User talk:Mortyman

Your edits to Rock in Rio

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Mortyman! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but please note that the link you added in is on my spam blacklist and should not be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an Imageshack or Photobucket image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was genuine spam, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 22:34, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

A-ha awards

FYI, the awards aren't suited to a stand-alone article. You should instead incorporate them (with proper citations) as a brief text section in the main article. Cheers. --Ckatz^chat_spy 10:03, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Help me with the a-ha awards article. I've cleaned it up but i still want som help from a person who knows about these awards. --Alive Would? Sun (talk) 15:45, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. --Alive Would? Sun (talk) 19:06, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Where they nominated for Favorite Pop/Rock Band/Duo/Group. --Alive Would? Sun (talk) 19:38, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the different awards. --Alive Would? Sun (talk) 20:40, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Do you know any nominatins for the band. --Alive Would? Sun (talk) 10:00, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Morten Harket solo awards

I have nominated Category:Morten Harket solo awards (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for merging into Category:Morten Harket (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Doctormanhattan (talk) 03:30, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

That was my initial thought, but I was unable to do it. The award boxes got mixed up with the other info boxes on the Morten Harket page. When that is said, I don't think there is any problem in having a different page for the awards. The band a-ha wich Morten is the vocalist of also has this. Mortyman (talk) 13:23, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

I've fixed the page. And all award pages should be named List of artist/band Awards. --Black On High (talk) 11:38, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Morten Harket solo awards has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 02:14, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

a-ha discography

Add sources and most and the official Brazillian certification site sais thats wrong and add sources. And when i say add sources i mean the different chart positions, i'm goin to delete all the chart positions if you're not adding sources. And this is the official certification site for Brazilian certifications. [1]. --Black On High (talk) 11:11, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

First of all the discography site is not made by me, so if you want to delete it entirely, then you should speak to the author, not me. I have made some corrections regarding the Brasilian certifications. The reason for this is that the numbers on the official site is based on the new system of certification in Brazil. The type of award you get for selling these kind of numbers has changed, since a-ha receaved their award. So it's a question of wether whe should state the award that a-ha actually got in 80's or what it would have been if they had gotten it today. An exaple: a-ha sold atleast 600 000 copies of Stay On These Roads album. When they received their award for this back in the late 80's, they receaved after calculating using the old system. They got double platinum. With the new system, they would have gotten Diamond and then some. The source used, WAS added, but in the " edit this page " section. I am not aware of how one add's the source, wich is why I asked in the edit page someone to add it. Mortyman (talk) 11:50, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

a-ha

The band's own website cannot be considered reliable here as it is self-published. There is no peer reviewing of the band's website and it could be argued that the band would increase claims of their owns sales to promote themselves. I don't see why Berlinista can be considered a reliable source either. 22:38, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

So? How does that translate to 80 million sales worldwide? indopug (talk) 22:50, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

No, you don't need to source every bit of information, only contentious information per our verifiability policy. Sales figures are certainly contentious. When you find an appropriate, reliable source that says that a-Ha sold 80 million worldwide, add the information. As for the population thing, its very trivial, and was already removed by another editor just before my edit. indopug (talk) 23:08, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

"Everyone is claiming that Elvis Presley has sold a billion records" Please stop making ridiculous arguments that are irrelevant to this discussion; I don't even know what you're trying to say. Anyway, I don't see the relation of those 600,000 copies sold for that one album either to claims that they sold 80 million. I guess you can add that 600k sales figure to the appropriate album page. indopug (talk) 23:45, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Its Indopug, Drewcifer300, Tenacious D Fan and many more and a newspaper is always goin to be more reliable then a french website with the name http://aha-fr.com/discographie.php so don't remove, but if you find a reliable source instead of discussing this with me it you had probably found a source for it now. --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 12:56, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Another thing to consider, is that even thoguh let's say Hunting High and Low was released in 1985, it has sold also after that. No one here is gonna tell me that the album has'nt sold in the USA after it's got its innitial certification in 85 / 86. So the 1 million number should be taken with a pinch of salt. Same with the UK and all other countries. Old albums continue to sell, as new albums are released. To base discography on the innitial certifications the got amny, many years ago is silly.

