Hurricanehink
deletion request
edit- Category:2000's Atlantic hurricane impacts - use a category redirect to the correct category, like this: {{category redirect|new category name}}
- 2000s Atlantic hurricane impacts - use a normal redirec to the correct category, like this: #REDIRECT [[New page name]]
If you still want them deleted, leave a note on my Talk page. pfctdayelise (translate?) 04:26, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Hurricane Danny- Damage.JPG
edit
Thanks for uploading Image:Hurricane Danny- Damage.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. skINMATE 21:32, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Hurricane Danny- Flooding.JPG
edit
Thanks for uploading Image:Hurricane Danny- Flooding.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. skINMATE 21:33, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
Superseded image
editImage deletion warning | Image:Unnamed Subtropical Storm (2005).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion on its entry. |
Nilfanion 19:58, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright | Image:Henri damage.JPG has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image talk page.
|
Thats the Delaware Department not the US DOT Hink...Nilfanion 14:33, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
CheckUser
editHi Hurricanehink,
Per the CheckUser Policy, I have been granted the checkuser permission. Thankyou for supporting this request. Requests for checkuser can be made at the Administrators' noticeboard. Thanks, Alphax (talk) 01:40, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Re: Nexrad
editYea it surely possible. I presume you want it at its US landfall? I'll look into it...--Nilfanion 23:28, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:1944 Cane Damage.jpg
edit
Thanks for uploading Image:1944 Cane Damage.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Remember the dot 04:36, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Inez1966rain.gif
edit
Thanks for uploading Image:Inez1966rain.gif. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Adambro 21:29, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
You might want to request that this be speedy-deleted, I've uploaded the jpeg, and with the correct year in the filename now. ;) Image:2006 unnamed.jpg. NSLE-Chacor 12:01, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Allison 2001
editHi. I noticed for Image:TS Allison Texas flooding.jpg you had the date as 2006. I'm guessing that was a mistake and the photo was from 2001? (I don't recall another Allison hitting the coast in 2006.) Thanks, -- Infrogmation 02:44, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:1992 Possible Spain Hurricane.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Tip: Categorizing images
edit
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 11:07, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
- Image:1970 PR track.PNG was uncategorized on 6 January 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:07, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Perfect Storm Ocean City.jpg was uncategorized on 9 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:24, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
File:Alberto1982rain.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Alberto 1994 Rainfall.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Allison 1989 Rainfall.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Allison Texas rain.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Bertha2002rain.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Beryl1988rain.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Help
editDear Andrew, please go to my Wikipedia talk page, thank you. You see, i made a unblock request which was decline. I am only 15 days before being unblocked and i need a chance to show that i can make a real concrete difference! I believe not just me but other users who i blocked need a chance, as blocking them is only making matters a bit worse, as they can't contribute and show they can change! I also believe administrators are slightly abusing their power of blocking!--Earth100 (talk) 14:13, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Please Vote
editPlease vote this image, thank you.--Earth100 (talk) 05:00, 8 April 2013 (UTC)--Earth100 (talk) 04:56, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- InfoTrue color Aqua Satellite image of the South China Sea and Tropical Depression 26w on December 11, 2011. The near cloud-free Southern China and Vietnam can also be seen in the image.--Earth100 (talk) 13:12, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Earth100 (talk) 13:12, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose. It's a pretty bland image, nothing special. Hurricanehink (talk) 05:17, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
- Comment There is, like Hurricanehink said, nothing special about this image. The subject of the image is a bit unclear, are we focused on the China Sea or the weak depression covering it. Image has artifacts in the water and clouds, and I had uploaded a similar image over a year ago. Supportstorm (talk) 11:33, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
- Comment If it wins, I will kill myself... Typhoon Megi’s picture failed, how can this win the candidates? -- Meow 15:35, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose. Errrrr....what's the line of distinction between this image and other satellite images? HF (talk) 17:44, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
- Re: what makes this distinct from other tropical depressions (...with clouds)? HF (talk) 17:12, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose--Djhé (talk) 14:41, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose as above. --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 20:55, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
Please Vote!
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2013 at 04:53:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info The Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) on NASA’s Terra satellite captured this natural-color image of a patch of fog off the coast of Eastern China and Shanghai on April 15, 2013. The patch of fog was rapidly moving north east at that time, and ship wave cloud formations can be seen off the coast of Shanghai caused by air disturbed by small islands. A smaller fog patch also lingers off southern Shanghai's coast can be seen in the image. Besides Shanghai and fog, on the top left of the image, inter-linking towns can also be seen, along with yellow sediment in the Yellow sea and Eastern China sea.
Created by NASA - uploaded by User:Earth100 - nominated by Earth100 -- Earth100 (talk) 04:53, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
- Support -- Earth100 (talk) 04:53, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
- Support Nice once. --Llorenzi (talk) 06:29, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose. The image is blurry, and it seems bland. --Hurricanehink (talk) 17:20, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2013 at 14:53:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info The Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) on NASA’s Aqua satellite captured this natural-color image of scattered thunderstorms, showers or Cumulonimbus clouds over Hainan island on May 21 2012.
The cluster of thunderclouds formed on the western edge of a trough of low pressure are on that day. Sunglint can also be seen in the photo along with faint sea waves and the eastern Gulf of Tokin.
- Created by NASA - uploaded and nominated by --Earth100 (talk) 14:53, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Earth100 (talk) 14:53, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
comments section
edit- Thank you!--Earth100 (talk) 12:57, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
How can you oppose?! It's in high definition and there's nothing blurry! You just can't oppose on such an interesting image, with no problems! Besides, is your computer screen large? Please change! --Earth100 (talk) 05:48, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- No, it is a boring image that doesn't look that high quality. You shouldn't be trying to canvass votes for your image, either. Hurricanehink (talk) 15:07, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Fine, it's like someone looking at a clear blue sky, while another says it's blurry and grey.--Earth100 (talk) 02:47, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Perfect Storm Oceanfront flooding.jpg
editThis media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Perfect Storm Oceanfront flooding.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
File source is not properly indicated: File:Perfect Storm Ocean City.jpg
editThis media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Perfect Storm Ocean City.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
File:Typhoon Matsa (Landfall).PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
RfC: Third-party images published by the National Weather Service
editI've now reviewed 1,000 images uploaded under the rationales expressed in the {{PD-NWS}} template and requested deletion of several.
The arguments for deletion, and to keep, are now following repetitive, predictable patterns and it would greatly help all involved if we could centralise discussion and obtain some wider community input.
Therefore, I have opened an RfC to gather opinions. Apologies in advance: it's long and detailed, but is frankly nothing compared to the words and time expended by all parties up to this point. Probably the most crucial issue revolves around how we interpret a general disclaimer published at weather.gov (Q.1 in the RfC).
Your advice is greatly appreciated! --Rlandmann (talk) 10:39, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
editSome contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Rlandmann (talk) 23:24, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
editSome contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |