| Predicate |
Object |
| contentType |
Journal Article|Comment |
| endingPage |
7 |
| issn |
2168-6106 |
| issueIdentifier |
2 |
| pageRange |
216-7 |
| publicationName |
JAMA Internal Medicine |
| startingPage |
216 |
| bibliographicCitation |
Claeys MJ. Is primary percutaneous coronary intervention still the superior reperfusion strategy? JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Feb;175(2):216–7. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.6586. PMID: 25486596. |
| creator |
http://rdf.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubchem/author/MD5_6f6e809f903c7cb11e0378eab35ed1d1 |
| date |
2015-02-01^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#date> |
| identifier |
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.6586
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25486596 |
| isPartOf |
http://rdf.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubchem/journal/40864
https://portal.issn.org/resource/ISSN/2168-6106 |
| language |
English |
| source |
https://www.crossref.org/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ |
| title |
Is Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Still the Superior Reperfusion Strategy? |
| discusses |
http://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/M0008434 |
| hasPrimarySubjectTerm |
http://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D062645Q000706
http://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D015425Q000706
http://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D010360Q000706
http://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D009203Q000188
http://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D012042
http://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D005343Q000627 |
| hasSubjectTerm |
http://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D008297
http://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D006801
http://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D005260 |