Jusjih

Effective immediately, I may move your posts to your talk page to reply. New archive will not always be made as I have limited time. Please check the history. Thanks.--Jusjih (talk) 02:26, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Please also see:Archive 1 and 2.

Help translation

Hello Jusjih, can you help me translate this article from english to chinese mandarin please? Lupenquarto (talk) 09:40, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Uhersky Brod znak.jpg

File:Uhersky Brod znak.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TFerenczy (talk) 23:51, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Temp undelete

Hi Jusjih! I assume you've been to busy to let us know that you transfered the two file to wikilivres. I deleted the two files again. If you didn't have the time for transfer, ping me and I'll happily do the transfer. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 02:27, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of PD works for 'no source'

Where Commons hosted file are clearly public domain, it is poor practice to delete them for having an unknown source. Could you please revisit your closure of the DR of File:82nd troop command2.PNG? It is inconsistent with other related deletions. --Fæ (talk) 07:58, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Jusjih!

Happy New Year!

Jusjih, a new year is like a blank book, the pen is in your hands. It is your chance to write a beautiful story for yourself! Happy New Year 2017. Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 18:21, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

請幫忙圖像更名

您好： 我在Administrators' noticeboard留言申請幫忙圖像更名(https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Rename_Request )，目前已經過了三天，都沒有人處理。可以請您幫忙處理嗎？謝謝。--Akira123 (talk) 08:45, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Deletion?

Hi, why have you deleted File:Hallein Postgasse 4.jpg? I had requested just deletion of File:Hallein Ruprechtgasse 3.jpg which was a duplicate of File:Hallein Postgasse 4.jpg, but now both files have been deleted? thanks, br, --Niki.L (talk) 08:01, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

SORRY. Deletion request has more automated way to close cases faster, but certain glitch seemed to mislead to deletion of Hallein Postgasse 4.jpg that was not intended. THANKS for understanding. PLEASE use Template:Duplicate instead of Template:Delete and redirect to avoid similar glitch next time.--Jusjih (talk) 14:18, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

File:ROC2017-06-14道路交通標誌標線號誌設置規則修正條文.pdf

File:ROC2017-06-14道路交通標誌標線號誌設置規則修正條文.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kkairri (talk) 03:18, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

請幫忙圖像更名

File:ROC National Academy for Educational Research name.svg的名稱可能容易讓人困惑，改成File:ROC National Academy for Educational Research logo.svg就比較可以讓人明白它的內容，但是這個名稱目前已經存在，所以無法使用move的功能提出更名請求，而File:ROC National Academy for Educational Research emblem.svg似乎更適合目前的File:ROC National Academy for Educational Research logo.svg，可以請您幫忙調整這兩個圖像的名稱嗎？謝謝。--Akira123 (talk) 23:48, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

沒必要改。--Jusjih (talk) 18:50, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

請幫忙台灣海軍陸戰隊軍階圖像更名

如同今年5月份請您協助更名的台灣陸軍軍階圖像的狀況（無法透過MOVE功能申請更名）一樣，這次是海軍陸戰隊，目前的File:Taiwan-Marine-OF-6.svg正確應該是File:Taiwan-Marine-OF-7.svg，目前的File:Taiwan-Marine-OF-7.svg正確應該是File:Taiwan-Marine-OF-8.svg，目前的File:Taiwan-Marine-OF-8.svg正確應該是File:Taiwan-Marine-OF-9a.svg，北約軍階代號OF-6是准將或大校，台灣目前沒有這個階級，請您幫忙更名，謝謝。--Akira123 (talk) 15:24, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

完成。請檢查。--Jusjih (talk) 01:14, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

請教關於台灣士兵階級臂章圖案的問題

您好：在Category:Non-commissioned rank insignia of the Republic of China Army中，關於台灣士兵階級章圖案，原本都錯誤地使用肩章型式，我按照軍服法律附件的規定做了修正，但發現其中的File:Private Second Class rank insignia (ROC).svg、File:Private First Class rank insignia (ROC).svg和File:Senior Private rank insignia (ROC).svg分別會和File:Taiwan-army-OR-1.svg、File:Taiwan-army-OR-2.svg、File:Taiwan-army-OR-3.svg重覆（因為士兵臂章只縫在單邊手臂，沒有橫放成對的可能），請問能請您幫忙直接將這三個檔案改成重定到正確的檔案內容嗎？或是我另外再上傳一模一樣的檔案修正現有的錯誤呢？謝謝您的幫助。--Akira123 (talk) 11:41, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

請幫忙台灣陸軍士官軍階圖像更名

按照國防部2009年出版的《國軍簡明美華軍語辭典》倒數第2頁的附錄「國軍軍階對照表」（國防部官網的載點已被移除，目前只能從這裡下載），陸軍中士是Sergeant，陸軍上士是Staff Sergeant，但目前File:Staff Sergeant rank insignia (ROC).svg的內容卻是陸軍中士軍階，陸軍上士則是File:Sergeant (上士) rank insignia (ROC).svg，應該是陸軍中士的File:Sergeant rank insignia (ROC).svg被重定向到陸軍上士，甚至陸軍一等士官長的File:Sergeant Major rank insignia (ROC).svg也被重定向到陸軍上士，情況相當混亂。此外，陸軍士官長則全部被錯誤命名為Warrant Officer（准尉）包括File:Warrant Officer First Class rank insignia (ROC).svg、File:Warrant Officer Second Class rank insignia (ROC).svg、File:Warrant Officer Third Class rank insignia (ROC).svg，按官方英譯名稱應分別更正為File:Sergeant Major rank insignia (ROC).svg、File:First Sergeant rank insignia (ROC).svg、File:Sergeant First Class rank insignia (ROC).svg，不只是副檔名.svg的圖像需要更正，副檔名.jpg的圖像也有同樣問題，希望能拜託您幫忙糾正目前混亂、錯誤的命名，如果可能，也請幫忙將這些圖像的重定向檔名順便清理。非常感謝您的幫助。謝謝！--Akira123 (talk) 15:24, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

我看到有其他維基人引用《陸海空軍軍官士官任官條例》英文版，但是第2條「上士」譯為「Sergeant」、「中士」譯為「Staff Sergeant」（這兩個譯名與上述辭典相反）；第6條「上士」譯為「 First Sergeant」（上述辭典中是陸軍及陸戰隊「二等士官長」）、「中士」譯為「Sergeant」（與上述辭典相同）。相同中文軍階，卻有完全不同英譯，甚至前後矛盾，明顯有錯，所以我已寫信向國防部詢問，是否確實是法規資料庫的內容出現錯誤，並建議將不同軍種的英譯名稱比照軍官階級的譯名，都寫出來，避免造成引用時發生錯誤。--Akira123 (talk) 16:23, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

如果把下士到一等士官長的軍階圖像，依序改以OR-4, OR-5, OR-6, OR-7, OR-8, OR-9來命名，避開官方同樣混亂的英譯，也許就可以省去將來可能又出現因為英譯而改名的要求。謝謝您。--Akira123 (talk) 16:57, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

不能太相信民國政府英譯法律法規。品質常常太差。所以有時乾脆用中文命名圖像。現在要改何檔案？--Jusjih (talk) 03:58, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

因為狀況有些複雜，方便做個表格寄到您的電子郵箱嗎？如果可以，我先把我的郵箱寄給您。另外，請幫忙解答上一個段落提到關於台灣陸軍士兵軍階圖像的處理方法的問題。謝謝。--Akira123 (talk) 04:31, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

民國陸軍士兵用臂章，但請問法源？做個表格寄到電子郵箱，可。--Jusjih (talk) 02:36, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

士兵用臂章法源：陸海空軍服制條例的附圖三：帽徽、帽飾及階級標識制式圖.PDF，實際上，因為軍服上都要縫上代表所屬單位的臂章，所以也只能在沒縫團體臂章的一邊袖子上縫上階級臂章。另外，我昨天已經透過您的使用者頁面發了電郵給您，還請回信給我，如此才能將表格發給您。謝謝。--Akira123 (talk) 02:54, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

收到了。請。--Jusjih (talk) 03:56, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

新年快乐

	Happy Lunar New Year!
	Hello Jusjih, 希望你的新年 Chinese New Year 过得好。. 这将是又一个充满成果的年度 Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for this new year. Kind regards, Artix Kreiger (talk) 18:00, 15 February 2018 (UTC)(UTC)(UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:March of the Volunteers.png

Yours sincerely, Jc86035 (talk) 07:42, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Leafcutter ant 2.gif

Bonjour, J'ai demandé à ce que ce fichier soit supprimé pour des raisons de mauvais fonctionnement. Merci. bien cordialementFilo gèn' (talk) 00:34, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Titleblacklist

Dear Jusjih,

Can you help to change this? Thank you!--維基小霸王 (talk) 15:28, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Yuriy kosygin

請管理員處理Yuriy kosygin用戶問題。我知道這問題是小事，只要動手移除類別就好，可是這並不是最好的解決。因為我的主張是，我們每一個人都不是他的保母，也不是他的家人，不可能24小時照顧他，他必須學會讓自己成長，以改善自己行為與想法，如此才是對commons.wikimedia有幫助，否則他一直錯下去，除了造成別人困擾，還會增加別人時間去巡查他的編輯。也就是說，Yuriy kosygin用戶問題是為了逼迫他面對自己問題。因為他的問題有以下三點：

• 心態錯誤：他的解釋有種歪理，他拿刀殺人，說是刀子殺人，以藉此理由使他自己可以殺人無罪。相同的，他使用CropTool是他自己使用的問題，不該因為錯了就繼續犯錯。
• 行為錯誤：他已發現CropTool有問題，但是他有腦子與眼睛，可以去思考怎麼解決，即使上傳者不能填寫Yuriy kosygin，他可以上傳之後再檢查一次，填錯就改回Yuriy kosygin，使他自己養成檢查好習慣，但是他沒有做到，只是告訴我他沒做錯事。
• 沒有為別人立場設想：這次他做錯事，剛好發生在"Flickr files uploaded by Kai3952"類別，當然受害是我，他應該為我的立場設想，但是他非但沒有移除類別，反而說File:Taichung Liuchuan Canal Waterfront.jpg是我上傳的，他如此的溝通態度，不僅對事情沒幫助，而且會製造事端（與人吵架），所以要必須強迫他學習面對錯誤。
  

以上三點是我請管理員幫助的原因，否則他下次會再犯。--Kai3952 (talk) 16:40, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

相同的情況也發生在Joe young yu，不過他沒有Yuriy kosygin用戶問題，所以這更加使我相信，不是我上傳Flickr照片的問題，更不是我"Flickr files uploaded by Kai3952"類別。--Kai3952 (talk) 16:53, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Please participate in the Universal Code of Conduct consultation on Wikimedia Commons!

Dear Jusjih

Thank you for your hard work to create the sum of all knowledge that is freely sharable to every single human being across the world. As our diverse community grows, we need a guideline that will help all of our work collectively and constructively where everyone feels safe, welcomed, and part of a team. That is why the Wikimedia movement is working on establishing a global guideline called the Universal Code of Conduct, often referred to as UCoC.

After the months-long policy consultation, we have prepared a policy (available in many languages) that has been ratified by the Board of Trustees. We’re currently in the second phase of the process. During this round of consultation, we want to discuss the implementation of this policy. As a member of the functionary team of Wikimedia Commons, your opinion on enforcement is of great value. We want to hear from you on how this policy can be enforced on the Wikimedia Commons community and what might be needed to do so. There are a few enforcement questions so you can easily outline your answers based on them. Please do not hesitate to bring any more questions/challenges you think are not yet discussed.

The discussion is taking place on Commons:Universal Code of Conduct consultation. You can also share your thoughts by replying to this message (Please ping me so I get notified), posting your message on my talk page. I am aware that some thoughts cannot be expressed publicly, so you can always share your opinion by emailing me as well.

As a valued member of the Commons community, please share your thoughts, ideas, and experiences that relate to UCoC. Let us know what needs to be improved so we can build a more friendly and cooperative space to increase editor engagement and retention of new users.

Wikimedia projects are governed by you. So, it is you who needs to step up to ensure a safe, comfortable, and pleasant working environment.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you! Wikitanvir (WMF) (talk) 10:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Please take a short survey regarding UCoC

Hello Jusjih,

I would like to inform you that we now have a survey in place to take part in the UCoC consultation. It is not a long one and should take less than 10 minutes to complete. You can take the survey even if you have already participated in the on-wiki consultation. It has a different set of questions and allows you to participate anonymously and privately.

As a member of the Commons functionaries, your opinion is especially essential. Please click here to participate in the survey.

You are still welcome to participate in the on-wiki discussions. If you prefer you can have your say by sending me an email. You can also drop me an email if you want to have a one-to-one chat.

Thank you for your participation! Wikitanvir (WMF) 13:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Category:Tongyong Pinyin

Hey- I saw that you created the Tongyong Pinyin category in 2019. What goes in that category? I had been adding any image that contained words that were derived from Tongyong Pinyin. One user has seen fit to remove a host of those images I added. Could you give me an opinion about this discussion? Please reply there if you want to. Thanks. --Geographyinitiative (talk) 19:08, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Category:Tongyong_Pinyin

Tongyong Pinyin has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Geographyinitiative (talk) 22:07, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

How we will see unregistered users

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:11, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:2022-01-06 NJDOT Administrative Order 2022-01.pdf

Copyright status: File:2022-01-06 NJDOT Administrative Order 2022-01.pdf

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:2022-01-06 NJDOT Administrative Order 2022-01.pdf. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 04:05, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

File:March of the Volunteers.png

File:March of the Volunteers.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

George Ho (talk) 07:12, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

File:March of the Volunteers.png

File:March of the Volunteers.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

George Ho (talk) 20:39, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:ROC2022-05-17-2022-05-27Law07219att1.pdf

Copyright status: File:ROC2022-05-17-2022-05-27Law07219att1.pdf

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:ROC2022-05-17-2022-05-27Law07219att1.pdf. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:ROC2022-05-17-2022-05-27Law07219att2.pdf

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 05:06, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Sound Logo

Hello,

I am messaging you because a contest for a sound logo for Wikimedia is being developed and your opinion as a Wikimedia Commons admin is appreciated. My team would like to know if it is possible for the top finalist sound logos in the contest to have attribution temporarily hidden from public view until all the votes are final? The idea is to let the public judge the sound logo contestants based on the merit of the logo, not the person or people who made it. Again, any feedback is appreciated.

Thank you,

VGrigas (WMF) (talk) 17:44, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Yes. Temporarily hiding something is possible.--Jusjih (talk) 18:00, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

尊敬的管理员，请发表意见

Commons_talk:Library_back_up_project#Proposal:_Tolerate_users_to_upload_pre-1949_Chinese_books_建议：容忍用户上传1949年和以前的中文书籍 Upload for Freedom (talk) 13:11, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Flag of sweden svg.svg

File:Flag of sweden svg.svg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: CSD G2 (Unused and implausible, or broken redirect)) Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Rkt2312.

And also:

• File:Flag of sweden svg.svg ( Nominator : Rkt2312 | Reason : CSD G2 (Unused and implausible, or broken redirect) )

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 00:39, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Canadian coins

Hello,

I found this deletion discussion that you initiated in 2007: Commons:Deletion requests/Images of Canadian coins less than 50 years old. The coins were not free in 2007, when they were less than 50 years old, but 3 or 4 of them are probably PD-Canada now. Do you think you can undelete them? I cannot view deleted files, so I have only the information from the filenames and from the upload logs.

• File:Canadian silver dollar 1962.jpg and File:Carlb-penny1967centennial-01.jpg : The years of the coins are mentioned. And their upload logs seem to imply that the photos are the works of the uploaders.

• File:Canada 25 cents.JPG : The upload log specifies that the coin is from 1960. But the file would have to be checked to see if the photo is free.

• File:Coincan.jpg : The upload log does not specify the year of the coin. Maybe the file can just be checked to see if the coin is old enough or still too recent.

• The other two coins, from 2004 and 2006, are still too recent.

Thank you in advance for your attention. -- Asclepias (talk) 17:28, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

I wonder if Commons:URAA-restored copyrights would affect undeleting them. I will ask at Commons:Undeletion requests later.--Jusjih (talk) 02:42, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Canadian government has said their works are not effected by URAA. Canada 25 cents is an unfree photo, and Coincan is a 2004 penny. Abzeronow (talk) 16:38, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Request to update Chinese version of a template

Hello.

Could you update the Chinese version of Template:PD-US-patent by making the changes which were done to the English vesion recently? Those changes have drastically changed the use of the template.

Thanks in advance. Veverve (talk) 07:30, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Done.--Jusjih (talk) 04:45, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/2024/01/12

Hi Jusjih, could you please take action and upload a revised version so we can finalize above DR? Regards, Ellywa (talk) 13:53, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Category:People_sitting_while_urinating

People sitting while urinating has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Prototyperspective (talk) 11:38, 12 October 2024 (UTC)