Milan Bandić
Milan Bandić | |
---|---|
50th and 52nd Mayor of Zagreb | |
In office 14 June 2005 – 28 February 2021 Powers and duties suspended: 21 November 2014 – 9 March 2015 | |
Preceded by | Vlasta Pavić |
Succeeded by | Jelena Pavičić Vukičević (Acting) Tomislav Tomašević |
In office 2 June 2000 – 1 March 2002 | |
Preceded by | Marina Matulović-Dropulić |
Succeeded by | Vlasta Pavić |
Deputy Mayor of Zagreb for Social Services | |
In office 4 April 2002 – 14 June 2005 Serving with Stipe Tojčić | |
Mayor | Vlasta Pavić |
Preceded by | Morana Paliković-Gruden Vlasta Pavić |
Succeeded by | Ivo Jelušić Ljiljana Kuhta Jeličić |
President of the Bandić Milan 365 – Labour and Solidarity Party | |
In office 28 March 2015 – 28 February 2021 | |
Preceded by | Position established |
Succeeded by | Jelena Pavičić Vukičević |
Personal details | |
Born | Grude, PR Bosnia and Herzegovina, Yugoslavia | 22 November 1955
Died | 28 February 2021 Zagreb, Croatia | (aged 65)
Political party | SKH (1980–1990) SDP (1990–2009) BM 365 (2015–2021) |
Spouse |
Vesna Bandić
(m. 1981; div. 1996)
(m. 2003) |
Children | 1[1] |
Parents |
|
Alma mater | University of Zagreb |
Occupation | Politician |
Profession | Teacher |
Milan Bandić (22 November 1955 – 28 February 2021) was a Croatian politician and the longest-serving mayor of Zagreb, the capital of Croatia. Bandić was mayor almost continuously from 2000 to 2021, except for one occasion – from his resignation in 2002 until the 2005 election. He was also suspended from exercising his powers and duties for several months after his 2014 arrest over a corruption scandal. Out of Bandić's multifaceted engagement in politics, the most noted part was his mayoralty of Zagreb, which followed the Croatian Democratic Union's (HDZ) first post-socialist period of government (1990–2000), and exacerbated many existing transitional problems in the city.
As Bandić de facto abandoned urban planning, Zagreb's skyline was changed by new high-rises. Inner parts of the city suffered from overbuilding, i.e. too dense construction which could not be sustained by market demand and infrastructure and decreased the amount of greenery and open spaces in the city. The suburbs were affected by construction without a permit (including luxury housing) in formerly green areas; Bandić himself built a house illegally and pushed to legalise tens of thousands of illegal housing units. The Bandić administration's vague and frequently altered general urban master plan (GUP) led to the construction of an unsustainable amount of overly dense luxury housing, while few social housing projects were realised. City and private housing estates alike were marked by poor planning leading to a lack of services and facilities. At the end of Bandić's mayoralty, Zagreb suffered the destructive 2020 earthquake. The earthquake's effects were compounded by the COVID-19 pandemic, a flood and a stronger but more remote earthquake. Bandić's handling of these events was criticised, and occurred concurrently with a falling out with his coalition partner at the time, the HDZ.
Born in the Herzegovinian town of Grude, Bandić moved to Zagreb to study for teacher of Marxism and Defence and Protection at the University of Zagreb. Starting in early 1980s, he rose through the ranks of the League of Communists of Croatia and its post-1990 successor, the Social Democratic Party (SDP), becoming a city councillor in 1995 and president of SDP's Zagreb branch in 1997. Following the 1995–97 Zagreb crisis, he led the opposition against the imposed HDZ administration led by Mayor Marina Matulović Dropulić. Forcing snap elections in 2000, following the fall of national HDZ government, Bandić ran for mayor with SDP and won the plurality with 20% of the vote. He would go on to serve five more terms. In 2010, he was expelled from the SDP for running for Croatian president in the 2009–10 election, where he ran against and lost the second round to the SDP's chosen candidate, Ivo Josipović. In 2015, he formed a new party, Bandić Milan 365 – Labour and Solidarity Party, and entered into a coalition with the HDZ. His mayoralty was fraught with scandals and interrupted twice. First time was from 2002 to 2005 when he was caught fleeing the scene of an accident he caused while drunk driving and threatening the police officer who caught him; he resigned and was kept on as deputy mayor for social services under Acting Mayor Vlasta Pavić. The second time was in 2014–15 due to prosecution in the Agram affair which was still ongoing at the time of his death. Bandić remained mayor throughout the events, but was temporarily forbidden from exercising his mayoral duties and powers, and appointed Sandra Švaljek and later Vesna Kusin as acting mayors before fully assuming his duties. Some of the scandals led to convictions of high-ranking city officials, but Bandić himself was never convicted of a felony, though he was fined for conflicts of interest.
Bandić ruled the city in a direct and highly centralised manner, deferring few to no powers to elected officials beneath him, and maintaining much control over the city during the periods when he was not in office. His politics was populist, primarily seeking support from the poor, while trying to appeal to the rest of the citizens by announcing numerous capital infrastructure projects. A few projects were realised in the mid-2000s, such as Lake Bundek renovation, construction of Arena Zagreb and Zagreb Avenue widening, as well as the long-awaited late-2010s construction of an underpass under Remetinec Roundabout. Many more were repeatedly announced but never completed, e.g. reconstruction of the Sljeme cable car, a spa in Blato, completing the long awaited Blato University Hospital, a congress centre, and reconstructing the Maksimir Stadium.[2][3][4] Public transport was not improved beyond renewing the tram rolling stock. Bandić's era saw an unprecedented 20 years go by without the construction of new tram lines, despite Bandić's many announcements of tram network expansions.
Bandić died of an alleged heart attack in early 2021, two months before the regular local elections, having held office for 17 years and 165 days. He was succeeded in his role as mayor and BM 365 president by his deputy, now acting mayor, Jelena Pavičić Vukičević. His legacy remained controversial due to numerous nepotism and clientelism scandals – which involved many of his associates, including his successor Pavičić Vukičević – budget deficit and soon to mature bonds, and the slow and expensive recovery from the heavily damaging 2020 earthquakes. During his mayoralty, Bandić was bestowed with several honours including honorary citizenship of Srebrenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and membership in the Croatian Dragon Fraternity.
Mayor of Zagreb
Continuing his predecessor, Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) government's, 1990s pattern of deregulation and abandonment of urban planning,[5][6][7][8] Bandić's mayoralty was characterised by unsustainable projects[9] creating unplanned investment-driven sprawl and causing overbuilding.[10][11] The inconsistence and non-specificity of the general urban master plans of 2003 and 2007 allowed the private sector to take over the role of urban planning from professionals.[12][13][14] The master plan was frequently altered to accord with private investors' interests,[15][16][17] while citizens and urban planners had minimal participation in the projects.[18][14] As a consequence, it failed to achieve its objections, and urban renewal in Zagreb was characteristic of the so-called era of the bulldozer: a discarded approach involving construction of unsustainable luxury housing on the site of former undesirable neighbourhoods and areas.[19][20] The city continued an ongoing trend of losing vegetation, replacing a significant fraction of its green spaces with pavement and buildings.[21][22] Bandić's administration was highly centralised. Bandić was directly involved in all matters that concerned running the city. The 1999 city statute created two levels of self-government: 17 arbitrarily drawn city districts which were divided into local committees. In practice, district councils were bogged down in bureaucracy and had no effect beyond enacting plans for "small community actions", while forming of local committees only began in 2008. During the Great Recession, the city cut the funding for small community actions, effectively stopping self-governmental activity.[23][24] Bandić's mayoralty reduced citizen participation to a formality, using manipulation and confrontation to marginalise citizens who disagreed with their initiatives. Bandić often confronted disagreeing citizens and participated in publicity stunts.[25][26][27]
The master plan removed a long-standing moratorium on construction of buildings over nine storeys in height.[28] Together with lack of precision in detailed spatial plans,[29] which were in fact abrogated for many city project areas in the 2006 plan,[30] this state of affairs allowed new structures to arbitrarily affect the city's skyline.[29] High-rise office towers in urban areas and dense housing projects in previously suburban areas, such as Lanište and Borovje,[31][32] were built without improvements to infrastructure and corresponding amenities, causing traffic jams and overburdening of schools, hospitals and other amenities.[33][34][29][35] New apartment buildings lagged behind late Communist-era housing in construction standards and amenities.[36] In one case, poor construction standards at a building site led to the creation of a sinkhole which swallowed up one whole side of Kupska Street in Trnje.[37][38][39]
Much of the prime development space was allocated to commercial developments, numerous shopping malls in particular, while new residential developments were relegated to less attractive and poorly connected, previously industrial areas.[29][40][41] Among other cultural venues, Bandić made efforts to resettle Zagreb Hippodrome, Zagreb Fair and NK Lokomotiva's football stadium to clear space for real estate development.[42][43] By 2006, Zagreb had over 30 shopping malls.[44] Overbuilding and subsequent failure of shopping malls created abandoned lots in areas well supported by infrastructure.[45] It also caused a loss of profitability and large-scale closure of small shops and crafts in the city centre, especially on Ilica, Zagreb's historical high street,[46][47] and created private land out of previously public sections of streets and squares, particularly in the Donji grad pedestrian zone.[48] Lack of interest and investment on the city's part enabled continued decay of old buildings in the city centre, making them vulnerable to purchase and conversion into luxury apartments, which attracted the rich and displaced existing middle class residents.[49][50][51] The city centre also lost population as residents were beset by high traffic and noise pollution—the city raised allowed noise limits to 95 dB during daytime and 90 dB at night, far above Ministry of Health regulations.[52] Bandić would repeatedly put focus on attractive perennial capital projects, while failing to improve Zagreb's aging infrastructure; in 2015, 80,000 households lacked running water and sewerage connections. Funds raised by Zagreb Holding bonds in 2007 for the purpose of improving infrastructure were almost in entirety spent on other projects, including real estate acquisition.[53][54]
In the 1990s, Zagreb was hit by a spate of illegal construction. Informal settlements were created by refugees of Yugoslav Wars, while better-off land owners built or enlarged their homes without permits. Illegal building due to property speculation was most prevalent in the Medvednica Foothills, renamed Podsljeme in 1999.[6][55] Construction in Podsljeme in particular has been characterised by so-called "urban villas" (urbane vile), apartment buildings of up to twenty flats, densely packed into formerly green areas and often lacking basic services and facilities.[10][56][22] In 1998, the Croatian Democratic Union's Matulović-Dropulić administration legalised all illegal developments built up to that point, with the clause that future illegal construction would be demolished.[57] However, the problem of illegal construction intensified after Bandić came to power, expanding from the suburbs into the interiors of Donji grad city blocks.[58] Bandić, who himself constructed a house illegally,[59] defended illegal construction throughout his mayoralty,[60] supporting an early 2010s effort by the Kukuriku coalition government to legalise over 90,000 buildings in Zagreb;[61][62][63] yet few buildings in destitute Kozari Putevi neighbourhood, where Bandić had launched his career in 2000, had been legalised by 2013.[64] Some of the legalised buildings ended up preventing the construction of long-planned arterial roads in whose paths they were located.[65]
Flower Square affair
Bandić established himself as the person in charge of all aspects of running Zagreb,[66] becoming a spokesman for several controversial projects, one of which was the construction of a shopping mall on a historic Donji grad square.[67] In 2006, real estate developer Tomislav Horvatinčić, who had made use of Bandić's new urban master plan to build the 17-storey HOTO Tower in 2004, presented a plan for "Life Style Center" (later to become Centar Cvjetni, "Flower Centre"), a 50,000 m2 (540,000 sq ft) mall with a 700-car underground parking garage in Zagreb's pedestrian zone, on the Petar Preradović Square, popularly known as Flower Square (Cvjetni trg).[68][13][69][70][71] The project involved tearing down former home of Zagreb's most famous architect Hermann Bollé, the birth house of poet Vladimir Vidrić, and the Cinema Zagreb.[72] It was opposed by the NGOs Green Action and Right to the City, as well as numerous public figures.[73] The Serbian Orthodox Church also opposed the project, laying claim to Cinema Zagreb, which had been expropriated from the church by the post-WWII Communist government.[71] A petition to stop the project was run, collecting over 54,000 signatures.[68][74]
After initially denying the existence of the shopping mall project,[75] Bandić supported Horvatinčić's efforts by modifying the general urban master plan.[76] Horvatinčić attracted controversy by calling the buildings "rat holes";[75][77] the invective was picked up by the Bandić administration.[78][68] In one case in 2007, Bandić publicly cursed out the protesters, singling out Right to the City leader Teodor Celakoski.[79] Protests and lawsuits filed by the Ministry of Environmental Protection and Spatial Planning delayed and reduced the scope of the project, which at one point involved remodelling the entire city block, but ultimately failed to stop it,[73][80] in large part thanks to Bandić's involvement.[81] Notably, police cracked down on a protest in February 2010 opposing the conversion of part of Varšavska Street pedestrian zone to parking garage ramp, arresting its leaders, including Green Action president Tomislav Tomašević and actress Urša Raukar.[82][83] The ramp was finished in 2011, completing the project.[84] Further expansions of the shopping mall were prevented by a 2013 amendment to the general urban master plan.[85] A related controversy arose temporarily in 2016, as Bandić administration allowed Horvatinčić to place a bar patio in front of the entrance to the Flower Square's Serbian Orthodox Cathedral, also hindering access to a public seating area. Bandić withdrew the permit after public pressure.[86]
Other Bandić's projects at Flower Square included an unexecuted project for canopy and floor heating in the adjoining Bogovićeva and Petrićeva Streets[87] and closing down Cinema Europa, the home of Zagreb Film Festival, despite public protests. Bandić described the closure of the cinema as "stealing [Cinema Europa] away from tycoon privatisation."[88][89] Much of Flower Square today is covered by coffee bar patios, and few flower stands remain.[90][91]
Zagreb Housing Development Model
At the end of the 1990s, the Croatian government began a programme of social housing called Subsidised Housing Development Programme (Program društveno poticane stanogradnje, POS), creating private-public partnerships to develop housing estates accessible to low-income residents.[92] One POS housing estate was built in Zagreb: Špansko–Oranice, whose construction began during the mayoralty of Vlasta Pavić.[93] Soon after Bandić's return to power in 2005, his administration bought out the government's POS projects in Zagreb, Bandić terming the city-led projects the "Zagreb housing development model" (Zagrebački model stanogradnje). Despite Bandić prominently leading social housing projects for low-income residents,[94] few such projects eventually panned out.[95] At the same time, a glut of higher-priced housing was created. It was estimated that only half of all new flats built privately between 2001 and 2008 had been sold by 2013.[96]
According to urban planners, City of Zagreb's private-public partnership model was a "complete failure".[96] Despite the fact that POS estates residents were highly content with their new housing,[97] in large part owing to the exceedingly low quality and availability of existing affordable housing and high demand for cheap flats,[98][99] only three out of nine POS estates: Špansko–Oranice, Sopnica–Jelkovec and Vrbani III were built by 2015,[95] while the construction in a fourth one, Podbrežje, finally began in 2016,[100] but the plan was later amended and only a few buildings were constructed by 2021.[101][102][103] 2014 research showed that only 6.1 percent of Zagreb's residents lived in POS housing,[104] a far lower share than in social housing projects of other European capitals.[105] The new estates were also criticised for high flat prices rivalling those in a cheap gated community in Sveta Nedelja, Zagreb County.[106][107]
The plan for Sopnica–Jelkovec estate (later renamed Novi Jelkovec) was laid out in 2003 and amended several times.[108] The location was set in the Sesvete industrial zone, on the site of the former Sljeme pig factory, whose grounds the city purchased in 1999.[109] The project would create a new neighbourhood on a 39.5-hectare (98-acre) area that was to be connected to the city by an extension of Vukovar Street and a new tram line, with numerous amenities such as a library, a kindergarten and a community swimming pool.[98][109] Bandić associated himself publicly with the project after taking it over from the POS programme.[94] The City of Zagreb invested 2.5 billion kuna (€300 million) into the project,[109] whose construction began in 2006. In 2009, at the opening of the estate, Bandić announced that "we almost solved the housing problems of most of [Zagreb's] residents [who could not afford a flat]."[110] In the next several years, the estate attained a negative reputation as none of the promised facilities and traffic connections materialised.[109] Many of the residents were assigned flats lacking basic amenities such as internet and phone service.[111] Bus lines were added to the neighbourhood only in 2013. An additional problem was poor construction causing water leaks.[109] Bandić took a leading role in the allocation of flats,[94] where inhabitants of the same social status were largely accorded flats in the same buildings, creating segregation and stunting social cohesion.[112][109][113] Most of the problems were eventually remedied and the residents expressed satisfaction with the estate in a survey five years after its opening, but it could not shake off its initial negative reputation,[114] leading to significant vacancy rates years after it was constructed.[109][115] In 2020, the remaining apartment were offered at reduced rent rates to the Zagreb earthquake victims.[116]
Construction of the Vrbani III estate started in 2006, after a 2004 design contest. Located near Lake Jarun, it was intended to be located between two new roads and a new park. It was also intended to feature a new kindergarten and elementary school.[117] The amenities were only partially completed in following years, causing the residents to rely on nearby neighbourhoods for daily needs.[118][119][120] The first flats were sold by 2006, when it came to light that some of the buildings were affected by severe tap water contamination with mineral oil concentrations over 500 times the legal allowance.[121][122] Bandić was quick to dismiss the issue, lining up with mayor's office employees to drink from an affected hydrant in a publicity stunt,[123] and assuring citizens that the problem would be remedied within days.[124] Affected residents ended up relying for years on bottled water for all their daily needs except flushing toilets until the problem was remedied.[125] Zagrebgradnja, Geoprojekt and Capital Ing, the companies involved in the construction of Vrbani III, were eventually found liable in court for the contamination.[126] The city nevertheless continued to do business with the companies. Several of Bandić's associates, including Jelena Pavičić Vukičević would obtain flats in a Geoprojekt project, while Bandić himself reportedly had flats in Zagrebgradnja buildings.[127][128] Zagrebgradnja and Geoprojekt were among the companies with whom Bandić conducted hundreds of unsupervised land swaps from at least 2005 until 2009, which would later be investigated by USKOK.[129]
While not labelled part of Zagreb Housing Development Model by Bandić, Arena Zagreb and its surrounding neighbourhoods exhibited many related problems.[130][112] At the onset of Great Recession, Bandić pushed for the construction of Arena Zagreb, one of several controversial handball stadiums which were opened in 2009 for the purposes of hosting the 2009 World Men's Handball Championship.[131] The venue, which would house sports matches and concerts, drew controversy from the start, having been built at a different location and according to a different plan from the one chosen at the public tender.[112] In addition, the costs required that it be occupied 250 days a year to break even. The arena was constructed by a private-public partnership which left the city paying for part of the arena's upkeep on top of renting it from the concessionaire, who themselves had expressed doubts in the venue's cost-effectiveness.[131][132][133][134] The arena was paired with the adjacent Arena Centar shopping mall,[135] and more construction followed in the form of Jaruščica housing estate and expansion of Lanište. Years later, the neighbourhood lacked basic amenities such as parks, schools, kindergartens and ambulatory care clinics, using up capacities of nearby older neighbourhoods. Public spaces were largely devoid of trees and instead dominated by parking lots,[44][112] which were still insufficient for the needs of Arena Zagreb concertgoers, causing parking problems for residents.[136][137] As part of the confidential concession agreement, the passage of Arena Zagreb into city ownership depends on regular payments of rental fees, which Bandić's administration did not service in timely fashion.[138][139]
Transport infrastructure
Bandić frequently talked about the state of transport infrastructure in Zagreb,[140][141] regularly announcing numerous capital infrastructure projects, which would allegedly remedy traffic problems in Zagreb.[142][143][144] Some of these were urban motorways through densely populated Medvednica Foothills, a tunnel under the Medvednica that would connect Zagreb with Zagorje[145][142][143] various tunnels and underpasses in the historic city centre,[146][147][148] extensions of numerous arterial roads, such as Branimir Road and Prisavlje[149][150] and building several new bridges over Sava near Jarun[151] and Bundek.[152][150]
A few projects were carried out: widening part of Ljubljana Avenue (which Bandić subsequently in a populist move renamed Zagreb Avenue),[153] Radnička Road and Jankomir Bridge, and constructing Homeland Bridge and overpasses or underpasses at several high traffic junctions such as Remetinec Roundabout.[154][155] A few new stretches of arterial roads were built, including filling a one-kilometre gap in Branimir Road, which took place from 2005 to 2016.[156] Many projects were criticised for the poor quality of execution, such as an underpass which continued to flood regularly during rainfall despite specific repairs to that end, and the inconsistently marked cycling paths.[157][158][159][160]
In 2016, the city renovated the pedestrian Sava Bridge,[161] and in 2018 began works to renovate Liberty Bridge.[162] In 2019, Sava Bridge was closed after a part of the pavement fell through onto the embankment below. Bandić said the bridge was safe and would be repaired within days.[161] However, the failed pavement remained closed to traffic until the end of Bandić's mayoralty, at which time it was scheduled to be opened in 2022.[163][164] After finishing the Liberty Bridge renovation in December 2019,[165] the city began the renovation of Youth Bridge; this was also Bandić's last announcement of imminent works on his perennial Jarun Bridge project.[166] The Liberty Bridge renovation was criticised by the Ministry of Construction and Spatial Planning for only renovating asphalt and railings instead of carrying out repairs to the dangerously corroded bridge structure.[167][168]
Public transport
Most of Bandić's involvements in transport infrastructure concerned car traffic.[71][46] For instance, while the cycling infrastructure was expanded, it was still fragmentary and cycling rate lagged behind other European capitals, despite Zagreb having one of the smallest shares of car traffic in the commute modal split.[169] Although Bandić announced numerous new lines in the core of Zagreb's public transport, its tram network, his administration did not realise any of these projects, leading to an unprecedented 20-year drought in tram line construction.[170] In 2000, Bandić opened two new tram lines, Dubrava–Dubec and Jarun–Prečko, construction of which was finished during the previous mayor's term. These remained the last new tram tracks in the city.[171] The Prečko turning circle remains marred by a property dispute, which at one point occasioned a temporary closure.[172] In 2007, the city announced construction of seven new tram lines "over the next few years", including lines in Trešnjevka, Lanište, Dubrava, and the never realised[173] Jarun Bridge, two different lines to Zagreb Airport, as well as proposals for further tram lines in Trnje and on the never built Vatikanska Street extension.[174] Bandić would announce construction on many of these lines again until the end of his mayoralty.[175][176][177] Further tram lines and other projects, such as reconstructing the tram storage yard or an intermodal terminal at Sava Bridge, were announced, but no such plans came to fruition by the end of the mayoralty.[172][87][173][178] When one of the perennial airport tram projects was brought up by news media in 2019, Bandić denied he proposed it.[179] On multiple occasions since mid-2000s, Bandić had presented plans for a subway network;[145] in 2014, the plan involved a 17-kilometre (11 mi) light rail line to be finished by 2017.[180][181][87][182][183] Subway plans were revived after the 2020 earthquake, "so that trams would not cause vibrations [in the apartments]" of the residents in damaged city centre buildings, per Bandić.[184]
In early 2000s, the City of Zagreb selected Crotram's TMK 2200 as the lowest bid for conversion of Zagreb tram rolling stock to low-floor vehicles; the first trams were announced during Pavić's mayoralty.[185] Bandić pushed for purchase of TMK 2200s, which came to dominate the rolling stock, with 140 units by 2010.[186][187] Though he announced and lobbied for plans to sell Crotram units in a number of European cities, including Stockholm, Sofia and Helsinki, the deals all fell through,[188] with Helsinki residents finding the test units "cramped and noisy",[189] while Osijek, the other Croatian city with a tram network, found import trams to be cheaper.[187] In 2017, wheelchair ramps were installed in the low-floor trams, since the tram floors did not line up with platforms.[190]
One of Bandić's long-running projects was the reconstruction of the Sljeme cable car . The original Sljeme cable car was opened by Mayor Pero Pirker in 1963. After long calling into question the safety of the cable car, Bandić closed the cable car in 2007 after the failure of an electric motor.[191] In 2008, plans were announced for a new, higher capacity cable car to be opened in 2009.[192] Money continued to be spent on the project,[193] which eventually expanded to a €45 million scheme which would have included an extension with Zagorje at Bistra.[194] Eventually, construction began in 2019 and only on the original cable car's route, while Bandić announced a new tram line under Medvednica, which was also not realised.[173] The cable car was to be opened in 2020, but the opening was pushed back several times,[195][196] including for "strengthening steel reinforcements" after the Petrinja earthquake.[197] Bandić was criticised by the opposition for continuing with the expensive project after the devastating March 2020 earthquake.[198] A legal expert also characterised the cable car terminal as a plagiarism of the Deloitte building in Oslo, Norway.[199] The city announced that they would apply for EU funding to finance the cable car.[200] ZET took out a 537 million kuna (€72 million) long-term loan to finance the project.[201][202] The cost overruns included some highly overpriced construction materials, totalling at 0.4 percent under the limit which would require additional legal oversight. Bandić disavowed responsibility for the overruns, saying the causes were outside his control.[203] As of 2021, the cost overruns were under investigation by USKOK following a 7-hour YouTube video by a pseudonymous whistleblower, and the cable car remained under construction.[204][205][197][206]
Parking garages and square remodelling
In an attempt to alleviate traffic problems, the city built a number of parking garages in the early 2000s. Garages were built under Lang and Kvaternik Squares, drastically changing their appearance.[208][209] In the latter case, the garage came to dominate a larger plan for a makeover of Kvaternik Square,[210] which followed the removal of its popular farmers' market.[211] In order to accommodate car traffic, highly trafficked zebra crossings were replaced with underground walkways.[210] The new square was widely criticised as it became unattractive to pedestrians and consequently remained empty.[46] A survey found the new Kvaternik Square to be the most unpleasant square in Zagreb.[212] Some reconstruction and renovation projects were also criticised for shoddy workmanship, e.g. the controversial British Square remodelling created a roundabout too narrow to be traversed by the city buses,[213] while the fountain in its centre sprayed water on a nearby bus station[214] (this particular remodelling was investigated by USKOK).[215][216] The Homeland Monument on Stjepan Radić Square, unveiled in December 2020, was showing material wear already by April next year.[217] The effect of these remodellings has been described as an "elimination of squares".[218]
An early 2000s plan for a public parking garage for visitors of Children's Hospital Zagreb under the Ellipse High School Sports Ground behind Mimara Museum[219] ballooned into a—later abandoned—310 million kuna (€43 million) private-public partnership project with an attached shopping mall.[220] An alternative deemed more attractive by the Zagreb leadership was a garage under the Republic of Croatia Square.[221] Bandić lobbied for the controversial project which involved pedestrian entrances surrounding Ivan Meštrović's monument, Well of Life, while garage ramps would flank the 19th-century building of the Croatian National Theatre.[222][223] Late 2000s plans called for three further garages in the vicinity of Flower Square and one under Strossmayer Square, as well as 16 more inside various Donji grad blocks. Most of these plans were abandoned after opposition by art history societies and intervention by courts, Ministry of Culture as well as SDP party leadership. One planned garage was constructed as a private venture, part of Centar Cvjetni (see § Flower Square affair).[224] In 2010, Zagreb Assembly enacted an ordinance against parking garages in Donji grad, effectively putting an end to the developments, although Bandić and Zagrebparking officials continued to toy with the idea of a garage under the theatre for a few more years.[225][226] The spatial arrangement of garages constructed (e.g. the close-by Cvjetni Centar and Tuškanac garages) has caused low occupancy at some of the garages while other parts of the neighbourhood lack adequate parking facilities.[46] Several garages are located at the fringes of the central pedestrian zone; despite their original intent to alleviate congestion, they themselves cause traffic jams and increase traffic in the city core.[90][227][9]
In late 2017, the city started works to remove trees surrounding the Meštrović Pavilion in the middle of the Square of the Victims of Fascism, prompting protests against the city administration led by a citizens' initiative named Vratite magnoliju ("Bring Back the Magnolia") after several old magnolias among many trees and bushes that the city intended to cut down, reducing the greenery around the Pavilion to a grass cover.[228][229][230] Bandić and another city official were prosecuted for damaging cultural heritage and other accusations regarding the square remodelling.[231] The trees, some of which were protected heritage and fixtures of Zagreb pop culture,[232] were removed while the process was ongoing by the city authorities; some of the trees were reportedly "diseased",[233] and some "grew too much",[232] while the project documentation was contradictory on the others.[234][235] The makeover also included removing Brač limestone steps and replacing them with concrete.[229] At the end of the process, Bandić was found not guilty, and subsequently taunted protestors by cutting grass on the square while dressed in the uniform of Zrinjevac, the city's park maintenance company, which caused them to demand his resignation.[236][237] The city administration also removed benches and placed signs forbidding walking on the green surfaces. While a few academics supported the square makeover, most were opposed, including architectural, landscaping and art history societies.[238] The makeover polarised the public, leading to "guerrilla" tree planting actions suppressed by the police, the end result was that the citizens much less often frequented or stopped at the square.[239][240][241] The renewed square's "cold monumentality" has been compared to the architecture of totalitarian and fascist Independent State of Croatia, which had cleared part of the square in 1941–42 while converting the pavilion to a mosque.[242][243]
In 2013, the city changed the zoning of the sole park in Savica neighbourhood in order to accommodate a plan to build a church in the park. Protests, which were ongoing by 2016, intensified in 2017, the election year, by which point Savica residents and activists held round-the-clock sit-ins to prevent construction crews from entering the park.[244] A 2016 survey found that the vast majority of Savica residents were opposed to the project, including 72 percent of Catholic residents.[245] Two weeks before the elections, Bandić promised that the project would be stopped and called for an end to protests.[246][24] The Ministry of Environmental Protection and Spatial Planning refused to issue a location permit for building the church, and it appeared that the project, which would have placed the church in the most wooded area of the park, was cancelled.[247] Nevertheless, the project was renewed in 2018 after Bandić secured another term and began supporting the project. In 2019–20, while Bandić was attempting to pass a new general urban master plan, the church project was expanded to incorporate a shrine dedicated to Blessed Alojzije Stepinac and plans for pilgrim tourism which would have caused the removal of the entire park.[248] The new master plan failed in the city assembly, and several months later city gave the park a name; there were no further attempts to build in the park as of Bandić's death.[249][250] The success of the Savica park protests was seen as a potential end to unchallenged decision making by Bandić and the city government.[24]
City finances
Bandić's mayoralty saw Zagreb's city budget increase from 3.8 billion Croatian kuna in 1998[251] to 13.7 billion kuna in 2021.[252] During his mayoralty, Bandić controlled the allocation of around 177 billion kuna (€24 billion) in budgets.[253]
On 1 January 2007, Bandić founded the Zagreb Holding, placing city companies under a single corporate umbrella, of which he maintained full control as the sole board member until a 2009 intervention by the Ministry of Public Administration.[254][255][256][257] The holding took up some of the city's responsibilities, such as building schools and kindergartens, and sold and leased back city's property, such as trams, to finance projects.[255][258] In 2007, the company issued €300 million in bonds on the London Stock Exchange, purportedly to finance improvements to water, sewerage and gas network.[54] The sewerage network in particular was severely outdated. Central Zagreb depends on a 1892 combined sewer system which would later disastrously fail in the 2020 flash flood.[259] Little of the money was spent on the intended purpose, being re-routed into patching up the city budget, real estate acquisition, and Sopnica–Jelkovec construction, although Bandić had vouched this would not happen when the bonds were issued.[54] A 2013 paper called for restructuring Zagreb Holding, finding that the company was exposed to high foreign exchange risk and relied on new loans to pay off existing debts. In 2011, Zagreb Holding raised 1 billion kuna in short-term loans and used it to pay off debts.[260] When the London bonds matured in 2016, Zagreb Holding was unable to make the payments and raised the funds by issuing a new series of bonds in the Croatian bond market. Reportedly, Holding leaders planned to refinance already in 2007.[54][261] In 2017, Zagreb Fair and long-time loss-leader Zagrebački električni tramvaj (ZET) were separated from Zagreb Holding.[262] ZET, the public transport company, operated at a loss for a long time due to Bandić's decision to allow free travel for most Zagreb citizens, and was criticised for practices such as giving a commission to drivers selling tickets.[263][264][265][266] In the course of the separation, Zagreb Holding controversially retained part of ZET's assets, including a workers' holiday resort, which it sold in 2020, prompting a protest by the workers.[267][268]
Research carried out by Corruption Research Center Budapest (CRCB) into City of Zagreb and Zagreb Holding found the city to be the worst among European capitals in corruption risks and public tender competition.[269] In the 2011–2016 period, more than a third of the contracts awarded by the two entities had only one bidder, covering billions of Croatian kunas. CRCB estimated that the social loss to the entities due to inefficient pricing over this period was 2.70 billion kuna. Zagreb Holding's tenders were the most inefficient in 2013, while City of Zagreb's were in 2016, both years close to local elections.[270] Using Benford's law, CRCB found high price distortions compared to true market value of services rendered, especially in no-competition tenders and those issued by Zagreb Holding.[271] The tenders were mainly won by companies with high presence in the public procurement market and low international export turnover.[272] The city also poorly utilised EU funding, below average for both Croatia and comparable European capitals.[273] While Vodoopskrba i odvodnja, Zagreb Holding's water management company, announced it would spend 1.4 billion kuna (€200 million) from EU funds in 2014, it only received 4.5 million kuna (€600,000).[53]
In 2014, Bandić and a number of high-ranking Zagreb Holding and city officials were arrested, one of them while attempting to flee Croatia. The case was dubbed Agram affair by the press. The mayor was charged with evading tax on political donations, illegal preferential treatment of the CIOS refuse management company, as well as trading city-owned land below market price. Bandić was bailed out a month later. His bail, set at a record 15 million kuna (€2 million) was paid by the same law firm which was retained by the city; Bandić was later fined 30,000 kuna for this conflict of interest. Bandić was returned to jail in 2015 after attempting to influence a witness, but was released after a month.[274][275][276] Bandić did not resign from his post; instead, the city was led by acting mayor and former Bandić's deputy Sandra Švaljek between Bandić's first and second arrest. The latter coincided with Bandić's successful appeal to the legal ban from exercising his office. Švaljek continued leading the city for a short period until Bandić rescinded her authorisation from jail, and gave it to Vesna Kusin. Soon after his release, Bandić returned to the mayor's post.[277][278][279] At the time of Bandić's death, he was being tried in several court cases, including the case of the aforementioned Agram affair, the "stands affair" involving alleged preferential treatment of politician Željka Markić's anti-abortion rally, a case involving the Zagreb wastewater treatment plant, and others.[280][275] Several high-ranking officials in Bandić's administration were convicted of illegally altering the general urban master plan, and received suspended prison sentences.[281][282]
Undeveloped properties
During Bandić's mayoralty, the city acquired several brownfield properties which proved impossible to sell or develop. In April 2004, then-mayor Vlasta Pavić criticized Bandić for buying land formerly owned by the Zagrepčanka meat packing plant, as the city was unable to register itself as the owner.[283] The controversy was dubbed "the Zagrepčanka case" by the newspapers.[283][284] Pavić distanced herself from Bandić, and Bandić was heard cursing her during a session of the Assembly.[283][284] Backed by SDP members in the City Assembly, Bandić launched a newspaper advertisement in support of his decision to buy the lot. Charges were brought against Bandić and others involved over the advertisement and "frequent and inadmissible attacks on [...] the court".[285] Three years later, Bandić was acquitted; the City of Zagreb was awarded ownership of the Zagrepčanka lot in a court judgment. Bandić promised a new business district in the Zagrepčanka location.[286] However, in 2021, the city was still hoping to balance the budget by selling the undeveloped lot.[287]
A number of similarly derelict former factories exist in the streets around the Main Railway Station.[37] Among a number of similar cases was that of former Janko Gredelj railway factory at the Main Railway Station. Zagreb Holding bought the closed factory from Gredelj in 2006 for 660 million kuna, a sum raised by issuing bonds. Years later, Bandić announced a plan to have the city buy the grounds from Zagreb Holding, in order to help Zagreb Holding pay off its debts. In 2006, most of the old factory was taken off the cultural heritage register while Bandić announced plans for a "new city centre". No construction has been done on Gredelj grounds, which remain occupied by decaying unmaintained buildings except for a small city-operated parking lot opened in 2018.[2][287][288][289][290] Paromlin is another former factory complex and protected industry heritage in city ownership, located adjacent to Gredelj and the railway station. A 2006 deal to preserve the complex and use it to house a Marriott Hotel and a 2012 project to house the Main City Library both failed. In 2011, a part of the complex was razed and turned into a public parking lot. Part of Paromlin collapsed in 2013, while a different part was illegally demolished in 2014. Of the 2013 collapse, Bandić said that "if [he] had been born earlier, [he] would have created a [...] renovation project in time."[291][292][293][294][295]
In 2007, Zagreb purchased the Potsdam Tin Theatre (German: Blechbüchse, Croatian: Potsdamsko limeno kazalište).[296][297] The prefabricated theatre was bought for €80,000 and 18 million kuna (€2.4 million) was spent transporting it to the city. Despite a proposal to place it in Središće, New Zagreb, the city decided to erect the theatre at the district's outskirts in Sloboština. The Sloboština lot was bought from a private company in exchange for a lot in Trešnjevka and 12 million kuna (€1.6 million). The theatre was never assembled, and by 2015, many of its parts had been reportedly stolen.[298][299][300]
Environment
In mid-2010s, during the fourteen-year project of widening Radnička Road, part of the main wastewater canal (previously an open sewer) was covered and sewerage was built in Kozari Putevi, one of a number of illegally built neighbourhoods in the Žitnjak area.[301][302][303] In 2000s, Bandić had based his campaign in Žitnjak informal settlements.
