Bramfab

Italiano: Welcome to the Commons, Bramfab!

Guida ai primi passi La Guida ai primi passi e le FAQ ti aiuteranno molto dopo la registrazione. Spiegano come personalizzare l'interfaccia (per esempio la lingua), come caricare file e le norme sulle licenze. Qui non c'è bisogno di abilità tecniche per contribuire. Sii intraprendente nel contribuire e presumi la buonafede nelle azioni altrui. Questo è wiki ed è molto semplice. Ricevere aiuto Maggiori informazioni sono disponibili nel Portale Comunità. Puoi rivolgere domande presso il Bar italiano o sul canale IRC #wikimedia-commons. Inoltre puoi contattare un amministratore sulla loro pagina di discussione. Se hai una domanda specifica sui copyright, chiedi (in inglese) qui.		Consigli e suggerimenti Inserisci la tabella Babel nella tua pagina utente così che gli altri possano sapere in quali lingue possono comunicare con te e indica le tue capacità grafiche. Tutti i file che hai caricato sono conservati nella tua galleria personale Per favore firma gli interventi nelle pagine di discussione mettendo ~~~~ Usa il CommonSense tool per cercare categorie adatte per i tuoi file. Per creare un link a una pagina di immagine, scrivi questo: `[[:Image:Ponte_vecchio.jpg]]`, che darà come risultato: `Image:Ponte_vecchio.jpg` *Se stai copiando dei file* da altri progetti, usa il CommonsHelper Hai commesso un errore?** Vuoi rinominare o spostare un file? Carica nuovamente il file e nel vecchio inserisci questo: `{{bad name\|Nome corretto}}` Per maggiori informazioni leggi i criteri per la cancellazione.
(P.S. vuoi discutere di questo template?)

Image:Tsavo Maneaters Field Museum.jpeg

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:Tsavo Maneaters Field Museum.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--Patstuart 21:26, 25 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Tsavo Maneaters Field Museum.jpeg

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:Tsavo Maneaters Field Museum.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 22:48, 25 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:SN21 - struttura1.gif

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 10:04, 20 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:SN21 - struttura.jpg

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 10:07, 20 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fixed, I got network interruption before to complete my upload check.--Bramfab 10:24, 20 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

TUSC token c0eae9cc1e9a28000ba0133a7f6e12e0

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Image:Statua chiesa canzo.jpg

Latest comment: 15 years ago4 comments1 person in discussion

What is the real name of the saint ... it:San Fernando? it:San Bernardo? What you put down doesn't make sense. Evrik (talk) 19:38, 28 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Well, you wrote "Bernando" not "Bernardo." Which San Bernardo is he? What is the main church of Canzo called? Also, is this correct: {{location dec|45.85|9.266667}} Evrik (talk) 16:00, 1 December 2008 (UTC)Reply
It's not "a type." Reading the Italian article doesn't identify which Bernard it is, nor what the main church is, nor its exact location. If you don't know the answers, that okay ... I'll make some inquiries. BTW, the misspelling Bernando is also in the italian Canzo article. Evrik (talk) 16:29, 1 December 2008 (UTC)Reply
Wow, thanks for cluttering up my page. Well, I guessed at the location and at which saint it was. I also took a guess at the name of the church. I left the italian alone. Evrik (talk) 17:59, 2 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

File:Pteranodon_rico.jpg

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Pteranodon_rico.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 10:17, 5 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Proto_rico.jpg

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Proto_rico.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 10:19, 5 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Glyptodont

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

The image you and me are editing simply says it depicts a "glyptodont", not a Glyptodon. Glyptodont can refer to any genus within the glyptodontidae family, so unless you know for certain that it is Glyptodon specifically, and not another glyptodon, please don't add the category. FunkMonk (talk) 15:47, 7 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

So what do you base it on? FunkMonk (talk) 23:33, 7 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Tip: Categorizing images

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Bramfab!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:40, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Image:Universal studios.JPG was uncategorized on 27 December 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:40, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Deletion requests

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, I've put all the deletion requests for paintings by Oreste Bogliardi into one request: Commons:Deletion requests/File:OresteBogliardi1.jpg. Please see Commons:Deletion requests/Mass deletion request for more info on starting a request for multiple files if you come across something similar again. Kind regards -- Deadstar (msg) 09:07, 2 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Loughboroughgrammarschooltowerblock.jpg

