Depictation is factually wrong. On a tidally locked planet, the points near the pole would have the same climate as other the points near the terminator Thue | talk13:28, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Gives a misleading impression that this is some kind of map. Nature of Gliese 581g as terrestrial planet or ocean planet is not known at this time, we do not know if this planet even has continents. Icalanise (talk) 09:55, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think it is reason for deletion that the planet may be an ocean planet. If the image was a correct depictation of what a non-ocean planet would look like, then it would be perfectly ok, and could be supplemented with a hypothetical depictation of what the climate of a tide-locked ocean planet would look like. And the image does not claim to be a map, but only a hypothetical representation, which I have seen often enough in fx scientific american, and that I don't see anything wrong with in principle. Thue | talk11:46, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: non-free image being used in Rui En without any critical commentary about the image fails WP:NFCC#8 as the reader's understanding of the article is not impaired by removing the image and might be provided by the addition of suitable prose. The fair-use rationale is insufficient for its current use. It also fails WP:NFCC#3a for minimal use because there are several non-free images in the article. ww2censor (talk) 13:43, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: non-free image being used in Rui En without any critical commentary about the image fails WP:NFCC#8 as the reader's understanding of the article is not impaired by removing the image and might be provided by the addition of suitable prose. The fair-use rationale is insufficient for its current use. It also fails WP:NFCC#3a for minimal use because there are several non-free images in the article. ww2censor (talk) 13:43, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: non-free image being used in Rui En without any critical commentary about the image fails WP:NFCC#8 as the reader's understanding of the article is not impaired by removing the image and might be provided by the addition of suitable prose. The fair-use rationale is insufficient for its current use. It also fails WP:NFCC#3a for minimal use because there are several non-free images in the article. ww2censor (talk) 13:44, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: non-free image being used in Rui En without any critical commentary about the image fails WP:NFCC#8 as the reader's understanding of the article is not impaired by removing the image and might be provided by the addition of suitable prose. The fair-use rationale is insufficient for its current use. It also fails WP:NFCC#3a for minimal use because there are several non-free images in the article. ww2censor (talk) 13:45, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: non-free image being used in Rui En without any critical commentary about the image fails WP:NFCC#8 as the reader's understanding of the article is not impaired by removing the image and might be provided by the addition of suitable prose. The fair-use rationale is insufficient for its current use. It also fails WP:NFCC#3a for minimal use because there are several non-free images in the article. ww2censor (talk) 13:45, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
