Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santonu Kumar Dhar
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 12:49, 8 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 12:49, 8 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:19, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Santonu Kumar Dhar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Declined CSD. Bio about an Indian magazine editor whose claims to notability are association (sources used to assert the notability of the people that are claimed he collaborated with), the creation of a magazine, and for having interviewed an actress. After some research I do not think this person meets WP:GNG or WP:BIO. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 23:31, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I'm unable to find evidence that this person meets WP:GNG or WP:PEOPLE at this time. Gong show 03:44, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Inherited notability is of no use. As for sources, there's nothing out there. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 11:02, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. LlamaAl (talk) 02:24, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. LlamaAl (talk) 02:24, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. LlamaAl (talk) 02:28, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete — Inadequate coverage in reliable sources indicates it is at least WP:TOOSOON to call this person notable. JFHJr (㊟) 18:25, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