Their first 3 albums has also been released as a 3 pack. That is also something to take into consideration.

Also much of the sales go through such channels as Amazon and Play. does these sales get registered ?

Mortyman (talk) 14:41, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Should sales of the soundtrack including a-ha's contribution here be added to the discography ?

How does this work ?

a-ha has also had their songs feautured on other soundtracks and compilations.

Mortyman (talk) 21:19, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

To answear your question, yes look at the Pearl Jam discography or Soundgarden discography. --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 13:12, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

The cover is not by the artist so no. --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 23:11, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Found a-ha's sales number thought you should know cause your all hanged up in it. See a-ha discography. --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 18:58, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

One of the sources is Norwegian which sais the album has sold a total of 11 million copies and you can't trust homepages. Look at the cranberries homepage. Everything is false, i've checked it myself on the RIAA if the certifications are right. What i'm trying to say is that most artist sais they have sold more records and singles then they have. --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 14:25, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

If the sales numbers are so importent for you find a reliable source instead on goin on my nerves and why can't you listen jackass, i don't make the rules on wikipedia so don't argue with me okay and please stop complaining your enoying the shit out of me. --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 15:00, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Be Black Hole Sun, I agree that this obsession with sales figures in the a-ha article (not to mention several others—have you ever taken a look at the Cher discography?!) is disconcerting from the standpoint of a music lover, ridiculous from the standpoint of a rational human being with any understanding of the music business, and unacceptable from the standpoint of an editor. Unacceptable from the standpoint of Wiki policy, however, is to engage in such blatant name-calling and profanity as you have here. I think both you and Mortyman need to take a step back from the article, and this issue, and chill out a bit before progressing. Abrazame (talk) 07:30, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Talk page tips; Double-posting on talk pages

Hi. I wanted to give you a few tips for posting discussions: When you sign your name, do it in the last line of your text, not on a separate line. When responding to, or continuing a thought from, a previous post, type a colon (:) which will indent your post and help separate it without having to leave several spaces and add dashes to draw lines. If the previous post in a conversation you're participating in has one or more colons before it, type one more than they used immediately before the first word of your new post. Each time you start a new paragraph in your comment, you'll need to type the same number of colons, so it indents the same and reads as one person's continuous thought.

I've indented this paragraph with one colon so you can open the edit window and see if you don't follow what I'm saying.

This paragraph is indented twice, as you would if you were responding to the paragraph immediately above it. This way you only need one space between each comment to follow along clearly.

Also, if you ask a question of a particular editor, you don't need to post a duplicate on the article page unless you don't get a response in a couple days, and vice-versa. (Most established editors monitor pages they have been working on, and can see in their watchlists when something has been added or changed.)

I mention all this because when talk pages get too long, they have to be archived before others get a chance to read the questions and answers that might help them as well...or to weigh in with a different opinion or policy interpretation. It's also easier to scroll through, and to tell when a completely new idea is being discussed. Thanks! Abrazame (talk) 11:34, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Re: a-ha awards

Feel free to re-add them then. I didn't think they were very notable so I removed them. I am not currently working on the article which is why I am trying to focus on the ones I am working on right now. Gary King (talk) 03:26, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

I removed all of those awards again, why!. Well you don't need all of those awards and second you are missing nominations. --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 11:18, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

I added them back on again, as I don't see how you have any superior reason to dictate anyone what is an important award or not. As for lack of info regarding certain nominations, it is regrettable that this info is not available, due to age, however nominations are really irrelevant, as the list is first and foremost a list of awards won. As one of the main author of this page, I would appreciate that you respect my desicion to include the awards added and not argue any further on this issueMortyman (talk) 20:09, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

NO NO NO NO, you don't all of those awards, Bryan Adams has won more awards then a-ha but i don't add all of them to the list, why no good reason to add them all. --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 13:30, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

