Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ingolf of Sweden

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 09:04, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ingolf of Sweden

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

None of these people are named Ingolf. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:05, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

~~Support~~ Delete : This is one of the most embarrassing of all my millions of embarrassing typos, when the page was created. Sorry! The kings have often been called Ingold (never Ingolf!) in older English literature such as here. Referring from such older exonyms, I believe, is one of the most helpful reasons to have disambiguations and redirects, but mega-embarrassing typos won't do the trick. What we have in Ingold of Sweden will suffice. Thank you for catching this! --SergeWoodzing (talk) 09:19, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:23, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per SergeWoodzing (can we shortcut or snow close as a CSD G7?) PamD 11:22, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
delete - we don't create dabs just for typos. Bearian (talk) 16:19, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per author's request. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:22, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.