Names of large numbers
Names of numbers larger than a quadrillion are almost never used, for reasons discussed further below. It is debatable which of them should be considered real working English vocabulary and which are merely trivia, curiosities, or coinages. The following table lists those names of numbers which are found in many English dictionaries and thus have a special claim to being "real words". The "Traditional British" values shown are unused in American English and are largely obsolete in British English, but are dominant in many non-English-speaking areas, including continental Europe and Spanish-speaking countries in Latin America; see Long and short scales.
The "standard dictionary numbers"
Name | Short scale (USA and Modern British) |
Long scale (Continental Europe and/or Traditional British) |
Authorities | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AHD4[1] | COD[2] | OED2[3] | OEDnew[4] | RHD2[5] | SOED3[6] | W3[7] | UM[8] | |||
million | 106 | 106 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
milliard | 109 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||
billion | 109 | 1012 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
billiard | 1015 | [9] | [9] | ✓ | ||||||
trillion | 1012 | 1018 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
trilliard | 1021 | [9] | [9] | [9] | ✓ | |||||
quadrillion | 1015 | 1024 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
quintillion | 1018 | 1030 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
sextillion | 1021 | 1036 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
septillion | 1024 | 1042 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
octillion | 1027 | 1048 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
nonillion | 1030 | 1054 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
decillion | 1033 | 1060 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
undecillion | 1036 | 1066 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
duodecillion | 1039 | 1072 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
tredecillion | 1042 | 1078 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
quattuordecillion | 1045 | 1084 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
quindecillion (quinquadecillion) | 1048 | 1090 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
sexdecillion (sedecillion) | 1051 | 1096 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
septendecillion | 1054 | 10102 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
octodecillion | 1057 | 10108 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
novemdecillion (novendecillion) | 1060 | 10114 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
vigintillion | 1063 | 10120 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
googol | 10100 | 10100 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
centillion | 10303 | 10600 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
googolplex | 10googol | 1010100 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
✓ |
Apart from million, the words in this list ending with -illion are all derived by adding Latin prefixes (bi-, tri-, etc.) to the stem -illion.[10] Centillion[11] appears to be the highest name ending in -"illion" that is included in these dictionaries. Trigintillion, often cited as a word in discussions of names of large numbers, is not included in any of them, nor are any of the names that can easily be created by extending the naming pattern (unvigintillion, duovigintillion, duoquinquagintillion, etc.).
All of the dictionaries included googol and googolplex, generally crediting it to the Kasner and Newman book and to Kasner's nephew. None include any higher names in the googol family (googolduplex, etc.). The Oxford English Dictionary comments that googol and googolplex are "not in formal mathematical use".
- In the book Fast Food Nation, author Eric Schlosser claims a Geographic Information System named "Quintillion" is used by McDonald's to analyze data to help predict a new location for one of its restaurants. According to Schlosser, Quintillion uses data such as satellite photos, income, new housing plans, and road layouts to predict future incomes and population patterns.[12]
- The term Vigintillion was used by H. P. Lovecraft in his short stories The Call of Cthulhu and The Dunwich Horror.
i will eat of of you let me tell you story of how i killed taron, lets all eat taron, including you moumar
cos if you dont i will rape all humans
Adam, Chuquet and the origins of the "standard dictionary numbers"
The words bymillion and trimillion were first recorded in 1475 in a manuscript of Jehan Adam. Subsequently, Nicolas Chuquet wrote a book Triparty en la science des nombres which was not published during Chuquet's lifetime. However, most of it was copied by Estienne de La Roche for a portion of his 1520 book, L'arismetique. Chuquet's book contains a passage in which he shows a large number marked off into groups of six digits, with the comment:
Ou qui veult le premier point peult signiffier million Le second point byllion Le tiers poit tryllion Le quart quadrillion Le cinqe quyllion Le sixe sixlion Le sept.e septyllion Le huyte ottyllion Le neufe nonyllion et ainsi des ault's se plus oultre on vouloit preceder
(Or if you prefer the first mark can signify million, the second mark byllion, the third mark tryllion, the fourth quadrillion, the fifth quyillion, the sixth sixlion, the seventh septyllion, the eighth ottyllion, the ninth nonyllion and so on with others as far as you wish to go).
Chuquet is sometimes credited with inventing the names million, billion, trillion, quadrillion, and so forth. This is an oversimplification.
- Million was certainly not invented by Adam or Chuquet. Milion is an Old French word thought to derive from Old Italian milione, an intensification of mille, a thousand. That is, a million is a big thousand, much as 1728 is a great gross.