I see no reason to bring Bryan Adams into this discussion. What problem do you really have on this ? Does it really bother you that much, that you have to delete what other people are adding ? This is not your personal venture you know. I see no reason why we can't include the awards. I don't see how it can bother anyone. On a different note, a-ha receaved 8 MTV awards in 1986, not 6 like the article mentioned in the nr awards won window after you had reverted it back. Now can we please just end this silly discussion here. You don't have any better reason to delete them. Adding as many awards as possible only makes the article more informative and THAT is what Wikipedia is for. INFORMATION. Mortyman (talk) 03:54, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Your note

Thank you for your note. You have a reply. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 11:40, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Posting rumors on wikipedia

Hello. Thank you for your post. I agree in general that publishing rumors like these isn't a problem so long as it is stated that they are rumors. However not on wikipedia. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Here we include information known to be true. Two of the core principles of wikipedia are that added information must comply with Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:No original research. Even if rumors and personal opinions are stated to the press and published by them. They are not verifiable. Inge (talk) 19:56, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Re: The article " Sniper " and mention of Norwegian specialforces

I see that the info I posted regarding the range of one shot fired by a Norwegian specialforces soldier and the source of this info has been labelled with " ".

The info is correct and the article is siting sources within the Norwegian armed forces. The insident has actually been under investigation in Norway. Not because of the range of the shot, but because of the ammo used. it is normally not intended for soft human targets. If there was any false info regarding the range, I'm sure that that also would have been adressed. This source is in Norwegain, but I don't see how that can be a negativity to the article. If we were only to site English sources and regard that as the only truth in the world, then we would all have a serious problem. Please remove the label. Mortyman (talk) 01:43, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Hi, I tagged the statement with {{verify credibility}} because the website that the info came from seemed very suspiciously full of ads and seemed similar to that of an interactive blog of some sort. However at your request, I will remove the tag. Sorry if I have caused any problems, but another citation from a different source (preferably English) would be greatly appreciated. Thanks again! WinterSpw (talk) 05:15, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

A-ha at Rock in Rio

Don't be childish. There's no such thing as "It is indisputable", since you're obviously working from the point of a view of a fan who wants to see your idols in a good light. First of all, I happen to be Brazilian. I happen to have been there. Guns n'Roses played for over 120.000 people on January 20th, a Sunday, third day of the festival. O Globo, Brazil's number 2 newspaper (and Rio de Janeiro's number 1), states that and also states it was the festival's biggest audience. Unfortunately, I only have the newspaper clipping and not an electronic file here with me, but will work on that if it's necessary to stop with your insistence (it's in Portuguese, but I guess you'll be able to understand the numbers).

Anyway, all this is beside the point since it wasn't a single performance. a-ha played at the second-to-last day of Rock in Rio 2. It was a huge event which mobilized the whole city and, as hard as it is for you to understand that, NOT EVERYONE WAS THERE BECAUSE OF YOUR FAVORITE BAND. Nenhum de Nós, Engenheiros do Hawaii, Information Society, Debbie Gibson, Paulo Ricardo and Happy Mondays also performed that day. There were fans to all of these artists, plus the ones who just wanted the Rock in Rio experience, as it is common in events like these. The ticket stub doesn't say "a-ha plus special guests". It says "Rock in Rio 2". You can't possibly contact every single one of those people and ask them which artist brought them to Maracanã that day. So your claim is simply unverifiable. Besides, if Guinness doesn't publish the record anymore, it means it doesn't stand anymore. So there. JimboB (talk) 14:06, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of A-ha and their fans

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is A-ha and their fans. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A-ha and their fans. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Flag icons

Please stop adding flag icons to places of birth. For more on this, see Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(icons)#Do_not_use_flags_to_indicate_locations_of_birth_and_death. Dismas|^(talk) 01:16, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

a-ha

Please refrain from inserting sales figures with support of You Tube which is not regarded as reliable. Please see WP:RSE which clearly states YouTube and other video-sharing sites are not reliable sources because anyone can create or manipulate a video clip and upload without editorial oversight, just as with a self-published website. Please be advised that future continuous insertions of the footage as a source will constitute edit-warring and will be treated as such. Regards.--Harout72 (talk) 20:32, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

I have not ignored any policy. Yes the policy states that Youtube are not NESSERELY reliable sources, BUT CAN BE USED if the source can be traced back to a reliable source. The video in question is an offical promo video distributed by recordlabel in all markets where a-ha's recent album was released. The video comes in several languages and content in my view can not be questioned. Sales figures are in general a difficult subject to handle, as sales figures are rarely uppdated, rarely follow a common source and is often counted in various ways in various countries. Rrecordlabels rarely give insight in their artists accounts on this matter. The numbers that various media reports on usually comes from recordlabels and therefore media and what recordlabels says are just as reliable sources than anything else. Mortyman (talk) 20:43, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

This video footage here that you used which states 70 million in sales cannot get any more unreliable than it is. If you have doubts, then I suggest you to post a question regarding its reliability at WP:RSN and wait for other folks to submit their opinion on it. And yes, sales figures are a difficult subject in general to deal with, therefore, it is a good idea to refer to artists' available certified sales as I have gone over a-ha's certified sales here. It's quite clear that a-ha's actual sales is not remotely close to 70 million in sales. Perhaps close to 36 million albums and 15 million singles as stated by The Norway Post. As for statements by record labels regarding record sales, I would not immediately assume they are true, because record companies are in business to make their artists as impressive as they can by applying numerous marketing tools including inflated sales figures.--Harout72 (talk) 21:08, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

::: Sales are only certified at the request of artist / reordlabel, 

so the numbers that you refer to are not nesseserely more correct / uppdated / official than any other info. What about the video. why is it not reliable. You have alredy stated your WP:RSN issue with this issue, wich I have answered in my previous comment. Is there anything else I am missing about this video ?

Mortyman (talk) 21:26, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

What you are missing is the part where the wikipedia policy states in the first sentence YouTube and other video-sharing sites are not reliable sources because anyone can create or manipulate a video clip and upload without editorial oversight, just as with a self-published website. And the 70 million in sales which appears in the footage qualifies the footage for the very category of the videos which policy warns. In other words, the sales figure on there could very easily be added by anyone. While I realize that there is a fee involved in certifying the records, it doesn't necessarily mean that most of the records go without being certified, there is only a small fraction of releases which reach the required certification-award level and don't get certified. In the end, certifications are more reliable way of weighing record sales than claimed sales figures.--Harout72 (talk) 21:46, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

No, you are missing the point... The promo video is an offical video from recordlabel SHOWN across Europe on TV. I know this for a fact. Are you seriously saying that this video was manipulated across all TV stations in Europe ? Youtube is one thing, but TV is a different issue. The video has ofcourse not been manipiulated for youtube. Mortyman (talk) 22:01, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Anyone, could record a footage on TV and than modify it by using different softwares and then upload the modified version on YouTube. Therefore, as I initially suggested, you should post it at WP:RSN and see for yourself what others apart from me might say. The fact and the matter is that the reliability of the video is questionable. And regardless of whether you claim that it's an official video across Europe or not, it doesn't change the fact that if I questioned the reliability of the video, then, it could be questioned by many others too. And that's exactly why we should follow the policy rather than insisting on claiming that it's an official video, which, in no way, serves as a proof.--Harout72 (talk) 22:25, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

With all due respect, you are starting to become a tad bit ridiculouse now. If everyone are gonna be as paranoid as you, we can just say that any info out there is manipulated. Magazines, certifications, videos etc. Your misstrust must stop somewhere. It is obvious that the video is official and original. The video also comes in various languages with same info

From Universals official German youtube section ( pop24 is the username for Universal Germany official youtube section. You can click on the username if you want to. ), you will find the video in both English and German version under upploads : http://www.youtube.com/user/pop24#p/u/77/Wcd5ZkQS3dY

English: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wcd5ZkQS3dY German http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uBHW4HnXYhg

