Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Cheese (producer)
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 22:20, 11 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 04:34, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The Cheese (producer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability. Janet Jackson part may be hoax. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 23:28, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Janet Jackson part so no hoax (have posted response with images to Marcus' page), however that part of the article has been removed in case the story and pictures submitted are not enough "evidence" of the event of me as a production assistant purchasing a towel.
Are Internet Movie Database links not sufficient evidence for Producing credits? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thecheesefeed (talk • contribs) 00:46, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fails notability. Nakon 00:48, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and Nakon. User:Thecheesefeed appears to be the subject of the article per this edit. — Jeff G. ツ 01:05, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom; not a shred of notability, not to mention obvious COI. Majorclanger (talk) 14:09, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:45, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:45, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No notability asserted, irrelevant BLP material, ELs to unreliable sources, COI... let me count the reasons it's not ready for Wikipedia yet. Jclemens (talk) 16:02, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