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Loughboroughgrammarschooltowerblock.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

82.5.45.32 18:15, 16 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Foto di Bruno

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

Il solo modo che hai è attraverso la moda dei vestitini delle bambine, dato che l'uomo indossa un costume tradizionale, e la tipologia di stampa è stata in uso dal tardo ottocento fino agli anni Venti. Dovresti sentire qualcuno che ne capisca di moda. A mio modo di vedere la foto. proprio a giudicare dai vestitini, si colloca più verso il 1900 che verso il 1850, ma se hai una necessità di studio, è meglio che tu senta un esperto in moda. Buon lavoro --User:G.dallorto (talk) 16:08, 5 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Se è questo il motivo, toglila senz'altro, dato che Bruno iniziò a fotografare negli anni Sessanta. --User:G.dallorto (talk) 16:39, 5 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
- La voce su Bruno in Wikipedia l'ho scritta io e ci ho messo tutto quel che sappiamo ora come ora. Le sue foto non possono essere usate per dimostrare un bel nulla, dato che sia il contadino che le bambine sono state vestite appositamente e messe in posa per foto da vendere ai turisti, che quindi erano una proposta di tipo ideologico (Souvenir de Sicile) e non certo un documento delle effettive condizioni di vita della popolazione siciliana. Inoltre, Bruno opera a Taormina, realtà urbana e per nulla rappresentativa della realtà della Sicilia, che è agraria. per finire, non so come t sia sfuggito il fatto che se la foto non è datata, NON può essere usta per dimostrare alcunché relativo al periodo anteriore il 1860. E' casommai chi dice che la foto risale a prima che lo deve dimostrare, e non tu che devi fare l'opposto. Quando si usano documenti per dibattiti relativi a un prima e a un dopo, tutti i documenti devono essere datati: sia quelli della fazione A, che quelli della fazione anti-A. Quando si fa storia, si ragiona così. --User:G.dallorto (talk) 17:36, 5 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dubbio su un'immagine

Ti segnalo questa discussione. Mi è sembrato logico chiedere all'autore dell'immagine.

File:Mala currant.jpg

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Mala currant.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ubcule (talk) 15:58, 28 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

r: manichino in legno

Latest comment: 11 years ago4 comments1 person in discussion

Grazie Bramfab, ho letto anche tardi il tuo avviso, hanno risposto e chiuso in quattro e quattr'otto la cosa senza nemmeno tanto discuterne, tanto ormai ho capito come funziona qui, il consenso è una presa in giro. --Pava (talk) 21:55, 4 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

scusami a me sembrava che fosse chiusa, io non so nemmeno spiegarmi bene in inglese: Qui c'è qualcosa sotto che non mi vogliono dire, e la cosa mi puzza molto, in più c'è l'utente FAEP che si diverte a danneggiare i miei contributi e seminare zizzania e screditarmi anziché collaborare e nessun amministratore che prenda provvedimenti, visto che lui danneggia commons per motivi personali, comunque ho chiesto un OTRS per le 3 foto del manichino, ora aspettiamo la Bertone. Tu sei riesci a spiegare loro che è una dima da lavoro già in dominio pubblico da decine di anni ti ringrazio molto, speriamo bene. Grazie mille intanto --Pava (talk) 22:04, 4 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. non vuol dire che è chiusa? --Pava (talk) 22:05, 4 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

ah forse ho letto male, non riesco a capire a quale discussione è riferita. comunque ho partecipato --Pava (talk) 22:13, 4 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Ingresso museo scienze nat Milano.JPG

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Ingresso museo scienze nat Milano.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Leoboudv (talk) 00:07, 5 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

riguardo la campagna di ripristino sul manichino della Giulietta

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

ciao, QUI Jim, da quando SERGIO gli ha palesato che si sta sbagliando di grosso, non ha più risposto, non è che dopo 7 giorni la bocciano e siamo punto a capo? Io nn voglio risultare tendenzioso ma non hanno fatto altro che ignorare i consensi, evitare di argomentare, arrampicarsi sugli specchi e ora spariscono.. non vorrei che non vogliano dirci i veri motivi per i quali la vogliono cancellare, che secondo me sono "personali" e contro gli interessi di Wikimedia. Comunque come possiamo sbloccare la situazione? grazie ciao --Pava (talk) 02:55, 11 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:World CupNetherlands.jpg

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:World CupNetherlands.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 10:50, 15 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:CanzoLocatie.png

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:CanzoLocatie.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 11:00, 9 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

E-mail complaint

Latest comment: 10 years ago7 comments2 people in discussion

I have sent you an e-mail regarding your spontaneous one-week block over at Italian Wikipedia. Have you received this e-mail? I'm inquiring here because you you to pursue me to Esperanto Wikipedia to engage in further unmotivated reverts. Since you blocked me at Italian Wikipedia not just from articles, but even from editing my own talkpage, I'm raising the issue where I know you are actually active.

I have attempted to be clear and open about my motivations for replacing or removing the macaque selfies in certain articles. Please acknowledge that you have actually read my motivations and explain why you are reverting them.

Peter ^Isotalo 14:27, 11 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Keeping the discussion in one place:

Because I would see how far are you going with your POV campain.--Bramfab (talk) 14:36, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[1]Reply

What does this have to do with any of my questions? How am I engaging in a "POV campaign"? Have you seen these discussions?[2][3][4][5] There is no general support for the idea that any Commons image can be used everywhere no matter what. So how exactly are you neutral in this matter? You haven't even explained your position, only that you oppose me. So far, you've acted been quite belligerent.

Peter ^Isotalo 15:19, 11 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

This is just your POV that you are pushing everywhere --Bramfab (talk) 15:30, 11 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Uh-huh. So have you seen these comments and edits?[6][7][8] Are all of those just "pushing their POV everywhere"? Last I checked, suggesting alterations to articles is how we develop Wikipedia. And, again, what is my POV and why is it a problem? What's your position in this and why would you be justified to block me without warning and ignore me?

Peter ^Isotalo 15:44, 11 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Because you are POV pushing, acting as POV pusher, the (worlwide) general consensus (that does non imply 100% of people) is that those pictures are good for wikipedia and can be used in the article, they are notable and relevant (if you like or not they becomes a piece of the history of photography as the first selfie of pope with children) and are selfie (selfie is a new-word coming from internet as comes from the internet the inclusion of these monkey selfies in the selfie category!).

You can argue against these for months in a on forum, but in wiki we are in case of black/white (binary) condition (take or reject those) and you have to accept the consensus decision and not damage the encyclopedia with destructive edits. --Bramfab (talk) 16:33, 11 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

I'm sorry, but your misrepresenting of my intentions are quite unfounded. You are assuming that I am 1) against any use of these images and 2) that I have tried to remove images from every article in my path. Neither is true. I was perfectly aware of the image in Macaca nigra I didn't remove it because for a reason; it at the very least had text to explain it. Take a look at the German selfie talk page. Notice the discussion? The lack of mute edit wars? No assumptions of bad faith and "POV pushing"? At it.wiki didn't just forego discussion, you didn't even follow normal blocking procedures. According to your own recommendations you treated me like you would when someone was spewing profanities or a "problem user". From my perspective, your block appears quite punitive, not preventive. Blocking someone for a single revert is a pretty extreme measure. Doing this to someone you are in a dispute with isn't kosher.

I've provided you with numerous diffs of discussions that clearly show my motives. You're welcome to check those out. Lecturing me about a "(worldwide) general consensus", however, isn't going to get us anywhere. I urge you to lift the block you meted out and engage in normal consensus discussion so we can resolve this.

Peter ^Isotalo 17:27, 11 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Torre diamante settembre 01.jpg

Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 00:31, 19 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Cancellazioni su commons

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

Potresti dirmi chi è il cancellatore cui ti riferisci nella discussione in corso al bar ? Vorrei saperlo solo per vedere se si tratta per caso dello stesso con cui ho avuto a che dire in passato e grazie al quale ho abbandonato ogni attività su commons e wikipedia. Ciao --Massimop (talk) 18:26, 1 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Grazie per l'indicazione. Io, invece, avevo avuto a che fare con Fastily, che opera, a quanto mi risulta, solo su commons. Ciao e buon lavoro. --Massimop (talk) 20:31, 2 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Temo che ormai non sia più possibile riportare i siti wikimedia a ciò che erano fino ad alcuni anni fa', quando si cercava di collaborare veramente e quasi nessuno si sentiva portatore della verità assoluta e in dovere di rifare il mondo per adeguarlo alle sue idee. Oggi, per quanto ho visto io, salverei solo il wikizionario, ma credo che ciò dipenda solo dal numero veramente irrisorio di contributori che non hanno nemmeno il tempo di litigare tra loro. Ciao --Massimop (talk) 23:18, 4 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Ciao caro, perfettamente d'accordo con te sulle contraddizioni Commons // FOP, salvo che il ponte di Calatrava lo collocherei a Reggio e non a Parma. Cordialità--Pạtạ fisik 10:24, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

BUON ANNO!!

