Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, KAVEBEAR!

Maps

edit

In the Perkins book, there are two maps. (1,2) Are they of use? Upload them? If so, please create an image description page for them and I will upload like the rest. – JBarta (talk) 18:07, 23 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

William C. Parke signature

edit

Hi KAVEBEAR,

I vectorized the signature you requested at Commons:Graphic Lab/Illustration workshop#William C. Parke signature. Is everything all right and can we consider the request as resolved?

Regards, --Patrick87 (talk) 01:53, 14 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

GL

edit

Not sure if GL is on your watchlist. Just letting you know that there was a reply. --McZusatz (talk) 18:00, 10 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Tamatoa

edit

Could you please check it? Thanks in advance.--Carnby (talk) 22:07, 11 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Redirects

edit

Please stop tagging redirects from names that have been in use for years for speedy deletion, those are not unnecessary. --Didym (talk) 16:44, 6 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Bots

edit


You are receiving this message because a technical change may affect a bot, gadget, or user script you have been using. The breaking change involves API calls. This change has been planned for two years. The WMF will start making this change on 30 June 2015. A partial list of affected bots can be seen here: https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2015-June/081931.html This includes all bots that are using pywikibot compat. Some of these bots have already been fixed. However, if you write user scripts or operate a bot that uses the API, then you should check your code, to make sure that it will not break.

What, exactly, is breaking? The "default continuation mode" for action=query requests to api.php will be changing to be easier for new coders to use correctly. To find out whether your script or bot may be affected, then search the source code (including any frameworks or libraries) for the string "query-continue". If that is not present, then the script or bot is not affected. In a few cases, the code will be present but not used. In that case, the script or bot will continue working.

This change will be part of 1.26wmf12. It will be deployed to test wikis (including mediawiki.org) on 30 June, to non-Wikipedias (such as Wiktionary) on 1 July, and to all Wikipedias on 2 July 2015.

If your bot or script is receiving the warning about this upcoming change (as seen at https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages ), it's time to fix your code!

Either of the above solutions may be tested immediately, you'll know it works because you stop seeing the warning.

Do you need help with your own bot or script? Ask questions in e-mail on the mediawiki-api or wikitech-l mailing lists. Volunteers at m:Tech or w:en:WP:Village pump (technical) or w:en:Wikipedia:Bot owners' noticeboard may also be able to help you.

Are you using someone else's gadgets or user scripts? Most scripts are not affected. To find out if a script you use needs to be updated, then post a note at the discussion page for the gadget or the talk page of the user who originally made the script. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 19:03, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Talkback

edit
 
Hello, KAVEBEAR. You have new messages on another wiki at COM:GL/PHOTO#John Mix Stanley.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

Ww2censor (talk) 10:48, 28 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Benjamin Pitman (Hawaii), undated

edit

Hallo KAVEBEAR, why did you change your mind regarding above image? First with frame and now without? I am a little bit irritated. Regards --Ras67 (talk) 22:47, 1 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy delete tags

edit

These tags should not be removed. You may replace them with a regular tag if you wish because they generally give a 7 day period so that you may add the required information. However, you must state where this digital image was acquired from. Just saying where the painting is not the correct, essential information.--Mark Miller (talk) 03:24, 12 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Mary Ann and Henry Hoolulu Pitman.jpg

edit
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Mary Ann and Henry Hoolulu Pitman.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:25, 12 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Old Pitman House at Hilo.jpg

edit
 
File:Old Pitman House at Hilo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:25, 12 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Henry Hoolulu Pitman, Peabody Essex Museum.jpg

edit
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Henry Hoolulu Pitman, Peabody Essex Museum.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:26, 12 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

A cup of coffee for you!

edit
  You probably need a few to keep to keep up with finals! In case I don't talk to you, have a safe trip and take lots of photos! ;-) Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:47, 12 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. I don't really know why I get really riled up with this particular editor but every year around this time it seems to occur. I've been working way too hard on this particular subject to just let it go or turn a blind eye as I've been doing with a lot of his antics. --KAVEBEAR (talk) 04:49, 12 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
Let it go. I have finally figured out why you have such a problem with me but I am not going to give out off Wikipedia information. Perhaps others will take time to look into the situation and you. Coffee is the last thing you need. Try some chamomile tea.--Mark Miller (talk) 04:42, 14 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
I can also see that part of the issue in the past is me from that snippy piece of comment I left. I just try to be more positive instead of negative.--Mark Miller (talk) 22:38, 27 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Old USCO Records

edit

"Wasn't aware of that. I used this search engine http://cocatalog.loc.gov/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?DB=local&PAGE=First but have since realized the records are way too recent. How do you get access to the copyright renewal submissions for the Library of Congress in 1957, 1958, and 1959?--KAVEBEAR (talk) 21:08, 24 December 2015 (UTC)"

See https://archive.org/details/copyrightrecords -- as I said in the DR, it's all there, but not at all user friendly. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:19, 28 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Ranavalona.jpg

edit
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ranavalona.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 23:33, 19 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Category:Samuel_Harrington_Littell

edit
 

Category:Samuel_Harrington_Littell has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Drbones1950 (talk) 19:29, 7 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

source of image?

