Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/02/09

Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive February 9th, 2018
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ПЭНЖТЖТЖТОГОТГАЕУЯ56 46.249.66.41 12:43, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Bad faith nom - tidying up. --Herby talk thyme 13:16, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded the file to a wrong destination; the file isn't under a PD license. Sorry. Donarius (talk) 12:58, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request. --Jcb (talk) 13:27, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

keine Lizenz Mehlauge (talk) 13:08, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request shortly after upload. --Jcb (talk) 13:22, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Risoluzione troppo alta, non autorizzata Alessandrodibenedetto (talk) 15:06, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb at 17:34, 9 Februar 2018 UTC: non autorizzata --Krdbot 19:43, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 17:09, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake. Template wasn't correctly coded. Vartemp (talk) 17:13, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Where did you take the base map from? Jcb (talk) 17:48, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
From this. Vartemp (talk) 22:06, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have fixed the source information. In the future, please do not claim own work if it isn't. Jcb (talk) 22:32, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 22:32, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspected copyright violation Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:20, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Christian Ferrer at 20:22, 9 Februar 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 01:41, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by MoiraMoira as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.mechelen.be/files/uploads/imagecache/nexSmWallImageFeed/images/socialMediaWall/foto-greet-facebook.jpgD Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:54, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The declaration of consent is received and confirmed, no need to delete anymore. Ciell (talk) 09:12, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: OTRS permission is received. --Ciell (talk) 09:12, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

falsche Farben, keine Lizenz Mehlauge (talk) 19:19, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:32, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PVRIS#/media/File:509_pvr_9816_bw_web_(1).jpg 208.251.181.122 18:02, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 01:13, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has a NC restriction from the source over here Leoboudv (talk) 21:25, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 19:44, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picasso died in 1973. His works are not in the public domain

Discasto talk 21:19, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

concerning my picture Ame02128 16.jpg, first of all thank you for the news of the death of Pablo. I conceive the picture as 'an activity' of the museum and NOT as a reproduction of the opera (difficult by the way to reproduce in such a way). So I think your observation is just a little stupid... Anyway, if someone need to cancel it to avoid problems, I really don't care. Thank you Francesco Gorup de Besanez

@Gorupdebesanez: It's pretty obvious that comments as yours cannot come but from ignorance. Read a little bit about licenses and about what a derivative work is, and possibly you won't make a fool of yourself again. You're welcome. --Discasto talk 22:27, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Obvious copyvios. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 04:20, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative works (photos) of temporary display of paintings by Picasso, not in the public domain, not covered by FOP.

Darwin Ahoy! 02:43, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am responsible for the upload of the imagem Picasso busto de homem masp.jpg, and understand the artwork, despite being from 1909, is not in public domain as mentioned above. Please feel free to delete the image and apologies for any misunderstanding. Thank you for the notification. Guilherme Altmayer (talk) 13:29, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:39, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nie jest to praca własna autora, fotografia wykonana około sierpień-wrzesień 1944 http://slowemmalowane.blogspot.com/2017/07/niedziela-z-albumem-powstanie.html Gruzin (talk) 18:57, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Masur (talk) 11:39, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BUNTY GOND (talk · contribs)

edit

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 15:14, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:25, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BUNTY GOND (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of scope - Not educationally useful; unused personal images of uploader.

hiàn 02:31, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 15:58, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably copied from other user's photo File:Billa Prosek a Prosek Point.jpg and then edited heavily. Kulmalukko (talk) 08:50, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:01, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Caradoc29105 fake images

edit

A bunch of files, mostly fake maps, created for hoaxes/vandalism on en-wiki by a sockpuppeteer. For more information, see here. Not notifying, obviously; is it okay if I don't tag the individual files either? Ansh666 (talk) 08:59, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, tagging all with G3. Close please. Ansh666 (talk) 19:27, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Done by Dyolf77.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:05, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too heavily edited. Superseded by the original photo File:Jiřího z Poděbrad.jpg, from which this image is copied. Kulmalukko (talk) 09:02, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:00, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems like copied from other user's photo File:Praha Kunratice kostel.jpg and edited heavily. Kulmalukko (talk) 09:24, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:00, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably copied from Tripadvisor (the cloudlets are in the same position). Too heavily edited. Kulmalukko (talk) 09:45, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 16:59, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I can't find the license for this image at the source but according to this the license is CC BY NC 3.0. There is reportedly a Non-Commercial restriction. Leoboudv (talk) 20:22, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. My mistake. There are three pictures in total.Rasbak (talk) 20:39, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Done by Neozoon.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:12, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy right UnitedPowersTalk 21:29, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't use this method to get obvious copyright violations deleted, JomaIran. Please tag them with {{Copyvio}} for speedy deletion. This method takes too long. --Majora (talk) 22:06, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Reping UnitedPowers. OP didn't change both links in their signature after their rename. --Majora (talk) 22:07, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Majora Hello! Thanks for teaching, sure. Because of its size (In Codes), i cant change both. UnitedPowersTalk 22:15, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@UnitedPowers: Please shorten your sig to allow you to change the talk link.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:18, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Done by Sealle.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:18, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

suppage del 최광모 (talk) 04:07, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Own userspace. --Achim (talk) 21:47, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 07:39, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete file:Miko Upgrade Hustle Gang.jpg due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 11:43, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 07:39, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete file:Hustle Mafia.jpg due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 11:41, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: coordinated schoolwork. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:27, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal file, out of Commons scope. Please see the talk page of Category:Unused personal files. E4024 (talk) 15:02, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Taivo at 09:33, 14 Februar 2018 UTC: Out of project scope: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mustafa elnisr.jpg --Krdbot 13:30, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:33, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 23:46, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files copied from the internet. Without giving the author and his consent. MAx 92 (talk) 23:14, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:18, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 05:49, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 01:13, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 05:49, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 01:13, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Une autre version avec métadonnées mise à jour a été proposé et ses droits ont été clarifié Anne-Marie Hassoun (talk) 14:17, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb at 16:01, 15 Februar 2018 UTC: No permission since 7 February 2018 --Krdbot 19:29, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. Small size, no metadata. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:36, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - facebook image "FBMD". --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:18, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. Small size, no metadata. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:36, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:18, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by রোকন (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of scope: unused personal photos. Unlikely to be used in a project. Commons is not a personal Webhost

Afifa Afrin (talk) 17:38, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:17, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not user's work. Neither suitable for competition entered nor commons Danidamiobi (talk) 19:42, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:59, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicate file. Hacastro15 (talk) 18:25, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:El Sueño Premiere.jpg in use File:El_Sueño_Premiere_1.jpg was not, so I deleted the unused one. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:37, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use, I deleted the duplicate. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:37, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is in use on Wikidata, but if you follow that link, you'll find it is attached to a declined submission about this individual. While that's interesting, I found http://www.imdb.com/name/nm5490409/ more interesting and, combined with the grey edge on this scan, leads me to believe this is a copyright violation. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:46, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:47, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
  • Yes, I'm the admin who kept this before, but it bothered me, and I'm renominating it. Image is in use on Wikidata, but if you follow that link, you'll find it is attached to a declined submission about this individual. While that's interesting, I found http://www.imdb.com/name/nm5490409/ more interesting and, combined with the grey edge on this scan, leads me to believe this is a copyright violation. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:48, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio https://mfoxes.net/c/castimage-5490409.jpg. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:57, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complete with little logo in lower right corner, this appears to be copied from https://www.libdems.org.uk/jane_bonham_carter Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:56, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:51, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Anna Staveley (talk) 20:06, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:49, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Corrupted file. No useful information. Out of scope. Kalbbes (talk) 22:02, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:43, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo by MICHAEL L mice. Identity of Simoniaque should be verified via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:00, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:26, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not created in Italy, any proof that it has been first published in Italy, any reason for Italian law to apply. Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:06, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:26, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not created in Italy, any proof that it has been first published in Italy, any reason for Italian law to apply. Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:07, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:26, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not created in Italy, any proof that it has been first published in Italy, any reason for Italian law to apply. Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:07, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:26, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 705ngawang (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of scope. Not in use.

D Y O L F 77[Talk] 00:09, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:25, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, personal image, out of project scope.

D Y O L F 77[Talk] 00:11, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:26, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo : JEAN-SEBATIEN EVRARD / AFP. Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:13, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete and block the uploader. Obvious {{copyvio}} by copyvio-only uploader. LX (talk, contribs) 17:56, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:26, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:20, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:27, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

At the original uploader’s request, and its name doesn't follow the new naming convention of ACC project. It is also out of scope: unused photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Moreover, it is the same character as File:中-bronze-shang.svg. Wargaz (talk) 00:25, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:27, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:27, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:27, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:27, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:27, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:27, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:27, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:28, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:27, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:28, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: ,. --Jcb (talk) 10:27, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:28, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:27, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:28, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:28, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and File:Factors Influence Political Stability in Somalia.pdf

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:29, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:28, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wayne Armstrong / University of Denver. Permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:42, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:28, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo by Peter Fischer-Piel. Permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:43, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:28, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - Not educationally useful; unused personal image of uploader. hiàn 00:48, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:28, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ogu Christian (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of scope - Not educationally useful; unused personal images of uploader.

hiàn 00:53, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:28, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - Not educationally useful; unused personal image of uploader. hiàn 00:54, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:29, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - Not educationally useful; unused personal image of uploader. hiàn 00:55, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:29, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - Not educationally useful; unused personal image of uploader. hiàn 00:56, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:29, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - Not educationally useful; unused personal image of uploader. hiàn 00:58, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:29, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Has cut-off watermark, unlikely own work. Train2104 (talk) 01:21, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:29, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

source does not give cc licence Weird1e (talk) 01:50, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:29, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - Not educationally useful; unused personal image of uploader. hiàn 02:24, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:29, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - Not educationally useful; unused personal image of uploader. hiàn 02:27, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:30, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - Not educationally useful; unused personal image of uploader uploaded solely for the purpose of promotion. hiàn 02:30, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:30, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:32, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - Not educationally useful; unused personal image of uploader. hiàn 02:32, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:30, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - Not educationally useful; unused personal image of uploader. hiàn 02:33, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:30, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - Not educationally useful; unused personal image of uploader. hiàn 02:34, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:30, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - Not educationally useful; unused personal image of uploader. hiàn 02:34, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:30, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - Not educationally useful; unused personal image of uploader. hiàn 02:36, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:30, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is "Seoul Metropolitan Government", and "Own Work"? Doesn't make sense... — regards, Revi 02:36, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:30, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - Not educationally useful; unused personal image of uploader. hiàn 02:37, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:30, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Khosa287n (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of scope - Not educationally useful; unused personal images of uploader.

hiàn 02:38, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:30, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 03:31, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:31, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 03:32, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:31, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 03:36, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:31, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 03:36, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:31, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 03:37, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:31, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 03:39, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:31, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 03:40, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:31, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 03:40, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:31, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License claim at the source is dubious (plus it only says "Creative Commons license"; doesn't say which). This seems to be a publicity photo; it's also available on Jenner's website. Anon126 ( ) 03:45, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:32, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 03:45, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:32, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 03:46, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:32, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 03:47, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:32, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 03:47, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:32, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 03:47, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:32, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 03:48, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:32, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 03:48, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:32, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 03:49, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:32, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 03:49, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:32, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 03:50, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:32, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 03:51, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:32, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 03:51, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:32, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 03:52, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:33, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 03:52, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:33, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 03:53, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:33, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 03:53, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:33, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 03:53, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:33, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 03:54, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:33, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 03:54, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:33, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 03:55, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:33, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 03:56, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:33, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 04:12, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:33, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 04:13, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:33, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 04:14, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:33, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 04:14, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:33, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 04:15, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:34, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 04:42, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:36, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 05:08, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:34, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:00, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:43, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:01, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:43, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:01, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:43, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:02, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:43, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:02, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:43, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:03, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:43, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:03, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:43, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:03, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:43, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:04, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:43, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It seems to have a wrong license, and unlikely to be own work Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:04, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:43, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:04, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:42, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:05, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:42, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:06, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:42, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:06, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:42, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:06, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:42, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:07, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:42, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:07, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:42, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:09, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:42, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:09, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:42, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:10, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is for an article in progress. Collecting the proper additional sources to support relevance. Please keep.

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:42, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:12, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:41, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:12, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:41, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:14, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:41, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:14, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:41, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:15, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:41, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:15, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:41, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:16, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work: google search. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:19, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:40, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:20, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:40, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:20, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:40, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:21, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:40, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Ceroles (talk) 11:46, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Used in ar.wiki, that means, in scope. Taivo (talk) 16:24, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Taivo. Green Giant (talk) 15:29, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:22, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:40, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:23, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:40, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:23, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:40, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:23, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:40, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:24, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:40, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:25, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:40, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:29, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:39, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:30, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:39, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:32, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:39, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:32, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:39, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:35, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:39, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:35, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:39, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:36, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:39, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:36, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:39, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:37, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:39, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:37, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:39, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:38, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:39, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:39, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:39, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:40, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:39, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:42, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:39, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:42, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:39, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:42, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:39, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:43, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:39, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:44, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:38, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:44, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:38, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:44, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:38, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:46, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:38, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alhassmt (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of scope, commons is not a photo album