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Auguri di buon anno! Un 2015 ricco di buone cose (non solo da mangiare :D ) --Pava (talk) 14:50, 1 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Torre diamante settembre 01.jpg

Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 09:09, 25 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Ammonite reconstruction.jpg

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Ammonite reconstruction.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 19:21, 10 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Head rugops reconstructiun musem.JPG

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Head rugops reconstructiun musem.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 19:21, 10 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Sanfedisti.jpg

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Sanfedisti.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 22 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Image without license

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Milano murales naviglio prima vennero BB poesia.jpeg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 20:34, 11 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Piccolo appunto sui caricamenti

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Ciao, onde evitare future lamentele e teorie della cospirazione commonara ;) Ci sono un paio di accortezze da seguire quando carichi materiale dal web. Prendi ad esempio File:Mercaticeratinae appenine evolution.jpg:

La licenza non corrispondeva a quella del sito web. Devi usare esattamente la stessa licenza, in questo caso la CC BY 3.0.
Non ti devi dimenticare di inserire il template {{Licensereview}} affinché qualcuno verifichi che non sia un copyviol. Una volta verificata l'autorizzazione, non ci sono problemi: altrimenti rischi che l'autore cambi licenza oppure che il sito web vada giù e il file va giù di conseguenza perché nessun utente fidato ha effettuato la verifica.

Buona continuazione! --Ruthven (msg) 08:21, 2 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

La CC by-sa 4.0 è compatibile con la CC by-sa 3.0, ma qui si parla di tutt'altra licenza: tu avevi scritto CC by-sa 4.0, che è molto più limitante rispetto alla volontà degli autori di pubblicare sotto la CC by 3.0. In pratica non stai commettendo nulla di illegale (non ti denunceranno per questo), ma stai limitando l'uso del file ripubblicandolo con una licenza più restrittiva. In pratica, più è libera è la licenza, meglio è per noi ed il mondo dell'open data. --Ruthven (msg) 16:29, 2 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Loves Monuments Italia 2019, è iniziato! Il tuo contributo è prezioso!

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

English | Italiano | +/−

Hi,

You're receiving this message because you've previously contributed to the annual Wiki Loves Monuments contest in Italy. We'd be delighted if you would do so again this year and upload your photos to share the italian cultural hertage with the world!!

You can find more details at the Wiki Loves Monuments Italia website and here. If you have images taken in other countries you can check the international participants.

This year's contest runs until 30 September 2019.

If you need help please contact me! --Marta Arosio (WMIT) (talk) 13:24, 5 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:Corteggiamento italia.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Corteggiamento italia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Capannoreso (talk) 09:47, 13 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Trex head recon Nat Hist museum NY 2019.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Trex head recon Nat Hist museum NY 2019.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:19, 25 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:MI M S N Miscellanea (15).jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:27, 25 June 2020 (UTC) These photos are:Reply

This is a photo of a monument which is part of cultural heritage of Italy. This monument participates in the contest Wiki Loves Monuments Italia 2018. See authorisations.

(wiki-ID: 03F2050050)

--Bramfab (talk) 15:59, 25 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Pentacrinites lyme regis.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Copyright status: File:Pentacrinites lyme regis.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Pentacrinites lyme regis.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Alex Cohn.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 04:29, 5 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Misteri guadiosi, se se un utente inserisce in Flickr una immagine come Public Domain Mark 1.0, l'immagine viene trovata come disponibile, ricercando nel web tra le immagini libere,modificabili, commerciabili e tutto quello che che si desidera, ci vuole la mente di un creatore di trame per legal fictions americane per scoprire che non è così, e la mente anomala di un azzeccagarbugli nel creare una licenza che sembra che prometta qualcosa che invece non mantiene.--Bramfab (talk) 09:20, 6 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Tue ultime immagini caricate

