Jump to content

Alexandre Galopin: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 39: Line 39:
Part of the goal of the Galopin committee was to keep Belgian industry strong during the war to avoid leaving the economy crippled once the war ended. To that end, Galopin gave his name to a controversial policy known as the "Galopin doctrine" (''Doctrine Galopin''). Under that plan, Belgian companies should continue production under German occupation provided that they were producing goods for Belgium's civilian population (such as food or consumer goods) even if it would benefit the German war industry by relieving it from the need to export similar goods. However, Belgian companies should refuse to produce [[materiel|war materiel]] or goods that were directly usable in the German war effort.{{sfn|Société Générale|1972|p=147}}
Part of the goal of the Galopin committee was to keep Belgian industry strong during the war to avoid leaving the economy crippled once the war ended. To that end, Galopin gave his name to a controversial policy known as the "Galopin doctrine" (''Doctrine Galopin''). Under that plan, Belgian companies should continue production under German occupation provided that they were producing goods for Belgium's civilian population (such as food or consumer goods) even if it would benefit the German war industry by relieving it from the need to export similar goods. However, Belgian companies should refuse to produce [[materiel|war materiel]] or goods that were directly usable in the German war effort.{{sfn|Société Générale|1972|p=147}}


The aim of the policy was to prevent a repeat of the economic destruction which had accompanied the [[German occupation of Belgium during World War I]], when workers and businessmen had been encouraged to resist German demands. That had led to the deportation of Belgian workers to Germany in 1916 and the confiscation of [[capital (economics)|capital]] from firms, which was also sent to Germany. The policy had, in turn, caused unemployment and inflation that continued to damage the Belgian economy for years after the war.{{sfn|Société Générale|1972|p=146}} Limited co-operation with the German occupiers was hoped to limit the war's effects on the Belgian economy and to make postwar recovery. It was therefore an extension of a similar policy of "lesser evil" (''moindre mal'') adopted by Belgian civil servants through the [[Committee of Secretaries-General]]. Initially, it was also supported by the [[Belgian government in exile]].
The aim of the policy was to prevent a repeat of the economic destruction which had accompanied the [[German occupation of Belgium during World War I]], when workers and businessmen had been encouraged to resist German demands. That had led to the deportation of Belgian workers to Germany in 1916 and the confiscation of [[capital (economics)|capital]] from firms, which was also sent to Germany. The policy had, in turn, caused unemployment and inflation that continued to damage the Belgian economy for years after the war.{{sfn|Société Générale|1972|p=146}} Limited co-operation with the German occupiers in non-military production was hoped to limit the war's effects on the Belgian economy and to facilitate post-war economic recovery. It was therefore an extension of a similar policy of "lesser evil" (''moindre mal'') adopted by Belgian civil servants through the [[Committee of Secretaries-General]]. Initially, it was also supported by the [[Belgian government in exile]].


In practice, the distinction between the limited co-operation in the Galopin doctrine and outright collaboration proved difficult to maintain. It was widely perceived as a form of [[collaboration with the Axis Powers|collaborationism]] in the Belgian population.{{sfn|Van den Wijngaert|Dujardin|2006|p=35}} After some initial acceptance, in 1941 and 1942, German officers began to force Belgian businessmen to disapply the distinction at the risk of personal punishment and the confiscation of their businesses.{{sfn|Van den Wijngaert|Dujardin|2006|p=36}} In 1942, the occupation administration began to deport [[Forced labour under German rule during World War II|Belgian workers as forced labourers in Germany]] as during World War I. However, it has been argued that the co-operative approach represented by the doctrine did prevent German companies from expanding their control over the Belgian economy.{{sfn|Mazower|2008|pp=268–9}}
In practice, the distinction between the limited co-operation in the Galopin doctrine and outright collaboration proved difficult to maintain. It was widely perceived as a form of [[collaboration with the Axis Powers|collaborationism]] in the Belgian population.{{sfn|Van den Wijngaert|Dujardin|2006|p=35}} After some initial acceptance, in 1941 and 1942, German officers began to force Belgian businessmen to disapply the distinction at the risk of personal punishment and the confiscation of their businesses.{{sfn|Van den Wijngaert|Dujardin|2006|p=36}} In 1942, the occupation administration began to deport [[Forced labour under German rule during World War II|Belgian workers as forced labourers in Germany]] as during World War I. However, it has been argued that the co-operative approach represented by the doctrine did prevent German companies from expanding their control over the Belgian economy.{{sfn|Mazower|2008|pp=268–9}}

Revision as of 09:55, 15 July 2020

Alexandre Galopin
Black and white photograph of an elderly man with a beard
Portrait of Alexandre Galopin
Born
Alexandre Marie Albert Galopin

(1879-09-26)26 September 1879
Died28 February 1944(1944-02-28) (aged 64)
Etterbeek, Brussels, Belgium
NationalityBelgian
OccupationBusinessman
Known forGalopin Doctrine

Alexandre Galopin (26 September 1879 – 28 February 1944) was a Belgian businessman notable for his role in German-occupied Belgium during World War II. Galopin was director of the Société Générale de Belgique, a major Belgian company, and chairman of the board of the motor and armaments company Fabrique Nationale d'Armes de Guerre (FN). At the head of a group of Belgian industrialists and financiers, he gave his name to the "Galopin Doctrine" which prescribed how Belgian industry should deal with the moral and economic choices imposed by the occupation. In February 1944, he was assassinated by Flemish collaborators from the DeVlag group.

Early career

Born to a university professor in Ghent on 28 September 1879, Galopin became in 1913 managing director of FN Herstal.[1] He championed its development into an important manufacturer of motor vehicles in Belgium. In 1935 he became governor of the Société Générale de Belgique (SGB), a giant holding company with close ties to the Belgian government which dominated the economy of Belgium and its colonial empire and controlled almost 40 percent of the country's industrial production.[2]

World War II

Belgium was invaded by Nazi Germany on 10 May 1940. At the start of the German occupation, Galopin was made chairman of an informal group, dubbed the "Galopin Committee", which convened senior figures in Belgian economic life, notably representatives of major holding companies, banks, and industry. The committee had been set up by the Belgian government, shortly before it left the country, on 15 May 1940.[3][4][5] It served as a sort of a Belgian shadow government in the occupied territory that decided a common stance on economic and social issues and was able to set rules for dealing with the German administration. The committee included politicians and businessmen:

Because of his power and influence within the Belgian wartime economy, Galopin was nicknamed "the Uncrowned King of Belgium" by German occupation officials.[6]

Galopin doctrine

A Belgian worker at the Siemens factory in Berlin. The Gallopin committee failed to prevent the deportation of Belgian workers to Germany in 1942 which had been one of its main objects

Part of the goal of the Galopin committee was to keep Belgian industry strong during the war to avoid leaving the economy crippled once the war ended. To that end, Galopin gave his name to a controversial policy known as the "Galopin doctrine" (Doctrine Galopin). Under that plan, Belgian companies should continue production under German occupation provided that they were producing goods for Belgium's civilian population (such as food or consumer goods) even if it would benefit the German war industry by relieving it from the need to export similar goods. However, Belgian companies should refuse to produce war materiel or goods that were directly usable in the German war effort.[7]

The aim of the policy was to prevent a repeat of the economic destruction which had accompanied the German occupation of Belgium during World War I, when workers and businessmen had been encouraged to resist German demands. That had led to the deportation of Belgian workers to Germany in 1916 and the confiscation of capital from firms, which was also sent to Germany. The policy had, in turn, caused unemployment and inflation that continued to damage the Belgian economy for years after the war.[8] Limited co-operation with the German occupiers in non-military production was hoped to limit the war's effects on the Belgian economy and to facilitate post-war economic recovery. It was therefore an extension of a similar policy of "lesser evil" (moindre mal) adopted by Belgian civil servants through the Committee of Secretaries-General. Initially, it was also supported by the Belgian government in exile.

In practice, the distinction between the limited co-operation in the Galopin doctrine and outright collaboration proved difficult to maintain. It was widely perceived as a form of collaborationism in the Belgian population.[9] After some initial acceptance, in 1941 and 1942, German officers began to force Belgian businessmen to disapply the distinction at the risk of personal punishment and the confiscation of their businesses.[10] In 1942, the occupation administration began to deport Belgian workers as forced labourers in Germany as during World War I. However, it has been argued that the co-operative approach represented by the doctrine did prevent German companies from expanding their control over the Belgian economy.[11]

The Galopin doctrine was similar to the policy of "co-operation" (samenwerken) in the German-occupied Netherlands and overseen by senior civil servants such as Hans Hirschfeld.[12]

Assassination

Galopin was assassinated in 1944 by members of Devlag, a radical pro-Nazi paramilitary group active in Flanders, under direct orders from Robert Jan Verbelen.[13] Galopin's name has been given to a street: avenue Alexandre Galopin in Etterbeek, Brussels.

See also

References

Bibliography

  • Van den Wijngaert, Mark; Dujardin, Vincent (2006). La Belgique sans Roi, 1940–1950. Vol. 2. Brussels: Éd. Complexe. ISBN 2-8048-0078-4. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help); Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Mazower, Mark (2008). Hitler's Empire: Nazi Rule in Occupied Europe (1st ed.). London: Allen Lane. ISBN 978-0-713-99681-4. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Mommen, André (2002). The Belgian Economy in the Twentieth Century. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-203-40348-8. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • La Société Générale de Belgique, 1822–1972. Brussels: Société Générale. 1972.
  • Grosbois, Thierry (2007). "Les relations avec la Belgique occupée". Pierlot, 1930-1950 (in French). Lannoo Uitgeverij. ISBN 978-2-87386-485-9. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Nefors, Patrick (2006). "La reprise industrielle (mai - septembre 1940)". La collaboration industrielle en Belgique, 1940-1945 (in French). Lannoo Uitgeverij. ISBN 978-2-87386-479-8. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Gildea, Robert; Wieviorka, Olivier; Warring, Anette (2006). Surviving Hitler and Mussolini: Daily Life in Occupied Europe. Berg. ISBN 978-1-84520-181-4. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • "Galopin, Alexandre Marie Albert". Biographie Belge d'Outremer (PDF) (in French). Vol. IV. Royal Academy for Overseas Sciences. 1968. p. 383.

Further reading