User talk:PauBatlleV

PauBatlleV, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi PauBatlleV! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Mz7 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:10, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, PauBatlleV, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Nahal 09:06, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spamming

Hello, I'm Viewmont Viking. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. --VViking_TalkEdits 13:28, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you.--VViking_TalkEdits 13:44, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links to Sealife Collection

Hi, I've checked out a few dozen of these pages on Sealife Collection that you've been linking to and they largely don't see to be very useful. Rather than linking to an external website, can you instead add some photos to the articles directly from Wikimedia Commons? —Hyperik ⌜talk⌟ 01:40, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment. I have been adding external links to various articles. These links redirect to a living website, that is being constantly updated by users with graphic material of the species on its natural environment. It also contains other information about the species itself as well as the place and date of the sightings, etc.— Preceding unsigned comment added by PauBatlleV (talk • contribs)

If you have images to add, please do so via Commons and license them under a CC-BY-SA 4.0 license. The WMF appreciates good quality images at Commons which can be used on WP to enhance articles, but we do not allow spam links to external sites. If you need any help uploading to Commons, contact me on my UTP. Thank you. ^Atsme _Talk 📧 19:27, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for running unapproved bot scripts.

Under the bot policy, all automated scripts must be approved by the Bot Approvals Group to ensure that they perform safe and useful functions without stressing system resources.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. TonyBallioni (talk) 19:47, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've blocked you as you appear to be using a script or both to mass add links in mainspace. I don't think this is consistent with the WP:BOT policy, and you'll need to either add these manually, or get a BFRA run. See also WP:MEATBOT. TonyBallioni (talk) 19:51, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

PauBatlleV (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It seems that I'm suspect to be using a bot, but I'm editing different articles manually...

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=It seems that I'm suspect to be using a bot, but I'm editing different articles manually... |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=It seems that I'm suspect to be using a bot, but I'm editing different articles manually... |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=It seems that I'm suspect to be using a bot, but I'm editing different articles manually... |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Dear administrator, I'm no tusing any bot to add the links, I'm doing it manually... so would be nice to continue adding content to some articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PauBatlleV (talk • contribs) 20:51, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

So you are not using a script to help you edit nearly 200 pages in a little over an hour? Primefac (talk) 21:09, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

PauBatlleV (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear admin, quick answer is no, I'm doing it manually. Look at my contributions you will see that usually I'm editing for 30min, 1 hour, and I stop. If I were using a bot I would have it running for one night and all the links that I have been introducing for the last 15 days (aprox) would have been pasted in one night..., the reason why I am quite fast doing it is beacause I previously prepared a excel file with all the links to wikipedia and the link to the external website in the form "* Photos of PauBatlleV on Sealife Collection", so I just have to make sure I put the link in the proper site of the article. Usually I spent between 10 min and 1 hour, because is almost unhuman to do it for longer. I hope this explains your concerns

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Dear admin, quick answer is no, I'm doing it manually. Look at my contributions you will see that usually I'm editing for 30min, 1 hour, and I stop. If I were using a bot I would have it running for one night and all the links that I have been introducing for the last 15 days (aprox) would have been pasted in one night..., the reason why I am quite fast doing it is beacause I  previously prepared a excel file with all the links to wikipedia and the link to the external website in the form "* Photos of [https://sealifecollection.org/taxon/273919 PauBatlleV] on Sealife Collection", so I just have to make sure I put the link in the proper site of the article. Usually I spent between 10 min and 1 hour, because is almost unhuman to do it for longer. I hope this explains your concerns |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Dear admin, quick answer is no, I'm doing it manually. Look at my contributions you will see that usually I'm editing for 30min, 1 hour, and I stop. If I were using a bot I would have it running for one night and all the links that I have been introducing for the last 15 days (aprox) would have been pasted in one night..., the reason why I am quite fast doing it is beacause I  previously prepared a excel file with all the links to wikipedia and the link to the external website in the form "* Photos of [https://sealifecollection.org/taxon/273919 PauBatlleV] on Sealife Collection", so I just have to make sure I put the link in the proper site of the article. Usually I spent between 10 min and 1 hour, because is almost unhuman to do it for longer. I hope this explains your concerns |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Dear admin, quick answer is no, I'm doing it manually. Look at my contributions you will see that usually I'm editing for 30min, 1 hour, and I stop. If I were using a bot I would have it running for one night and all the links that I have been introducing for the last 15 days (aprox) would have been pasted in one night..., the reason why I am quite fast doing it is beacause I  previously prepared a excel file with all the links to wikipedia and the link to the external website in the form "* Photos of [https://sealifecollection.org/taxon/273919 PauBatlleV] on Sealife Collection", so I just have to make sure I put the link in the proper site of the article. Usually I spent between 10 min and 1 hour, because is almost unhuman to do it for longer. I hope this explains your concerns |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}