User talk:Anil1956

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Anil1956, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Abecedare 18:40, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Crippen_on_british_telecom_phonecard.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Crippen_on_british_telecom_phonecard.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:26, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Mamc001.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mamc001.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:31, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Crippen_on_british_telecom_phonecard.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Crippen_on_british_telecom_phonecard.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 02:51, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Pooja chauhan

A tag has been placed on Pooja chauhan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. WODUP 10:09, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

your Journal

I take an interest in articles on scientists & on scientific journals, and I would like to keep this article from being deleted--I have to warn you that a journal with your own name in the title will attract some unfavorable attention & it is in any case very difficult to convince some of the people here that academic journals are important--I have no more voice in the decision than anyone else. It would help to decrease the impression of self-advertising if the article were relatively modest and avoided the temptation to repeat its name many time, to use bold face italics, to put things into an unusually large number of categories, and to make the existing links and references look more important than they actually are. I have made some edits in these respects, and will make some more--as the edit screen says-- it is our basic principal that anything submitted here will be mercilessly edited. :) DGG (talk) 01:19, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have similarly removed links to individual articles in this journal from he external links section of several article--we do not do this unless there is some very special reason--normally it is considered what we call WP:LINKSPAM.

I also simplified the article on your medical school in line with similar articles. This isn't getting after you in particular--we administrators generally look around. DGG (talk) 02:26, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your cooperation--and, not thinking only about WP for the moment--wish the journal had been named differently.DGG (talk) 20:22, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello Prof. Aggrawal, It's nice to see you editing here on wikipedia. You (hopefully) will find this limerick at the Portal India Quiz amusing. Regards. Abecedare 04:49, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to hear that you enjoyed the ditty. You can email me through wikipedia by clicking here (or by going to my wikipedia page and clicking on the "Email this User" link in the left panel).

I also saw that you created the biographical article at Anil Aggrawal. I think that is a good idea and arguably long overdue. However wikipedians are wary of conflict of interest when users create or edit their own biographical article, so it may be a good idea if in the future you comment on the article talk page, instead of editing the article directly, since that way any appearance of conflict can be avoided. Also it would be greatly helpful if you can provide any independent, reliable source where biographical details about you have been published - these can include for example, newspaper/magazine articles that are not written by you. I, as a neutral user, will be happy to incorporate any relevant content into the article itself.

I look forward to hearing from you. Regards. Abecedare 23:56, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Prof. Aggrawal,

To address the points raised in your email:

You are already a wikipedian, since that term simply refers to anyone who edits here. We don't have any secret handshakes or codes, although we do try to keep the Five Pillars in mind. :-)
You can edit your user page by simply clicking here and editing it as you would any other wikipedia page. Whenever you are logged in, you can also find a link to your user page (labeled Anil1956) and talk page (labeled "my talk") at the top of every wikipedia page. You can read some guidelines on what-to-have and what-not-to-have on ones user page at WP:USER
As for the limerick, it is accessible at this location
Finally, with regards to the Anil Aggrawal article: if you recall any newspaper/magazine articles about you, you can list the reference on the article's talk page so that other editors, besides me, too can help in incorporating that information into the page. (For example such a reference may look like, " A Times of India article titled 'Forensic Medicine in India that appeared on MM-DD-YYYY".)

If you have questions about editing here, please feel free to ask them on your/mine talk page o through email. Regards. Abecedare 18:36, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:5611 betty blue cf.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:5611 betty blue cf.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:05, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Jcsuri.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Jcsuri.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 14:36, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Jcsuri.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Jcsuri.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 14:42, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The image jcsuri.jpg is my own work. How do I add this information now? I forgot it earlier.Anil1956 14:43, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Modern Diagnostics.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Modern Diagnostics.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 13:38, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1000 Love and Sex Quiz

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article 1000 Love and Sex Quiz, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Bfigura ^(talk) 04:46, 4 September 2007 (UTC) Nominator de-prodded. Probably better with a tag for notability. --Bfigura ^(talk) 04:48, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Golden Triangle (disambiguation)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Golden Triangle (disambiguation), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Golden Triangle (disambiguation). Truthanado (talk) 21:58, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Online Sexual Activity

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Online Sexual Activity, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 23:59, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Online Sexual Activity

An editor has nominated Online Sexual Activity, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Online Sexual Activity and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 18:59, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

dnvrfantj

When you add stuff to articles, you not supposed to include your name. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dnvrfantj (talk • contribs) 20:17, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Sumer's Radiology Weblog

A tag has been placed on Sumer's Radiology Weblog, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Self-advertisement & notability not established

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Also, please do not remove the tag from the article by yourself, as you have done previously with other articles. Thanks. Shovon (talk) 13:42, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

STOP Removing Tags from your OWN Articles

Hi, I had previously also requested you not to remove the tags put on articles written by you. But it seems that you have failed to see any reason. Your edit history shows that, you are trying to use Wikipedia as a Marketing Tool by writing favorably about you/your books/your projects. If you want to remove the tags, please cite independent references (this should not include claims by you published in any media) and then remove the tags. Thanks. Shovon (talk) 06:52, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 07:51, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Response to your queries

Dear Dr. Aggarwal, at the very outset, I would like to make my position clear. I do not have any doubts regarding your notability or for that matter, the notability of Dr. Sumer Sethi. I also understand that many of the articles written by you are there in the Wikipedia for months. Understandably your primary concern is about me, who suddenly appeared from nowhere and put up tags on some of the articles written by you.
Well, sir, let me defend my actions one by one.

Regarding the notability of Sumer's Radiology Weblog, I have voiced my opinion, which can be found at the article's talk page as well as it's AFD page.
Let me come to the article 1000 Love and Sex Quiz. There are sentences like Rupa approached him to write a book of popular appeal in their successful "1000 quiz series"; His first book 1000 Crime Quiz had proved successful; This challenge was successfully dealt with. and many more. As the author himself is writing the article about his book, there's every chance of painting false-positive picture, more so, as I could not see any references. I would be happy to help you cite references leading to removal of the tags, if you could point me to possible sources where these can be found.
I would have removed the "autobiography" tag that I had put on your article Anil Aggrawal, as after thorough reading, I did not find anything which can be termed as glorifying the author who himself is the subject of the article in an undue manner.

Hope I make myself clear!
On a lighter note, I would not have dared to take panga with an Indian Doctor, especially when I am Indian living in India, if I was not sure that in my lifetime there's no chance of me going under your scalpel. :-)
Jokes apart, please do contact me, if I can be of any help. Thanks again. Shovon (talk) 15:04, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your expert opinion wanted on Fan death

Dear Sir, i would like to bring your notice to an article listed under Urban Legends/Hoax. This is known as Fan Death in South Korea and may be in some places in Japan. I was just curious to know whether this can actually happen. My common sense says "NO". Your input will be highly appreciated. Thanks. Shovon (talk) 16:13, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Non-Winners in Nobel Prize

A tag has been placed on Non-Winners in Nobel Prize requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 16:31, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Supratim Dutta

I have nominated Supratim Dutta, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supratim Dutta. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Peripitus (Talk) 06:53, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Supratim's Entry (re: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supratim Dutta)

Hello Ani. Although his injury, and subsequent survivial, is rare; the world is full of rare injuries are survived. From my experience, humans ability to damage themselves in odd ways, and survive, is demonstrated daily in hospital emergency departments. One day there may be a book about Supratim Dutta's survivial but today it's just a one-off remarkable event. He's used up a lifetime of luck in a very short time - Peripitus (Talk) 00:34, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Hutt river province currency 01.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hutt river province currency 01.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 12:01, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

History of abortion

Thanks for adding content to History of abortion. However, your edits were problematic because they violated basic wikipedia policies. All content on wikipedia needs to be verifiable. We do that by citing reliable sources. It would be appreciated if you could go back and add citations for all the content you added to the article. If you need help formatting your citations or have any questions or anything like that, feel free to ask, and I'd be glad to help. If you don't add citations, there is a chance that your content will be removed as being unsourced. Hope this helps.-Andrew c ^[talk] 14:34, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Alphabiotics

A tag has been placed on Alphabiotics, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Tagishsimon (talk) 15:14, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this users initial version of the article was fine, it got hi-jacked later and turned into advert by User:Trisfb. User:Jac16888 has reverted it back to acceptable content and removed speedy tag. Article does need watching though -Hunting dog (talk) 05:59, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:KC_Agrawal.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:KC_Agrawal.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:04, 29 August 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:04, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to infinity. Thank you. siℓℓy rabbit (talk) 18:53, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Lia Beldam (ghost of a young woman) seducing Jack Nicholson.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Lia Beldam (ghost of a young woman) seducing Jack Nicholson.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 16:08, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Indian people in history

Category:Indian people in history, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 07:32, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

notice of proposed deletion

CfD nomination of Category:Agostino Carracci

Category:Agostino Carracci, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Stepheng3 (talk) 21:24, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Diwali Wishes

Sir, wishing you and your family a very happy and prosperous Diwali! Regards, Shovon.

Shovon (talk) 10:25, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:John Money.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:John Money.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 07:01, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Anil_aggrawal's_internet_journal_of_forensic_medicine_and_toxicology.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Anil_aggrawal's_internet_journal_of_forensic_medicine_and_toxicology.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 00:24, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Forensic and Medico-legal Aspects of Sexual Crimes and Unusual Sexual Practices

The article Forensic and Medico-legal Aspects of Sexual Crimes and Unusual Sexual Practices has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:N. Recent publication, no reviews found on Gnews, only references on Gscholar are by the author of the book.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ray^Talk 06:16, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Forensic and Medico-legal Aspects of Sexual Crimes and Unusual Sexual Practices

I have nominated Forensic and Medico-legal Aspects of Sexual Crimes and Unusual Sexual Practices, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forensic and Medico-legal Aspects of Sexual Crimes and Unusual Sexual Practices. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ray^Talk 06:55, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Roma15.jpg

File:Roma15.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Roma15.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Roma15.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 19:27, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Anil Aggrawal

An editor has nominated Anil Aggrawal, an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anil Aggrawal and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Abecedare (talk) 05:43, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Anil Aggrawal's Internet Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology

An editor has nominated Anil Aggrawal's Internet Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology , an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anil Aggrawal and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Abecedare (talk) 05:43, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 1000 Crime Quiz

The article 1000 Crime Quiz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unremarkable quiz book (the only reference given is to a review edited by the author).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Goochelaar (talk) 19:50, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 1000 Love and Sex Quiz

The article 1000 Love and Sex Quiz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unremarkable quiz book (the only reference given is to a review edited by the author).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Goochelaar (talk) 19:51, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Some Common Ailments

The article Some Common Ailments has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unremarkable quiz book (the only references given are to the publisher and to a journal edited by the author).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Goochelaar (talk) 19:52, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Book of Medicine

The article The Book of Medicine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unremarkable popular science book (the only references given are to its publisher and to a journal edited by the author).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Goochelaar (talk) 19:53, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Narcotic Drugs

The article Narcotic Drugs has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unremarkable popular science book (the only references given are to its publisher and to a journal edited by the author).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Goochelaar (talk) 19:54, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 1000 Biology Quiz

The article 1000 Biology Quiz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unremarkable quiz book (the only references given are to its publisher and to a journal edited by the author).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Goochelaar (talk) 19:54, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Modern Diagnostics

The article Modern Diagnostics has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unremarkable popular science book (the only references given are to its publisher and to a journal edited by the author).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Goochelaar (talk) 19:55, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Health Quiz Book

The article Health Quiz Book has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unremarkable quiz book (the only references given are to its publisher and to a journal edited by the author).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Goochelaar (talk) 19:56, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Self Assessment and Review of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology

The article Self Assessment and Review of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unremarkable textbook (the only references given are to its publisher ).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Goochelaar (talk) 19:57, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Reclining sex positions

Category:Reclining sex positions, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. –BLACK FALCON ^(TALK) 05:26, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Forensic and Medico-legal Aspects of Sexual Crimes and Unusual Sexual Practices

Regarding this, it seems this is the same text that is in the copyrighted book (the Preface, page xxi). That copyright belongs to the publisher. Per Wikipedia's license, the text cannot be hosted here. Or am I mistaken? maclean (talk) 15:29, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Barkha Dutt, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Anshuk (talk) 12:37, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mitti Mein Sona

The article Mitti Mein Sona has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No suggestion of notability. Per IMDB, no awards. Neither the director nor any of the cast has any awards per IMBD. Some claim to notability must be provided beyond its theme song being "an evergreen favorite".

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ^Bongo_matic 03:00, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Eugene Revitch

The article Eugene Revitch has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:
Eugene Revitch – news, books, scholar
Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 09:00, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:1000 Love and Sex Quiz.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:1000 Love and Sex Quiz.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk) 23:41, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Narcotic Drugs.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Narcotic Drugs.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk) 23:42, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Modern Diagnostics.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Modern Diagnostics.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk) 23:43, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Headache cartoon.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Headache cartoon.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk) 23:44, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Some common ailments.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Some common ailments.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk) 23:44, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Khashaba jadhav.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Khashaba jadhav.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:44, 3 October 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 23:44, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Sumer blog snapshot.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sumer blog snapshot.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk) 23:46, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Seldinger technique.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Seldinger technique.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk) 23:46, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:1000 Love and Sex Quiz.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:1000 Love and Sex Quiz.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk) 03:56, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sabrina Lal

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Sabrina Lal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. PDCook (talk) 21:24, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of K. C. Agrawal

The article K. C. Agrawal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable Indian academic with no significant coverage of himself, though his own works are clearly useful sources. Additionally, self promotional.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sadads (talk) 14:49, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Criminal Abortion

A tag has been placed on Criminal Abortion, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

it is a page that is completely unrepresentative of the article name and does not require redirecting or merging

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 06:58, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rajat Sharma

The article Rajat Sharma has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable sources and POV concerns as per tags.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Darkwind (talk) 08:24, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Anil Aggrawal.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:55, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Stanley H. Durlacher

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Stanley H. Durlacher requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – S. Rich (talk) 05:34, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Medical colleges in New Delhi

Category:Medical colleges in New Delhi, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shyamsunder (talk) 10:45, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Courtship disorder for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Courtship disorder is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Courtship disorder until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — James Cantor (talk) 17:09, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Anil1956. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Anil1956. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Anil1956. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Anil1956. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rajat Sharma

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rajat Sharma, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Praxidicae (talk) 23:40, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Women leaders of India has been nominated for deletion

Category:Women leaders of India has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:07, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sugandha for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sugandha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sugandha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

TrangaBellam (talk) 13:28, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:This is how the victim's glasses fell on the ground in Hitchcock's 1951 classic "Strangers on a train".png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:This is how the victim's glasses fell on the ground in Hitchcock's 1951 classic "Strangers on a train".png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 21:57, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Your edit to Richard F. Edlich has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 19:59, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I understand this, Thanks. I was under the impression that scientific material may be reproduced if due credit etc. is given. From now onward, I will be using my own words. If this is alright, let me know and I would re-edit Edlich page with my own words. Anil1956 (talk) 02:01, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay to add content that is written in your own words. Cite your sources. — Diannaa (talk) 14:32, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for your kind advice.

Warm Regards

Anil1956 Anil1956 (talk) 02:44, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In your recent edit to Blond, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. TylerBurden (talk) 13:33, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this note. I am a beginner. In this particular case [editing Blond], when I saw the page again [after my first edit], I thought I should add one more link. Hence the multiple efforts. You may count all of them as one edit, which indeed is the situation. Anil1956 (talk) 14:06, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Access to Wikipedia Library

Dear all, can somebody [e.g., senior Wikipedia editors] help me. I have been given access to Wikipedia library. But since about 2 days, I have been unable to access it. Can somebody let me know the reason, please? Thanks. Regards

Anil1956

List of parents-children who won Padma awards moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of parents-children who won Padma awards, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ––FormalDude (talk) 06:29, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Thanks. I am a beginner and can do with all the advice I get. Thanks again Anil1956 (talk) 10:46, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I feel, if you make this page visible to all, it will help the page to get populated faster. A combined effort is always better. Moreover, another beginner [like me] may start another page with the same name - it is such a captivating topic! The page may be kept at a draft stage, as you rightly suggested. Regarding references that you mentioned, the first "pair" that I entered is already in Wikipedia. In fact I have created links for those pages. Please advise. Thanks. Anil1956 (talk) 10:50, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone who visits List of parents-children who won Padma awards will see a message directing them to your draft already. Linking to their Wikipedia articles is fine, but citations are still required for verification. ––FormalDude (talk) 02:01, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Linking to their Wikipedia articles is fine, but citations are still required for verification. "

Regarding the above suggestion, Thanks. This is an interesting new thing for me. Because I thought the reader can see the required references by visiting the original Wikipedia pages [to which we are linking/referencing]. We can avoid duplicating the references that way. So in effect you are advising that I should copy the references from the original page, and paste them into the new created page, right? Or should I search for new references for the same fact? Kindly advise. Anil1956 (talk) 10:45, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If existing sources verify their winning of the award you can add those. ––FormalDude (talk) 21:57, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Anil1956 (talk) 07:30, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. If you need any more help, please ping me or visit the Teahouse. ––FormalDude (talk) 08:21, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I would need a lot more help, as I am an absolute greenhorn. And it is rare to find helping persons like you. Thanks again. Warm regards Anil1956 (talk) 09:08, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Matthew Colombo

Hello, Anil1956. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Matthew Colombo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:00, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of parents-children who won Padma awards

Hello, Anil1956. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of parents-children who won Padma awards, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of parents-children who won Padma awards

Hello, Anil1956. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of parents-children who won Padma awards".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:35, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bullion coin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Specie. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Archana (actress, 1970s)

The article Archana (actress, 1970s) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Marginal actress (career consists of 3 movies) that fails WP:NACTOR but more crucially doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pichpich (talk) 21:18, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Archana is an important actress, despite the fact she worked in very few films. She intentionally opted out of the movies after marriage [like Bhagyashree] despite having a good career in films. The latter acted in only 1 movie, and did not do anything else of note, yet her page exists. Anyone who sees the "now classic" Buddha Mil Gaya wants to know who Archana is, and there is almost nothing to provide the info. She is also the daughter of a start director, who directed star films. Anil1956 (talk) 01:52, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Archana (actress, 1970s) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Archana (actress, 1970s) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Archana (actress, 1970s) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Citadeol(talk) 18:21, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dunbeath Castle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neeyat.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Your edit to 1962 Asian Games has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 14:29, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lindau, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lindenberg.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I did so indeed. Did I commit a mistake? Kindly advise.

Anil1956 (talk) 07:28, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gupt Gyan moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Gupt Gyan. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 11:30, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I can add something myself, if that is allowed. Anil1956 (talk) 13:05, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nice. I will vote. Thanks for information.

Anil1956 (talk) 13:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Kader Khan filmography. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 13:03, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thanks. I did not know that. I am a beginner only. Thanks again for guiding me. Your reasoning is logical. Anil1956 (talk) 14:52, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since you are a pro, may I ask you a question? Several times, I have thought to click on "submit for review" for that Gupt Gyan article. But I refrained from doing so, thinking there might only a limited attempts to do that. If I can do that indefinitely, I would try clicking and see if the article has become acceptable already. Kindly advise. Anil1956 (talk) 14:55, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Arjayay. Can you please reply to my question regarding Gupt Gyan article? I am still waiting for the correct guidance. Thanks Anil1956 (talk) 06:49, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anil1956 apologies for the delay. I was unaware of your original question, as you did not notify (or "ping") me, which you did with today's follow-up.
To answer your question, AFAIK there is no limit to the number of reviews, but you need to have addressed the problems identified in the previous refusal, or the reviewers get annoyed at their time being wasted.
Although I am not a new page reviewer, looking at Draft:Gupt Gyan, I am sure it will be refused again, for lack of reliable sources that discuss the subject in detail. Please see WP:EYNTK for a summary. You have 2 sources - the YouTube video gives me "Video unavailable" "This video is private" - whilst YouTube is not normally considered a WP:Reliable source. Your other reference to the Times of India, is promising, but only has one paragraph, not the extensive coverage that is needed. You need to find multiple sources that meet WP:EYNTK - Good luck - Arjayay (talk) 11:31, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Khel Khel Mein (1975 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marathi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:04, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Language tags

Hello, please add language tags (like {{lang-hi}}) and transliterations (of non-Latin writing systems) whenever adding non-English text. These help with fonts and with screen reader users like me. Adding random Hindi terms as you did to Apricot is completely inappropriate; this is the English Wikipedia. Even in Indian articles we don't often use Indic scripts. Graham87 (talk) 15:31, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Graham,

Many thanks for your message. I am sorry. I am a newbie, and still learning the basics of editing Wikipedia. I was not even aware of language tags. I went to the page Template:Lang-hi and Template:Lang. Tried to learn something. Based on what I learnt, I re-edited the page of apricot. Do you think it is okay now? If not, kindly suggest me the right code. Thanks for letting me learn more. Warm Regards

Anil1956 (talk) 11:17, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for learning about and using language tags, but they are not at all helpful in this case. See the Manual of Style guideline about use of foreign languages (MOS:LEADLANG) and my edit summary. Graham87 (talk) 14:00, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The syntax you wanted would have been "{{lang-hi|खुबानी|khubani}}", which produces (Hindi: खुबानी, romanized: khubani. Graham87 (talk) 14:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Graham. You are truly a pro. I think I will no more harm that page, and I should better leave that page untouched. I have miles to go... miles to go... before I.... But thanks to friends like you. I am truly grateful to you.

Warm Regards

Anil1956 (talk) 15:17, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Graham,

Thanks for your guidance. I understood fairly well, why my addition of a Hindi name at the apricot page was inappropriate. Since I really wanted to internalize this concept [especially given the incredible help from you], I surfed through some Wikipedia pages, till I hit upon a page, which I thought would fit perfectly for me to use the lang tag, and learn more about it. May I humbly request you to please visit

Kuch Kuch Hota Hai

I used a similar code [as taught by you] here. Would you please let me know if this is alright? Thanks for your excellent help. So far, I had nobody to teach me, except some inanimate Wikipedia pages, which unfortunately do not reply to your questions.

Thanks and regards

Anil1956 (talk) 05:55, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please check WP:NOINDICSCRIPT Sid95Q (talk) 05:56, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks sir. As you can see from my above note to Graham, I was trying to understand the use of {{lang}} tag. Sorry if I caused you -or anybody else- any problem. I did learn from the page you suggested that we cannot use Indiscripts. But in that case, do you think the tag {{lang-hi}} is redundant; or where exactly can we use this? In my quest to learn the use of this tag, which was taught to me by Graham a day earlier, I made this edit. I had no other aim in my mind.

Many thanks and warm regards

Anil1956 (talk) 06:02, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Mirror in Room 22 moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to The Mirror in Room 22. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 17:03, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aetbaar (disambiguation)

The article Aetbaar (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation page not required (WP:ONEOTHER). Primary topic article has a hatnote to the only other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:59, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Arshad Nadeem

Hi, I just saw that you made and edit on the page Arshad Nadeem. I have a request, can you please edit the highest world ranking section in the info box? It's misleading amd incorrect. I added all the sources and information related to this topic in the talk page of Arshad Nadeem. Thank you! 2402:8100:3843:632F:6F8D:3FF9:6816:83A2 (talk) 02:22, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I will see what I can do. However, somehow I find, that my addition - which I thought put Nadeem's achievement in perspective - has been deleted. Could not understand, why?

Anil1956 (talk) 02:28, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the reply. BTW, The information about the previous Olympic record holder you added, is already published in the article. I just checked. 2402:8100:3843:632F:6F8D:3FF9:6816:83A2 (talk) 02:37, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Thanks for your update. Anil1956 (talk) 08:41, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anil1956 (talk) 08:41, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you check the incorrect information regarding Arshad Nadeem's highest world ranking on his Wikipedia page. The current source cited is the Season Top List, which reflects the longest throw of the 2024 season, not the official world ranking. The latest world ranking has not been updated yet, and someone has mistakenly provided incorrect information on the page. Arshad Nadeem's best world ranking is 4th.

Please review this information and make the necessary corrections. For more details, you can refer to the talk page of Arshad Nadeem.

Thank you. 2402:8100:386B:C8D2:F16:3735:8125:2DCF (talk) 14:30, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your kind information. I am not a sports specialist, and certainly do not know anything about javelin. It may take time to verify this information, that you are asking me. Thus, may I respectfully request you to put this question to someone better equipped with this information. Thanks for your faith in me. May God always bless you.

Anil1956 (talk) 13:36, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anil1956 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not exactly been blocked from editing, but every day, I need to log in. This has happened only recently for no reason that I can think of. When I read the page here [1], I am advised that I may have been blocked because my IP may be coming within a range. That is what I believe has happened. Thanks.

Decline reason:

We can't control that you get logged out; indeed, the range you are editing from is subject to a rangeblock for logged out users. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 16:53, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I find myself blocked, because my IP is coming within a range. I have been suggested to put this tag on my talk page [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Help:Introduction/feedback&action=edit&section=new&editintro=Template:Feedback_editintro/Help:Introduction&preload=Template:Feedback_preload/Help:Introduction&preloadtitle=Feedback+from+%5B%5BUser%3A%7B%7Bsubst%3AREVISIONUSER%7D%7D%7C%7B%7Bsubst%3AREVISIONUSER%7D%7D%5D%5D+%28%7B%7Bsubst%3A%23time%3Aj+F+Y%7D%7D%29]

Anil1956 (talk) 16:24, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of English Language Book Society

Hello Anil1956,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged English Language Book Society for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 10:44, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I agree. Soon, I will change the language. Actually I wanted this page to go to a kind of "vault" [I am forgetting the name of that vault, since I am a beginner]. The main use of this "vault" is that it [the page] is not "submitted for review" immediately. Then I can keep on developing the page, till I find that it is okay to submit it for review. When I completed these two lines, I even acknowledged the source from where I had borrowed those lines, in the form of a reference. I changed them somewhat, but not enough - as you rightly say. But after I published it, I could not figure out a way to put it in that "safe vault". If you can put it there, I shall be thankful. I wanted to create this page, because my father used to read books published by this society. Now these books are nowhere to be seen. They used to be very economical. I could not find an entry in Wikipedia. So I thought I should well create it. Thanks for your inputs.

Anil1956 (talk) 11:00, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What you describe is Draftspace, so Draft:English Language Book Society. However, copyright material is not permitted anywhere on Wikipedia, not even in draftspace.

You should also note that, while you are blocked, you have access to your user talk page so that you can make an appeal for an unblock, not for any other purpose. Cabayi (talk) 16:25, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cabayi (talk) 10:57, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Vanapalli

Hello, Anil1956. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vanapalli, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:07, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Unblocking and Clarification on Copyright Violations

Dear Cabayi,

I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to respectfully request an unblock of my account following the indefinite block you imposed on 18 September 2024 due to copyright violations. I fully understand the seriousness of these violations and recognize the importance of adhering to Wikipedia’s copyright policies.

After receiving your message, I carefully reviewed my editing history and realized that I had committed multiple unintentional copyright violations from 2006 to 2009 during my initial learning phase, followed by a long hiatus. Upon resuming editing in December 2021, I made four more unintentional violations:

• 25 December 2021

• 7 August 2022

• 5 October 2023

• 18 September 2024

In hindsight, I now understand how these repeated violations may present the appearance of disregard for Wikipedia’s policies. Upon resuming my activity in December 2021, I took Wikipedia more seriously but still encountered a few issues [as outlined above], which were entirely unintentional. I acknowledge that I failed to monitor my talk page closely enough and did not realize the cumulative impact of these errors until now. I deeply regret that my actions have led to this situation and I fully accept responsibility for not adhering to the required standards more closely.

I assure you that I have now thoroughly familiarized myself with Wikipedia’s copyright policies and the proper use of non-free content. Going forward, I am committed to ensuring that all my contributions strictly follow the guidelines. I have learned from these mistakes and am eager to make meaningful contributions in compliance with Wikipedia’s standards.

I kindly request you to reconsider the indefinite block on my account and allow me the opportunity to demonstrate that I can be a responsible editor. I am open to any further guidance you may have on how I can improve and ensure such violations do not happen again.

Thank you for your time and consideration. Anil1956 (talk) 07:37, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]