User talk:Wikiisaac
A Welcome Apology
Hello.
If you're looking at the history of this talk page (I've left the nice ones on here from previous years), you're probably thinking that I've got quite a good talent for being a total moron with Wikipedia and not conforming to simple rules and regulations
You'd be right! (If it was still 2008!) I just want to establish that I was around 14/15 years old at the time and rather immature. I also had much higher thoughts of myself as a Wikipedia editor and didn't really know the full extent of policies on the website. It would seem most often with not realising that Google Images isn't a valid copyright source!.
I want to apologise to all of the users that had to deal with my nonesense and nuisance. I have since become a much more proficient coder and have cleaned up my User area thoroughly.
Just putting it out there. Should be smooth sailing from here. Send a message and say hi! Wikiisaac (talk) 23:06, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
Apprentice WikiProject Initiation
|
Hello, Wikiisaac and thank you for your contributions on articles related to The Apprentice UK. I'd like to invite you to become a part of WikiProject The Apprentice UK, a WikiProject aiming to improve coverage of The Apprentice UK and related articles on Wikipedia.
If you would like to help out and participate, please come over and visit us here for more information. Thanks! Seaserpent85 17:13, 12 March 2009 (UTC) |
Doesn't seem to have been deleted?
Thanks for uploading File:S5Candidates.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Uh-Oh. I was a little stupid back in 2009
Google Images is not a source, it's a search engine. We need to know who the copyright holder is and where the image came from (ie. what web page, or what book, etc.) in order to verify the license. --Carnildo (talk) 00:33, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
This is just gold
Please don't speculate as to Ó Briain's religion n the basis that he used one Yiddish word (which is not that uncommon anyway) in an interview. Please review policy on biographies. Rodhullandemu 15:00, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
Problem with my own work?
Thank you for uploading File:New Wikiisaac.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:42, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
- Hi make a choice between public domain, CC-BY-SA-3.0, pr CC-BY-3.0 Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:27, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
Again. Brilliant
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Mild Insomnia, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Bhockey10 (talk) 00:24, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
Bit Late?
Hi Wikiisaac: A belated welcome to Wikipedia from me, hope you enjoy it! Well done on creating the article about Rabbi Yehoshua Hartman, a well-deserved feat! It would help your work and Wikipedia if you could add any additional WP:RS and WP:CITE to this article and to any other articles that you create or are trying to improve. Best wishes, IZAK (talk) 10:14, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
Okay Safe one Wikipedia
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Nisha Hurst requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Best regards, Cind.amuse (Cindy) 18:44, 4 March 2012 (UTC
Nomination of Leslie Cass for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leslie Cass is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leslie Cass until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:46, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
I'm so very honoured that people got together to actually discuss an article I made quite legtimately about my great uncle
Wikiisaac (talk) 23:06, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
