Jump to content

Talk:E series of preferred numbers

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jahibadkaret (talk | contribs) at 13:22, 23 April 2019. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconElectronics Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk page
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requesting historical documents

If any one has links to old historical standards for component values prior to 1952, please post a link or expand the history section. Thanks in advance. • SbmeirowTalk09:34, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have commented out the "E1" series (if it ever existed), since I could not find any historical sources for it (and I never heard of it before).
--Matthiaspaul (talk) 14:30, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article renaming

Please quit renaming the article. Discuss it the talk section, settle on something, then change it. • SbmeirowTalk03:37, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK, yes, that would have been better. But I took the discussion instead to User talk:Matthiaspaul#E series where we worked it out. If you disagree, let us know. Dicklyon (talk) 05:28, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rounding Rules

The article is mentioning that E24 and below are using different rounding rules than E48 and above. But there are no references, links or other hint to what these rules are or where they are defined. This is problematic, for people trying to implement this algorithmically without having to resort to lookup tables. Please add rounding references if you know it. Jahibadkaret (talk) 13:22, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]