process. Dr He alleges that serodiscordant couples are at a higher risk of mother-to-child transmission of HIV during the first 18 months of life, and that changing the CCR5 gene may confer genetic resistance. He also argues that the gene editing technology is justifiable in a rural Chinese "AIDS village" where more than 30% of the population has AIDS.<ref name=qzpresentation/> |
||
Revision as of 16:07, 28 November 2018
 | This article documents a current event. Information may change rapidly as the event progresses, and initial news reports may be unreliable. The latest updates to this article may not reflect the most current information. (November 2018) |
 | This article or section is in a state of significant expansion or restructuring. You are welcome to assist in its construction by editing it as well. If this article or section has not been edited in several days, please remove this template. If you are the editor who added this template and you are actively editing, please be sure to replace this template with {{in use}} during the active editing session. Click on the link for template parameters to use.
This article was last edited by Callinus (talk | contribs) 5 years ago. (Update timer) |
Lulu and Nana | |
|---|---|
| Born | November 2018 China |
| Known for | Claimed to be the world's first genetically edited babies |
| Parent(s) | Mark and Grace[1] |
Lulu and Nana are allegedly twin girls born to parents Mark and Grace, which according to the researcher He Jiankui are the world's first germline genetically edited babies.[2][3][4][5] Using CRISPR-Cas9, a technology that can modify DNA, He claims to have edited the CCR5 gene to confer genetic resistance to the HIV virus that causes AIDS.[1] According to Dr He's slides, one of the twins has both CCR5 genes disabled (conferring an immunity), while the other has only one allele disabled (suggesting she is still vulnerable).[6][7]
His claim was reported in November 2018 during a public conference but has received no independent confirmation and has not been peer reviewed or published in a scientific journal.[3][4] The reaction to the project has been widespread scepticism and criticism.[2][1][8]
Process
(04:43) (file details)
The main researcher, He Jiankui of Shenzhen, said he modified about 70% of 31 embryos from seven couples during fertility treatments, with one pregnancy giving rise to two live twins, with another pregnancy in progress.[9][10][7] Dr. He said he was trying to provide a trait (CCR5 Δ32) that few people naturally have — that possibly confers innate resistance to HIV, seen in the case of the Berlin Patient.[3] In this instance, the CCR5 gene was targeted. Based on a mechanism described in Quartz, the CCR5 gene "is responsible for producing a protein that HIV uses to latch on, enter, and infect a human immune cell. If the CCR5 gene were mutated, ... the HIV virus would not be able to infect—and thus the mutation would confer resistance to the disease."[11]
Dr He recruited serodiscordant couples (where the father is HIV positive and the mother is HIV negative) though an HIV/AIDS support group on social media. He argues that human germline modification of the CCR5 gene prevents mother-to-child transmission of HIV if the mother were to become HIV positive. The father's sperm goes though sperm washing during the IVF process. Dr He alleges that serodiscordant couples are at a higher risk of mother-to-child transmission of HIV during the first 18 months of life, and that changing the CCR5 gene may confer genetic resistance. He also argues that the gene editing technology is justifiable in a rural Chinese "AIDS village" where more than 30% of the population has AIDS.[9]
Dr He says he used CRISPR on a knockout mouse, before moving onto a monkey embryo model (to study chimerism and off-target modifications) before using the technique in human 3PN embryos deemed unfit for implantation, and implantable embryos.[6]
Reactions
Reaction to the project has been widespread criticism.[2][4][3][1][8] Just some examples: geneticist Eric Topol stated, "This is far too premature .. We're dealing with the operating instructions of a human being. It's a big deal."[3][12] According to geneticist Kiran Musunuru of the University of Pennsylvania, the gene editing technique was "unconscionable ... an experiment on human beings that is not morally or ethically defensible."[3] Developmental biologist Kathy Niakan of the Francis Crick Institute said, "If true...this would be a highly irresponsible, unethical and dangerous use of genome editing technology."[1] Medical ethicist Julian Savulescu of the University of Oxford noted, "If true, this experiment is monstrous".[1] Bioethicist Hank Greely of Stanford Law School declared, "I unequivocally condemn the experiment".[13] Biochemist Jennifer Doudna, of the University of California at Berkeley, a pioneer of the CRISPR–Cas9 technology, condemned the research.[14][8] 122 Chinese scientists issued a statement to condemn Dr. He's action on human gene editing.[15] George Church, a geneticist at Harvard University, said gene editing for HIV resistance was "justifiable" since HIV is "a major and growing public health threat" but questioned the decision of this project to allow one of the embryos to be used in a pregnancy attempt as the use of that embryo suggests that the researchers’ “main emphasis was on testing editing rather than avoiding this disease,”.[3][13] That said, not all reactions were negative. For example Arthur Caplan, bioethicist at the New York University School of Medicine, said that engineering human genes is inevitable and, although there are concerns of creating "designer babies", medical researchers are more interested in using the technology to prevent and treat diseases, much like the type of experiments performed by Dr. He.