One of Bandić's perennial promises was closing the Jakuševec landfill, an ecological hazard to the city which was at times closed due to strikes, suffered from plastic waste fires, and which was at one time operated without a licence.[304][305][306][307] After a strike by local residents, Bandić exempted them from an ordinance forbidding raising livestock in the city.[308][309] The Jakuševec hazard was not solved by the end of Bandić's mayoralty.[310] In late 2010s, the city was beset by numerous fires, some allegedly intentionally started, at the private CIOS landfill, implicated in the Agram affair.[311][312][313]
In 2018, Bandić presented a project which would mandate an allegedly newly invented form of HHO cleaning of car engines for all vehicles in Zagreb at cost to owners, in order to reduce their carbon footprint. Proof of the project's usefulness did not surface and the project was eventually pulled after criticism from engineering experts.[314][315][316]
Political street renaming and monuments
In the early 1990s, the new post-Communist government carried out a series of street renames, returning many pre-1941 street names, but also giving some streets new names.[317] The most controversial rename was that of the Square of the Victims of Fascism, which was named Croatian Nobles Square. After SDP came to power in 2000, the square's pre-1990 name was returned, while the new name was transferred to the nearby Stock Market Square.[318] Though the wave of renames almost completely subsided after 1995,[319] Bandić administration also took a leading role in a few high-profile cases of street renaming. In 2008 he opposed protests calling for renaming Marshal Tito Square, named after Yugoslavia's long-time Communist leader Josip Broz Tito, to its erstwhile name Theatre Square, saying that there were "no historical reasons to change [its] name".[320] Nevertheless in 2017 he proposed a successful motion to change its name to Republic of Croatia Square.[321][322] Branko Lustig, a Croatian Jewish film producer and member of Bandić's party, was removed from his seat in Zagreb Assembly by Bandić after he refused to support the motion.[322]
In 2006, there was a movement to name a square after the first president of Croatia, Franjo Tuđman. Right-wing supporters of Tuđman proposed renaming various major squares after Tuđman, while left-wing opponents proposed the long meadow in the wide central reservation of Croatian Fraternal Union Street. Bandić, who multiple times stated that Tuđman would get the "most beautiful square in Zagreb because he deserves it",[323] ultimately gave the president the hitherto unnamed park behind Rudolf barracks,[324] a move criticised by the right.[325][326] The park was initially intended to be remodelled into an urban square with a water park and pavilion with shops and restaurants, creating per Bandić, "the second heart of the city".[323][326] Bandić later fielded a proposal to build a road interchange there in order to speed up car traffic in the city centre.[147] The projects were not carried out. In 2015, after forming a coalition with HDZ, Bandić ardently supported their plan to rename Zagreb Airport after Tuđman.[327] Tuđman's bust was eventually erected on the median of CFU Street, where Bandić had in 2012 placed a number of controversial fountains.[328][329][330]
Another 2006 controversy erupted over the 150th anniversary of the birth of scientist Nikola Tesla, which Bandić celebrated by "erecting"[331] Ivan Meštrović's statue of Tesla, which was relocated from its original position at the Ruđer Bošković Institute (RBI) to Tesla Street in Donji grad. Various institutions, including RBI, the Academy of Fine Arts, and Ivan Meštrović Museum, stated that the decision went against the wishes of Meštrović. The sculptor had strongly intended that the sculpture be shown paired with a statue of Bošković at the RBI, going as far as to destroy the moulds to prevent replication of the statues. The return of the statue was the subject of an unsuccessful petition in 2013.[332][333][331]
2020
In late 2019, Zagreb was beset by protests by the Zagreb Calls You initiative, Siget, Green Action, and Right to the City calling for Bandić's resignation and arrest over his alleged large-scale frauds and corruption.[334][335][336][337] The protests were motivated by the expectation that Bandić would pass a new general urban master plan accommodating the "Zagreb Manhattan" project which would have involved construction on a large amounts of green spaces and sports grounds, demolition of Zagreb Fair and Zagreb Hippodrome and, according to Bandić, construction of a 200-storey skyscraper in New Zagreb.[338][339][340] "Zagreb Manhattan" and other changes in the plan proved controversial, attracting more than 30,000 complaints from the public, which were all rejected by the city authorities. The plan eventually failed after Bandić and HDZ could not come to an agreement about amendments to the plan.[341][250] Defeat of HDZ's incumbent Kolinda Grabar-Kitarović in the 2019–20 Croatian presidential election, for which the backing of scandal-ridden Bandić was blamed, contributed to the falling out between Bandić and HDZ.[342][343][344] In early 2020, protests against Bandić were suspended due to the coronavirus pandemic,[345][346] which reached Zagreb on 25 February 2020.[347] In March 2020, Bandić was criticised for making jokes about the lack of soap in Zagreb schools.[348]
In the early hours of 22 March 2020, the day the coronavirus quarantine started, Zagreb was struck by a ML 5.5 earthquake. Despite its relatively low magnitude, the shallow focus of the earthquake and the poor state of Zagreb building stock contributed to widespread damage, even affecting some new buildings such as the Museum of Contemporary Art and Centar Cvjetni.[349][350][351] Most of the hospitals, located in old buildings in the vulnerable northern part of the city, suffered damage and had to be evacuated.[352] The damage was later estimated at €11.6 billion.[353] In the early days of recovery, Bandić appointed himself head of civil protection in Zagreb and began holding daily press conferences on the subjects of earthquake and COVID-19.[354] Bandić received criticism for his remark that the damages occurred because "the residents did not invest in their property"[355] the announcement that property owners would be left to finance their own repairs,[355] and assigning the blame for city centre damages to homeowners who did not take the city up on a façade renovation program, which in fact did not include seismic retrofitting or any other earthquake damage prevention work.[356][357][358] A state inquiry found that none of the contracts aforementioned renovation projects had been closed, and that the emergency disaster fund had been spent on various associations, religious community projects and festivities.[359] In April, protests against soon continued in the form of cacerolazo,[360] while Bandić was accused by the Ministry of Construction of obstructing the recovery efforts, including refusing to house residents made homeless by the earthquake in empty and squatted social housing.[361]
Bandić soon backtracked on his opposition to financing rebuilding[362] and remained optimistic in his statements about recovery from the earthquake.[363][364] However, reconstruction had not yet begun by the time of Bandić's death,[365][366][367] and many people were still living in severely damaged buildings months later.[368][369] In Donji grad, cultural heritage regulations created additional red tape for affected citizens. The authorities estimated that 20,000 people, or more than half of residents of Donji grad had moved out of their homes by the middle of April,[370][371] and scaffolding protecting pedestrians from falling masonry began to be erected only in 2021.[372] Bandić was criticised for spending millions on projects such as Snow Queen Trophy and decorative lighting while reducing allocation of funds for repairs of schools and other public buildings, and spending city money on uncoordinated duplication of residents' own renovation efforts.[373][374][375] The city was also affected by a flash flood in July where citizens forced open an unstaffed dam to drain the city,[376] and a stronger earthquake in nearby Petrinja area in December which, per Bandić's estimate, caused 20 times less damage to Zagreb than the March earthquake.[377] The city did not release precise information on the extent of damages in Zagreb from the flood and the Petrinja earthquake, though Bandić pledged financial assistance to earthquake victims in Petrinja,[378] where the City of Zagreb had earlier built school infrastructure while Petrinja's mayor was a member of BM365.[379][380] One of the people involved in protests against Bandić was filmmaker Dario Juričan, who legally changed his name to Milan Bandić and ran in the 2019–20 presidential election as the self-proclaimed "evangelist of corruption",[381] coming in fifth with 4.61% of the vote.[382] In 2020, he created a documentary film, Kumek, about Bandić's scandals.[383]
Personal life and education
Bandić was born on 22 November 1955 in Donji Mamići, Grude, PR Bosnia and Herzegovina, FPR Yugoslavia to Jozo Bandić and Ankica Tomić. He was a middle child, having an older brother Drago and younger sister Tonka.[256] In 1974, he went to Zagreb, where he majored in defence and protection at the University of Zagreb.[384] Students completing this major, which was in Zagreb taught at the Faculty of Political Science, were qualified to teach the subjects of defence and protection, foundations of Marxism, and theory and practice of socialism to high school students. As part of the class involved practical instruction in the Yugoslav People's Army, the students were exempted from mandatory military service; distinguished students were also granted the status of officer in the reserve force.[385][386] Bandić states that, after finishing schooling, he served in the army,[387] which some newspapers interpreted as mandatory military service.[388]
After finishing college, Bandić stayed in Zagreb where he married his wife Vesna, with whom he had a daughter, Anamarija.[256] In 1996, Bandić divorced his wife, citing "disagreements". A week later, his wife took advantage of a programme allowing highly discounted purchase of social apartments for people without a place to live, in order to purchase a small house in Donji grad for 35,760 kuna (€4,800), claiming she had lived there since 1975. Her request was approved by Bandić in his official capacity. Bandić remained living together with his wife in an apartment in Stara Peščenica, and in 2003, they remarried. In 2005, Bandić dismissed accusations of trying to profit from the social programme, saying: "If I had wanted to profit, I would have bought the [house] and sold it, and we would not be still paying it off today.[1] The house was in derelict condition and had collapsed by 2014, when the Bandićs sold it to Adris grupa shareholder and billionaire Ante Vlahović for €150,000, who proceeded to build a controversial apartment building occupying its place and the adjoining lots.[389][390]
In 2001, he illegally built a house in Slavagora near Samobor.[59] Bandić and his family also owned and/or lived in several flats which he did not report in his asset declaration.[391][392][393][394]
Bandić owned three horses, two of which were kept at the Zagreb Hippodrome.[43] He also had two golden retrievers, Bil and Rudi, which he often walked during his work hours.[395][396]
Political career
In socialist Yugoslavia, Bandić joined Croatia's communist party, the League of Communists of Croatia (LCC). In 1983, he found a job in his field in LCC's Municipal Committee of Peščenica municipality of Zagreb as an expert political worker responsible for defence and protection. After the collapse of SFR Yugoslavia, which started the transition to capitalism, LCC rebranded itself as the Social Democratic Party of Croatia (SDP). Bandić remained with the new party. In 1993 he became the secretary of SDP's Zagreb Committee, in 1995 he joined the Zagreb Assembly, and in 1997 he became the committee's president. In 2000, Bandić bought off two HDZ councilmen, finding the necessary majority to call snap elections.[256]
Bandić was ultimately elected mayor six times, in 2000, 2001, 2005, 2009, 2013, and 2017. All the elections had a low turnout, never exceeding 50 percent.[397][398] Bandić won with as little as 48,000 votes—in the 2000 election which had 689,000 eligible voters. His strongest show of support was 170,000 votes in the 2013 election against Ranko Ostojić, the candidate of Bandić's erstwhile party, SDP.
Bandić's politics were populist in nature: he split with the mayors of the 1990s by "fighting for the rights of little people",[399] campaigning in the early 2000s in the poor neighbourhoods of Peščenica; an iconic poster portrays Bandić walking through mud in an unpaved street in Kozari Putevi.[400][401] Bandić announced various populist measures, such as paying an extra salary to parents of three or more children, free public transport, and 100 kuna (€13) Easter bonuses for retirees, though not all of these measures were ever carried out whole or in part.[401][266][402] Some measures were reversed in face of financial issues; e.g. Bandić went from offering free rides to everyone in certain conditions in 2008, to vying for massive bus fare hikes in 2010, stating that it was "high time for a fair distribution of subsidies",[264] after ZET, the public transport company, registered a large deficit.[266][264][265]
In 2002, Bandić caused a political scandal by fleeing the scene of a car accident while under the influence of alcohol. Bandić unsuccessfully attempted to bribe and threatened the police officer who caught him.[403] The police officer was fired for leaking a copy of the police report. This judgment was later overturned by a court and he was reinstated in the police force.[404] The SDP leadership relieved Bandić of his mayoral duties and the Assembly voted in Vlasta Pavić as the new mayor,[405] while Bandić was kept on as deputy mayor,[406] Though initially supporting Bandić's projects[407] despite opposition councilmembers protests that Bandić would use Pavić as a puppet mayor,[399] Pavić soon expressed the same opinion herself, causing a falling out in the SDP ranks. Despite SDP president Ivica Račan siding with Pavić,[408] Bandić would behind the scenes retain much of his power over the city.[399] In 2003, Bandić was reportedly attempting to force snap elections by attacking SDP's coalition partners and forming new alliances in the Zagreb Assembly.[409] In 2004, he caused a controversy by publicly cursing out Pavić in the assembly,[410] for which she demanded an apology.[411] Eventually, she gave in and agreed not to run in the 2005 elections.[412] SDP would nominate Bandić as their mayoral candidate, and he won with 103,000 votes.