- From the way in which Adam and Chuquet use the words, it can be inferred that they were recording usage rather than inventing it. One obvious possibility is that words similar to billion and trillion were already in use and well-known, but that Chuquet, an expert in exponentiation, extended the naming scheme and invented the names for the higher powers.
- Notice that Chuquet's names are only similar to, not identical to, the modern ones.
Adam and Chuquet used the long scale of powers of a million; that is, Adam's bymillion (Chuquet's byllion) denoted 1012, and Adam's trimillion (Chuquet's tryllion) denoted 1018.
An aide-memoire
An easy way to find the value of the above numbers in the short scale is to take the number indicated by the prefix (such as 2 in billion, 4 in quadrillion, 18 in octodecillion, etc.), add one to it, and multiply that result by 3. For example, in a trillion, the prefix is tri, meaning 3. Adding 1 to it gives 4. Now multiplying 4 by 3 gives us 12, which is the power to which 10 is to be raised to express a short-scale trillion in scientific notation: one trillion = 1012.
In the long scales, this is done simply by multiplying the number from the prefix by 6. For example, in a billion, the prefix is bi, meaning 2. Multiplying 2 by 6 gives us 12, which is the power to which 10 is to be raised to express a long-scale billion in scientific notation: one billion = 1012.
These mechanisms are illustrated in the table in long and short scales.
The googol family
The names googol and googolplex were invented by Edward Kasner's nephew, Milton Sirotta, and introduced in Kasner and Newman's 1940 book, Mathematics and the Imagination,[13] in the following passage:
Words of wisdom are spoken by children at least as often as by scientists. The name "googol" was invented by a child (Dr. Kasner's nine-year-old nephew) who was asked to think up a name for a very big number, namely 1 with a hundred zeroes after it. He was very certain that this number was not infinite, and therefore equally certain that it had to have a name. At the same time that he suggested "googol" he gave a name for a still larger number: "Googolplex". A googolplex is much larger than a googol, but is still finite, as the inventor of the name was quick to point out. It was first suggested that a googolplex should be 1, followed by writing zeros until you got tired. This is a description of what would actually happen if one actually tried to write a googolplex, but different people get tired at different times and it would never do to have Carnera a better mathematician than Dr. Einstein, simply because he had more endurance. The googolplex is, then, a specific finite number, with so many zeros after the 1 that the number of zeros is a googol.
Value | Name | Authority |
---|---|---|
10100 | Googol | Kasner and Newman, dictionaries (see above) |
10googol = | Googolplex | Kasner and Newman, dictionaries (see above) |
Conway and Guy [14] have suggested that N-plex be used as a name for 10N. This gives rise to the name googolplexplex for 10googolplex; however, the word googolplexian is given by one site. In addition, the terms googolduplex, googoltriplex, etc. have been coined by various persons for the numbers 10googolplex, 10googolduplex, etc.[citation needed] Conway and Guy [14] have proposed that N-minex be used as a name for 10-N, giving rise to the name googolminex for the reciprocal of a googolplex. None of these names are in wide use, nor are any currently found in dictionaries.
Extensions of the standard dictionary numbers
This section needs additional citations for verification. (June 2006) |
This section possibly contains original research. (January 2007) |
This table illustrates several systems for naming large numbers, and shows how they can be extended past decillion.
Traditional British usage assigned new names for each power of one million (the long scale): 1,000,000 = 1 million; 1,000,0002 = 1 billion; 1,000,0003 = 1 trillion; and so on. It was adapted from French usage, and is similar to the system that was documented or invented by Chuquet.
Traditional American usage (which, oddly enough, was also adapted from French usage but at a later date), and modern British usage, assigns new names for each power of one thousand (the short scale.) Thus, a billion is 1000 × 10002 = 109; a trillion is 1000 × 10003 = 1012; and so forth. Due to its dominance in the financial world (and by the US-dollar) this was adopted for official United Nations documents.
Traditional French usage has varied; in 1948, France, which had been using the short scale, reverted to the long scale.
The term milliard is unambiguous and always means 109. It is almost never seen in American usage, rarely in British usage, and frequently in European usage. The term is sometimes attributed to a French mathematician named Jacques Peletier du Mans circa 1550 (for this reason, the long scale is also known as the Chuquet-Peletier system), but the Oxford English Dictionary states that the term derives from post-Classical Latin term milliartum, which became milliare and then milliart and finally our modern term.
With regard to names ending in -illiard for numbers 106·n+3, milliard is certainly in widespread use in languages other than English, but the degree of actual use of the larger terms is questionable. For example, as of 2004, Google searches on French-language pages for trillion, quadrillion, and quintillion return 6630, 312, and 127 hits respectively, whilst searches for trilliard and quadrilliard return only 102 and 7 hits respectively. However, one has to take into account that these large numbers are not often needed and that scientists almost always use scientific notation. In German the terms "Milliarde", "Billiarde" etc. are out of question.
The naming procedure for large numbers is based on taking the number n occurring in 103n+3 (short scale) or 106n (long scale) and concatenating Latin roots for its units, tens, and hundreds place, together with the suffix -illion. In this way, numbers up to 103·999+3 = 103000 (short scale) or 106·999 = 105994 (long scale) may be named. The choice of roots and the concatenation procedure is that of the standard dictionary numbers if n is 20 or smaller, and, for larger n (between 21 and 999), is due to John Horton Conway and Richard Guy. Since the system of using Latin prefixes will become ambiguous for numbers with exponents of a size which the Romans rarely counted to, like 106,000,258, Conway and Guy have also proposed a consistent set of conventions which permit, in principle, the extension of this system to provide English names for any integer whatsoever.[14]
Names of reciprocals of large numbers do not need to be listed here, because they are regularly formed by adding -th, e.g. quattuordecillionth, centillionth, etc.
For additional details, see Billion (disambiguation) and long and short scales.
Base -illion (short scale) | Value | U.S. (short scale) |
Traditional British (long scale) |
Traditional European (Peletier) (long scale) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 106 | Million | Million | Million |
2 | 109 | Billion | Thousand million | Milliard |
3 | 1012 | Trillion | Billion | Billion |
4 | 1015 | Quadrillion | Thousand billion | Billiard |
5 | 1018 | Quintillion | Trillion | Trillion |
6 | 1021 | Sextillion | Thousand trillion | Trilliard |
7 | 1024 | Septillion | Quadrillion | Quadrillion |
8 | 1027 | Octillion | Thousand quadrillion | Quadrilliard |
9 | 1030 | Nonillion | Quintillion | Quintillion |
10 | 1033 | Decillion | Thousand quintillion | Quintilliard |
11 | 1036 | Undecillion | Sextillion | Sextillion |
12 | 1039 | Duodecillion | Thousand sextillion | Sextilliard |
13 | 1042 | Tredecillion | Septillion | Septillion |
14 | 1045 | Quattuordecillion | Thousand septillion | Septilliard |
15 | 1048 | Quindecillion | Octillion | Octillion |
16 | 1051 | Sexdecillion | Thousand octillion | Octilliard |
17 | 1054 | Septendecillion | Nonillion | Nonillion |
18 | 1057 | Octodecillion | Thousand nonillion | Nonilliard |
19 | 1060 | Novemdecillion | Decillion | Decillion |
20 | 1063 | Vigintillion | Thousand decillion | Decilliard |
21 | 1066 | Unvigintillion | Undecillion | Undecillion |
22 | 1069 | Duovigintillion | Thousand undecillion | Undecilliard |
23 | 1072 | Tresvigintillion | Duodecillion | Duodecillion |
24 | 1075 | Quattuorvigintillion | Thousand duodecillion | Duodecilliard |
25 | 1078 | Quinquavigintillion | Tredecillion | Tredecillion |
26 | 1081 | Sesvigintillion | Thousand tredecillion | Tredecilliard |
27 | 1084 | Septemvigintillion | Quattuordecillion | Quattuordecillion |
28 | 1087 | Octovigintillion | Thousand quattuordecillion | Quattuordecilliard |
29 | 1090 | Novemvigintillion | Quindecillion | Quindecillion |
30 | 1093 | Trigintillion | Thousand quindecillion | Quindecilliard |
31 | 1096 | Untrigintillion | Sexdecillion | Sexdecillion |
32 | 1099 | Duotrigintillion | Thousand sexdecillion | Sexdecilliard |
N/A | 10100 | Ten duotrigintillion (also googol) | Ten thousand sexdecillion | Ten sexdecilliard |
33 | 10102 | Trestrigintillion | Septendecillion | Septendecillion |
34 | 10105 | Quattuortrigintillion | Thousand septendecillion | Septendecilliard |
35 | 10108 | Quinquatrigintillion | Octodecillion | Octodecillion |
36 | 10111 | Sestrigintillion | Thousand octodecillion | Octodecilliard |
37 | 10114 | Septentrigintillion | Novemdecillion | Novemdecillion |
38 | 10117 | Octotrigintillion | Thousand novemdecillion | Novemdecilliard |
39 | 10120 | Noventrigintillion | Vigintillion | Vigintillion |
40 | 10123 | Quadragintillion[15] | Thousand vigintillion | Vigintilliard |
50 | 10153 | Quinquagintillion | Thousand quinquavigintillion | Quinquavigintilliard |
60 | 10183 | Sexagintillion | Thousand trigintillion | Trigintilliard |
70 | 10213 | Septuagintillion | Thousand quinquatrigintillion | Quinquatrigintilliard |
80 | 10243 | Octogintillion | Thousand quadragintillion | Quadragintilliard |
