User talk:WanakoDX

January 2023

Hello, I'm JeffSpaceman. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Goldwyn Pictures, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. JeffSpaceman (talk) 18:02, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:ChampionsRegnum.png

Thanks for uploading File:ChampionsRegnum.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:31, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

First, how did you start a new account with moderate editing skills? If you already have any other Wikipedia accounts, you must disclose them here.

Secondly, stop edit warring. WP:3RR. Users can be blocked for that. And your edit is wrong. MOS:NOBOLD.

Third, stop not using edit summaries. You must describe and justify your edits. — Smuckola (talk) 03:01, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Donkey Kong shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. JOE BRO ⁶⁴ 03:00, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Donkey Kong. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. JOE BRO ⁶⁴ 20:22, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DK is not that much of a media franchise in the veins of Mario or Sonic.

I was reverting it to be a video game series to keep it in line with other Nintendo properties WanakoDX (talk) 20:28, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless of reason, you're still editwarring. There's only a few things that are acceptable to keep reverting in - see WP:3RRNO. This is not remotely close to any of those reasons. Please stop or you'll end up getting your account blocked. Sergecross73 msg me 21:37, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Editing while logged out is also a big no-no. JOE BRO ⁶⁴ 02:26, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You could go and make a DK media franchise page while keeping the video game series page. WanakoDX (talk) 02:30, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I'm MikeAllen. Your recent edit(s) to the page Universal Pictures appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Per this [1] Why did you write that? Where did that come from? Mike Allen 20:24, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have received numerous warnings about edit warring and discussing on talk pages. Today, you decided to yet again make the same edit you've made countless times, even though there was an active and unanimous consensus against your change.

As such, you are blocked for 3 days. When it expires, I hope you'll start handling content dispute through finding and following a WP:CONSENSUS rather than just continuing to edit war. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 19:48, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fuck all WanakoDX (talk) 20:00, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe change it to an indefinite block since they are WP:NOTHERE. Mike Allen 20:03, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is that all you have to say on this? I mean, what did you think the purpose of all those warnings and discussions were? Just to be tossed aside so you could just do whatever you wanted? Sergecross73 msg me 20:36, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

With this response above, the deliberate ignorance of consensus, and editing while logged out, I'd agree with MikeAllen this is becoming a WP:NOTHERE situation. JOE BRO ⁶⁴ 01:20, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree too. Wanako, a response isn't required per se, but it sure isn't inspiring any confidence. I won't change it to indef yet, but if you don't address this and keep doing it, it'll be escalated to an indefinite block pretty quickly. Sergecross73 msg me 18:49, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 21st Century Fox, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conglomerate. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]