Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Requests for page protection

You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level".
Return to Requests for page protection.

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. HurricaneEdgar 14:28, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Thesigmaofthiswebsite (talk · contribs) blocked by Muboshgu. indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 00:51, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. I think it is obvious from the article name Abo Yemen 15:07, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined as moot since the article has been moved. Will protect under its new name, Hamas temporary committee. Daniel Case (talk) 00:49, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continuing BLP:CRIME violations by IPs. Borgenland (talk) 15:18, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:Brettandelle, using multiple IPs and sock accounts. I expect that Template:The Hoosiers and The Hoosiers discography will need the same protection because they were targeted by Special:Contributions/148.252.159.73. Binksternet (talk) 15:38, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Irwin Sparkes, Alan Sharland and Leighton Allen (talk · contribs) blocked by Ingenuity. Indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 02:22, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – User has requested their talk page be speedied three times (previously declined twice) now under the guise of "I don't want to use or edit Wikipedia anymore at all" after being indef'd for sockpuppetry.

Requesting semi-protection to discourage further requests; they clearly do not wish to be part of the project any longer. GSK (talkedits) 16:27, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed by Justlettersandnumbers.
Daniel Case (talk) 02:24, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Coordinated POV pushing and WP:FORUM violations by IPs and newly-created accounts following recent developments on the article. Borgenland (talk) 18:07, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not seeing much reverting going on. Daniel Case (talk) 02:29, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent removal of sourced information. Semsûrî (talk) 19:50, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. And they have responded on talk, although, I admit, not encouragingly. Will leave a CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 02:36, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, there already is one. Sorry. Daniel Case (talk) 02:37, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 21:55, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I am concerned, pending changes protection is working as intended. Ymblanter (talk) 22:06, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok Filmssssssssssss (talk) 22:30, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It seems a little on the high end for pending changes. 26 out of the most recent 100 edits were from IPs and only 5 of those were accepted. And 9 out of 9 edits by users with fewer than 10 edits were reverted. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:36, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Do you think protection is necessary based off of this? Filmssssssssssss (talk) 22:45, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm on the fence so I'll leave it to another administrator to decide. If I wasn't on the fence, I would have already accepted or declined the request, which is still open. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:56, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 02:00, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7E:2661:E00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 02:59, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]