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Ciao, porta pazienza se è una richiesta un po' da fissati... dato che sono capitato su una delle tue ultime immagini caricate che, grazie al bot che cerca nei dati Exif, le aveva categorizzate in una data errata (quella dell'ultima modifica al file e non quella di scatto), mi faresti la cortesia di ripassare i tuoi ultimi upload per controllare la data effettiva di scatto? Tra l'altro alcune immagini non riportano per intero i dati Exif (ho scoperto essere un bug in fase di caricamento direttamente dallo smartphone), potresti quindi aggiungerli come ho fatto io (azzardando la data...) con la forma (è un esempio) Italy photographs taken on 2021-07-29? Grazie :-) PS: alcuni admin e molti patroller non gradiscono sovracategorizazioni (cioè una categoria inserita in un'altra a loop ma solo ad albero) per cui, per evitare che poi vengano a farti le pulci (e vedo che lo fanno), nel caso di File:Torre civica Lovere .jpg se metti Category:Lovere oltre alla sua cat specifica Category:Torre civica (Lovere) fai perdere il sonno ai commonari talebani ;-) --Threecharlie (talk) 07:33, 5 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Altra cosa, per conoscenza: se carichi da dispositivi android il tool lo riconosce e ci applica direttamente il {{According to Exif data}} ma non potendo (per ora) identificare il punto dello scatto lo lascia "indefinito", quindi, così come quando bot caricano da Flickr immagini a licenza compatibile con il {{Taken on}}, per cui per metterlo nella cat delle immagini scattate in Italia bisogna aggiungere in fondo il parametro |location=Italy perché lo categorizi in automatico nel posto giusto. Io personalmente aggiungo |cat=|location=Italy perché alle vole il parametro cat (che disabilità la categorizzazione automatica del dato) può essere utile in caso di sovracategorizzazione, spostando ad esempio un grande numero di file con il cat-a-lot ma che non riesce ad intervenire sul template... arriverà un giorno in cui qualcuno creerà un bot capace di individuare questa particolare sovracategorizzazione andando a eliminare la categoria messa a mano o inserendo un |cat=no rendendomi un patroller commonaro talebano delle date estremamente felice :-D --Threecharlie (talk) 07:52, 5 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Grazie per l'attenzione, tuttavia sto caricando con l'app di Android e per tutto il mese avrò ben pochi accessori ad un PC connesso. Se le date non sono perfettamente corrette enciclopedicamente non cambia nulla riguardo al contenuto per il quale sono caricate. Categorizzazione e altre indicazioni arrivano sempre tramite app. La doppia caratterizzazioni non mi è segnalata e non ho modo di verificarla. Per tutto il resto non ho proprio modo, ne tempo per intervenire per modificare cose di cui neppure vedo il significato (mi vien da scrivere il bisogno). Vedremo in settembre. Ciao Bramfab Bramfab (talk) 12:23, 5 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Psion zx spectrum software.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Psion zx spectrum software.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Túrelio (talk) 20:05, 26 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Zx spectrum games cartridges.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Zx spectrum games cartridges.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Túrelio.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 20:26, 26 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 1 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Milano murales naviglio prima vennero BB poesia.jpeg

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Milano murales naviglio prima vennero BB poesia.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 17:32, 30 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Foto storta

Latest comment: 1 year ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Ciao! Ti segnalo che File:Finale Ligure - Collegiata di San Giovanni Battista - 2023-09-25 17-41-28 016.JPG è a testa in giù :) Syrio posso aiutare? 19:14, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Syrio Ciao e grazie dell'avviso, non me ne ero accorto. C'è modo girarlo in Commons oppure ricaricarlo? e tal caso come faccio a sovrapporlo ? ... Non sono molto pratico di Commons ... (:-( . Bramfab (talk) 06:37, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Di primo impatto io avrei ricaricato l'immagine (nel qual caso, appena sotto alla sezione "Cronologia del fil", c'è il link per caricare una nuova versione dell'immagine, è molto intuitivo secondo me). Però mi sono ricordato che esiste Help:RotateLink, quindi ho già fatto io la richiesta al bot che ruota le immagini :) -- Syrio posso aiutare? 07:03, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Grazie, non ci avevo mai fatto caso. Bramfab (talk) 07:07, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Grazie per aver partecipato a WikiLovesMonuments 2023 - Italia

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

_{(English version available here)}

Ciao Bramfab, grazie per aver partecipato all’edizione italiana di Wiki Loves Monuments 2023!

