Wikipedia:Peer review/Pentax LX/archive1
Appearance
Toolbox |
---|
I greatly expanded this article from a referenceless stub, adding many sources with inline citations, adding photos (including some that I took of my own LX), adding missing information, and creating an entire section on accessories for the camera, but I'm unsure about some of it, which is why I'm listing this for peer review.
- First with the sources, are they sufficiently high-quality? Because of the subject matter, a lot of the available information is compiled by groups of enthusiasts (and even more so with this camera as Pentax went defunct in 2007), but is that enough? Most of what I found on search engines like Google Scholar (aside from the material that I used) was research papers that happened to detail how the researchers used a Pentax LX camera to record observations, etc.
- Second, does the article (particularly the 'Viewfinders' and 'Focusing screens' subsections) ever seem to be giving "too much" information?
- Third, and this is something I'm much less worried about, is whether the article flows well, i.e. the exposition and explanation of information is well-paced and easy follow.
General suggestions for minor improvements would also be appreciated.
Thanks, bella (talk) 06:15, 16 October 2023 (UTC)