Please see the discussion at Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#a-ha_recordsales. In the future please include the link to the relevant discussion page when you post on RSN. Further discussion of this topic should be taken to the relevant article's talk page so that other users can participate and reach consensus. 96.228.129.69 (talk) 01:51, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

List of best-selling music artists

Please refrain inserting a-ha to the list with source by YouTube as it cannot be regarded as reliable. Please read up WP:RSE, it clearly states YouTube and other video-sharing sites are not reliable sources because anyone can create or manipulate a video clip and upload without editorial oversight, just as with a self-published website. In some cases, video clips published on YouTube may be acceptable as primary sources if their authenticity can be confirmed, or as a secondary source if they can be traced to a reliable publisher, but even then should be used with caution. They may also be used as a convenience link for material originally published elsewhere. Be careful not to link to material that is a copyright violation.--Harout72 (talk) 23:53, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Norway

I have reverted your addition there. We need reliable, secondary sources for such claims (this and that are biggest success, are representative of Norwegian music, etc.), even if they seem obvious. Cheers. Materialscientist (talk) 01:02, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

The source was good enough. It is one of the larger news and media groups min Norway. I have now added several sources, including the official Norwegian film commmician. Mortyman (talk) 18:53, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Congratulations, Mortyman, you've recently made your 1,000th edit to articles on English Wikipedia! Thank you for improving the quality of Norway-related material in the encyclopedia, and for all your contributions. Keep up the good work! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 18:08, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

November 2013

Hello, I'm United States Man. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Hurricane Katrina, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. United States Man (talk) 02:13, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for alerting me. I undid your revision and added a source in the form of a link to the Norweegian government's website and an article on the matter. The article says 10 million Norwegian Kroner wich is today about 1, 6 million USD, but back then 1,8. Thank you Mortyman (talk) 20:45, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Awards section in Norwegian Air Shutte

Could you please provide me of a few examples of airline articles here on Wiki with Awards Sections? I have not seen any previously. And the categorization of it as encyclopaedic content is questionable as the article about NAS have been written with content taken directly from the PR Website of Norwegian Air Shuttle as late as last spring. That is why it is, at least in my opinion, suspicious to include an Awards section. Thanks.
JHZ94 11:16, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

A few Examples:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_New_Zealand#Awards

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_Baltic#Awards

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dragonair#Awards

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copa_Airlines#Awards_and_honors

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continental_Airlines#Awards

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SkyWest_Airlines#Awards_and_Recognition

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jet_Airways#Awards_and_achievements

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkish_Airlines#Awards

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SriLankan_Airlines#Awards_and_achievements

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aegean_Airlines#Awards_and_recognition

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SilkAir#Awards

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_Berlin#Awards

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Airlines_Center#Awards

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LOT_Polish_Airlines#Awards

As for the article being written as an add ... well it might be, but I think you will find that a lot of pages for companies are that way. That is not my fault. No reason to blame me and don't see what the point was to bring that into the discussion. I also like to point out that my award material was sourced. I will add it back on Do not remove. Mortyman (talk) 23:15, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Okey, Tusen takk! Then it's fine. I did just remember the edits of a certain user (User:Naigenors) which made me quite thoughtful. I'll don't remove it. JHZ94 12:08, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Release of hostage Christina Meier

The article Release of hostage Christina Meier has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article doesn't show ongoing media interest. Wikipedia is not a newspaper

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Moswento ^talky 15:37, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Release of hostage Christina Meier for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Release of hostage Christina Meier is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Release of hostage Christina Meier until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Moswento ^talky 07:45, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Release of hostage Christina Meier (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Norwegian

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Norwegian Armed Forces may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• >* [[Operation Anaconda]]<br />* [[Operation Jacana]]<br />* [[Release of hostage Christina Meier]]]<br/>* [[April 2012 Afghanistan attacks]]<br/>* [[Hostage incident at Qargha Reservoir / Lake Qara

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:06, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hostage incident at Qargha Reservoir / Lake Qara june 2012, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Norwegian and ANA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

