Talk:Astute-class submarine

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Astute-class submarine article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

SSN(R)

I noticed there was a recent attempt to add mention of a new Astute Nuclear Submarine Replacement (SSN(R)) proramme to the infobox, but it was reverted as "cite isn't sufficient". But there seems to be other sources as well,^[1]^[2]^[3]^[4]^[5] perhaps enough to add mention of SSN(R) somewhere in the arricle? Thoughts? - wolf 05:10, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Good finds. I've only looked at navylookout and Forbes as I recognise those, but they look good to me. Mark83 (talk) 06:05, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification required

In the Propulsion and general specifications section, final paragraph, a submariner is quoted speaking about "holding a [mock enemy] submarine" in sea exercises, in reference to the quality of the Astute class's sonar. Could this be clarified please? Does it refer to tracking another submarine? If so, perhaps there could also be some discussion about the issues of tracking another sub using sonar; for example how the sub doing the tracking avoids detection by the tracked sub, or if it does give away its own position what are the ramifications of this for submarine-on-submarine warfare? 2A01:4C8:1485:5869:B8B0:55B3:CBF1:6660 (talk) 13:41, 22 September 2021 (UTC)AJF[reply]

Software from Belarus

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/other/britain-s-nuclear-submarine-software-contract-handed-to-belarusian-engineers/ar-BB1r6KJ7 --2A02:908:898:9780:3283:6D52:32FC:1792 (talk) 08:36, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What are you proposing is done with this? Simply dropping a url is not a good use of a talk page. If you are suggesting that this is including the content in some way, can I just flag that the word 'Astute' does not appear in the article. It also seems like a bit of a non-issue, by my reading. Mark83 (talk) 09:16, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://www.matchtech.com/job/EMP451390/sda-project-manager-barrowinfurness-england

[2] ttps://www.navylookout.com/tag/ssnr/

[3] ttp://www.hisutton.com/Royal_Navy_Submarine_SSN-R.html

[4] ttps://www.forbes.com/sites/hisutton/2019/12/08/new-intelligence-on-the-secretive-next-generation-british-attack-submarine-ssnr/amp/

[5] ttps://www.defenceconnect.com.au/maritime-antisub/6062-its-never-too-early-to-start-planning-for-the-future/amp

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]