Returning to the mayoral position, Bandić consolidated his power, placing city companies in a holding company over which he had absolute control, appointing himself the sole board member (see § City finances).[256] Controversies continued in 2005, when a Novi list journalist alleged that Bandić said "Work liberates, the Nazis weren't totally dumb". The following day, Bandić threatened to sue the journalist and the newspaper; he claimed he said "Marxists", not "Nazis".[413] In January 2006, Bandić publicly threatened a journalist working for Večernji list because the journalist asked Bandić about an offer from a Czech company; Bandić then replied aggressively, cursing and threatening the journalist.[414] Afterwards, he claimed he had simply spoken to the journalist in a loud voice.[414] Following Račan's illness and death, Bandić unsuccessfully ran for the position at the 2007 leadership election,[415] losing to Zoran Milanović.[416] Bandić reportedly established himself as the leader of the opposition within the party against Milanović, who was alleged to have wanted Bandić out of the mayoral office.[417][418] Both Milanović and Bandić later denied that there were major disagreements and a discord in the SDP.[419] In 2008, a letter signed by 26 public figures of the Croatian Left, including academic Dražen Lalić, criticized the policies of the SDP, particularly Bandić's tenure as mayor and corruption allegations, and called out Milanović for "betraying social democracy". Milanović and the SDP leadership refuted the letter and expressed their support for Bandić.[420][421]
Bandić ran for president in the 2009–10 elections.[422] As he had done this without the authorisation of his party, who had nominated Ivo Josipović, he was expelled from SDP and lost his position as leader of the party's Zagreb branch.[423] In the first round of the election, on 27 December 2009, Bandić received 14.83 percent of the vote, placing him in second place after Josipović with 32.70 percent.[424] On 10 January he lost the second round with 39.74 percent of the vote.[425] In Zagreb, Bandić lost both rounds of the election, receiving support only in a handful of city neighbourhoods.[426][427] A year before his presidential campaign, it came to light that a record-breaking 251 criminal complaints had been filed against Bandić, but the State Attorney's Office had neglected to act on any of them.[428]
In 2014, Bandić's mayoralty was temporarily interrupted when he was arrested due to the Agram affair. However, he did not resign, and returned to his position after his second release from jail. As of Bandić's death, Agram and other court cases were still ongoing. See § City finances.
After running as independent for several years following his expulsion from SDP, in 2015 Bandić founded a political party, Milan Bandić 365 – Labour and Solidarity Party, which was soon renamed Bandić Milan 365 – Labour and Solidarity Party. The party found little support from voters. Its best show was two seats won in the 2015 election, which were followed with a single seat in 2016. In the 2020 election, BM365 won around 9,000 votes and was left without representation in the parliament. Nevertheless, Bandić formed numerous alliances in the parliament, and was credited with ensuring the victory of HDZ, with whom he formed a coalition in the 2015 elections.[429] Bandić once made a remark about the unsteady nature of these alliances, where he called the MPs in his alliance "play chips",[380][430] a term which caught on in the news.[431] He treated his allies, among them numerous minority representatives, with projects and donations funded by Zagreb city budget.[432]
Bandić's city administration and Zagreb Holding would frequently contract companies owned by Bandić's associates, such as Bandić's godfather Milan Penava's company Tigra, which gained media attention due to the conflict of interest involved, but also very high costs charged to the city.[433][434] The city administration would keep contracting construction companies which did work of poor quality that resulted in scandals, such as the Vrbani III companies, and Tehnika which had to redo twice its 2012 repaving of Flower Square.[434][435] During the Agram affair case, USKOK played back secret recording of Bandić and city officials where Bandić apparently created a confrontation to impel the officials to hire one of his relatives; Bandić did not deny the veracity of the tape.[436][437] Bandić's administration was fraught with accusations of nepotism, extending to the family of Bandić's deputy and acting successor Jelena Pavičić Vukičević.[438][439] Pavičić Vukičević herself was appointed head of a city department in controversial circumstances soon after her removal from the Croatian parliament, on which Bandić commented that he would not let her "end up in the streets".[439]
In early 2020, after HDZ's President Kolinda Grabar-Kitarović lost the election for her second term, there was a cooling in the relations between Bandić and the HDZ government, who killed his plan for a 200-storey skyscraper and criticised his handling of the 2020 calamities (see § 2020). In May 2020, Prime Minister Andrej Plenković publicly doubted Bandić's ability to pass the 2021 election threshold. In return, Bandić mocked the accusations that his notoriety brought down Grabar-Kitarović.[344]
Health and death
On 3 July 2003, Bandić suffered a serious stroke. After a session of the Zagreb Assembly, he requested medical assistance, stating that he had begun to feel ill during the session. He was hospitalised for a few weeks, then went to Krapinske Toplice to recover, and returned to his duties in September.[440][441] In 2018, he had a surgery to insert a coronary stent. In June 2020 he was again hospitalised due to suspicion of another stroke, following an apparent dizzy spell in front of the cameras where he needed help to remain upright.[441][442][443] In August 2020 he also underwent vocal cord surgery, which was unable to resolve speech problems which troubled him for the remainder of his life.[444][441]
Bandić died, allegedly from a heart attack at the Sveti Duh Clinical Hospital in Zagreb on 28 February 2021, aged 65.[445] He was the longest serving mayor of Zagreb at the time of his death.[446] He was buried at the Mirogoj Cemetery three days later, on 3 March. The funeral was attended by senior state officials, including Prime Minister Andrej Plenković, Parliament Speaker Gordan Jandroković, and ministers Tomo Medved and Gordan Grlić-Radman. Acting mayor Jelena Pavičić Vukičević, and Ljubo Jurčić, former Minister of Economy in Račan's second cabinet, addressed the funeral ceremony.[447][448] Serbian Patriarch Porfirije was expected among the speakers, but was unable to attend the funeral due to self-isolation after being in contact with a COVID-positive person.[449] His funeral was attended by more than a thousand people in total, thus violating quarantine rules that state that a maximum of 25 people can attend a funeral.[450]
On 22 March, the State's Attorney Office began an inquiry into the circumstances of Bandić's death.[451] As of May 2021, the results of Bandić's autopsy had not yet been published.
Honours and awards
In 2007, Bandić joined the Croatian Dragon Fraternity as the Dragon of Stone Gate.[452]
In 2009, Bandić was made honorary citizen of Srebrenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina,[453] while in 2018 received the Order of Friendship from Vladimir Putin.[454]
A 2019 attempt to bestow an honorary doctorate upon Bandić by University of Zagreb was stopped after protests and motions of opposition by councils of several faculties of the university, which included Bandić's alma mater, Faculty of Political Sciences.[455][456][457][384][458]
See also
Footnotes
- ^ a b c "Bandić se 1996. razveo zbog otkupa stana?". Index.hr (in Croatian). 10 February 2005. Archived from the original on 14 January 2012. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ a b Vrabec, Vedran (27 May 2020). "Sad kad Bandić najavljuje metro u centru grada, zgodno se prisjetiti obećanja koja nije ispunio. Evo ih 18". Telegram.hr (in Croatian). Archived from the original on 10 June 2020. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Došen, Kristian (5 April 2020). "Bolnica u Blatu potrebnija je nego ikad. Otkrivamo kako je zbog Grada i ministarstva izgradnja nedavno opet zapela". Telegram.hr (in Croatian). Archived from the original on 7 August 2020.
- ^ Bago, Mislav (4 February 2020). "Kako Milan Bandić troši gradski novac: U 20 godina potrošio je nevjerojatnih 177 milijardi kuna". Dnevnik.hr. Nova TV. Archived from the original on 23 October 2020. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Šimpraga, Saša (19 November 2019). "Grad je odustao od kvalitetnog planiranja". Vizkultura.hr (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ a b Zlatar 2014, p. 150.
- ^ Gašparović & Sopina 2018, p. 139.
- ^ Zlatar Gamberožić 2019a, p. 100.
- ^ a b Zlatar Gamberožić 2019a, p. 101.
- ^ a b Zlatar Gamberožić & Svirčić Gotovac 2016, pp. 113–115.
- ^ Zlatar Gamberožić 2019a, p. 91.
- ^ Zlatar 2014, p. 150-151.
- ^ a b Čaldarović & Šarinić 2008, p. 378.
- ^ a b Svirčić Gotovac & Šarović 2016, p. 144.
- ^ Svirčić Gotovac & Zlatar 2015a, pp. 32, 42.
- ^ Zlatar 2014, p. 154.
- ^ Čaldarović & Šarinić 2008, p. 375, 376, 378.
- ^ Zlatar Gamberožić 2019a, pp. 92, 99.
- ^ Svirčić Gotovac & Šarović 2016, pp. 69, 96.
- ^ Carmon 1999, pp. 145–146.
- ^ Gašparović, Zrinjski & Veselski 2018, pp. 124–125.
- ^ a b Goldstein & Hutinec, p. 310.
- ^ Hrženjak 2011, p. 44-45, 53-55, 67.
- ^ a b c Svirčić Gotovac & Zlatar Gamberožić 2020, p. 19.
- ^ Svirčić Gotovac & Zlatar Gamberožić 2020, pp. 20, 26.
- ^ Zlatar Gamberožić 2019a, pp. 99–101.
- ^ Penić, Goran (30 August 2009). "Zagrepčani često prosvjeduju, ali gradske ih vlasti rijetko čuju". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). Archived from the original on 1 September 2009. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Zlatar Gamberožić 2019a.
- ^ a b c d Zlatar 2014, p. 151.
- ^ Svirčić Gotovac & Zlatar 2012, p. 42.
- ^ Svirčić Gotovac & Zlatar 2012, p. 22.
- ^ Slavuj, Cvitanović & Prelogović 2009, p. 81.
- ^ Slavuj, Cvitanović & Prelogović 2009, p. 78.
- ^ Zlatar 2019.
- ^ Svirčić Gotovac & Zlatar 2015a, p. 37.
- ^ Zlatar 2014, p. 148.
- ^ a b Slavuj, Cvitanović & Prelogović 2009, p. 79.
- ^ Mamić, Tomislav (4 February 2010). "Naginje li se upravna zgrada HEP-a kao kosi toranj u Pisi?". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Novak, Tomislav (27 November 2012). "Sud izrekao presudu za Kupsku: Kriva je tvrtka Conex i njezin vlasnik Davorin Lovrenčić". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Svirčić Gotovac & Zlatar 2012, pp. 19–22.
- ^ Jukić, Mlinar & Smokvina, p. 43.
- ^ "Bandić: Zašto Zagreb ne bi imao neboder od 200 katova?". N1 (in Croatian). HINA. 20 March 2019. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ a b Dimitrijević, Andrej (5 June 2019). "Gospodin koji je upravljao Hipodromom tvrdi da ga je Bandić tjerao da ga prepusti Gradu kako bi tamo gradio vile". Telegram.hr (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ a b Svirčić Gotovac & Šarović 2016, p. 143.
- ^ Svirčić Gotovac & Zlatar 2013, p. 404.
- ^ a b c d Svirčić Gotovac & Zlatar 2015a, p. 40.
- ^ Jakovčić 2006.
- ^ Slavuj, Cvitanović & Prelogović 2009, pp. 78–79.
- ^ Svirčić Gotovac 2010, pp. 216–218.
- ^ Svirčić Gotovac & Zlatar 2015a, p. 34-35.
- ^ Svirčić Gotovac & Zlatar 2012, p. 20-21.
- ^ Balija, Petra (3 December 2016). "Egzodus iz centra grada – ne možemo živjeti od nesnosne buke". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ a b Trajković, Sergej (14 September 2015). "DRŽAVA ZAGREBU VRAĆA 400 MILIJUNA KN, ŠTO UČINITI S TIM NOVCEM? Cijeli bi grad mogao imati vodu i kanalizaciju, nove škole, vrtiće..." Jutarnji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ a b c d Mazzocco, Vojislav (26 November 2020). "Zagreb se 2007. u Londonu zadužio za 300 milijuna eura. Novac je potrošen". Index.hr (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Mattioni 2003, pp. 86–97.
- ^ Čaldarović & Šarinić 2008, p. 373.
- ^ Stanilov 2007, p. 400.
- ^ Svirčić Gotovac & Šarović 2016, p. 80.
- ^ a b Markas, Dario; Zajović, Milena (28 February 2021). "Bandić je u Zagreb došao s jednim koferom, radio je u hladnjači". Večernji list (in Croatian). Archived from the original on 21 April 2021. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ ""Legalizacija" gradonačelnika Bandića". Večernji list (in Croatian). 25 January 2005. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Bandić: Legalizaciju ne traži sirotinja, već oni koji imaju manje". Dnevnik.hr (in Croatian). Nova TV. 30 July 2015. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Bandić: Oko 10.000 zahtjeva za legalizaciju bespravne gradnje". Dnevnik.hr (in Croatian). Nova TV. 4 January 2013. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Buljan, Velinka (11 December 2013). "Bandić ne da ministrici da mu uzme legalizaciju i 70 mil. kn". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Goldstein & Hutinec 2013, p. 216.
- ^ Svirčić Gotovac & Zlatar 2012, pp. 166–168.
- ^ Svirčić Gotovac & Zlatar Gamberožić 2020, pp. 19–20.
- ^ Čaldarović & Šarinić 2008, pp. 377–379.
- ^ a b c Klicek, Slaven (14 March 2014). "Cleaning Out the Rat Holes of Zagreb's Flower Square". Failed Architecture. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Zlatar Gamberožić & Svirčić Gotovac 2016, p. 118.
- ^ Mišetić & Ursić 2010, p. 8.
- ^ a b c Svirčić Gotovac & Zlatar 2008, p. 56.
- ^ Svirčić Gotovac & Zlatar 2008, pp. 56–57.
- ^ a b Svirčić Gotovac & Zlatar 2008, p. 53.
- ^ Mišetić & Ursić 2010, p. 9.
- ^ a b Galović 2006.
- ^ Svirčić Gotovac & Zlatar 2008, p. 58.
- ^ Svirčić Gotovac & Zlatar 2008, p. 71.
- ^ Svirčić Gotovac & Zlatar 2008, p. 65.
- ^ Svirčić Gotovac & Zlatar 2008, p. 62.
- ^ Svirčić Gotovac 2010.
- ^ Zlatar 2014, p. 152.
- ^ Svirčić Gotovac 2010, p. 216.
- ^ "Prekršajni sud odbacio sve optužbe protiv prosvjednika iz Varšavske". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). 4 October 2010. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Mamić, Tomislav (27 May 2011). "Centar Cvjetni vapi za kupcima! H&M i podzemna garaža - jedina mjesta koja rade punom parom". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Spiric, Jovanka (18 August 2019). "Flower market Square Redevelopment Plan, Zagreb, Croatia". Environmental Justice Atlas. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Bandić dao pa uzeo: Horvatinčićeva terasa nestaje s Cvjetnog trga". Tportal.hr (in Croatian). 7 October 2016. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ a b c Vrabec, Vedran (27 May 2020). "Sad kad Bandić najavljuje metro u centru grada, zgodno se prisjetiti obećanja koja nije ispunio. Evo ih 18". Telegram.hr (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Knežević, Katarina (15 December 2020). "Predstavljen je projekt obnove Kina Europa; Bandić posve ozbiljno priča kako je kina oteo tajkunskoj privatizaciji". Telegram.hr (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "VIDEO Više od 2000 ljudi na prosvjedu, šef Kina Europa: Zatvaramo na tri dana". Index.hr (in Croatian). 6 April 2019. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ a b Zlatar Gamberožić & Svirčić Gotovac 2016, p. 119.
- ^ Šimat Banov, Ive (21 October 2016). "POVIJEST NESTANKA CVJETNOG TRGA Može li nekoliko kioska s cvijećem opravdati njegovo ime?". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Bobovec, Mlinar & Pozojević 2016.
- ^ Mlinar 2009.
- ^ a b c Svirčić Gotovac & Zlatar 2015b, p. 157.
- ^ a b Svirčić Gotovac & Zlatar 2015a, p. 32.
- ^ a b Svirčić Gotovac & Zlatar 2013, p. 403.
- ^ Svirčić Gotovac & Zlatar 2015a, p. 36.
- ^ a b Franić, Korlaet & Vranić 2005, p. 202.
- ^ Svirčić Gotovac & Zlatar 2015a, p. 35.
- ^ "Počela gradnja 608 stanova; projekt uključuje i škole, bazenski kompleks, sportske dvorane, igrališta…". Poslovni dnevnik (in Croatian). 13 September 2016. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Šobak, Mateja (6 October 2017). "VIDEO Više od 5000 Zagrepčana prijavilo se za stan u novom naselju". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Kezerić, Ana-Maria (23 December 2017). "Za najam prvih stanova u Podbrežju javile se 823 osobe". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Brkulj, Vedran (25 March 2021). "Sjećate li se što je sve Bandić obećavao pred prošle lokalne izbore? Provjerili smo što je od toga ostvareno". Tportal.hr (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Svirčić Gotovac & Zlatar 2015b, p. 148.
- ^ Svirčić Gotovac & Zlatar 2015b, p. 151.
- ^ Živko, Ivana; Blašković, Boba (10 April 2007). "Hoto Ville jeftinije od Bandićevih stanova". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Blašković, Boba (29 September 2006). "'Bandićevi stanovi' skuplji od 'Čačićevih'". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Svirčić Gotovac & Zlatar 2015b, p. 154.
- ^ a b c d e f g Turčin, Kristina (18 May 2014). "KAKO JE NASTAO NAJVEĆI HRVATSKI GETO U naselju Sopnica-Jelkovec više nitko ne želi živjeti". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Panić, Velibor (11 August 2013). "BANDIĆEV PLAN ZA SOPNICU JELKOVEC 'Prazni stanovi ne idu u prodaju. Iznajmit ćemo ih za 200 eura mladim obiteljima'". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Knežević, Velinka (18 November 2009). "Vapaj stanara Sopnice: Nema trgovine, ambulante i telefona..." Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ a b c d Šimpraga, Saša (13 November 2017). "Nema urbanizma bez vizije i percepcije". Vizkultura.hr (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Svirčić Gotovac & Zlatar 2015b, pp. 159, 176.
- ^ Svirčić Gotovac & Zlatar 2015b, pp. 149, 176–177.
- ^ Balija, Petra (24 February 2017). "Kako je novo naselje od 53 zgrade na istoku grada u sedam godina postalo geto". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Balija, Petra (29 April 2020). "Stanare iz "crvenih" stanova preselit će u Novi Jelkovec". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Mlinar 2009, p. 162.
- ^ Šmit, Duić & Krajnik 2011, p. 413.
- ^ "Ogorčeni roditelji s Vrbana uoči sjednice Gradske skupštine: "Imamo djecu, a nemamo vrtić i školu"". Index.hr (in Croatian). 28 November 2011. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Bandić NAPOKON položio kamen temeljac za vrtić i školu u Vrbanima III: Prvi put ljudi neće morati skakati preko pruge u Horvaćanskoj". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). HINA. 27 March 2012. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Novi Vrbani u strahu od bolesti iz slavina". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). 24 August 2007. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Krnić, Ivana (28 August 2012). "EKSKLUZIVNO Prvi put istina o Aferi Vrbani III: 'Ovo je najveća eko katastrofa u povijesti'". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Bandić: 'Bolju vodu u životu nisam pio'". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). 20 September 2007. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Milan Bandić: Problem s vodom na Vrbanima bit će riješen za sedam dana". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). 22 September 2007. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Krnić, Ivana (25 July 2011). "Vrbani III: Za stotine tisuća kuna su siromašniji, a još imaju otrovnu vodu... ali zato posao s prikupljanjem plastičnih boca od vode cvjeta". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Stanari Vrbana III dobili parnicu u slučaju trovanja vode: Od građevinskih tvrtki traže 41 milijun kuna odštete". Index.hr (in Croatian). 19 July 2013. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Ivković Novokmet, Oriana (30 May 2017). "Omiljeni Bandićev građevinar imao je 50 milijuna razloga da sponzorira HDZ na lokalnim izborima". Index.hr (in Croatian). Retrieved 30 April 2021.
- ^ Litvan, Goran (25 January 2019). "Zagrebgradnja: Tko vodi grupu tešku 330 milijuna kuna nakon smrti vlasnika Branka Vojnovića". Lider.media (in Croatian). Retrieved 30 April 2021.
- ^ Pandžić, Ivan (10 July 2019). "USKOK istražuje Bandića – Steže se obruč oko zagrebačkog gradonačelnika". Nacional (in Croatian). Retrieved 30 April 2021.
- ^ Svirčić Gotovac & Šarović 2016, pp. 143–144.
- ^ a b Panić, Velibor (1 February 2010). "Ljepotica s Laništa posluje uspješno, ali svima je teret". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Marić, Jagoda (30 July 2018). "PRIČA O NACIONALNOM STADIONU Jesmo li išta naučili iz gradnje šest rukometnih arena?". Novi list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Šimatović, Mislav; Rogošić, Željko (10 November 2008). "Što s Arenama nakon prvenstva". Nacional (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Poništava se natječaj za koncesiju Arene Zagreb". Tportal.hr (in Croatian). 9 June 2009. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Kraj Arene Zagreb gradi se ogromni trgovački centar". Index.hr (in Croatian). 8 September 2008. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Majdandžić, Sanela (10 May 2010). "Muke po dvorani: U Areni slavlje, a na Laništu tugovanje". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Lechpammer, Stela (19 January 2018). "Najlakše je samo reći da su gužve za vrijeme utakmica normalne". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Brkulj, Vedran (13 January 2018). "Nije vam jasno koji su problemi s Arenom Zagreb? Tportal donosi odgovore na sve što trebate znati". Tportal.hr (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Bandić u petak plaća dugove Ingri, prvenstvo u Areni neupitno". Tportal.hr (in Croatian). 11 January 2018. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Bandić: Hvata me jeza zbog Remetinečkog rotora". Javno.hr (in Croatian). 10 April 2008. Archived from the original on 12 April 2008. Retrieved 29 September 2008.
- ^ "Uskoro riješen problem parkiranja u Zagrebu?". Dnevnik.hr (in Croatian). Nova TV. HINA. 12 September 2007. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ a b "Sjeverna tangenta: Bandićeva lebdeća prečica". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). 16 December 2006. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ a b Polšak Palatinuš, Vlatka (5 June 2013). "Ovo su zagrebački megaprojekti vrijedni milijarde eura". Tportal.hr (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Mišetić & Miletić 2007, pp. 835–836.
- ^ a b Mišetić & Miletić 2007, p. 836.
- ^ Knežević 2018, pp. 59–64.
- ^ a b Korljan, Zrinka (22 April 2016). "BANDIĆ ŽELI ISKOPATI TUNEL ISPOD TRGA FRANJE TUĐMANA Pod zemljom će se graditi i veliki šoping centar s 400 parkirališnih mjesta". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Promet u centru seli u sedam podzemnih tunela". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). 24 November 2007. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Ivković, Hana (12 February 2021). "Dugo iščekivani projekt u Zagrebu: Bagere za novu Branimirovu šalju na proljeće". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ a b Bubalo, Stjepan (21 April 2016). "10 projekata koji bi riješili gradske gužve u Zagrebu – na čekanju". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "BANDIĆ OPET NAJAVIO GRADNJU JARUNSKOG MOSTA, ZAGREPČANI SE OŠTRO PROTIVE: 'Mi bismo radije da ga ne naprave'". Danas.hr (in Croatian). 12 February 2020. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Most Bundek - imat će dvije etaže i svijetlit će noću". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). 8 May 2008. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Marjanović 2007, p. 123.
- ^ "Iduće godine slijedi rekonstrukcija rotora Remetinec". Metro-portal.hr (in Croatian). 13 October 2009. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Šest projekata koji će promijeniti lice grada: Jarunski most, Paromlin, Zagreb na Savi..." Globus (in Croatian). 17 December 2020. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "ZAGREB Otvoren puni profil Ulice kneza Branimira". Nacional (in Croatian). HINA. 22 July 2016. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Podvožnjak na Škorpikovoj u Zagrebu lani je obnovljen, a sada je ponovno poplavljen. 'Bravo Bandiću, opet plivamo'". Tportal.hr (in Croatian). 28 July 2019. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Karleuša, Radoslav (October–December 2017). ""Plivajući" podvožnjak u Škorpikovoj" ["Swimming hole" underpass in Škorpik Street]. Hrvatska vodoprivreda (in Croatian). XXV (221). Hrvatske vode. ISSN 1330-321X.
- ^ Balija, Petra (20 January 2015). "Biciklistička karta kroz Zagreb – od staza do puteljaka". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Pogledajte novu biciklističku stazu u Zagrebu: 'Ovako se nitko neće voziti, nema smisla'". Večernji list (in Croatian). 16 October 2020. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ a b "POČELA SANACIJA URUŠENOG DIJELA SAVSKOG MOSTA Bandić: 'Nemojmo sijati paniku. Danas će ovo biti zakrpano. Doma nema dok se ne napravi'". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). 8 June 2019. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Šobak, Mateja (4 January 2018). "Počinje obnova Mosta slobode: Evo koliko će trajati i koliko će koštati". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Ograđeni nogostupi na Savskom mostu: 'Korištenje na vlastitu odgovornost'". Večernji list (in Croatian). 13 June 2019. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Ježovita, Mateja (28 January 2021). "Bili smo kod Savskog mosta gdje je krenula obnova: 'Bit će zatvoren do ožujka 2022.'". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Raić, Ante (17 December 2019). "Obnovljen zagrebački Most slobode, Most mladosti idući". Croatian Radiotelevision (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Žapčić, Andreja (5 September 2020). "Metropola pred izbore: Zagreb će s dva nova mosta preskočiti Savu, a starima se napokon smiješi obnova". RTL (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Boltižar, Matija (21 October 2019). "MOST SLOBODE PRED RASPADOM Struka tražila hitno saniranje upornih zidova, kamenih obloga i lukova, a Grad ipak prvo odlučio renovirati pločnik?!". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Mjesec dana nakon obnove Most slobode izgleda potpuno devastirano". eZadar (in Croatian). 17 January 2020. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Pilko, Tepeš & Brezina 2015, pp. 410–412.
- ^ Žapčić, Andreja (22 September 2020). "Mobilnost u Zagrebu: Dan bez automobila, 20 godina bez ijednog metra nove tramvajske pruge". RTL (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Šašić, Miroslav (19 May 2013). "Feljton: Zagrebački gradonačelnici V. dio". Radio Sljeme (in Croatian). Croatian Radiotelevision. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ a b Orešković, Željka (20 November 2020). "ZET se danas pohvalio godišnjicom okretišta u Prečkom. Onim istim oko kojeg se godinama natežu s jednom obitelji". Telegram.hr (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ a b c Šobak, Mateja (1 March 2021). "Što će biti od mega projekata: Gdje su metro, tramvaj do aerodroma, jarunski most, sjeverna obilaznica...?". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "GUP-om predviđeno 7 novih trasa tramvaja". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). 14 May 2007. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Tramvaj će ići do aerodroma: Bandić najavio radove za jesen". 24 sata (in Croatian). HINA. 13 May 2017. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Mamić, Tomislav (23 November 2016). "PROJEKT STOLJEĆA Kreće gradnja tramvajske pruge od Kvatrića do Zračne luke, slijede velike izmjene u prometu, jedini problem je jedna zgrada". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Šobak, Mateja (16 September 2019). "Hoće li ovo biti prvi metri pruge od 2000.: Vukovarskom tramvajem do Trešnjevačkog trga". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Lemo, Javorka (3 April 2010). "Terminal za autobus, vlak, tramvaj i taksi s podzemnom garažom". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Bandić tvrdi da nikad nije govorio o tramvaju do zračne luke, provjerili smo govori li istinu". Tportal.hr (in Croatian). 3 June 2019. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Brumec, Dino (4 January 2018). "Zašto se san star pola stoljeća o metrou u Zagrebu još nije ostvario". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Metro za Zagreb 2030". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). 29 November 2008. Archived from the original on 20 June 2013. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Bandić već 13 godina najavljuje metro, a pogledajte kakvo su čudo Rusi napravili prije 83 godine". Index.hr (in Croatian). 4 April 2018. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Kovačević, Lana; Kožul, Dijana (22 May 2014). "Milan Bandić opet obećao izgradnju metroa za tri godine". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Branica, Ema (28 May 2020). "Bandić bi nakon potresa u Zagrebu gradio - metro: "Može koštati od 350 do 400 milijuna eura. To je samo 70 milijuna eura godišnje!"". Dnevnik.hr (in Croatian). Nova TV. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Studeni 2002". Zagreb.hr (in Croatian). City of Zagreb. 19 April 2017. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Špoljar, Marko (30 June 2010). "Holding jedva plaća i za stare, a Bandić želi kupiti još 60 novih!?". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ a b Majdandžić, Sanela (20 April 2010). "U Osijeku ne žele domaće tramvaje". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Posao vrijedan 18 milijuna eura: Končar predstavio prvi niskopodni tramvaj za Latviju". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). HINA. 9 November 2020. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Croatian-made tram criticised as "cramped and noisy"". Helsingin Sanomat. 28 March 2008. Archived from the original on 2 August 2012. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "U mjesec dana svi niskopodni tramvaji će imati rampe za osobe s invaliditetom". ZG-magazin (in Croatian). 26 April 2017. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Knežević, Senka (10 June 2007). "Žičara: Odslužila 44 godine i stala - zauvijek". Večernji list (in Croatian). Archived from the original on 13 June 2007. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Knežević, Senka (16 April 2008). "ZET će sljedećeg tjedna zatražiti lokacijsku dozvolu za izgradnju nove sljemenske žičare". Večernji list (in Croatian). Archived from the original on 20 April 2008. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Drljača, Gojko (5 December 2009). "Tajna analiza: Zagrebački holding pred bankrotom". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Mindoljević, Lana (7 October 2014). "SPEKTAKULARAN PROJEKT NA SLJEMENU Nova žičara vrijedna 342 milijuna kn povezivat će Zagreb sa Zagorjem". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Balija, Petra (27 January 2021). "'Megalomansku ljepoticu' koja stalno zapinje Bandić otvara tik pred izbore". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Rastočić, Jelena (10 February 2021). "Gdje je zapelo sa sljemenskom žičarom? Bandić je već četiri puta sam sebi postavio pa prekršio rok otvaranja. I prije nego što je počela s radom - trebala je skupe popravke". Dnevnik.hr (in Croatian). Nova TV. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ a b Vrabec, Vedran (16 March 2021). "Sljemenska žičara i dalje ne vozi. Radnike zaposlene da bi njome upravljali plaćamo 260 tisuća kuna mjesečno". Telegram.hr (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "'Zagreb je financijski na koljenima s percepcijom mirisa korupcije. Evo zašto nisam rušio Bandića'". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). HINA. 7 March 2021. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Marušić, Branka (4 December 2020). "Slučaj zgrade nove Žičare Sljeme: Jesu li povrijeđena autorska prava arhitekata zgrade u Oslu?". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Balija, Petra (23 October 2020). "Žičaru će prijaviti na EU fondove, evo kada planiraju otvaranje". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Bogić, Boris (10 December 2019). "Odobren kredit od 537 milijuna kuna za žičaru!". Radio Sljeme (in Croatian). Croatian Radiotelevision. HINA. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "'Žičara postaje simbol Bandićeve vladavine Zagrebom, znate li koliko će koštati?'". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). HINA. 3 November 2020. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Goleš, Dino (20 November 2020). "Kako su troškovi sljemenske žičare išli u nebo: "Sifon s ventilom koji je koštao 200 kuna na kraju se popeo na 40.000"". Dnevnik.hr (in Croatian). Nova TV. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Neki insajder snimio je 7-satni video o Bandićevim dubiozama sa žičarom; gdje je 100 milijuna kuna?". Telegram.hr (in Croatian). 19 November 2020. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Dević, Damir (27 November 2020). "Nova sljemenska žičara - USKOK i PNUSKOK provode izvide". Croatian Radiotelevision (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Čorkalo, Ivan (29 March 2021). "Odavno je trebala biti otvorena, no još ni jednog putnika nije prevezla na Sljeme. Glavna nadzornica radova: "Radimo na učvršćivanju statike"". Dnevnik.hr (in Croatian). Nova TV. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Knežević 2010, p. 83.
- ^ Knežević 2009, p. 11.
- ^ Knežević 2004, p. 251.
- ^ a b Knežević 2008, pp. 3–11.
- ^ "Na Kvatriću vladaju automobili i šverceri". Večernji list (in Croatian). 23 January 2002. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Stiperski 2015, p. 339.
