Jump to content

User talk:IronicUsername44

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by IronicUsername44 (talk | contribs) at 20:54, 17 October 2024 (Welcome!: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Opus Dei, have removed content without a good reason to do so. Content on Wikipedia should not be removed just because you disagree with it or because you think it's wrong, unless the claim is not verifiable. Instead, you should consider expanding the article with noteworthy and verifiable information of your own, citing reliable sources when you do so. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Ixocactus (talk) 20:25, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I've added something to the talk section, but this should not be necessary for such obvious edits. The paragraph removed from the lede was poorly written and out of place. The paragraph removed from the controversies section is repeated, in more depth, later in the section. These are basic edits done to keep the page readable and simple, and do not remove any meaningful information. You can let me know if there is any reason they should not be made, but I do not see any reason to revert. IronicUsername44 (talk) 20:54, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]