90 | 10273 | Nonagintillion | Thousand quinquaquadragintillion | Quinquaquadragintilliard |
100 | 10303 | Centillion | Thousand quinquagintillion | Quinquagintilliard |
101 | 10306 | Uncentillion | Unquinquagintillion | Unquinquagintillion |
102 | 10309 | Duocentillion | Thousand unquinquagintillion | Unquinquagintilliard |
103 | 10312 | Trescentillion | Duoquinquagintillion | Duoquinquagintillion |
110 | 10333 | Decicentillion | Thousand quinquaquinquagintillion | Quinquaquinquagintilliard |
121 | 10366 | Unviginticentillion | Unsexagintillion | Unsexagintillion |
130 | 10393 | Trigintacentillion | Thousand quinquasexagintillion | Quinquasexagintilliard |
140 | 10423 | Quadragintacentillion | Thousand septuagintillion | Septuagintilliard |
150 | 10453 | Quinquagintacentillion | Thousand quinquaseptuagintillion | Quinquaseptuagintilliard |
160 | 10483 | Sexagintacentillion | Thousand octogintillion | Octogintilliard |
170 | 10513 | Septuagintacentillion | Thousand quinquaoctogintillion | Quinquaoctogintilliard |
180 | 10543 | Octogintacentillion | Thousand nonagintillion | Nonagintilliard |
190 | 10573 | Nonagintacentillion | Thousand quinquanonagintillion | Quinquanonagintilliard |
200 | 10603 | Ducentillion | Thousand centillion | Centilliard |
300 | 10903 | Trecentillion | Thousand quinquagintacentillion | Quinquagintacentilliard |
400 | 101203 | Quadringentillion | Thousand ducentillion | Ducentilliard |
500 | 101503 | Quingentillion | Thousand quinquagintaducentillion | Quinquagintaducentilliard |
600 | 101803 | Sescentillion | Thousand trecentillion | Trecentilliard |
700 | 102103 | Septingentillion | Thousand quinquagintatrecentillion | Quinquagintatrecentilliard |
800 | 102403 | Octingentillion | Thousand quadringentillion | Quadringentilliard |
900 | 102703 | Nongentillion | Thousand quinquagintaquadringentillion | Quinquagintaquadringentilliard |
1000 | 103003 | Thousand quingentillion | Quingentilliard | |
1010100 | Googolplex |
Other large numbers used in mathematics and physics
See also
References
- ^ American Heritage Dictionary, 4th edition, ISBN 0-395-82517-2. [1]
- ^ Cambridge Dictionaries Online, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- ^ Oxford English Dictionary, 2nd edition, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0198611862 (and addendums since publication in 1989.)
- ^ Oxford English Dictionary, New Edition, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. [2] (subscription required), checked April 2007
- ^ The Random House Dictionary, 2nd Unabridged Edition, 1987, Random House.
- ^ Shorter Oxford English Dictionary, 3rd edition, 1993, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- ^ Webster's Third New International Dictionary, Unabridged, 1993, Merriam-Webster.
- ^ "How Many? A Dictionary of Units of Measures". Russ Rowlett and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Retrieved 2007-11-01.
billiard unit of quantity equal to 1015, which is one quadrillion in American terminology or 1000 billion in traditional British terminology. The name is coined to parallel milliard, which has long been a name for 1000 million.
trilliard a unit of quantity equal to 1021, which is one sextillion in American terminology or 1000 trillion in traditional British terminology. The name is coined to parallel milliard, which has long been a name for 1000 million. - ^ a b c d e Not verified whether this term is mentioned in this work of reference
- ^ p. 316, The History of the English Language, Oliver Farrar Emerson, New York, London: Macmillan and Co., 1894.
- ^ Entry for centillion in the American Heritage Dictionary
- ^ Schlosser, Eric (2002) [2001]. Fast Food Nation. London, England: Penguin Books. p. 66. ISBN 0-14-100687-0.
- ^ Kasner, Edward and James Newman, Mathematics and the Imagination, 1940, Simon and Schuster, New York.
- ^ a b c The Book of Numbers, J. H. Conway and R. K. Guy, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1996, pp. 15–16. ISBN 0-387-97993-X.
- ^ Often misspelled quardragintillion.
External links
- Robert Munafo's Large Numbers
- How high can you count? by Landon Curt Noll.
- Full list of large number names list sorted by 10n and by word length
- Big numbers Educational site, which can name any numbers put into it (up to centillion)