Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olagist

Olagist

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Re-created for the third time. Speedy deletion templates removed repeatedly. This is a non-notable website. I can find no references discussing the topic. Additionally. the article is written as purely promotional, advertising its services, i.e. "sure source for the latest news and all Genre of music and Musical Videos" (sic). 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 19:58, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Per nom. I'd personally have gone down the route of WP:G11 – the article does sound quite promotional. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 13:27, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Don't Delete - Articles on Wikipedia are subjected to edits as there maybe need to Edit due to change in the previous fact hence any registered member is free to edit any article provided it is not out of context . same goes for the Proposed article . if any wikipedian feels the article needs more citation to back its claim anybody is free to do so by editing , its a stub which means its open for contribution and expansion. for this reason i strongly Support that the article should not be deleted.

Foreman22 (talk) 14:48, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and Salt Non-notable and promotional, where this is the third time this article has been re-created it and multiple i.p. and new unconfirmed editors removing deletion templates the article should also be salted. VViking_TalkEdits 14:56, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

it should not be Deleted though am still new here but have heard the name in question before , in my own candid view i will suggest the article be allowed and watched while the Creator be given a time frame to gather more material to backup the article claims.Anijames (talk) 15:00, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Please do not remove other editors comments when you create your own comments as you did with VViking above, that is considered rude and disruptive. VViking_TalkEdits 15:04, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please lets be Civil in Handling issues and no sentiments please No body should take sides with anybody here we are all entitled to our own different opinion.

With All Sense of Responsibility i will humbly ask that this article should not be deleted rather it should be given room to be improved upon16:05, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Mikebilz (talk)