Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carrie Lazenby
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 22:44, 5 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 22:44, 5 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Merge and redirect to List of American supercentenarians. Resolute 21:00, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Carrie Lazenby (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Yet another unreferenced stub on a very old person, fails WP:BIO. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:30, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No sources found. Epbr123 (talk) 16:27, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Unless I'm successful with Google-searching this woman, seems like this article is just another factoid. Neal (talk) 16:38, 9 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete or Merge My search was unsuccessful (I did all my searching for all these SCs before I started commenting, for those who are wondering why I'm voting in such rapid succession). No substantial independent, reliable sources to establish meeting WP:N or WP:BIO. Nothing here that couldn't be summarized in the many supercentenarian lists. Cheers, CP 16:54, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 17:02, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- ...Merge with list or delete... but go Victuallers (talk) 15:39, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.