Talk:S. Balachander

Untitled

Shouldn't the article be moved to "Sundaram Balachander"? // habj 21:04, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sundaram Balachander. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6U68ulwpb?url=http://mha.nic.in/sites/upload_files/mha/files/LST-PDAWD-2013.pdf to http://mha.nic.in/sites/upload_files/mha/files/LST-PDAWD-2013.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:46, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Long-standing vandalism

Added section:

==Feud with the Kanchi shankaracharya==
 
Balachander,though hmself a brahmin heavily resented the influence that the kanchi mutt held over brahmins in tamilnadu. His remarks calling the Kanchi shankaracharya [[Chandra shekarendra saraswati]] "A senile old man" and calling he kanchi mutt a "420 organization" deeply hurt the feelings of the brahmin community.

From Revision as of 04:25, 4 September 2016

This was tweaked subsequently, but "mutt" and "420" endured throughout. — MaxEnt 15:37, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Requested move 19 April 2020

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Moved as proposed. Although a headcount would yield no consensus (notwithstanding that one oppose is qualified as "weak", the overriding policy invoked here is WP:COMMONNAME, for which sufficient evidence has been provided to demonstrate that the initialism is used for this subject. BD2412 T 03:51, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Sundaram Balachander → S. Balachander – This is the more common name, and the one used in film credits. Compare the G-hits of S. Balachander and Sundaram Balachander.In fact, after he quit films he was called "Veenai S. Balachander" or "Veena S. Balachander". Kailash29792 (talk) 05:36, 19 April 2020 (UTC) —Relisting. buidhe 10:19, 26 April 2020 (UTC) —Relisting. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 16:43, 3 May 2020 (UTC)—Relisting. Jerm (talk) 19:16, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

• Weak oppose per WP:INITS, S. Balachander is used more often than Sundaram Balachander but they are both used a lot. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:14, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

  Marcocapelle, the page you linked here should have given it away: "Generally, use the most common format of a name used in reliable sources". We say John F. Kennedy, not John Fitzgerald Kennedy; and J. P. Morgan, not John Pierpont Morgan. Besides, a biography of this subject calls him "S Balachander" on the cover. In the credits of his best known film, he is credited as "S. Balachander" (in Tamil but the S is in English) at 3:30. --Kailash29792 (talk) 15:52, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

• Comment: Marcocapelle, has the rationale provided by me changed your view in any way? Is there a way I can lure more commentors? --Kailash29792 (talk) 15:54, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
• Support as per nominator. He is known by this name and is refered to by the media by this name. TamilMirchi (Talk) 7:32, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
• Oppose. Spelled out names are preferred to initialisms. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:06, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
• Support Just searched his full name in Google books and it almost entirely came up with S. Balachander. We should go with what the majority of publications go with and cite his full name in the article.† Encyclopædius 10:08, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

References

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.