- ^ "Na Britancu su nastavili s radovima i izgleda kako im je ovaj put uspjelo da i busevi mogu proći kroz rotor". Telegram.hr (in Croatian). 16 March 2017. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Jedan gospodin objavio je na Facebooku sliku nove fontane na Britancu; izgleda da su i s tim imali omanjih problema". Telegram.hr (in Croatian). 21 March 2017. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Trajković, Sergej (2 November 2016). "JUTARNJI DOZNAJE: USKOK ISTRAŽUJE RADOVE NA BRITANCU! Građevinska inspekcija zatvorila gradilište i do daljnjeg zabranila radove". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Trajković, Sergej (26 October 2016). "OGORČENI STANARI OBRATILI SE GRADONAČELNIKU 'Oduzeli ste nam parking, a zbog buke već noćima ne spavamo'". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Žabec, Krešimir (30 April 2021). "Spomenik Domovini vrijedan čak 35 milijuna kuna već je popucao, ali to nije jedini problem". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 30 April 2021.
- ^ Zlatar Gamberožić 2019b, p. 15.
- ^ Štulhofer & Muraj 2003, p. 41.
- ^ Brkulj, Vedran (17 November 2011). "Cijena garaže iza Mimare skočila s 250 na 310 milijuna kuna". Tportal.hr (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Petrov, D. (17 December 2002). "Javna garaža ispod HNK?". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Knežević 2018, p. 31.
- ^ Zlatar Gamberožić 2019b, p. 23.
- ^ Knežević 2018, p. 32.
- ^ Knežević 2018, pp. 33–34.
- ^ Trajković, Sergej (17 March 2017). "NAKON DEBAKLA S PREVELIKIM ROTOROM STIŽE NOVA NAJAVA ZA BRITANAC Bandić ispod trga želi sagraditi garažu, arhitekt Horvat: 'Ta je ideja posve suluda'". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Svirčić Gotovac & Zlatar 2013, pp. 401, 404.
- ^ Svirčić Gotovac & Zlatar Gamberožić 2020, p. 24.
- ^ a b Vladisavljević, Anja (4 October 2018). "Croatia Activists Denounce 'Devastating' Revamp of Popular Square". Balkan Insight. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Kasap, Daniel (28 March 2018). "'Trg žrtava fašizma bit će tri puta ljepši i dva puta više će imati magnolija'". Nacional (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Svirčić Gotovac & Zlatar Gamberožić 2020, p. 21.
- ^ a b Benačić, Ana (12 May 2018). "Pala je i Štulićeva tisa, jer gradske vlasti tvrde da su stabla previše narasla". Faktograf.hr (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Na Trgu žrtava fašizma srušena još dva stabla, navodno su bila bolesna". Večernji list (in Croatian). 14 September 2018. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Dobrić Žaja, Suzana (17 May 2018). "Nastavlja se devastacija Trga žrtava fašizma". H-Alter (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Boltižar, Matija (27 April 2018). "SJEČA U SAMOM CENTRU ZAGREBA Dok su građani spavali, djelatnici Zrinjevca su se bacili na posao, vijest se uskoro proširila i izazvala bijes". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Svirčić Gotovac & Zlatar Gamberožić 2020, pp. 21, 24.
- ^ "Bandić krenuo u košnju trave na Trgu žrtava fašizma, došlo i do naguravanja". Tportal.hr (in Croatian). 19 October 2018. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Svirčić Gotovac & Zlatar Gamberožić 2020, pp. 24–25.
- ^ "Od Meštrovića do Bandića: Vodimo vas kroz burnu i 'krvavu' povijest Trga žrtava fašizma". RTL (in Croatian). 12 October 2018. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Arežina, Bojan. "Iščupane magnolije koje je posadio Živi zid, glavnog tajnika policija unijela u auto". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Svirčić Gotovac & Zlatar Gamberožić 2020, pp. 25.
- ^ Kraševac 2018, p. 54.
- ^ Goldstein & Hutinec, pp. 105–106.
- ^ Svirčić Gotovac & Zlatar Gamberožić 2020, pp. 12–13, 16–17.
- ^ "Čak 77 posto stanovnika Savice protiv gradnje crkve u parku". N1 (in Croatian). 15 November 2016. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Boltižar, Matija (7 May 2017). "GRADONAČELNIK BANDIĆ NA PREDSTAVLJANJU SVOJE IZBORNE LISTE 'Pogriješio sam s parkom na Savici, trebali smo prvo pitati stanovnike'". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Svirčić Gotovac & Zlatar Gamberožić 2020, pp. 16–18.
- ^ Svirčić Gotovac & Zlatar Gamberožić 2020, pp. 18–19.
- ^ Balija, Petra (10 November 2020). "Ovo više nije "zelena površina", već Park Marije Ružičke Strozzi". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ a b "Pljušte reakcije: Pao zagrebački GUP, gore društvene mreže". N1 (in Croatian). 11 February 2020. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Petković, Marinko (18 November 1998). "Gradski proračun od 3.8 milijardi kuna samo za realne potrebe Zagreba". Vjesnik (in Croatian). p. 11.
- ^ "Zagreb: Prihvaćen proračun za 2021. od 13,65 mlrd. kn". Croatian Radiotelevision (in Croatian). HINA. 8 December 2020. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Bago, Mislav (4 February 2020). "Kako Milan Bandić troši gradski novac: U 20 godina potrošio je nevjerojatnih 177 milijardi kuna". Dnevnik.hr (in Croatian). Nova TV. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Bajo & Primorac 2013, p. 1.
- ^ a b "Kako će Milan Bandić platiti razvoj Zagreba". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). 3 May 2007. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ a b c d e Barilar, Suzana (4 November 2009). "Bandić: Od doseljenika s koferom do neprikosnovenog vladara Zagreba". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "I Ministarstvo uprave potvrdilo da Bandić više nije jedini član Skupštine Holdinga". Index.hr (in Croatian). 21 December 2009. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Pandžić, Ivan (23 April 2007). "Zagrebački holding tramvaje Zabi prodaje, pa ih od nje unajmljuje". Poslovni dnevnik (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Ježovita, Mateja (25 July 2020). "Stručnjak objasnio zašto su neki kvartovi pošteđeni poplave, ali i da se mogao dogoditi i gori scenarij". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Bajo & Primorac 2013, p. 5.
- ^ "Zagrebački holding izdaje 500 milijuna kuna obveznica". Lider.media (in Croatian). HINA. 20 June 2017. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Litvan, Goran (26 November 2017). "Bandić u deholdingizaciji Zagrebačkog holdinga". Lider.media (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Panić, Velibor (28 October 2012). "OTKRIVAMO Da bi vozači prodavali karte, ZET im godišnje plaća 17,4 mil. kn, a zaradi 5,8 milijuna!". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ a b c "ZET: Cijena karte skače na 25 kuna, mjesečni pokaz na 430 kuna? A sve to uz manji broj tramvaja". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). 19 November 2010. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ a b "ZET-u prijeti bankrot: Ukidaju se besplatne karte?". Index.hr (in Croatian). 12 August 2010. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ a b c Knežević, Senka (26 December 2008). "S Trga bana Jelačića dvije stanice besplatno". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Šalat, Davor (22 November 2018). "Vila na Lošinju nepravedno oduzeta ZET-u i dana Zagrebačkom holdingu?". Radio Sljeme (in Croatian). Croatian Radiotelevision. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Ježovita, Mateja (3 April 2020). "Holding prodaje ZET-ovo odmaralište vilu Mildu; radnici bijesni". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Tóth, Hajdu & Purczeld 2017, pp. 4–5.
- ^ Tóth, Hajdu & Purczeld 2017, pp. 4, 40.
- ^ Tóth, Hajdu & Purczeld 2017, pp. 32–43.
- ^ Tóth, Hajdu & Purczeld 2017, pp. 53–57.
- ^ Krasnec, Tomislav (18 October 2017). "Zagreb se tek treba dokazati u fondovima EU". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "AFERA AGRAM: Odbačeni nezakonito prikupljeni dokazi". Dnevnik.hr (in Croatian). Nova TV. 30 March 2016. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ a b Miljuš, Dušan; Petrušić, Željko (28 February 2021). "Sve istrage i postupci protiv Bandića: U kojoj su fazi i što će biti s ostalim osumnjičenicima". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Luzar, Ivan (8 February 2019). "Povjerenstvo kaznilo Bandića s 30.000 kuna jer je oko gradskih poslova angažirao Hanžekovića". Telegram.hr (in Croatian). HINA. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Kovačević, Lana (27 March 2015). "Sandra Švaljek podnijela ostavku na mjesto zamjenice gradonačelnika Zagreba". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Kovačević, Lana; Buljan, Velinka (26 March 2015). "Švaljek najavila smjenu Bandićevih pročelnika, on Zagreb dao V. Kusin". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Jakelić, Ivana (9 May 2018). "Čehok je ponovno na čelu Varaždina, a Bandić je izborio i deblokadu imovine". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Raić Knežević, Ana (2 March 2021). "Kako su Bandić i njegovi ljudi vladali Zagrebom? Ovo su samo afere za koje je USKOK skupio dokaze". Telegram.hr (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Paparella, Saša; Appelt, Hrvoje (27 February 2021). "Donosimo ulomak iz Kumeka, knjige o Milanu Bandiću: Agram, majka svih afera zbog koje je dva puta zatvaran". Telegram.hr (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "BIVŠIM BANDIĆEVIM SURADNICIMA UVJETNE KAZNE Osuđeni su zbog malverzacija sa zagrebačkim urbanističkim planovima". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). HINA. 22 February 2019. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ a b c "Milan Bandić opsovao majku zagrebačkoj gradonačelnici". Index.hr (in Croatian). 28 April 2004. Retrieved 29 September 2007.
- ^ a b Mazzocco, Vojislav (18 January 2006). "Esdepeovci zgroženi ponašanjem Bandića". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 September 2007.
- ^ "Kaznena prijava protiv Bandića, Buluma i nekih članova poglavarstva zbog oglasa "Istina je!"" (in Croatian). Croatian Radiotelevision. 10 May 2004. Archived from the original on 3 March 2016. Retrieved 30 April 2008.
- ^ "Zagreb To Get A City Centre". Javno.hr. 2 June 2007. Archived from the original on 12 June 2007. Retrieved 28 September 2008.
- ^ a b Ćimić, Ilko (28 February 2021). "O mrtvima sve najbolje? Bandić je bio lopov i primitivac koji je uništio Zagreb". Index.hr (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Panić, Velibor (25 August 2013). "REKONSTRUKCIJA ZG HOLDINGA Gradu ostaju ZET, Plinara, Vodoopskrba i odlagalište otpada. Sve ostalo ide u koncesiju!". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Kalčić 2015, pp. 22–23.
- ^ "Zagreb dobio još jedan parking u središtu grada: "Cilj Zagrebparkinga nije profit, nego da građani budu zadovoljni"". Dnevnik.hr (in Croatian). Nova TV. 5 July 2018. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Bubalo, Stjepan (12 November 2013). "Urušavanje Paromlina u veljači trebao je biti alarm da se zaštiti kompleks". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Knežević 2018, pp. 193–195.
- ^ Kožul, Dijana; Bubalo, Stjepan (27 June 2014). "Ruši se južni zid Paromlina, za deset dana odluka ruši li se cijela građevina". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Peršić, Jana (13 February 2013). "Od 1998. žele ulagati u Paromlin, no Zagreb ne želi strani kapital". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Novo parkiralište s 550 mjesta unutar kompleksa Paromlin". Zagreb.hr (in Croatian). City of Zagreb. 7 September 2011. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Oelschläger, Volker (13 October 2014). "17 Millionen Mark in den Sand gesetzt". Märkische Allgemeine Zeitung (in German). Potsdam, Germany. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Becker, Dirk (14 April 2007). "Provisorium bleibt Provisorium". Potsdamer Neueste Nachrichten (in German). Potsdam, Germany. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Šobak, Mateja (9 May 2019). "Limeno kazalište kupili da bi 10 godina propadalo". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Peršić, Jana (4 February 2014). "Pljuska kulturi: iz Limenka pokrali sve što vrijedi, kazalište od 10 milijuna propada, a svi šute". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Idealno za kazalište". Večernji list (in Croatian). 14 May 2008. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Kovačević, Lana (10 November 2014). "'Drek river' uskoro samo povijest – napokon stiže kanalizacija". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Radnička cesta od danas u punom profilu". ZG-magazin (in Croatian). 31 October 2018. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Radnička cesta". Zagreb.hr (in Croatian). City of Zagreb. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "VIDEO: 'Spalit ću se na Jakuševcu ako ga za 4 godine ne saniram'". Večernji list (in Croatian). 24 August 2012. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Borić, Tamara (1 October 2019). "EKSKLUZIVNO Bandić je lagao i ugrozio zdravlje građana Zagreba nakon požara u Jakuševcu". Nacional (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Klarić, Jasmin (25 July 2019). "Jakuševec je samo jedno veliko finale ljeta prepunog debakala Milana Bandića. Koliko ih može podnijeti?". Telegram.hr (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Lauš, Krešimir (22 August 2012). "Pogledajte sukob Bandića i Zagrepčana na Jakuševcu". Tportal.hr (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Špoljar, Marko (24 August 2012). "Bandić pobjegao kad su došli inspektori. Pročitajte zapisnik!". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Na Jakuševcu se više neće uzgajati svinje, dio stočara ne želi preseliti". Index.hr (in Croatian). 8 February 2021. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Ugovori o naknadi za umanjenu kakvoću življenja". Croatian Radiotelevision (in Croatian). 29 March 2021. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Policija: Požar u pogonu C.I.O.S. grupe namjerno je izazvan". Večernji list (in Croatian). HINA. 11 June 2018. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Požar u CIOS-u pod kontrolom, vatrogasci na terenu". Večernji list (in Croatian). 13 August 2020. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Opet gorjelo u CIOS-u: "Nema opasnosti za ljude i okoliš"". Dnevnik.hr (in Croatian). Nova TV. 3 September 2019. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Turčin, Kristina (23 April 2018). "KAKO JE BIVŠI DJ UVJERIO BANDIĆA DA IMA GENIJALNI IZUM Od Grada bi trebao dobiti 1,2 milijuna eura plus PDV, od svakog vozača 150 kuna..." Jutarnji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Šobak, Mateja (16 April 2019). "Propast projekta čudesnog stroja za čišćenje motora". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Luzar, Ivan (25 April 2018). "Siroti gradonačelnik Bandić. Ni profesori FSB-a ne podržavaju genijalnu ideju nameta za čišćenje auta čudesnim strojem". Telegram.hr (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Marjanović 2007.
- ^ Stanić, Slavuj & Sakaja 2009, p. 102.
- ^ Stanić, Slavuj & Sakaja 2009, p. 104.
- ^ AFP (10 February 2008). "Thousands of Croatians rally against Tito Square". B92. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Bandić: Predlažem da Trg maršala Tita postane Trg Republike Hrvatske". Večernji list (in Croatian). HINA. 26 June 2017. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ a b "MILAN BANDIĆ IPAK IMA VEĆINU Mikulić izabran za predsjednika zagrebačke Gradske skupštine! Esih: 'S naše strane nema ucjena'". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). 10 July 2017. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ a b Stanić, Slavuj & Sakaja 2009, p. 110.
- ^ Stanić, Slavuj & Sakaja 2009, pp. 108–111.
- ^ Jajčinović, Milan (15 December 2006). "Milan Bandić - Zagrebački kralj Mida". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ a b "Tuđmanov trg u Zagrebu". Deutsche Welle (in Croatian). 14 December 2006. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Božić, Nataša (28 October 2015). "Franjo Tuđman ujedinio Bandića, HDZ i SDP: ime prvog hrvatskog predsjednika uskoro na aerodromu". RTL (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Quien 2015, p. 27.
- ^ "Spomenik domovini gradit će i tvrtka Bandićeva kuma?". N1 (in Croatian). 13 August 2019. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Korljan, Zrinka (18 December 2012). "'Bandićeve su fontane neprimjerene prostoru... Služe jedino kao spomenik njegovoj političkoj ambiciji'". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ a b Hrgović, Maja (5 January 2013). "Kako spojiti Boškovića i Teslu nakon što ih je Bandić razdvojio 2006. godine?". Novi list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Skala, Petković & Martinis 2013, pp. 12–13.
- ^ "Otkriven spomenik Nikoli Tesli u Zagrebu". Vlada.gov.hr (in Croatian). Government of the Republic of Croatia. HINA. 7 July 2006. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Svirčić Gotovac & Zlatar Gamberožić 2020, p. 20.