È stato un anno da record, con oltre 52.000 immagini caricate su Wikimedia Commons, di cui già 2.800 utilizzate sui progetti Wikimedia (numero destinato ad aumentare). Stiamo davvero documentando il patrimonio culturale italiano insieme!

In attesa del risultato dei lavori di selezione delle fotografie da parte delle giurie, ti chiediamo di dedicarci pochi minuti del tuo tempo per rispondere a un breve questionario (anonimo), che ci aiuterà a fare ancora meglio il prossimo anno: link al sondaggio sul limesurvey di Wikimedia Italia

Grazie ancora. --Ysogo(talk) 21:00, 4 October 2023 (UTC) (Questo messaggio è stato inviato tramite il sistema Global message delivery)Reply

Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 in Toscana

Ciao, un messaggio da alcune utenze del gruppo locale Toscana

L'edizione 2023 di Wiki Loves Monuments si è conclusa.

Lo scorso anno non avevamo segnalato l'inizio del concorso perché abbiamo avuto delle metriche di adesione più alte rispetto agli ultimi anni, quindi incentivare il caricamento sarebbe stato controproducente per i partecipanti più occasionali.

Anche quest'anno l'adesione è stata alta (anzi nettamente più alta), probabilmente perché c'erano molte foto di chiese (la novità di quest'anno) negli archivi dei partecipanti storici e per questo non è stato inviato un messaggio durante settembre, mantenendo la strategia di massimizzare la promozione durante gli anni di minore partecipazione.

I finalisti son stati nel frattempo selezionati e annunciati. Qui troverete il riepiligo con i vincitori. Continuate a seguire i nostri canali social per ulteriori informazioni riguardanti la cerimonia di premiazione, che avrà luogo a Piombino nei prossimi mesi. Tutti i semifinalisti sono cordialmente invitati a partecipare.

per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da questa lista

Per informazioni:

toscana wikimedia.it

WikiToscana

Wiki Loves Toscana, Toscana Wiki

toscanawiki

Hashtag: #WikiLovesToscana #WikiLovesToscana2023 #WikiLovesMonuments #WikiLovesMonuments2023 #WLM2023

Inviato da Alexmar983 usando MediaWiki message delivery

Wiki Loves Pesto Genovese 2024 è iniziato: partecipa anche tu!

Latest comment: 8 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Buongiorno Bramfab ricevi questo messaggio perché in passato hai partecipato a concorsi fotografici come Wiki Loves Monuments Italia o Wiki Loves Earth Italia.

Questo marzo, in concomitanza con il Campionato Mondiale del Pesto, è stato organizzato Wiki Loves Pesto Genovese, un concorso fotografico per valorizzare e documentare il pesto alla genovese e il suo utilizzo.

Dal 1 al 31 marzo puoi caricare tue fotografie che raffigurino il pesto genovese, ma anche i suoi ingredienti, la sua preparazione e ricette cucinate con tale condimento. Sono ammesse anche foto scattate prima del concorso, purché siano inedite. Non sono ammesse fotografie con watermark e cornici, né foto che ritraggano marchi commerciali. I tre scatti migliori saranno premiati con un cesto di prodotti gastronomici.

I fotografi che lo desiderano potranno inoltre richiedere uno dei 10 pass per accedere al salone dove si svolgerà la finale del Campionato Mondiale del Pesto, in programma a Genova il 23 marzo, una ulteriore occasione per scattare foto valide per il concorso.

Vai sul sito https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Campaign:Wiki_Loves_Pesto_Genovese_2024 per trovare i dettagli del concorso e consultare il regolamento completo.

In bocca al lupo e buon divertimento!--Ysogo (talk) 11:50, 1 March 2024 (UTC) (Questo messaggio è stato inviato tramite il sistema Global message delivery)Reply

Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 in Toscana - Premiazione

Latest comment: 7 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Ciao, un messaggio da alcune utenze del gruppo locale Toscana

L'edizione 2023 di Wiki Loves Monuments si concluderà a breve con la cerimonia regionale.

I semifinalisti, come ogni edizione, sono invitati alla cerimonia di premiazione che quest'anno si terrà dalle 16:00 alle 18:00 di sabato 16 marzo p.v. a Piombino (LI) nella sala consiliare.

