User talk:1549bcp
Autopatrolled
Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:
- This permission does not give you any special status or authority
- Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
- You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
- If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it
- If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing!HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:47, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Great job on making the original Thirty-Six Immortals of Poetry article. I am glad someone else is also interested in the subject, and willing to put together a nice page on it. Ph0kin (talk) 07:14, 6 July 2011 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
|
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Wikipedia should give you a trophy! Wyclif (talk) 02:12, 14 December 2021 (UTC) |
John Fulton (priest) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, John Fulton (priest), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 20:48, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
The article Slovak National Catholic Church has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
I cannot find any centered reliable secondary source to establish that this alleged organisation meets WP:GNG. There is a clear lack of notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Veverve (talk) 17:34, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Slovak National Catholic Church for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slovak National Catholic Church until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Veverve (talk) 11:54, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
The article John Walter Lea has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Doesn't meet WP:NOTE
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mr.weedle (talk) 16:22, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:John Fulton (priest)
Hello, 1549bcp. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:John Fulton (priest), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:03, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
Royden Yerkes to draftspace
Hi. As your article on Royden Yerkes has had no references for over 8 years and is largely a list of works he published, I have moved it to draftspace. You will find it at Draft:Royden Yerkes. If you want to improve it with references, ideally as inline citations, and demonstrate that it meets notability, please do so. Thank you. DiamondRemley39 (talk) 19:27, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- I have done the same with the following drafts for similar reasons (articles are low on citations and/or notability):
- You probably have access to some good information on these topics and could enhance the articles. Ask for help in the Teahouse if you need assistance.
- Have a good day. DiamondRemley39 (talk) 20:14, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- And the same with Draft:Íslenzk fornrit. Both sources were self-published and one was a catalog, this does not indicate notability. DiamondRemley39 (talk) 20:23, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
The article Woman's Seamen's Friend Society of Connecticut has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Has been tagged for years. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to show that it passes WP:GNG or WP:ORGDEPTH.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 TT me 10:18, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Royden Yerkes for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Royden Yerkes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Onel5969 TT me 18:43, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Otofuke Shrine for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Otofuke Shrine until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Medarduss (talk) 01:10, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Kendall Harmon for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kendall Harmon, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kendall Harmon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
The article Jennifer Tucker has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable academic, no significant coverage, unreferenced article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 05:50, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
The article Andrew Smith (bishop) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 01:58, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of National Council of Churches in Bangladesh for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Council of Churches in Bangladesh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Worldbruce (talk) 14:22, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
The article Ogé Beauvoir has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Dr vulpes (💬 • 📝) 20:32, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Fellowship of Christian Councils and Churches in the Great Lakes and Horn of Africa
The article Fellowship of Christian Councils and Churches in the Great Lakes and Horn of Africa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Per WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Seemingly non-notable organization... of organizations, apparently. Unsourced. Google books and general Google searches are not turning up anything of significance.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Compulsive Researcher (talk) 15:12, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