- ^ Stilin, Forrest (2 February 2020). "Zagreb Mayor Milan Bandic Protest 'Enough' Draws 20,000: Stops Traffic". Total Croatia News. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Prosvjed protiv Bandića u centru Zagreba, ljudi skandirali "zatvor"". Index.hr (in Croatian). 21 December 2019. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Duhaček, Gordan (6 January 2020). "Što Kolindin poraz znači za USKOK-ova optuženika Bandića?". Index.hr (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Nezirović, Vanja (7 February 2020). "BRIŠU 500.000 ZELENIH KVADRATA! Analizirali smo 80-ak amandmana koje su Bandićeva stranka i HDZ uputili Gradskoj skupštini". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Stamać, Maruša (24 June 2019). "Stručnjaci šokirani planovima za zagrebački Manhattan: "Nepoznatom investitoru dajemo da radi što hoće"". Dnevnik.hr (in Croatian). Nova TV. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Bradarić, Branimir (29 August 2019). "Zagrebački Manhattan – ogledalo megalomanskog Beograda na vodi?". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Novi prosvjed protiv gradonačelnika Bandića". N1 (in Croatian). HINA. 17 January 2020. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Milan Bandić nakon poraza Kolinde Grabar Kitarović žestoko napao HDZ". Radiosarajevo.ba (in Croatian). 7 January 2020. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ ""Predsjednica ima sreću da su njeni protukandidati jednako loši kao i ona"". N1 (in Croatian). 15 November 2019. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ a b "BANDIĆ 'Ja sam kriv i za Kolindin poraz. Drag mi je Platon, ali istina mi je još draža' RASPUDIĆ 'Nikada im nisam spominjao ni žene ni djecu'" (in Croatian). 25 May 2020. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "U petak novi prosvjed protiv Bandića na prozorima i balkonima". Nacional (in Croatian). 14 April 2020. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "VIDEO Novi prosvjed protiv Bandića, ljudi lupali loncima, trubili, fućkali". Index.hr (in Croatian). 17 April 2020. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Bsuby, Mattha; Belam, Martin; Marsh, Sarah; Rourke, Alison; Rawlinson, Kevin; Farrer, Martin (25 February 2020). "Europe on alert as four more Covid-19 deaths reported in Italy – as it happened". The Guardian. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Bandić na primjedbe da u školama nema sapuna savjetovao da se ruke peru - lugom". Večernji list (in Croatian). HINA. 2 March 2020. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Dimitrijević, Andrej (16 April 2020). "Ovako je u potresu stradalo pročelje Centra Cvjetni gdje je Horvatinčić prodavao kvadrat stana za 7000 eura". Telegram.hr (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Car, Maja (23 March 2020). "Nastradali gotovo svi zagrebački muzeji i galerije, MSU poplavio". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Nezirović, Vanja (2 April 2020). "POTRES RAZOTKRIO KATASTROFALAN PROPUST U NOVOGRADNJI 'Sina mi još uvijek proganja taj prizor, nije mogao pobjeći iz stana jer je stubište - nestalo!'". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Bičak, Darko (26 March 2020). "Potres razotkrio svu nebrigu za zgrade bolnica i institucija vlasti". Poslovni dnevnik (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Izravne štete od potresa na Baniji i u Zagrebu veće od 120 milijardi kuna". Novi list (in Croatian). HINA. 13 March 2021. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Ljudi, sve će biti OK. Bandić je upravo sam sebe imenovao šefom Stožera civilne zaštite". Telegram.hr (in Croatian). 5 April 2020. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ a b Grund, Zdravka (30 March 2020). "Bandić: 'Građani su krivi, prije potresa su zapustili svoju imovinu'. A tko je kriv za gradske škole?". Telegram.hr (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Pavić, Filip (1 April 2020). "KOLIKO JE BANDIĆ ULAGAO U ZGRADE KOJE SU SADA NEUSELJIVE Nakon što je optužio građane da nisu održavali nekretnine, provjerili smo njegov rezultat". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Galić, Gabrijela (26 March 2020). "Obnova pročelja umanjuje štetu od potresa, ali nije ključna za statiku zgrade". Faktograf.hr (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "BANDIĆ O POTRESU 'Da je bilo razumijevanja za jedan moj prijedlog, ne bismo imali ni 5 posto štete. To vam govori čovjek koji je i žbukao i armirao'". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). 25 March 2020. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Šobak, Mateja (11 April 2020). "Fond za nepogode potrošili na "prigodne manifestacije"". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "TOMISLAV TOMAŠEVIĆ 'Večeras lupamo loncima protiv Bandića ne samo da shvati da je gotov, već da to prihvati i HDZ'". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). HINA. 17 April 2020. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Uhlir: "Moramo biti potpuno jasni i otvoreni, Grad Zagreb ne želi obnavljati grad"". Dnevnik.hr (in Croatian). Nova TV. 1 April 2020. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Bandić kaže da želi pomoći građanima u sanaciji šteta od potresa, ali ima uvjete: "Zagreb nije Gunja!"". Dnevnik.hr (in Croatian). Nova TV. 2 April 2020. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Bandić o obnovi potresom oštećenog središta Zagreba: "Kroz maraton od pet, šest godina gradnje, bit će ljepši nego što je bio"". Dnevnik.hr (in Croatian). Nova TV. 28 March 2020. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Bandić poručio: 'Dobit ćemo obje utakmice - i koronu i potres. Samo onaj na nebu je nepogrešiv'". RTL (in Croatian). 20 April 2020. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Zašto još nije počela obnova Zagreba?". Al Jazeera Balkans (in Bosnian). 24 March 2021. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Godinu dana nakon potresa ministar graditeljstva dao hrabro obećanje: "Organizirana obnova u Zagrebu počinje u lipnju"". Novi list. 21 March 2021. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Skledar, Vjekoslav; Lendler, Sandro (22 March 2021). "Telegramova galerija ostavljenog grada: Prošle godine snimili smo 40 zgrada stradalih u potresu. Evo kako izgledaju danas". Telegram.hr (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Pavle Kalinić: "Mnogi žive u zgradama koje imaju crvenu ili žutu naljepnicu, nemaju kamo"". Nacional (in Croatian). 29 December 2020. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Vesić, Vanja (22 February 2021). "OBNOVA KAO OBMANA Jedanaest mjeseci od potresa u Zagrebu građani i dalje u – birokratskom labirintu". Novi list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Borovac, Marina (16 April 2020). "Da, zbog potresa i straha iz centra Zagreba iselilo se 20 tisuća ljudi". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Population by Age and Sex, by Districts of City of Zagreb, 2011 Census". Census of Population, Households and Dwellings 2011. Zagreb: Croatian Bureau of Statistics. December 2012.
- ^ "Roditelji su uspjeli: Zagreb je konačno počeo postavljati željezne prolaze za sigurniji put djece do škole". Telegram.hr (in Croatian). 17 January 2021. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Vrabec, Vedran (14 January 2021). "Ovo su ludosti na koje Bandić troši milijune od 22. ožujka, a nemaju veze s obnovom skršenog grada". Telegram.hr (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Mazzocco, Vojislav (4 January 2021). "Index Istrage: Bandić uzeo 3.35 milijuna kuna školama i dao za Snježnu kraljicu". Index.hr (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Vrabec, Vedran (3 February 2021). "Bandić smislio genijalan način kako da sredi Zagreb prije izbora: farba oštećenja u boju cigle". Telegram.hr (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Vrabec, Vedran (7 August 2020). "Kako su potop i ona ukleta brana u Trnju razotkrili kaos koji vlada između Hrvatskih voda i Vodoopskrbe Zagreb". Telegram.hr (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Bandić: U Zagrebu 20 puta manja šteta nego u ožujku". N1 (in Croatian). HINA. 29 December 2020. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Bandić obišao Banovinu: 'Najteže stradalima Zagreb će obnoviti kuće ili će im pomoći financijski'". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). HINA. 9 January 2021. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Grad Zagreb osnovnim školama u Petrinji darovao udžbenike". Zagreb.hr (in Croatian). City of Zagreb. 1 September 2018. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ a b Duhaček, Gordan (17 February 2020). "Bandićevi žetončići, priča o mizeriji hrvatske politike". Index.hr (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Juričan dobio pravnu bitku: Na izbore smije pod imenom - Milan Bandić!". Novi list (in Croatian). 29 November 2019. Archived from the original on 29 November 2019. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Izbori za predsjednika Republike Hrvatske (22.12.2019.)". Izbori.hr (in Croatian). Government of the Republic of Croatia. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "'Kumek' premijerno prikazan na RTL-u, Dario Juričan za RTL.hr piše o tome kako radi i što bi mu mogao biti idući projekt". RTL (in Croatian). 18 December 2020. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ a b Vrabec, Vedran (28 March 2019). "Sad je i fakultet na kojem je Bandić diplomirao donio odluku protiv njegovog počasnog doktorata". Telegram.hr (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Rendulić 1976.
- ^ Cvrtila 2007.
- ^ Bandić, Milan. Biografija Archived 24 April 2008 at the Wayback Machine. Bandić's official web site. Retrieved 30 October 2011 (in Croatian)
- ^ Radoš, Ivica (6 January 2010). "Josipović i Bandić: Partijska knjižica za uspon do vlasti". Večernji list (in Croatian). Archived from the original on 21 April 2021. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Nezirović, Vanja (3 February 2020). "JUTARNJI U POSJEDU UGOVORA O KUPOPRODAJI STANA VESNE BANDIĆ Bivši šef Adris grupe Vlahović od Bandićeve supruge kupio je stan u kući za 150.000 eura". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). Archived from the original on 21 April 2021. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Orešković, Željka (15 February 2020). "Svi pričaju o 'vili bez prozora' koju u centru Zagreba gradi Ante Vlahović. Za Telegram je komentiraju stručnjaci". Telegram.hr (in Croatian). Archived from the original on 3 February 2021. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Jakelić, Ivana (28 February 2015). "Žalba obznanila: Bandići u Zagrebu imaju četiri stana!". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Petrušić, Željko (3 March 2020). "NOVI DETALJI O STANU KOJI JE NEDAVNO JEFTINO KUPILA BANDIĆEVA SUPRUGA Šelendić 2015. Uskoku priznao da ga je dao gradonačelnikovoj kćeri na korištenje". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "NOVA OTKRIĆA O STANU KOJEG JE OD POZNATOG PODUZETNIKA KUPILA BANDIĆEVA SUPRUGA: U njemu već 15 godina besplatno živi gradonačelnikova kćer". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). 29 February 2020. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Stilin, Forrest (1 February 2020). "Zagreb Mayor Milan Bandic Divorced Wife To Acquire Cheap Apartment". Total Croatia News. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Vukadin, Romana (22 March 2007). "Bandićev Bil ide na kemoterapiju?". 24 sata (in Croatian). Retrieved 3 August 2008.
- ^ "Bandiću u dom stiže retriver Rudi" [Retriever Rudi arrives in Bandić home]. Nacional (in Croatian) (664). 4 August 2008. Archived from the original on 1 July 2012. Retrieved 6 August 2008.
- ^ Božić, Nataša (28 January 2006). "Račan vs. Bandić: Račan treba Bandića da bi opet bio premijer". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Ciglenečki, Dražen (27 July 2020). "Tko će nakon Mikija voditi Zagreb? Mladi danas ni ne znaju kako to izgleda kad gradom ne upravlja aparatčik s Peščenice". Novi list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ a b c Goldstein & Hutinec, p. 316.
- ^ "SDP Says it Will Remember Bandić for His Talent for Populism". Total Croatia News. HINA. 28 February 2021. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ a b Goldstein & Hutinec, pp. 316–317.
- ^ "Umirovljenici kojima pomaže grad Zagreb dobit će uskrsnicu od 100 kuna". Index.hr (in Croatian). 9 March 2016. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Kako se riješiti policajca koji radi svoj posao?". Index.hr (in Croatian). 17 June 2008. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Otpušteni policajac Mišić sumnja u pozitivan rezultat novog disciplinskog postupka". Index.hr (in Croatian). 29 March 2003. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Veljača 2002". Zagreb.hr (in Croatian). City of Zagreb. 19 April 2017. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Travanj 2002". Zagreb.hr (in Croatian). City of Zagreb. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Horvat, Vedran (1 March 2002). "Vlasta Pavić nova zagrebačka gradonačelnica". Vjesnik (in Croatian). Archived from the original on 12 July 2002. Retrieved 17 March 2008.
- ^ Pleše, Mladen (15 May 2002). "Račan potiče Vlastu Pavić da vlada bez Bandića" [Račan urges Vlasta Pavić to govern without Bandić]. Nacional (in Croatian). Archived from the original on 30 June 2012. Retrieved 30 June 2012.
- ^ Babić, Jelena (27 May 2003). "Bandić s desničarima ruši Vlastu Pavić" [Bandić and right-wingers brings down Vlasta Pavić]. Nacional (in Croatian) (393). Archived from the original on 30 June 2012. Retrieved 7 June 2015.
- ^ Berislav Jelinić (4 May 2004). "Račan ustuknuo pred Bandićevim divljaštvom" [Račan taken aback by Bandić's savage remark]. Nacional (in Croatian). Archived from the original on 1 July 2012. Retrieved 1 July 2012.
- ^ "Milan Bandić opsovao majku zagrebačkoj gradonačelnici". Vijesti.net (in Croatian). 28 April 2004. Retrieved 10 July 2008.
- ^ Jelinić, Berislav (24 February 2004). "Vlasta Pavić u zamjenu za primirje ustupa mjesto Bandiću" [Vlasta Pavić steps down for Bandić in exchange for a truce]. Nacional (in Croatian). Archived from the original on 30 June 2012. Retrieved 30 June 2012.
- ^ "Bandić očito nije blesav - tko jest?". Večernji list. 5 August 2005. Retrieved 28 February 2021.
- ^ a b "Bandić javno prijetio novinaru". Bolji život (in Croatian). 17 January 2006. Archived from the original on 28 September 2007. Retrieved 11 September 2007.
- ^ Bajruši, Robert (21 May 2007). "Obračun Bandića i Milanovića odlučuje o šefu SDP-a" [Conflict of Bandić and Milanović to decide leader of the SDP]. Nacional (in Croatian) (601). Archived from the original on 30 June 2012. Retrieved 4 August 2008.
- ^ Bajruši, Robert (6 June 2012). "Milanović widens his base". Nacional (603). Archived from the original on 25 July 2012. Retrieved 30 September 2007.
- ^ Bajruši, Robert (12 December 2007). "Revolt against Milanović". Nacional (630). Archived from the original on 25 July 2012. Retrieved 28 July 2008.
- ^ Karlović-Sabotić, Marina (12 June 2008). "Milanović krenuo u obračun s Bandićem". Slobodna Dalmacija (in Croatian). Retrieved 28 July 2008.
- ^ "Milanović: Glasovat ću za Bandića, on je najbolji". Jutarnji list. 20 April 2009. Retrieved 28 February 2021.
- ^ "Pismo poznatih: protiv Bandića, a Milanović izdao socijaldemokraciju". Slobodna Dalmacija. 8 July 2008. Retrieved 28 February 2021.
- ^ Bajruši, Robert; Gaura, Orhidea (14 July 2008). "Pismo koje je učvrstilo Bandića" [A letter that strengthened Bandić]. Nacional (in Croatian) (661). Archived from the original on 30 June 2012. Retrieved 2 August 2008.
- ^ RTS, Radio televizija Srbije, Radio Television of Serbia. "Bandić za predsednika: Radiću kao konj!". rts.rs. Retrieved 28 February 2021.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ "Bandić više nije član SDP-a, šef stranke u Zagrebu je Jelušić". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). 5 November 2009. Retrieved 28 February 2021.
- ^ RTS, Radio televizija Srbije, Radio Television of Serbia. "Josipović i Bandić u drugom krugu". rts.rs. Retrieved 28 February 2021.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ "Ivo Josipović novi predsednik Hrvatske". Politika. Belgrade, Serbia. Retrieved 28 February 2021.
- ^ "Detaljna analiza kraha - Kako je Milan Bandić izgubio povjerenje Zagreba". Zagrebancija.com (in Croatian). 30 December 2009. Archived from the original on 20 January 2010. Retrieved 16 January 2010.
- ^ "Donja Dubrava i Brezovica jedine Bandićeve četvrti - Josipović potukao Bandića u gotovo svim zagrebačkim četvrtima". Večernji list (in Croatian). 10 January 2010. Retrieved 16 January 2010.
- ^ "Sve prijave protiv Milana Bandića završile u ladicama". eZadar (in Croatian). 19 November 2008. Retrieved 8 May 2021.
- ^ Ciglenečki, Dražen (29 December 2015). "Gradonačelnik u novoj političkoj mladosti: Bandić je, a ne Most, doveo HDZ na vlast". Novi list (in Croatian). Archived from the original on 8 November 2020. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Mrak Taritaš: Bandićevi 'žetončići' zapravo pripadaju Plenkoviću". Večernji list (in Croatian). HINA. 12 February 2020. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Klarić, Jasmin (20 April 2021). "Nacional tvrdi da je Pavičić Vukičević dopustila namještanje natječaja za Bandićeve prijatelje". Telegram.hr (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Toma, Ivanka (8 September 2018). "Uđite u saborski klub zagrebačkog gradonačelnika i dobit ćete bogate donacije". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Špoljar, Marko (27 October 2014). "Milan Penava – od kumstva s Bandićem do unosnih poslova za Grad Zagreb". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 2 May 2021.
- ^ a b Šobak, Mateja (11 October 2017). "Evo kako gradska uprava mulja". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 2 May 2021.
- ^ Kukec, Tomislav (28 February 2012). "FUŠERAJ NA CVJETNOM 'Treći put prekopavaju, nove ploče pucaju kad ih malo jače pogledaš!'". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 2 May 2021.
- ^ "IMAMO SNIMKU NA KOJOJ BANDIĆ URLA NA SURADNIKA 'Vido, Vido pa tko je trebao znati? Za to što radite posao preko k***a, boli vas k***c!'". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). HINA. 15 April 2019. Retrieved 2 May 2021.
- ^ "AKTUALNI SAT U SKUPŠTINI, BANDIĆ ODGOVARAO I NA PITANJE O SPORNOJ SNIMCI 'Vi mene u stvari volite, vi ste se zaljubili u mene, želite živjeti sa mnom'". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). 18 April 2019. Retrieved 2 May 2021.
- ^ Nezirović, Vanja (21 December 2020). "I šogorica Natalije Price radi kod Bandića, a brat joj je u Saboru umjesto Rajka Ostojića". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 2 May 2021.
- ^ a b Milković, Ante (23 June 2008). "Nova pročelnica zaposlila obitelj u gradskoj upravi". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 30 April 2021.
- ^ "Bitka za Zagreb: Kako je Ostojić Bandiću spasio život". Večernji list (in Croatian). 28 December 2012. Retrieved 3 March 2015.
- ^ a b c Jureško, Goranka (28 February 2021). "Zdravstveni problemi Milana Bandića: moždani udar, plućna embolija, brojne operacije..." Jutarnji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Mazzocco, Vojislav (17 June 2020). "Bandić teturao, liječnik objasnio: To je primjer akutno opijene osobe". Index.hr (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Bandić jutros na pregledu u KBC-u Zagreb, sada je dobro". Croatian Radiotelevision (in Croatian). HINA. 19 June 2020. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Bandić završio na operaciji glasnica, oporavlja se na kućnoj njezi". Nacional (in Croatian). 11 August 2020. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Long-time mayor of Croatian capital of Zagreb dies at 65". Associated Press. 28 February 2021. Retrieved 28 February 2021.
- ^ "Posljednje počivalište najdugovječnijeg gradonačelnika: Ovdje je pokopan Milan Bandić". dnevnik.hr (in Croatian). 3 March 2021.
- ^ "Funeral held for Zagreb Mayor Milan Bandic". N1 televizija. 3 March 2021. Retrieved 3 March 2021.
- ^ "Funeral held for Mayor Milan Bandić". Croatian Radio Television. 3 March 2021. Retrieved 3 March 2021.
- ^ "Patrijarh Porfirije je u samoizolaciji: "Sam se povukao, ne želi nikoga dovesti u opasnost"". dnevnik.hr (in Croatian). 3 March 2021. Retrieved 3 March 2021.
- ^ "Na sprovodima je dozvoljeno 25 ljudi. Pogledajte Bandićev sprovod". index.hr (in Croatian). 3 March 2021.
- ^ "DORH započeo izvide o okolnostima smrti Milana Bandića". Večernji list (in Croatian). 22 March 2021. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "BRAĆA HRVATSKOG ZMAJA: Zazmajenjem je Milan Bandić 2007. dobio ime Zmaj od Kamenitih vrata". Nacional (in Croatian). 29 January 2021. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ A. B. (10 July 2009). "Povelja opštine: Milan Bandić počasni građanin Srebrenice" (in Bosnian). BiH Vijesti. Archived from the original on 14 September 2011. Retrieved 16 November 2011.
- ^ "Putin odlikovao Milana Bandića Ordenom prijateljstva". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 November 2018.
- ^ Polšak Palatinuš, Vlatka (27 November 2018). "Boras časti: Bandić će dobiti počasni doktorat Sveučilišta u Zagrebu?". Tportal.hr (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ Šobak, Mateja (20 March 2019). "Pet razloga zbog kojih Bandiću daju doktorat". Večernji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "'Bandić ne dijeli niti jednu od osnovnih normi koje bi sveučilište trebalo promovirati'". Večernji list (in Croatian). HINA. 19 March 2019. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Sveučilišno "šibanje" osebujnog "doktora" Bandića". TRIS (in Croatian). Šibenik, Croatia. 23 March 2019. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
References
- Bajo, Anto; Primorac, Marko (2013). "Vrijeme za restrukturiranje Zagrebačkog holdinga". Newsletter : povremeno glasilo Instituta za javne finacije (in Croatian). 15 (73): 1–11. doi:10.3326/nlh.2013.73. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- Bobovec, Borka; Mlinar, Ivan; Pozojević, Andriana (31 December 2016). "Housing Construction Programs in Croatia between 1991 and 2016". Prostor : znanstveni časopis za arhitekturu i urbanizam (in Croatian). 24 (2(52)): 216–227. doi:10.31522/p.24.2(52).6. ISSN 1330-0652.
- Carmon, Naomi (1 May 1999). "Three generations of urban renewal policies: analysis and policy implications". Geoforum. 30 (2): 145–158. doi:10.1016/S0016-7185(99)00012-3. ISSN 0016-7185.
- Cvrtila, Vlatko (2007). "Studij obrane i zaštite na Fakultetu političkih znanosti". In Kasapović, Mirjana (ed.). Izlazak iz množine? (in Croatian). Faculty of Political Science, University of Zagreb. pp. 137–154.
- Čaldarović, Ognjen; Šarinić, Jana (2008). "First signs of gentrification? Urban regeneration in the transitional society: the case of Croatia". Sociologija i prostor : časopis za istraživanje prostornoga i sociokulturnog razvoja. 46 (3/4 (181/182)): 369–381. ISSN 1846-5226.
- Franić, Tin Sven; Korlaet, Luka; Vranić, Dubravka (15 December 2005). "Contribution to Analysis of Housing Policies and Planned Housing Construction in the Netherlands and Croatia". Prostor : znanstveni časopis za arhitekturu i urbanizam (in Croatian). 13 (2(30)): 195–204. ISSN 1330-0652.
- Galović, Krešimir (21 December 2006). "Zagreb d.o.o." Vijenac (in Croatian). Vol. XIV, no. 333. Zagreb: Matica hrvatska.
- Gašparović, Sanja; Sopina, Ana (30 June 2018). "The Role of Landscape in Planning the City of Zagreb from the Early 20th to the Early 21st Century". Prostor : znanstveni časopis za arhitekturu i urbanizam (in Croatian). 26 (1 (55)): 132–145. doi:10.31522/p.26.1(55).10. ISSN 1330-0652.
- Gašparović, Mateo; Zrinjski, Mladen; Veselski, Antonija (2018). "Analiza urbanizacije grada Zagreba". Zbornik radova - 11. simpozij ovlaštenih inženjera geodezije. Croatian Chamber of Authorised Geodesist Engineers: 121–126.
- Goldstein, Ivo; Hutinec, Goran (2013). Goldstein, Slavko (ed.). Povijest grada Zagreba (in Croatian). Vol. 2. Zagreb: Novi Liber. ISBN 978-953-325-021-2.
- Hrženjak, Juraj (5 April 2011). "Organisation And Functioning Of Sub-Municipal Self-Government In The City Of Zagreb". Hrvatska i komparativna javna uprava : časopis za teoriju i praksu javne uprave (in Croatian). 11 (1): 43–69. ISSN 1848-0357.
- Jakovčić, Martina (1 June 2006). "Business Functions and Problem of Closure of Commercial Premises in Ilica Street in Zagreb". Hrvatski geografski glasnik. 68 (1): 27–50. doi:10.21861/HGG.2006.68.01.02.
- Jukić, Tihomir; Mlinar, Ivan; Smokvina, Marina (2011). Zagreb - Stanovanje u gradu i stambena naselja (in Croatian). Zagreb: Faculty of Architecture, University of Zagreb. ISBN 978-953-622981-9.
- Kalčić, Silva (13 March 2015). "Snješka Knežević: Između neosvojenih perspektiva i urušenih vrijednosti". Zarez (in Croatian). Vol. XV, no. 404. Zagreb: Druga strana.
- Knežević, Snješka (1 December 2004). "Nadbiskupski / Langov trg: mijene i poništenje". Radovi Instituta za povijest umjetnosti (in Croatian) (28): 250–269. ISSN 0350-3437.
- Knežević, Snješka (2008). "Scena u očekivanju protagonista". Oris - časopis za arhitekturu i kulturu življenja (in Croatian) (53). Zagreb: 2–11. ISSN 1331-7571.
- Knežević, Snješka (15 June 2009). "Teturanja oko urbanističke baštine". Kvartal : kronika povijesti umjetnosti u Hrvatskoj (in Croatian). VI (1–2): 8–14.
- Knežević, Snješka (15 December 2010). "Gornji i Donji grad u Zagrebu 21. stoljeća. O problemima revitalizacije zagrebačke povijesne jezgre". Kvartal : kronika povijesti umjetnosti u Hrvatskoj (in Croatian). VII (3–4): 81–85. ISSN 1334-8671.
- Knežević, Snješka (2018). Zagreb u škarama. Zagreb: UPI-2M plus. ISBN 9789537703516.
- Kraševac, Irena (15 December 2018). "Meštrović mijenja Zagreb". Kvartal : kronika povijesti umjetnosti u Hrvatskoj (in Croatian). XV (1–4): 50–54. ISSN 1334-8671.
- Marjanović, Bojan (16 February 2007). "Change of Government, Change of Streets". Diskrepancija : studentski časopis za društveno-humanističke teme (in Croatian). 8 (12): 105–127. ISSN 1332-3415.
- Mattioni, Vladimir (2003). Zagreb se mijenja (in Croatian). Zagreb: UPI-2M. ISBN 953-96480-8-4.
- Mišetić, Anka; Miletić, Geran-Marko (31 October 2007). "Socijalni aspekti planiranja gradskog prometa: stavovi javnosti o razvojnim posljedicama gradnje tunela i metroa u Zagrebu". Društvena istraživanja : časopis za opća društvena pitanja (in Croatian). 16 (4-5 (90-91)): 831–850. ISSN 1330-0288.
- Mišetić, Anka; Ursić, Sara (7 July 2010). ""The Right to the City": An Example of a Struggle to Preserve Urban Identity in Zagreb". Sociologija i prostor : časopis za istraživanje prostornoga i sociokulturnog razvoja. 48 (1 (186)): 3–18. ISSN 1846-5226.
- Mlinar, Ivan (15 June 2009). "Zagrebačka stambena naselja nakon 2000. godine". Prostor : znanstveni časopis za arhitekturu i urbanizam (in Croatian). 17 (1(37)): 158–169. ISSN 1330-0652.
- Pilko, Hrvoje; Tepeš, Krunoslav; Brezina, Tadej (28 October 2015). "Policy and Programs for Cycling in the City of Zagreb – A Critical Review". Promet - Traffic&Transportation. 27 (5): 405–414. doi:10.7307/ptt.v27i5.1694. ISSN 0353-5320.
- Quien, Enes (13 March 2015). "Polarizirajuće interpretacije". Zarez (in Croatian). Vol. XV, no. 404. Zagreb: Druga strana.
- Rendulić, Nedeljko (1 March 1976). "Osnivanje studija Općenarodne obrane na Fakultetu političkih nauka". Croatian Political Science Review (in Croatian). 13 (1): 115–119. ISSN 0032-3241. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- Skala, Karolj; Petković, Tomislav; Martinis, Mladen (31 March 2013). "From Bošković's fundamental theory in natural philosophy to generic technical innovations of Tesla". Periodicum biologorum. 115 (1): 9–14. ISSN 0031-5362.
- Slavuj, Lana; Cvitanović, Marin; Prelogović, Vedran (2009). "Emergence of problem areas in the urban structure of post-socialist Zagreb". Spatium (21): 76–83. doi:10.2298/SPAT0921076S. ISSN 1450-569X.
- Stanić, Jelena; Šakaja, Laura; Slavuj, Lana (30 June 2009). "Renaming Zagreb Streets and Squares". Migracijske i etničke teme (in Croatian). 25 (1–2): 89–124. ISSN 1333-2546. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- Stanilov, Kiril, ed. (2007). The Post-Socialist City: Urban Form and Space Transformations in Central and Eastern Europe after Socialism. Springer Netherlands. ISBN 978-1-4020-6052-6.
- Stiperski, Zoran (28 December 2015). "Perception of Pleasurable and Unpleasurable Places in Zagreb City; Survey Research". Prostor : znanstveni časopis za arhitekturu i urbanizam (in Croatian). 23 (2 (50)): 332–343. ISSN 1330-0652.
- Svirčić Gotovac, Anđelina (2 December 2010). "Aktualni revitalizacijski i gentrifikacijski procesi na primjeru Zagreba". Sociologija i prostor : časopis za istraživanje prostornoga i sociokulturnog razvoja (in Croatian). 48 (2 (187)): 197–221. ISSN 1846-5226.
- Svirčić Gotovac, Anđelina; Šarović, Rade, eds. (2016). Tranzicijska preobrazba glavnih gradova, Zagreba i Podgorice, kao sustava naselja: bilateralni projekt između Hrvatske i Crne Gore. Institute for Social Research in Zagreb. ISBN 9789536218721.
- Svirčić Gotovac, Anđelina; Zlatar, Jelena (5 June 2008). "Actors of the Flower Square reconstruction in Zagreb". Sociologija i prostor : časopis za istraživanje prostornoga i sociokulturnog razvoja (in Croatian). 46 (1 (179)): 53–76. ISSN 1846-5226.
- Svirčić Gotovac, Anđelina; Zlatar, Jelena, eds. (2012). Akteri društvenih promjena u prostoru; Transformacija prostora i kvalitete života u Hrvatskoj (in Croatian). Zagreb: Institut za društvena istraživanja u Zagrebu. ISBN 978-953-6218-48-6.
- Svirčić Gotovac, Anđelina; Zlatar, Jelena (2013). "Housing Quality and Lost (Public) Space in Croatia". RealCorp 2013: Planning Times. Rome, Italy: 399–405.
- Svirčić Gotovac, Anđelina; Zlatar, Jelena (29 July 2015a). "Urban Processes in Zagreb. Residential and Commercial Developments". Hrvatski geografski glasnik. 77 (1): 29–45. doi:10.21861/HGG.2015.77.01.02. ISSN 1331-5854.
- Svirčić Gotovac, Anđelina; Zlatar, Jelena (2015b). The Quality of Living in New Housing Estates in the Settlement Network of Zagreb (in Croatian). Zagreb: Institut za društvena istraživanja u Zagrebu. ISBN 978-953-6218-67-7.
- Svirčić Gotovac, Anđelina; Zlatar Gamberožić, Jelena (2020). "Obrana javnih prostora u zagrebačkim slučajevima „Čuvamo naš park" i „Vratite magnoliju"". Sociologija i prostor (in Croatian). 58 (1 (216)): 5–31. doi:10.5673/sip.58.1.1.
- Šmit, Krunoslav; Duić, Vjera; Krajnik, Damir (14 December 2011). "Impact of Construction Stages on the Functionality of the Špansko-Oranice and Vrbani III Housing Estates in Zagreb". Prostor : znanstveni časopis za arhitekturu i urbanizam (in Croatian). 19 (2(42)): 404–415. ISSN 1330-0652.
- Štulhofer, Ariana; Muraj, Iva (2003). "High-school Sports Ground in Zagreb". Prostor : znanstveni časopis za arhitekturu i urbanizam (in Croatian). 11 (2(26)): 125–134. ISSN 1330-0652.
- Tóth, István János; Hajdu, Miklós; Purczeld, Eszter (11 October 2017). "Corruption risks, intensity of competition and estimated direct social loss in public procurement of Zagreb – 2011-2016". Budapest, Hungary: Corruption Research Center Budapest: 1–122.
{{cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires|journal=
(help) - Zlatar, Jelena (2014). "Zagreb". Cities. 39: 144–155. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2014.03.004.
- Zlatar Gamberožić, Jelena; Svirčić Gotovac, Anđelina (5 November 2016). "Transformation of Public Space in Zagreb since 2000". Research in Urban Sociology. 15: 105–126. doi:10.1108/S1047-004220160000015005.
- Zlatar Gamberožić, Jelena (2019a). "Revitalization paths of urban centers: tentative observational comparison of two cities: Ljubljana and Zagreb". Družboslovne razprave. XXXV (90): 83–104. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- Zlatar Gamberožić, Jelena (1 April 2019b). Urban Transformation of Contemporary Zagreb - Sociological Perspective and Examples of Research. LE:NOTRE Landscape Forum: Zagreb 2019. Zagreb: LE:NOTRE Institute, European Council of Landscape Architecture Schools. pp. 1–57.