Come sempre, si consiglia di seguire i canali sociali.

per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da questa lista

Per informazioni:

toscana wikimedia.it

WikiToscana

Wiki Loves Toscana, Toscana Wiki

toscanawiki

Hashtag: #WikiLovesToscana #WikiLovesToscana2023 #WikiLovesMonuments #WikiLovesMonuments2023 #WLM2023

Alexmar983 tramite --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:53, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Foto di Marianna De Crescenzo

Latest comment: 5 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Buongiorno, le segnalo che la fonte indicata per la foto di Marianna De Crescenzo detta Giovannara è probabilmente errata. Possiedo infatti il libro citato (Gian Luca Fruci, Il lungo momento plebiscitario) ed ho anche contattato l'autore, e la foto non viene da lì. Sto preparando un'opera universitaria con le foto delle "combattenti", quindi le sarei grato se potesse indicarmi la fonte corretta, o addiritturra fornire uno scan di migliore qualità (purtroppo la foto attuale non è utilizzabile). Cordialmente. Danielik (talk) 12:26, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Buongiorno a Lei, è' strano, perché metto sempre attenzione alle fonti delle fotografie e loro dettagli, per esempio il fatto che io abbia specificato che trattasi di fotografia al collodio significa che questo era esplicitamente scritto nella legenda della fotografia. Guardando la voce https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marianna_De_Crescenzo vedo che di Fruci ho anche utilizzato la sua voce in Treccani, ove tuttavia oggi non vedo immagini. Quello che è anche incredibile è che di questa fotografie tutte le copie che si trovano in rete provengono dal file che ho caricato e che tutt'ora credo di aver ricavato da un pdf di un lavoro di Fruci.

Purtroppo a distanza di 7 anni non ho ricordi più precisi, ho sfogliato, sia pur digitalmente qualche centinaio di file pdf sul risorgimento e quello che mi sento di dire e che se ho fatto confusione nell'indicare la fonte, (ma ancora non ne son convinto, ma non trovo in rete una pubblicazione di Fruci intitolata Il lungo momento plebiscitario, probabilmente presente in in sito non più attivo), l'altra soluzione è che io abbia trovato tale immagine in uno dei tanti libri ottocenteschi (fine secolo) presenti digitizzati in Googlebook, ciò mi è suggerito sia dalla bassa risoluzione dell'immagine, che risulta visibile quasi decentemente soltanto se allargata alla dimensione di una pagina di libro, come per l'appunto nella maggior parte di questi libri digitizzati e sia dalla considerazione che si tratta di una foto non diversamente diffusa in rete, se non da questa copia di Commons. Con le mie ricerche da topo di biblioteche digitali ho finito per mettere in rete molte illustrazioni del risorgimento prima invisibili, alcune persino utilizzate in programmi Rai, (ovviamente sempre mai citando Commons come fonte!). Per quanto i libri dell'epoca solitamente non specificavano che una foto fosse al collodio. Mi spiace di non essere di ulteriore aiuto. Cordiali saluti e i migliori auguri per questa sua opera (sarei curioso di vedere il risultato finale), sempre a disposizione per altri chiarimenti. Bramfab (talk) 14:23, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Results of Wiki Loves Folklore 2024 is out!

Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, Greetings

The winners for Wiki Loves Folklore 2024 is announced!

We are happy to share with you winning images for this year's edition. This year saw over 41,038 images from 1921 uploaders represented on Commons in over 140 countries. Kindly see images here.

Our profound gratitude to all the people who participated and organized local contests and photo walks for this project.

We hope to have you contribute to the campaign next year.

Thank you,

Wiki Loves Folklore International Team

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:22, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Feedback Request for Wiki Loves Folklore2024

Latest comment: 16 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello!

As we close the curtains on a successful Wiki Loves Folklore 2024, we'd love to hear your thoughts! Your valuable feedback will help us improve future campaigns and ensure the continued preservation of cultural heritage around the globe.

Please take a few minutes to share your experience by filling out the following feedback form.

The form will be open for submissions until November 10th, 2024, at 23:59 UTC (Coordinated Universal Time). We appreciate your participation and support! See you in February 2025!

Sincerely, The Wiki Loves Folklore International Team

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic