Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Reflet-tour-Eifel-Paris-Luc-Viatour.jpg

File:Reflet-tour-Eifel-Paris-Luc-Viatour.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Feb 2012 at 17:13:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Luc Viatour (talk) - uploaded by Luc Viatour (talk) - nominated by -- Luc Viatour (talk) 17:13, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Luc Viatour (talk) 17:13, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice picture! Sadly, it will get deleted due to copyright restrictions. --Jovian Eye _storm 20:39, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- NON, jusement c'est pour cela que je poste cette image après autant de temps. Voir ici l'explication française et Ici la restauration sur common des images retirées en 2011! (machine translation) No, just that's why I post this picture after so long. See the explanation here and here French restoration of common images removed in 2011--Luc Viatour (talk) 21:03, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Info Check Category:France FOP cases/kept the Eiffel tower by night has been restored. Eiffel tower is in public domain, the SETE claims to have registred copyright which is impossible in France (you only register patents and industrial properties stuff), copyrights exists just by the creation. PierreSelim (talk) 07:26, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lošmi (talk) 03:16, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support There is no copyright on ordinary light. Yann (talk) 18:51, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--David საქართველო 21:07, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support ■ MMXX ^talk 23:08, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Karelj (talk) 23:17, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow for me, I like the composition which is the not usual picture of Eiffel Tower by night. PierreSelim (talk) 07:37, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Pretty cool. But I think it is a little too dark isn't it? --Paolo Costa (talk) 13:17, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 17:27, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose superb idea, but the image is noisy and I would prefer more space at top and less at bottom --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 17:25, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Interesting concept, including WOW, but insufficient image quality (e.g. noise). พ.s. 13:00, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support a very interesting and fantastic shot. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:43, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes, noisy. But...Did somebody ever see such a view of this monument ?--Jebulon (talk) 16:17, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great shot. --Dmitry Rozhkov (talk) 13:17, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support with a reservation. This is not a picture of the Eiffel tower, but of the reflection of the Eiffel tower in a sheet of water. I'm sure French lawyers will appreciate the difference. I'm equally sure they will take this completely nonsensical and idiotic matter seriously. MartinD (talk) 13:59, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:01, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture