Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jai Hind (newspaper)

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 14:02, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jai Hind (newspaper)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I do not see any reliable sources coverage. The only link it has is a link to its official website. Gazal world (talk) 13:31, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 September 3. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:50, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:33, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:33, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No reliable sources. Simple advertising. - Funky Snack (Talk) 15:27, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Hold it, hold it! This article was a stub for 12 years until some anonymous 'smartass' came along in February this year and changed the text to this 'ghastly version'. This of course have to be dealt with and cleaned up, but there are absolutely no need to remove the article all together. There are plenty of sources about Jai Hind easily to be found stretching from at least 1950 and to the present days. I've done some updating to the article, removed some of the worst sentences from Februar, and added a number of sources dealing with the subject. Please feel free to edit some more in the text if it still seem to biased in some respects. If one needs to add more about the history of the newspaper, then NewsPapers Club seem to be one of the better sources for this. Oleryhlolsson (talk) 22:12, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The paper seems to have existed in Gujarat for about 72 years now. It is harder to find sources about newspapers in India. I suggest keeping this. -- Padavalam ► 16:26, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Seems to be an important paper in the Saurashtra region of Gujarat with publishing for 72 years. Seems to qualify the WP:NMEDIA criteria. - Roller26 (talk) 08:40, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - based on a look online, it appears to have been involved in some controversies over the past decade. Bearian (talk) 19:56, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.