99th Infantry Battalion (United States)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 99th Infantry Battalion (United States), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.wehrmacht-awards.com/forums/showthread.php?t=515403&page=4.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:44, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Criticism against Norwegian Air International Limited

The article Criticism against Norwegian Air International Limited has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Strong WP:POVFORK that may qualify as an attack page.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nat Gertler (talk) 20:59, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Criticism against Norwegian Air International Limited for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Criticism against Norwegian Air International Limited is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism against Norwegian Air International Limited until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nat Gertler (talk) 00:11, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Criticism against Norwegian Air International Limited, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page One World (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

July 2014

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Karl Rove. Thank you. Bbb23 (talk) 00:37, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Your edit is reverted. The sources are more than good enough and he has been inducted in the Scandinavian-American Hall of Fame. It is well known that he has Norwegian roots and that he has been several times to Norway, visiting the old family farm. If you seriously want to pursue this even further, then make an official case. Mortyman (talk) 00:53, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mortyman. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

March 2017

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! 220 of ^Borg 04:37, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited March 2017 Kabul attack, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Norwegian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 Park Palace guesthouse attack, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Norwegian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited A-ha discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Gallery. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited MTV Unplugged – Summer Solstice, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bells and Ian McCulloch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited MTV Unplugged, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ian McCulloch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

November 2017

Hello, I'm FlightTime Phone. I noticed that you made a change to an article, A-ha, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 17:11, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mortyman. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ping (golf), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Norwegian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 Inter-Continental Hotel Kabul attack, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Norwegian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Norwegian Air Shuttle, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 21:11, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Norwegian Air Shuttle. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jetstreamer ^Talk 21:41, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

I still don't get what youir problem is. What about the info I added is false / unsourced ? It's already on the pages from earler posed by someone else. I just put the various subsidiaries, fleet numbers and bases into a table. Furthermore, you will find similare tables made for other airlines. Take Avianca for instance who has a table for their subsidiaries and number of routes. Please explain your actions. They are totally out of bounds ! Mortyman (talk) 15:18, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

June 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at a-ha discography. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You were reverted months ago. The page is a-ha's discography, not any other artist's. This info is trivial and does not belong here. Stop adding it. Ss112 16:19, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Please reply on your own talk page if somebody has posted there first. As for what you said on my talk page, you can try to make a separate page on a-ha's material being covered by other artists, but without any references or indication of why it's important, it will most likely be nominated for deletion. Ss112 16:38, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mortyman. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

June 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Oslo Gospel Choir. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:35, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of recipients of the George Medal, 1940s, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Agent. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Liv Grannes

Hallo, Thank you for creating the article Liv Grannes, but unfortunately some of this article just doesn't make sense. What does "From 1942 this prize was rented by Birger Sjøberg." mean? Did you create it using machine translation, I wonder? Or are you not really familiar enough with written English to be writing articles here in English Wikipedia? Please take care that anything you write is in comprehensible English. Thanks. PamD 10:39, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Harald Baldr

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Harald Baldr requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harald Baldr. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CommanderWaterford (talk) 22:30, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

The deletion has been contested through the page you asked for Mortyman (talk) 22:36, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hunting High and Low (A-ha song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Waterloo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited A-ha discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Burlingame.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:A-ha- Greatest Hits - Japanese Singles Collection.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:A-ha- Greatest Hits - Japanese Singles Collection.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 19:00, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Greatest Hits - Japanese Single Collection - (CD+DVD)

Hello, Mortyman

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Yeeno, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Greatest Hits - Japanese Single Collection - (CD+DVD), for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Yeeno}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Yeeno (talk) 🍁 19:03, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

June 2021

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:20, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of A-ha – Live in South America

The article A-ha – Live in South America has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Simply does not meet WP:NFILM.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:55, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:A-ha- Greatest Hits - Japanese Singles Collection.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:A-ha- Greatest Hits - Japanese Singles Collection.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ngô Thanh Vân, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Norwegian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

September 2021

Hello, I'm Beevil. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Boeing 737, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The linked citation appears to be to a fairly obvious copy of wikipedia. It was also just a bare URL. Beevil (talk) 13:14, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

This is not acceptable. Reliable source ? what is that ?? Just because it's in Norwegian it's not reliable ? I do not accept this desicion. Please add it back on. The source is more than reliable. Here is the photo of the article from Flight International in English: https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=10159656253848109&set=gm.4544522642241096 and https://www.bing.com/images/search?view=detailV2&insightstoken=bcid_RKiZEYIR0DID5Z7kpKPXWJGM2IMp.....0M*ccid_qJkRghHQ&form=ANCMS1&iss=SBIUPLOADGET&selectedindex=0&id=%E2%88%921008285807&ccid=qJkRghHQ&exph=600&expw=424&vt=3&sim=11&cal=0.05&cab=0.95&cat=0.05&car=0.95 Mortyman (talk) 14:01, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

@Mortyman: Hi, see here for Wikipedia's definition of a reliable source. The reference given in your edit ([2]) wasn't in Norwegian, it was a link to a copy of the wikipedia article for Busy Bee hosted, without attribution, on hpedc.org. You didn't mention that article (which appears to be in English?), but that may be a better reference for the text. Beevil (talk) 09:04, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of A-ha – Live in South America for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article A-ha – Live in South America is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A-ha – Live in South America until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

scope_creep^Talk 22:32, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cbcnvcnvc.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cbcnvcnvc.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

a-ha "associated acts"

The instructions at Template:Infobox musical artist#associated_acts sets a high bar to inclusion. The listed artists must have collaborated with a-ha multiple times, with significant media attention. You added, for instance, Graham Nash who sang backing vocals on two minor album tracks and was never featured—he never received star billing. Thanks for your attention. Binksternet (talk) 04:06, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Elizabeth Olsen

This video looks sourceable to me. She answers a lot of questions that many readers here probably have. Should I paraphrase her answers and include them all? No. That would allow citing all interviews, and before we know it, half of the citations on Olsen's article are YouTube videos. Please do not revert again. Thanks. KyleJoan^talk 17:14, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

May 2022

Your recent editing history at Morten Harket shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Binksternet (talk) 19:47, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

This response of your is totally unessesery. I have made my comments in the edit section when I have reverted. That should be enough to explain why I do what I do. Furthermore, Morten Harket has played in several Norwegian films and he has also been judge on Norwegian The Voice (franchise). Again, I don't see how you can question me adding actor and TV personality to occupatiuon. Furthermore he is also a producer of several of both his solo songs and A-ha's songs. what he is most famous for should be totally irrelevant. His various endavours should be lsited under occupations Mortyman (talk) 20:19, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

This response of your is totally unessesery. I have made my comments in the edit section when I have reverted. That should be enough to explain why I do what I do. Furthermore, Morten Harket has played in several Norwegian films and he has also been judge on Norwegian The Voice (franchise). Again, I don't see how you can question me adding actor and TV personality to occupatiuon. Furthermore he is also a producer of several of both his solo songs and A-ha's songs. what he is most famous for should be totally irrelevant. His various endavours should be lsited under occupations Mortyman (talk) 20:21, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Harkett is famous for singing and songwriting. Everything else he does is related to that. He is not famous for producing, even though he has produced some of his own songs. He is not famous as a "musician" because he is not hired to play an instrument. He is not famous as an actor even though he has appeared in two minor character roles in three minor films. When he appears on TV as himself, that does not count as acting.

I gave you a harsh warning because you reverted three times and if you reverted again you would be blocked. The warning was necessary to make you stop and consider your actions. Binksternet (talk) 22:42, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mike Sturgis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bob James.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

August 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at A-ha. Sundayclose (talk) 00:46, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Source added. Look under the mentioned song in the source Mortyman (talk) 14:39, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited State Kremlin Palace, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Norwegian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

October 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at True North (A-ha album). Sundayclose (talk) 14:03, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

The source material is the A-ha True North CD itself. it is directly from the liner / credits notes. Mortyman (talk) 21:43, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Without a citation it's unsourced. Read WP:V. Sundayclose (talk) 23:18, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

The info is not online unfortuently. Mortyman (talk) 23:29, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Source do not have to be online. You've edited for 18 years. Please learn how to identify reliable sources and how to cite. Read WP:RS and WP:CITE. Sundayclose (talk) 01:27, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Then I assume that this source is acceptable. Please confirm : https://www.discogs.com/release/24892877-a-ha-True-North Mortyman (talk) 23:01, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Undid revision and source added. Please get back to me if there is a problem with this source.Mortyman (talk) 21:35, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited A-ha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Electronic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited A-ha discography, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages ARD and WDR.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited A-ha discography, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages English, German and Norwegian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

a-ha discography

Hello. Regarding your edits this month to a-ha discography, television appearances, appearances of a-ha's songs on soundtracks and especially books (a bibliography) do not belong on a discography. This is getting into WP:NOT territory, where you're trying to shoehorn all sorts of information that is either trivial or only interests a small portion of an audience onto a discography as a catch-all for everything a-ha has made or appeared in. This is not what a discography is for, and you have also provided unreliable (a-ha fansites) or user-generated sourcing (setlist.fm), which fails WP:USERG. Either you should start a-ha's bibliography page, or try and include some of it with better sourcing on their main article, but it does not belong on a discography. Thanks. Ss112 00:32, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello. If you look at the Beatles discography, they have a Documentaries section where documentaries, but also concerts that has been on TV etc is listed. No different than what I was trying to do : The Beatles discography#Other appearances . On Paul McCartneys discography you will find a list of soundtracks, film and TV series his music has been in. I do not see why I can't make such a list for A-Ha Paul McCartney discography#Soundtracks and other appearances . As for sources, I try to use uppdated sources, but as A-ha is a Norwegian band, not everything is in english. Their nationality can not be held against them. Please revert your deletion. Mortyman (talk) 02:09, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

As for other discography articles, you are resorting to whataboutism as an argument. Wikipedia articles are not perfect—there's always going to be other examples of bad practices on this website. That doesn't mean they should be on those articles either. I know for a fact McCartney's discography attracts a lot of fancruft as well; it's not perfect and you shouldn't say "but this other article has this on it too" because if it's relevant information but not part of a discography, it should most likely be separated from those discographies too, or removed if it's unsourced/a fancruft list. What's happening on McCartney's discography is a lot more thought out than you simply listing what films "Take on Me" was used in, and resorting to using poor sourcing for it.

I didn't say anything about sources being in a different language. You used unreliable sources regardless of their language. Setlist.fm should not be used as it is user-generated (which fails WP:USERG), and fansites fall under WP:BLOG—anybody can start a fansite or a blog and claim things. It doesn't make them a source we should use. I didn't say anything about sites being in Norwegian. Besides the information you added being fancruft, those are not reliable sources per WP:RS and I suggest you read our policies around reliable sources before adding more sources to articles in future.

Regarding your recent edits to a-ha discography, please avoid adding certifications for countries that do not have charts listed on the article per WP:DISCOGSTYLE. That includes Brazil, Spain and Hong Kong certifications. They should be listed on the album articles directly if they are reliably sourced. Thank you. Ss112 04:00, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Regarding certifications ... Those are SUGGESTED guidelines only. Please revert your edits. Mortyman (talk) 12:10, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

No. All guidelines are "suggestions" as they are not policies—see WP:POLICY. There would never be a policy about discography content. This practice is widely followed and no decent discography lists certifications for countries without charts on the page. a-ha should not be the exception just because you want to stuff the article with everything they've ever achieved. You still need to read WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Wikipedia's articles are not intended to be an exhaustive list of everything related to a topic; they have a scope and limits. The limit here is not overstuffing their certifications with countries not represented with charts present because then there'd be no limit and we'd be listing 20 certifications and making the cells for their albums incredibly long, unwieldy and unfriendly for readers to read/scan. Ss112 05:36, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)