Critics of He say that the English version of the informed consent form he used had a vague phrase "AIDS vaccine development project" that did not describe fully the risks of using Cas9 on embryos.[6]
Investigation
The Southern University of Science and Technology (SUSTech) claims that Dr. He had been on non-paid leave from February 2018. SUSTech, and the Department of Biology, were unaware of the research project and its nature, and will call for international experts to form an independent committee to investigate this incident, and to release the results to the public.[16]
Another researcher, Micheal Deem, an associate of Dr. He, and a bioengineering professor at Rice University in Houston, Texas, may also have been involved in the gene editing studies, and may also be investigated, according to news reports.[17]
See also
References
- ^ a b c d e f Reuters (26 November 2018). "China Orders Investigation After Scientist Claims First Gene-Edited Babies". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 27 November 2018. Retrieved 26 November 2018.
{{cite news}}:|author=has generic name (help); Unknown parameter|dead-url=ignored (|url-status=suggested) (help) - ^ a b c Regalado, Antonio (25 November 2018). "Exclusive: Chinese scientists are creating CRISPR babies - A daring effort is under way to create the first children whose DNA has been tailored using gene editing". MIT Technology Review. Archived from the original on 27 November 2018. Retrieved 26 November 2018.
{{cite news}}: Unknown parameter|dead-url=ignored (|url-status=suggested) (help) - ^ a b c d e f g Marchione, Marilyn (26 November 2018). "Chinese researcher claims first gene-edited babies". AP News. Archived from the original on 27 November 2018. Retrieved 26 November 2018.
{{cite news}}: Unknown parameter|dead-url=ignored (|url-status=suggested) (help) - ^ a b c Begley, Sharon (26 November 2018). "Claim of CRISPR'd baby girls stuns genome editing summit". Stat News. Archived from the original on 27 November 2018. Retrieved 26 November 2018.
{{cite news}}: Unknown parameter|dead-url=ignored (|url-status=suggested) (help) - ^ Roberts, Michelle (26 November 2018). "China baby gene editing claim 'dubious'". BBC News. Archived from the original on 27 November 2018. Retrieved 26 November 2018.
{{cite news}}: Unknown parameter|dead-url=ignored (|url-status=suggested) (help) - ^ a b c Pam Belluck (28 November 2018). "Chinese Scientist Who Says He Edited Babies' Genes Defends His Work". New York Times.
- ^ a b "Chinese genomics scientist defends his gene-editing research in first public appearance". Washington Post. 28 November 2018.
{{cite web}}: Unknown parameter|authors=ignored (help) - ^ a b c Cyranoski, David (27 November 2018). "How the genome-edited babies revelation will affect research - Some scientists worry the startling claim will lead to knee-jerk regulations and damage the public's trust in gene editing". Nature. Archived from the original on 27 November 2018. Retrieved 27 November 2018.
{{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter|dead-url=ignored (|url-status=suggested) (help) - ^ a b "Crispr babies creator He Jiankui says another could be on the way — Quartz". qz.com.
- ^ "Expert reaction to Jiankui He's defence of his work". www.sciencemediacentre.org. Science Media Centre.
- ^ Rathi, Akshat (26 November 2018). "China's gene-edited babies will push bioethics into a dark new era". Quartz. Archived from the original on 27 November 2018. Retrieved 26 November 2018.
{{cite news}}: Unknown parameter|dead-url=ignored (|url-status=suggested) (help) - ^ Eric Topol (27 November 2018). "Editing Babies? We Need to Learn a Lot More First - An experiment in China to alter the genomes of embryos in vitro, then implant them in the mother, is a step too far". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 27 November 2018. Retrieved 27 November 2018.
{{cite news}}: Unknown parameter|dead-url=ignored (|url-status=suggested) (help) - ^ a b Farr, Cristina (26 November 2018). "Experiments to gene-edit babies are 'criminally reckless,' says Stanford bio-ethicist". CNBC. Archived from the original on 27 November 2018. Retrieved 27 November 2018.
{{cite news}}: Unknown parameter|dead-url=ignored (|url-status=suggested) (help) - ^ Leuty, Ron (27 November 2018). "Why 2 key gene-editing voices in Berkeley condemn Chinese scientist's designer babies 'stunt'". San Fransico Business Times. Retrieved 28 November 2018.
- ^ Staff (26 November 2018). "122 Chinese scientists issued a statement to condemn human gene editing". Sky.name. Archived from the original on 27 November 2018. Retrieved 27 November 2018.
{{cite web}}: Unknown parameter|dead-url=ignored (|url-status=suggested) (help) - ^ Staff (26 November 2018). "Southern University of Science and Technology Statement On the Genetic Editing of Human Embryos Conducted by Dr. Jiankui HE - In the Focus - SUSTC". Southern University of Science and Technology (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 27 November 2018. Retrieved 27 November 2018.
{{cite web}}: Unknown parameter|dead-url=ignored (|url-status=suggested) (help) - ^ LaMotte, Sandee (27 November 2018). "Rice professor under investigation for role in 'world's first gene-edited babies'". CNN News. Archived from the original on 27 November 2018. Retrieved 27 November 2018.
{{cite news}}: Unknown parameter|dead-url=ignored (|url-status=suggested) (help)
External links
- Official WebSite/Jiankui He
- The He Lab's channel on YouTube
- Video (04:43) Lulu and Nana details (The He Lab; 25 November 2018)
- Video (02:51) Lulu and Nana news (AP News; 26 November 2018)
