edit
 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:L-Assemblee-Nationale-Gillray.jpeg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:L-Assemblee-Nationale-Gillray.jpeg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

Thank you! naerii 08:18, 1 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

bearskin busby

edit
 

The Opposition is held at bay by a sentry with G.R. on his busby. (The Text under the image)

Maybe a bearskin busby? ;-)--Kürschner (talk) 18:04, 24 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

File:Toothpasteonbrush.jpg

edit

Err... I wish I could tell you, but that particular tube has long been disposed of. I can say that it was definitely fluoridated (all toothpaste that I use is), and it's apparent from the image that it's Crest and ADA-approved (whatever that means). I'm almost certain that the type was Pro-Health Cinnamon, but I'm not absolutely certain. FWIW, Crest's website gives the fluoride content as 0.454% stannous fluoride, equivalent to 0.243% sodium fluoride. Sorry not to be of more help. Thegreenj (talk) 04:20, 19 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thank you!

edit

I just wanted to thank you for your help in fleshing out the descriptions of the Gillray images and linking them to existing higher resolution images. Without the context of the contemporary politics, a lot of them just seem really strange. Dcoetzee (talk) 04:26, 2 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

DLS image

edit

Excellent work on the daylight saving image. Just letting you know a referendum is proceeding in Western Australia (voting finished about 2 hours ago) which, on current results (55.5% No with around three-quarters of votes counted), will end the three-year trial of daylight saving here. Major media networks have already indicated this. I'm advising you of this so WA can be changed from blue to orange (the official result will probably be known later in the week but won't differ much from this one). Orderinchaos (talk) 12:18, 16 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, it got fixed. Eubulides (talk) 17:03, 28 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

TUSC token 6ef13d373b9d83ef12b8723b3b40ca3c

edit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account! Eubulides (talk) 17:04, 28 August 2009 (UTC)Reply


File:DrinkingWater 155px.jpg

edit
 
File:DrinkingWater 155px.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

The file you pulled from CDC.gov of tap water on the topic of fluoridation is not public domain. Please be careful when pulling images from government websites. If the agency licensed the image from a stock house, as is the case with this, then they did not create the content and it is not public domain.--Ericschrader

(talk) 22:15, 20 October 2009 (UTC)Reply


edit
bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading Image:Portal-puzzle.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

David Göthberg (talk) 23:59, 6 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Daylight Saving Time: restoration nominated

edit

I don't know if you'd be able to describe the steps you took in restoring the Daylight Saving Time poster, at en:Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Victory-Cigar-Congress-Passes-DST.jpeg. Thanks for your comment. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 12:05, 29 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Image in dispute

edit

On Wikipedia at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Harris Theater (Chicago, Illinois)/archive1, File:Compass rose pale-50x50.png, which is an image you uploaded, is under dispute.--TonyTheTiger (talk) 19:25, 17 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

In case you didn't know. ;) -- IdLoveOne (talk) 00:54, 22 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Coughlin-Social-Justice-NYC-Lange.jpeg

edit

nice upload Decora (talk) 03:59, 13 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

 
File:KJV-King-James-Version-Bible-first-edition-title-page-1611.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 21:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hilleman-Walter-Reed image

edit

I have updated/corrected/improved the photo of Hilleman-Walter-Reed, but can't upload it - could you do it, please? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Maurice_Hilleman I could send you the image via an e-mail?

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:15, 22 March 2017 (UTC)Reply