Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bronte O'Brien
Appearance
AfDs for this article:
- Bronte O'Brien (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This appears to be a hoax or fantasy. No Ghits on "Bronte O'Brien" and "Dolly Magazine". Grahame (talk) 03:06, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete as likely hoax per nom's evidence. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 03:10, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 03:13, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete This probably qualifies for speedy delete. Dgf32 (talk) 04:37, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Dolly Magazine is a real and popular magazine aimed at young women in Australia, but the lack of Ghits for someone who won a major award at a very young age for writing in major daily papers such as The Australian and Sunday Telegraph strongly suggests that this is either a hoax or that Ms O'Brien doesn't meet Wikipedia's notability requirements. --Nick Dowling (talk) 10:14, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- Comment: I wasn't implying that "Dolly Magazine" was a hoax, just that there were no ghits for the 2 in conjunction.--Grahame (talk) 12:25, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. There does appear to be an award of this name ([1]), but there is no list I can find on their site that has the past winners on it. Given the above, I'm inclined to agree that this is a hoax. Lankiveil (speak to me) 04:53, 27 February 2008 (UTC).