Gbawden (talk) 06:46, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:38, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:46, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:38, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:47, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:38, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:47, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:38, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:48, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: withdrawn by nominator. --Jcb (talk) 10:38, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:48, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:37, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:49, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:37, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:50, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:37, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:51, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:36, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:51, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:36, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:53, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:36, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:54, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:36, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:54, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:36, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:55, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:36, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:55, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:36, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:56, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:36, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:59, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:36, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:59, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:36, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 07:01, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:36, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 07:02, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:36, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 07:02, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:36, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 07:02, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:36, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 07:03, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:36, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 07:03, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:36, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 07:04, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:35, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 07:05, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:35, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Meshaal 111 (talk · contribs)

edit

randomly uploaded, no sources and a lot of them is small size without exif

Ibrahim.ID 07:14, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:34, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File from Category:Personal files from panoramio. Looks too personal, doesn't it? E4024 (talk) 14:41, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:28, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio 131.111.216.60 14:48, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Mistress and Fellows of Girton College own copyright - it is not free to be shared or to remix. 131.111.216.60 09:04, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • See above. They most certainly do not own the copyright to the coat of arms that I created. COM:COA applies. I created that file myself based on a blazon. That blazon is Quarterly vert and argent, a cross flory counterchanged between in the first and fourth quarters a roundel ermine and in the second and third quarters a crescent gules. I can legally create my own interpretation of what that coat of arms should look like and upload it to Commons. I did not steal any art from their site and post it - this is their version on the college website and FYI, I think mine is better and since I uploaded it to Wikimedia Commons, the university is free to use my version. Additionally, there are multiple copies of the arms already online in Category:Girton College, Cambridge so I don't know why you keep trying to delete only mine. Please familiarize yourself with how coats of arms are handled on Wikimedia Commons and stop creating frivolous deletion requests. — ʷiḳỉℳẚṅ₫¡₳ (talk) 04:23, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - The copyright for a CoA created from the blazon is owned by the creator, not the institution represented by the CoA. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:27, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File from Category:Personal files from panoramio. Looks too personal, doesn't it? E4024 (talk) 14:52, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:25, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal file, out of Commons scope. Please see the talk page of Category:Unused personal files. 9 days in Wiki system, only hanging a personal image. E4024 (talk) 15:00, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:25, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong licence: "Own work"? E4024 (talk) 15:04, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:25, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal file, out of Commons scope. Please see the talk page of Category:Unused personal files. E4024 (talk) 15:07, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:25, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 15:08, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:25, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal file, out of Commons scope. Please see the talk page of Category:Unused personal files. Note:Does anybody know him? Could he be in scope even without an article? File description and categorization do not help much. E4024 (talk) 15:13, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This Image is now use at International University of Business Agriculture and Technology. aashaa


Deleted: per nomination - uploader putting the image on WP is not "in use" for our pruposes. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:18, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low resolution image Afifa Afrin (talk) 15:11, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I know that the quality of the picture is bad. But the car is very very rare. I have not found any other picture of a car from the Velox Motor Company on commons. The picture is used in de:Velox Motor. A bad picture is better than no picture. You can see some details: 4 wheels (not 3 wheels like this) / small wheels (not Highwheeler like this) / small car / open body with 2 seats / front hood, apparently for front engine / Steering wheel. --Buch-t (talk) 10:27, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

low resolution image Afifa Afrin (talk) 15:13, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2 deleting requests in 2 minutes from the same user for the same picture with the same text. I do not understand this. --Buch-t (talk) 10:27, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Neither do I.  Keep This is the only picture of a Velox we have at all, and it was taken in 1995. I suggest that we found more and better Velox pictures before we delete this one.--Chief tin cloud (talk) 14:45, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Only image we have of a Velox auto. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:16, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low resolution image Afifa Afrin (talk) 15:11, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete // sikander { talk } 19:12, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Photograph of a historical car on the move. If we have more photos of this car like this one , but at higher resolution, we can delete it. We do not. --FocalPoint (talk) 19:22, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(Now: File:--Vulcan 1904 on London to Brighton VCR 1995.jpg )

 Keep I know that the resolution is low. It is a reason for deleting? I don't know. The car is very rare. The picture is used in de:Vulcan Motor. A bad picture is better than no picture. You can see some details: 4 wheels (not 3 wheels like this) / small wheels (not Highwheeler like this) / open body / front hood for front engine / Steering wheel. --Buch-t (talk) 10:43, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep The picture is good enough to show radiator layout. Category:London to Brighton veteran car run 1995 is far away from being complete.We should avoid to widen the gap.--Chief tin cloud (talk) 14:54, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - File:AW 432, Veteran car run, Micklefield, High Wycombe, 1980.jpg is a much much better photo of the same car. This is not useful. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:15, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal file, out of Commons scope. Please see the talk page of Category:Unused personal files. E4024 (talk) 15:15, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:12, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:12, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Twitter image. E4024 (talk) 15:23, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:11, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tovarcityy (talk · contribs)

edit

Uploaded as "own work" but a Google Image search shows higher resolution versions available online. Possible copyright violation unless uploader is (per exif on one image with Nikon camera) Jürgen Freund (www.jurgenfreund.com), who seems to use a Canon camera for the other image but without mentioning their copyright in the exif there.

Takeaway (talk) 15:24, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:11, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal file, out of Commons scope. Please see the talk page of Category:Unused personal files. E4024 (talk) 15:25, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:11, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very few edits, too many personal images. E4024 (talk) 15:28, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:11, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image elsewhere on Internet, probably not a free image Shev123 (talk) 15:31, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:11, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not an own work. Too many personal files. Please see: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Cavid Süleymanlı. E4024 (talk) 15:33, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:11, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Strange how the name in the exif doesn't correlate with the name of the uploader of the same image elsewhere. @MarkVII88: , please explain? -> http://www.capturemyvermont.com/photos/2160569 Takeaway (talk) 15:35, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's the same with File:123017 Burlington Waterfront.jpg uploaded by the same user, where the author is stated as A. Mark Gadue while on theis page: [1] it is Lee Stirling. --cart-Talk 15:56, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:10, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [2]. Yann (talk) 13:35, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo is very blurry everywhere. Probably out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 15:41, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:10, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused. Looks out of scope. Also there is another one in the system. E4024 (talk) 15:43, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:10, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Annalisa7491 (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:10, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:10, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:10, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not sure if this is actually the work of the federal government. It's a painting by GIl Cohen, an aviation painter who has produced commissioned work for the military, but I'm having trouble nailing down info for this specific image. For what it's worth, the painting is marketed by Corbis/Getty Images: https://www.gettyimages.com/license/544183152 Ytoyoda (talk) 15:47, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination -- Aside from two years in the US Army, Cohen has never been a government employee, see http://www.aviationarthangar.com/gilcohen.html. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:09, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bill Wong (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:07, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User seems to be here to make flags for their EN:WP user page only. No other contributions to WP or Commons. E4024 (talk) 15:49, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:07, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:07, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too personal an image. Sorry, cute little girl. Keep this in your family album please. E4024 (talk) 15:57, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:07, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:01, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:07, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:01, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:06, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparent copyvio. Found at higher resolution at https://aprilmeservy.com/. SummerPhDv2.0 (talk) 16:02, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:06, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abhisheklucky (talk · contribs)

edit

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://www.facebook.com/KhardahaHanumanMandir/photos/a.1857979404514655.1073741827.1857949967850932/1857979214514674/?type=3&theater.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:06, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:06, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:06, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:08, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:06, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the user's last remaining upload. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. VisionJohnny has problems with copyright, for example look at Commons:Deletion requests/Files of Visionjohnny. Taivo (talk) 16:10, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, also due to poor quality – most probably from video, but in any case IMHO < 1% probability of Own work. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 18:05, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:06, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry picutre. No Met data. May be a violation of the original photographers copyright Ranjith -- (Ranjithsiji) (talk to me) 16:10, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:06, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:13, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:05, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hajooora (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused documents of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:14, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:05, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons has a lot of sunrises of Venezuela, so this little bad photo is not needed. Taivo (talk) 16:19, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:05, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These personal portraits are not in project scope. (They were uploaded as part of a batch upload from Flickr.)

Mindmatrix 16:20, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:05, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted book cover (Romania) Gikü (talk) 16:39, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - way below the ToO. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:04, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:42, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:04, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Les métadonnées indiquent Photo : Jeanlouis Wertz, il faut donc une autorisation de l'auteur, voir Commons:OTRS/fr Shev123 (talk) 16:59, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:04, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1948. Jcb (talk) 17:12, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:03, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Perhaps the cartoon is in PD, but for sure the licence tag is wrong. Shouldn't it be {{PD-US-not renewed}} or something like this? jdx Re: 17:15, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Sheepish Wolf is a cartoon of the public domain in 1971. 455jiujo (talk) 17:28, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep The uploader changed the licence while I was filling the DR so I withdraw my nomination. --jdx Re: 18:16, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - no renewal found. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:03, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be still in copyright [3]. — Racconish💬 10:46, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:40, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Annzannz (talk · contribs)

edit

Unlikely to be own works, unclear copyright status

Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:24, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:03, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and File:XXV AÑOS DE LA PREPARATORIA No. 12.pdf

out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:30, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:49, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. Small size, no metadata. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:34, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:48, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo. Unlikely to be used in a project. Commons is not a personal Webhost Afifa Afrin (talk) 17:41, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not used in any project, no reason to keep this file 37.111.201.8 18:31, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:48, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1948. Jcb (talk) 17:44, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:48, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Undeletion request granted Vysotsky (talk) 13:05, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Riffie7 (talk · contribs)

edit

Likely copyright violations with false authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata (except metadata from social media sites) and the uploader's history.

LX (talk, contribs) 17:57, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:47, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it's blurry. there is a better version in commons: File:Davidraju DSCF5333.jpg Arnaud Palastowicz (talk) 18:12, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:47, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"own work" questionable. Most likely taken from picture series on www.karinsolidoro.com with identical hair ornaments. Archie02 (talk) 19:07, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:46, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not from real source. No proof of copyright status Sridhar1000 (talk) 10:40, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:04, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
According to http://www.exoticindiaart.com/product/paintings/mirza-asadullah-khan-ghalib-MI71/ this painting is a modern illustration. The upload seems to containe false information on date and origin, unless the uploader can provide me a reliable source for the information. Obviously also the author information ist wrong. According to that page

The Red Fort Museum, New Delhi has in its collection a portrait of Ghalib rendered in circa 1855, that is, during his life time. This portrait depicts an exactly similar Ghalib, the same likeness, posture and setting.

That similar historic painting can be seen at http://www.tribuneindia.com/2012/20120923/spectrum/main3.htm - Martin H. (talk) 15:23, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Hi I fail to understand the reason for deletion request. Can you please clarify whether it is being marked for deletion as the image here is believed to be from one of the 2 sources mentioned above? As stated above on the red fort link, if the portrait is from circa 1855 AD, what prevents it from being here? I have mentioned the source on the image page that is from twitter account, the link is provided there as well. None of the two sources provided above depicts the exact image, one with faint coulours and another in entirely different colours.--Dsvyas (talk) 11:24, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 13:30, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Re-nomination. This painting is the work of a living artist created recently. The 1855 painting the uploader referes to is depicted at http://www.tribuneindia.com/2012/20120923/spectrum/main3.htm. The upload of this recent painting is a copyright violation. Martin H. (talk) 19:32, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Where do you see the colours matching in the two images? I am still failing to understand the reason behind your conclusion that the image we have here on commons is the same as http://www.exoticindiaart.com/product/paintings/mirza-asadullah-khan-ghalib-MI71/.--Dsvyas (talk) 21:19, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The change in colour is not difficult to explain, might be poor image editing. The modern painting has a sky with birds in the background, the historic image hasn't. This is not the historic painting but a bad edit or a copy of the modern painting --Martin H. (talk) 18:17, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:45, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Theodor Innitzer died in 1955. This cannot be {{PD-old}} before 2026. Ankry (talk) 20:13, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: {{PD-Austria}} cannot apply because this is, in copyright law terms, a "literary work", not a photograph. {{PD-AustrianGov}} does not apply, because the RC Church is not part of the Austrian Government. I see no reason why this document will not be under copyright until 70 years after the death of the last surviving author. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:41, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:Antonin_Slavicek_16.5.1870-1.2.1910_-_Ve_veltruskem_parku.jpg miktalk 20:24, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Mik: Delete I haven't made this file but it could be only a tiny crop that isn't visible to the naked eye. I don't think there is need to keep it. It is possible another case of an insignificant crop. NOTE: As it is uncontroversial deletion, you can just tag it for speedy deletion using the duplicate template. I don't need a talk page notice that the file is nominated for deletion. Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:34, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, speedy per request. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:12, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:35, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1944. Known publishing of the photo was in this book issued in 2003. All the details of the book are copyrighed: "Jelen könyvet vagy annak részleteit a kiadó és a szerző engedélye nélkül reprodukálni tilos!" Regasterios (talk) 20:57, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:34, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful. Private party pic Frankzweers (talk) 21:13, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:34, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image claims to be from 2MASS, but it is actually a DSS image (see source and compare the image sources). DSS images are copyright: https://archive.stsci.edu/dss/acknowledging.html Lithopsian (talk) 21:20, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:34, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Why is this exactly in the public domain? Discasto talk 21:21, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:34, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:24, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:33, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, not very sharp. Partially censored. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:33, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:33, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imagevio, copyrighted logos — Draceane talkcontrib. 21:43, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:33, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image derived from this presentation — Draceane talkcontrib. 21:47, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:33, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artwork from living artist. No permission. Jcb (talk) 22:23, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:32, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no way to assert the pictures were taken by Polish photographers or first published in Poland Dd1495 (talk) 07:46, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 07:46, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inappropriate license - the author is unknown and we do not know when he died. Change the license or delete the file. MAx 92 (talk) 23:47, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:30, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The license used requires the source and date of publication of the photo. The description lacks such information. Therefore, it should be presumed that the file is not in the public domain. MAx 92 (talk) 23:48, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:30, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 23:58, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:30, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнение в верности лицензии MisterXS (talk) 04:14, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:11, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused personal image. 125.227.40.133 04:53, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:11, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 04:56, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:11, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 04:58, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:11, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 05:06, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:11, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 05:07, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:11, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 05:07, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:11, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 05:08, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:11, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 05:08, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:11, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 05:09, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:10, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 05:09, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:10, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Yann (talk) 13:49, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. --The Evil IP address (talk) 14:41, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 05:10, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:11, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 05:42, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:12, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 05:42, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:12, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 05:43, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:12, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 05:44, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:12, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 05:44, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:12, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 05:46, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:12, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 05:46, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:12, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 05:46, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:12, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 05:47, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:12, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 05:47, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:12, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 05:47, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:12, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 05:48, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:12, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 05:48, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:12, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 05:48, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:12, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 05:49, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:12, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 05:50, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:12, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 05:51, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:11, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

manque le nom et l'autorisation du photographe - le Parti socialiste n'est pas un photographe Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 05:52, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Sauf mention contraire, les photos sont accréditées Flickr-CC/Parti Socialiste. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:38, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Le parti socialiste n'est pas un photographe (ni une agence de presse) ; le PS n'a pas le droit de publier avec la licence CC sans donner le nom du photographe (et le PS doit avoir l'autorisation des photographes pour publier avec cette licence). Pas de nom du photographe, pas d'autorisation, pas de publication sur commons.
Moi aussi je peux ouvrir un compte flick au nom de l'association des Joyeux amis des photographes sans auteurs, mettre des photos en ligne avec la licence "libre de commercialisation on s'en fout du nom et de l'autorisation des photographes" et hop le tour est joué/
Admettre ce genre de photos sur commons c'est faire de la promotion de publications ne respectant pas la législation sur les droits des auteurs. Un photographe est un auteur.
Le "Parti socialiste" n'est pas un photographe. Il n'est pas l'auteur de la photo. Il n'a pas les droits moraux sur la photo.
--Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 20:11, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 05:53, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:32, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 05:53, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:35, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 05:54, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:39, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 05:54, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:39, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 05:55, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:40, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 05:55, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:40, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 05:57, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:45, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 05:57, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:46, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 05:58, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:48, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 05:58, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:48, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 05:58, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:48, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 05:59, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:08, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio from site Alain Soral "Egalité et réconciliation" https://www.egaliteetreconciliation.fr/Entretien-avec-Robert-Steuckers-sur-la-reception-de-l-oeuvre-de-Julius-Evola-en-Belgique-6735.html -- Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 05:59, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:08, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 05:59, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:08, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:00, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:08, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:00, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:08, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 07:25, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:09, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 07:26, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:09, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 07:26, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:08, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 07:28, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:08, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 07:28, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:08, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Those dead eyes (talk) 07:30, 9 February 2018 (UTC)w:en:WP:DENY[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:10, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 07:30, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:10, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Wdwd (talk) 10:29, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 09:13, 16 Februar 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: © Copyright newsdeguinee.com 2018, Tous droits réservés. --Krdbot 13:26, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KennthAdams (talk · contribs)

edit

Commercial advertisement, SPAM: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 10:31, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 15:55, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image.

+ Files of author:fullfen666

Mitte27 (talk) 20:00, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep The nominator has clearly not assessed all these images. The bundle DR is ridiculously large to respond to. As the uploader I am not prepared to spend my New Year week, when I'm in bed recovering from 'flu, arguing the toss over every file in this massive list. Sampling several files shows very high quality portraits and locations that are definitely in scope due to being useful for illustration or are likely to be the best photographs we have of those locations. Please just keep and repitch a DR focussed on individual photographs that are out of scope, not this nuclear blast of everything. @Mitte27: I do not appreciate disruptive mass DRs of this collection, especially over the holidays, nor the apparent wilful misuse of project scope to put in-scope high quality photographs at risk of deletion. Over several months I have raised my objections to your actions several times very politely but persistently. If this continues in 2018 I will be forced to summarise a timeline of these unhelpful deletions at AN and ask for assistance, such as banning you from creating mass DRs. Thanks -- (talk) 14:58, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - out of scope, obviously. The main focus of most of them is on one and the same girl. None has categories. All have watermarks. 'High quality'? No. Please don't flood the project with useless files. --Jcb (talk) 17:41, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photos, not used.

Kulmalukko (talk) 13:27, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:13, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio. See EXIF (google), thumbnail size. Wdwd (talk) 10:31, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:09, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Depicted person is uploader and this is not a selfie. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:02, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:09, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:08, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photos, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:46, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:07, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photos, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:46, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:11, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

holiday picture : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:06, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:11, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:37, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:14, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:41, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:14, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:47, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:15, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:BOYABAT KALESİ - panoramio (46).jpg. E4024 (talk) 13:35, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:18, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurry image Afifa Afrin (talk) 14:13, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agreed. // sikander { talk } 19:11, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Finishing line photograph. --FocalPoint (talk) 19:25, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(now: File:Star 1904 on London to Brighton VCR 2011.jpg )

 Keep I know that the quality of the picture is bad. But the car is rare. I have not found any other picture of this existing Star 1904 on commons. The picture is used in nl:Star (Wolverhampton). A bad picture is better than no picture. You can see some details: 4 wheels (not 3 wheels like this) / small wheels (not Highwheeler like this) / open body with 2 seats / front hood for front engine with radiator / Steering wheel. --Buch-t (talk) 10:15, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep There are several British and American motor vehicle manufacturers who used the Star brand name. The picture shows clear enough that this is a Wolverhampton car, with "snake" water cooling. Even the chain drive is visible in front of the rear wheel. We really should keep this picture as long there is no better one on Commons.--Chief tin cloud (talk) 14:41, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:20, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 07:41, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:35, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 07:41, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:35, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 07:42, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:36, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 07:43, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:36, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Adams Seth Peter (talk · contribs)

edit

Personal image ; No notability ; No use : Commons is not a private photo album

Civa (talk) 14:33, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:56, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal file, out of Commons scope. Please see the talk page of Category:Unused personal files. E4024 (talk) 15:11, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 21:01, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seemingly private file, not obviously usable or educational. Doesn't seem worth the risk to keep. 185.38.150.20 19:03, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep no valid reason for deletion, this file was made specifically for Commons --User:tbolttrain

 Delete Personal unused file with a Coca-Cola ad. --E4024 (talk) 08:16, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep no valid reason for deletion


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 21:05, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pieter Janssens (talk · contribs)

edit

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:10, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Foto bejaardenhuis De Witte Poort is eigen werk. De foto met koningin Juliana is afkomstig uit het publiek domein.


 Kept, the first photo is in public domain, but the other is probably not own work. It is not so easy to take photos about queen, so this photo is  deleted. Taivo (talk) 19:23, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

holiday picture : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:06, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:42, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File from Category:Personal files from panoramio. Looks too personal IMO. E4024 (talk) 13:37, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:42, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File from Category:Personal files from panoramio. Looks too personal IMO. E4024 (talk) 13:39, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:43, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File from Category:Personal files from panoramio. Looks too personal IMO. E4024 (talk) 13:49, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:45, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File from Category:Personal files from panoramio. Looks too personal IMO. E4024 (talk) 14:03, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:45, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File from Category:Personal files from panoramio. Looks too personal, doesn't it? E4024 (talk) 14:11, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:45, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File from Category:Personal files from panoramio. Looks too personal IMO. E4024 (talk) 13:40, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Shizhao at 07:53, 23 Februar 2018 UTC: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file - --Krdbot 13:23, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File from Category:Personal files from panoramio. Looks too personal IMO. E4024 (talk) 13:41, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Shizhao at 07:50, 23 Februar 2018 UTC: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file - --Krdbot 13:23, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File from Category:Personal files from panoramio. Looks too personal IMO. E4024 (talk) 13:43, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Shizhao at 07:48, 23 Februar 2018 UTC: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file - --Krdbot 13:23, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too personal an image. Very little view of Bora Bora. E4024 (talk) 13:59, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Shizhao at 07:48, 23 Februar 2018 UTC: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file - --Krdbot 13:23, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File from Category:Personal files from panoramio. Looks too personal to me. E4024 (talk) 14:01, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Shizhao at 07:47, 23 Februar 2018 UTC: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file - --Krdbot 13:23, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Artix Kreiger as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: I think the picture of the Windows 10 is too much for Creative commonsD Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:41, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:GPD Win-Face View-Open and Running Windows 10.jpg Dienthoaiquangcao41 (talk) 03:00, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:GPD Win-Face View-Open and Running Windows 10.jpg 42.113.157.249 08:39, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is not a simple drawing. Taivo (talk) 11:36, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope, unused personal image Migebert (talk) 08:45, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 16:48, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

중복되는 자료입니다 Jihoon Chung (talk) 05:54, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request on day of upload. --Green Giant (talk) 23:47, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 05:56, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure where to respond. I do not know what is meant by "out of scope." This photo was taken by me of my own facial scar. It has been used, and it may be sued again.
Is this the appropriate place to respond to the nomination for deletion of my photo of my facial scar? I apologize for not knowing HOW to answer the nomination. I find the instructions well-intentioned but very difficult to understand. My reason for posting this picture (taken by me of my own face) was to be able to return to it whenever I wanted to illustrate my own version of a traditional fraternity saber scar. It is not in fact a scar caused by a sword but the result of a skin cancer surgery. It is not meant to fool anyone, but it is important to me as a reminder. The scar has healed over since it was fresh. This photo is to keep it as (a) a souvenir of a reality and a satirical response to the German dueling tradition that led for several generations to such scars.
Above comment was posted erroneously posted here by User:KFFOWLER. Rehman 06:41, 14 February 2018 (UTC) [reply]

Kept: per uploader and Dyolf77. --Green Giant (talk) 23:51, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

중복된 자료를 올렸습니다 Jihoon Chung (talk) 06:04, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request on same day as upload. --Green Giant (talk) 23:52, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Those dead eyes (talk) 06:39, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Crosswiki spammer. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Neelkamal gautam. --Green Giant (talk) 23:57, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lynda. Dange 36715241 200.113.234.97 06:39, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Green Giant (talk) 23:59, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Those dead eyes (talk) 06:39, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Crosswiki spammer. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Neelkamal gautam. --Green Giant (talk) 23:58, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational value Those dead eyes (talk) 06:42, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 00:00, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Those dead eyes (talk) 06:43, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (promotional material for a now deleted ENWP article). --Green Giant (talk) 00:02, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File from Category:Personal files from panoramio. Looks too personal IMO. E4024 (talk) 13:39, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(Ich kann nicht Deutsch verstehen.) If this person is notable please categorize the file properly. Then of course it can be kept. What does he do for a living? --E4024 (talk) 13:46, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: previously deleted. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:38, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2010 panoramio streams of obviously ("Home...") personal files, rather moderate-quality smartphone pix not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:25, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:10, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File from Category:Personal files from panoramio. Looks too personal, doesn't it? Note: A file with this name has already been deleted but I don't know if it was this image or not. E4024 (talk) 14:14, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: previously deleted. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:39, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

cross wiki upload technically failed - grey WereSpielChequers (talk) 10:11, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: damaged file, per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 15:01, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

cross wiki upload technically failed - grey WereSpielChequers (talk) 10:11, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: damaged file, per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 15:02, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

cross wiki upload technically failed - grey WereSpielChequers (talk) 10:12, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: damaged file, per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 15:02, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurryy, even File:Phébus 1900.JPG is a better image Bulwersator (talk) 10:01, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very blurry image Afifa Afrin (talk) 13:08, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Same discussion as 6 years ago. I know that the quality of the picture is bad. But the car is very very rare. I have not found any other picture of a Phébus 4-wheeled-car (Quadricycle) on commons. The picture is used in de:Phébus (Automarke). A bad picture is better than no picture. You can see some details: 4 wheels (not 3 wheels like this) / small wheels (not Highwheeler like this) / open body / no front engine / front passenger seat. --Buch-t (talk) 09:55, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per user Buch-t. --Rosenzweig τ 15:03, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this file by mistake, it is the licensed property of someone else Rishik S (talk) 06:43, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:06, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too blurred / out of focus. Hundreds of similar photographs on hand. Retired electrician (talk) 08:12, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:08, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurry image Afifa Afrin (talk) 13:35, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Cannot be used anywhere. // sikander { talk } 19:10, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:09, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurry image Afifa Afrin (talk) 13:57, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Finishing line photograph. --FocalPoint (talk) 19:24, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I know that the quality of the picture is bad. But the car is very very rare. I have not found any other picture of an existing Winton 1904 on commons. The picture is used in uk:Winton (автовиробник). A bad picture is better than no picture. You can see some details: 4 wheels (not 3 wheels like this) / small wheels (not Highwheeler like this) / open body / front hood, apparently for front engine / steering wheel. --Buch-t (talk) 10:04, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use so in scope. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:10, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurry image Afifa Afrin (talk) 14:08, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I know that the quality of the picture is bad. But the car is rare. A bad picture is better than no picture. You can see some details: 4 wheels (not 3 wheels like this) / small wheels (not Highwheeler like this) / open body with 2 seats / front hood, apparently for front engine / steering wheel. --Buch-t (talk) 10:10, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Within scope, not in use but if someone thinks it's useful that's good enough. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:11, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurry image Afifa Afrin (talk) 14:15, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I know that the quality of the picture is bad. But the car is rare. I have not found any other picture of this existing Sunbeam 1904 on commons. A bad picture is better than no picture. You can see some details: 4 wheels (not 3 wheels like this) / small wheels (not Highwheeler like this) / open body touring car with rear doors / front hood for front engine with radiator / no screen / Steering wheel. --Buch-t (talk) 10:19, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Within scope, not in use but if someone thinks it's useful that's good enough. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:11, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurry image Afifa Afrin (talk) 14:16, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I know that the quality of the picture is bad. But the car is rare. I have found only one other picture of this existing Swift 1904 on commons. The picture is used in de:Swift Motor Company. A bad picture is better than no picture. You can see some details: 4 wheels (not 3 wheels like this) / small wheels (not Highwheeler like this) / open body with 4 seats / front hood for front engine / steering wheel / no screen. --Buch-t (talk) 10:22, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Within scope, not in use but if someone thinks it's useful that's good enough. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:11, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

My upload. I am not satisfied with the result. Original still available at File:Halina-reijn.jpg. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 15:13, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: User request. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:12, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:49, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:23, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

likely copyvio, user only has one upload, no file info, very similar to this copyrighted getty photo: https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/smashing-pumpkins-billy-corgan-darcy-wretzky-pukkelpop-news-photo/835375076?esource=SEO_GIS_CDN_Redirect#/smashing-pumpkins-billy-corgan-darcy-wretzky-pukkelpop-festival-picture-id835375076 Ringerfan23 (talk) 07:13, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:24, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographer was Claire Goll (1890 Nuremberg - 1977 Paris) , Yvan Goll's wife. No evidence, that this file was first published in Italy Mutter Erde (talk) 07:24, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:21, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 07:31, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:45, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 07:33, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:45, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 07:34, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:45, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be taken from here - http://blizz-regensburg.de/regional/die-regensburger-strassenbahn-ist-in-ihr-neues-depot-uebergesiedelt-75331/. Unlikely to be own work Gbawden (talk) 07:34, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:46, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 07:36, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:46, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 07:37, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:47, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 07:38, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:47, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 07:44, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:47, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 07:56, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:47, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file; self promotion; no educational value. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 07:57, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:48, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:22, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:48, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As per watermark, not own work. Copyright according to that site Gbawden (talk) 08:29, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:48, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from www.cse.iitk.ac.in/users/amit/bicycling/rural/ which is from 2010. License status not clear. Not in use. Rahul Bott (talk) 08:54, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:49, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Senapa as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyrighted picture, see: File:КНИГА ВЛАДИМИР НАСЕДКИН.pdf, page 3 Wdwd (talk) 10:22, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:51, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 10:48, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:52, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, lack of Exif data – unlikely to be own work of the uploader. jdx Re: 11:19, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:52, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vix545 (talk · contribs)

edit

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 11:46, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:53, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Redundant – It's a montage of 2 awful photographs I took. A much better image is File:Simon Tedeschi.jpg, so this one is no longer needed. Michael Bednarek (talk) 13:00, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:58, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Broken file —TheDJ (talkcontribs) 13:29, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:59, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There's no freedom of panorama in Norway for sculptures and the photo violates sculptor's copyright. Taivo (talk) 13:49, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:01, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abhilash Varasala (talk · contribs)

edit

All images are not own work

Migebert (talk) 13:52, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:01, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Internet item. E4024 (talk) 13:55, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:02, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Freedom of Panorama is allowed in Moldova, but only in public places and only for buildings and sculptures. This painting is in a museum (the Military Museum of Chișinău). No info on the author. Gikü (talk) 14:09, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:03, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collages need source and license for every used image. Taivo (talk) 14:10, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:03, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; this photo is the only upload of the user. Civa (talk) 14:12, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:03, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown people ; Personal image ; No notability ; Unknown location ; No use ; this photo is the unique upload of the user. Civa (talk) 14:17, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:08, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pdf soubor je kopií z našich veřejných stránek www.spvtrutnov.cz. Protože jsem platným členm, mohu tento text dále šířit a zveřejňovat. Děkuji Martin Kašpar


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:09, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Piankoff (talk · contribs)

edit

Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:08, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:09, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image published elsewhere on Internet, probably not afree image, see Commons:OTRS/fr Shev123 (talk) 16:53, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:11, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I just noticed that the screenshot is from the proprietary Pro version. So I don't think this screenshot is eligible for Commons. :-( Ixfd64 (talk) 17:43, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Update: added free alternative File:SoapUI Open Source.png. --Ixfd64 (talk) 18:16, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:12, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely false authorship claims based on the low resolution, missing metadata, previous publications found elsewhere, e.g. https://contactdetailswala.in/rewati-raman-singh-contact-details/ (published seven months before the uploaders claims to have created it) and http://inextlive.jagran.com/kunwar-reoti-raman-singh-119466 (published 1½ years before its supposed creation date), and the uploader's history. LX (talk, contribs) 18:20, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:23, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photos, not used.

Kulmalukko (talk) 21:49, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination all bar one. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:25, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1948. Jcb (talk) 23:37, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:20, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The license used requires the source and date of publication of the photo. The description lacks such information. Therefore, it should be presumed that the file is not in the public domain. MAx 92 (talk) 23:40, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:21, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low-quality copy (and bad cross-wiki upload) of File:Serie A 1969-70 - Cagliari v Bari - Gigi Riva.jpg Danyele (talk) 23:41, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:21, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Its content and filename (if translated into English) are almost identical to File:1980 Summer Olympics (Moscow) boycotting countries (blue).png. IRTC1015 23:54, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:22, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably out of scope. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:24, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:42, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Une autre version avec métadonnées mise à jour a été proposé et ses droits ont été clarifié Anne-Marie Hassoun (talk) 14:15, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Disponible ici : File:Daniel Desmedt. - 30 mai 2007.jpg. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:44, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Une autre version avec métadonnées mise à jour a été proposé et ses droits ont été clarifié Anne-Marie Hassoun (talk) 14:16, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: disponible ici : File:Daniel Desmedt. - 9-2-1997.jpg. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:44, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Une autre version avec métadonnées mise à jour a été proposé et ses droits ont été clarifié Anne-Marie Hassoun (talk) 14:16, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: disponible ici : File:Daniel Desmedt. - 2-7-1997.jpg. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:45, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source site claims at http://cinespot.net/disclaimer.html , that all its contents are in public domain, unless otherwise mentioned. In my opinion watermark "cine spot.net" on source site is a clear instance of "otherwise mentioning" and the photo is claimed to be copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 13:05, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep. All photos on the site show some kind of watermark. A watermark with the same domain name where said disclaimer is situated is not “otherwise mentioning”. Taivo proposed an absurd interpretation. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 09:37, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: agreed with Incnis Mrsi, the watermark does not meet the "otherwise" criteria. --VIGNERON (talk) 13:01, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cropped image from a print. No camera meta data. May be a copyright violation of the original photographer Ranjith -- (Ranjithsiji) (talk to me) 16:18, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and COM:PRP. --Ezarateesteban 18:27, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.


Files uploaded by Vinunathanrenga

edit

Might mistake Wikimedia Commons for the media server of an enterprise. We don’t like to have it here because

  1. educationally worthless; sorry, overreacted to detestable blurry JPEGs. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 12:58, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  2. {{BadJPEG}}.

Incnis Mrsi (talk) 12:03, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. also Own work is very dubious because of http://www.thamizhstudio.com/ and http://www.iffchennai.com/ --Incnis Mrsi (talk) 12:58, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:54, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

hi, I am a real user in South Korea. the file is mine and my license, and now in use, the file is within commons'scope So you should not delete the file. best regards Kim jong soo (talk) 02:04, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

At moment, not used. Taivo (talk) 16:45, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

i sent my ID to Wikimedia Commons<wiki@wikimedia.org> Kim jong soo (talk) 22:36, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This file is my past career certificate, And is a generic certificate that I have received formally to prove me, and I am now using it well. 118.40.251.23 01:03, 1 March 2018 (UTC) I want to remove that designation by deleting that file. Kim jong soo (talk) 02:07, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Only this file is my a career certificate that I have photographed, so recreating - modification of the work, modification, and the creation of the secondary work is prohibited. 118.40.251.23 08:40, 3 March 2018 (UTC) Kim jong soo (talk) 08:41, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 19:34, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Une autre version avec métadonnées mise à jour a été proposé et ses droits ont été clarifié Anne-Marie Hassoun (talk) 14:16, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 19:37, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted materials Afifa Afrin (talk) 16:35, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. --Sealle (talk) 19:40, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Une autre version avec métadonnées mise à jour a été proposé et ses droits ont été clarifié Anne-Marie Hassoun (talk) 14:17, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Otourly (talk) 08:55, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Painting by Sereirrof, French contemporary artist. Copyright violation. 83.204.225.24 12:25, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Une autre version avec métadonnées mise à jour a été proposé et ses droits ont été clarifié Anne-Marie Hassoun (talk) 14:17, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Otourly (talk) 08:55, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Une autre version avec métadonnées mise à jour a été proposé et ses droits ont été clarifiés Anne-Marie Hassoun (talk) 14:18, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Otourly (talk) 08:56, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Une autre version avec métadonnées mise à jour a été proposé et ses droits ont été clarifiés Anne-Marie Hassoun (talk) 14:18, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Otourly (talk) 08:56, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Une autre version avec métadonnées mise à jour a été proposé et ses droits ont été clarifiés Anne-Marie Hassoun (talk) 14:18, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Otourly (talk) 08:56, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Une autre version avec métadonnées mise à jour a été proposé et ses droits ont été clarifiés Anne-Marie Hassoun (talk) 14:19, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Otourly (talk) 08:56, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader claims that he is the author of this picture. Metadata saying that the picture is made by Christian Bothe and taken from picasa. For me it's quite unlikely, that the photographer doesn't upload his original picture but the pic from picasa. Stepro (talk) 12:45, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I, scheint sinnig, am Jakob Weissinger, the colleague of Christian Bothe. The picture is one of severeal photographs both of us took with Mr. Bothe's camera on an event of the Hamburg greens in January 2018. We are both copyright holders. It was uploaded to Picasa and then downloaded to our server. I didn't realize that the picture would bear Mr Bothes name in the Metadata. I will ask Mr. Bothe for an email certifying this to be sent to permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org (User:Scheint_sinnig) 14:52, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: OTRS permission received (2018020910007038). --Эlcobbola talk 15:58, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

One photo - two copyright holders? Sounds odd. --Itu (talk) 09:16, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 78.250.128.55 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.efemeridespedrobeltran.com/es/eventos/agosto/garzon.-hoy-13-de-agosto-de-1999-muere-jaime-garzon-abogado-y-humorista-satirico-colombianoD Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:59, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a photo of a mural... So not, this photo should not be deleted. -- Remux - Nunca Olvidaré, que me enamoré de la más hermosa flor. Ĉu mi povas helpi vin iel? 05:25, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - whether mural or not, the depicted image is a derivative of the photograph. --Эlcobbola talk 16:03, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© Man Gobinda Chowdhury - in metadata - same image deleted 7 feb Arjayay (talk) 14:02, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, don't know why you are sending request for deletion. This photo is taken using my mobile. শক্তিশেল (talk) 17:22, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Last time I thought as it was uploaded in the licence policy 3.0 so there be a problem ... So don't argued. But now it is annoying me.. শক্তিশেল (talk) 17:24, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: This claims self-authorship with a metadata author "Man Gobinda Chowdhury"; however, that is contradicted by certain of the uploader's other images (for example: File:RadhaShyam Temple Bishnupur (WB) Facade.jpg, also claiming self-authorship, has the metadata author "Subhabrata Banerjee"). This runs afoul of COM:PRP. Note, also, that this could also have been deleted as an out-of-process recreation of deleted content (File:Fish market of Bengali.jpg). --Эlcobbola talk 16:16, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low resolution Image. No camera meta data. May be some other photographer's Image. Violation of copyright. Ranjith -- (Ranjithsiji) (talk to me) 16:25, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Appeared in high resolution here. Note also that uploader username implies user is a depicted subject; the photographer, not the subject, is generally the copyright holder. OTRS permission would be required. --Эlcobbola talk 16:24, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution image. Cropped from another photo. May violate the original photographers copyright. Ranjith -- (Ranjithsiji) (talk to me) 16:30, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out-of-process recreation of File:Ajith.jpg. --Эlcobbola talk 16:27, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Existe déjà ! Andreal90 (talk) 18:07, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Courtesy deletion: uploader requested shortly after upload, file unused. --Эlcobbola talk 16:29, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Freedom of Panorama in Greece is not Commons-compatible. Storkk (talk) 13:40, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, i don't think there was any problem till now with the numerous photos in this category, which depict public or private buildings in public dispay. Also, does flickr allow the upload of photos, even if they violate the origin country's law? Wolfymoza (talk) 11:31, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:13, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is a larger one, in case we need this. E4024 (talk) 15:21, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:14, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Request by picture owner at OTRS 2018020710013534. The original photograph is faded and damaged. For use in a book it was professionally restored and lent to the Tribune India for the purpose of a book review. The owner has included an image of the original untouched image, and a picture of the book with the restored image. It is clear that there has been quite some restoration of the image. Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:23, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I do not see any valid reason for deletion in the above nor any claim that our information / copyright status is incorrect. According to the 1911 copyright act the photo entered PD in 1943 and no evidence for copyright restoration. I doubt that the photo restoration is creative work that can establich new copyright. Ankry (talk) 11:50, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ankry: Do we need to know where the restoration was done? In some countries the tiniest bit of work can be significant (e.g where I am in UK). I can ask the OTRS poster if necessary. Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:38, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Can we ask the picture owner for the original picture? If we then decide to remove the improvement then it can be replaced with the original. This would be good evidence that we have the right person if they are able to supply a high res scan of the original picture. We do not need to delete, but only to replace this (370 × 456) image with a hi res version that we can then repair. Victuallers (talk) 18:03, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Have asked the picture owner. Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:20, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Ankry. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:14, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]