edit
 

Hi Kavebear, I have a question regarding this image. The Google Books source that you give does not show this image or only a tiny fraction of it, because it was obviously scanned folded together. Is this your own scan out of the book? Background of my question is that also the map beside page 32 (which I am looking for) is not shown properly in the book. Greetings,--Ratzer (talk) 07:48, 16 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Yeah I scanned it after loaning it through interlibrary loan. I don't have access to it anymore though.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 08:13, 16 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Re: Cropp and replace

edit

Hello, I done all pictures as requested. Regards PawełMM (talk) 13:39, 1 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Re: Converting jp2 to jpg

edit

I can convert pictures from its tif source like this File:Hawaii album, p. 58, church.jpg. Is it enough? Regards PawełMM (talk) 08:29, 23 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Yes.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 08:30, 23 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

AskArt.com

edit

I do not know anybody with a paid subscription to AskArt. However, the full text of the biographies is available free on Fridays. I hope this helps. Wmpearl (talk) 19:30, 30 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

File in better resolution reloaded.

Regards PawełMM (talk) 07:46, 23 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Re: Charles Berger

edit
 

All done for you. Regards PawełMM (talk) 09:24, 24 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Reverting crops

edit

I noticed you've been reverting some crops for images in the clean-up category Category:Images with borders. As long as these files have the templates saying they need cropping, it's going to be a continual, endless cycle of cropping and reverting, which is counter-productive for everyone. That category link gives more information about the maintenance cropping categories and templates that can be used. Sweet kate (talk) 20:58, 4 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Is there a more specific template to use because my problems is only with the crops that are done improperly, cropping more than is necessary. I mean I could have done the crop myself if I was not wanting some help getting it down to the minute point where nothing except unnecessary frames are lost. --KAVEBEAR (talk) 22:34, 4 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
 
File:'Hilo Bay', oil painting by Joseph Nawahi, circa 1881 (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:31, 5 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Reverting

edit

Hello.Why did you retreat my cropping?Do you want to crop while retaining the text?--ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 07:39, 29 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

I wanted a lossless crop. You removed the parts of the image backgrounds for no reason. Please check how other users perform these crops (see File:Kalakaua (PP-96-15-003).jpg for your version I reverted because it was not done right and the other version which another user did and I retained because I was satisfied with the result). I only want the page in the background cropped. I don't ever want any part of the image to be cropped. Whenever you address the images I've tag in the future, please keep this in mind or refrain from editing them. Thanks, --KAVEBEAR (talk) 07:49, 29 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Tattooing on native woman, Easter Island (1891).png

edit
 

Done as requested. Regards PawełMM (talk) 17:37, 29 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Re: Crop of Newspapers

edit

Done as requested.

Regards PawełMM (talk) 14:09, 16 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Category:John_Richardson

edit
 

John Richardson has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Geo Swan (talk) 01:31, 31 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Possible heirs of Gertrude Miller-Toledo

edit

It is not certain if she had children. It appears she was a battered wife (there is a book source for that claim) and divorced her husband in a rather controversial situation. I don't know the full details but it might be a tender subject should you approach anyone. Here is a list of her siblings in order to identify any possible heirs. This is public information so, no issue there.

Daisy Kaihikapumahana Miller, John Kilioe Miller, Virginia Kahelekaapuni Miller, Margaret Kaahumanu Miller, Mona Jane Miller and Elmer Ellsworth Kalahumoku Miller (and again, no relationship to my line although several names are similar).--Mark Miller (talk) 22:36, 27 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

The original paintings are displayed at Liliuokalani Church (808) 637-9364. They may be able to provide some information.--Mark Miller (talk) 22:42, 27 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Just found this; her daughter and probable heir to Mary Koski is Kathy Long of Kamuela (public info from http://merriemonarch.staradvertiser.com/faces-of-merrie-monarch-the-arts-fair/)--Mark Miller (talk) 22:59, 27 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Askart.com

edit

Sorry, but I do not have a subscriptionHiart (talk) 02:58, 22 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Re: PBA

edit

Unfortunately, I will not undertake this task. For me it is too labor-intensive in relation to the expected results. My skills and software have limits. Regards PawełMM (talk) 08:49, 14 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Kamehameha III in Prussian uniform, c. 1831 (PP-97-7-010).jpg

edit

The painting is on loan to the Honolulu Museum of Art from the Hawaii State Archives. I took the pictureHiart (talk) 05:29, 24 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Re: File:Kaipo and Aimoku.jpg

edit
 

I scaled the incline to a 4:3 aspect ratio. I removed the unnecessary border. I do not know, however, whether the proportions of the picture I have taken are appropriate. PawełMM (talk) 06:59, 3 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:09, 30 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Liliuokalani image

edit

D'ye think we should add the two derivative colour versions? I mean, I don't think they're particularly accurate - for one thing, look at the curtain in the upper left, which wasn't as obviously one in the older copies of the image, so it's treated weirdly in the colourised version, likewise the apparent artwork of some kind above the throne that becomes just more wall, because it too wasn't very defined - but it's from the same photo. Adam Cuerden (talk) 03:31, 31 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

No they are not historical.KAVEBEAR (talk) 06:32, 31 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Re: Watermark

edit

Unfortunately I can't do this right now. I'm on vacation. Until September 28, I won't have access to graphics software. Greetings PawełMM (talk) 11:47, 9 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Important message for file movers

edit
 

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

R. H. Macy

edit

Hi Kavebear, Louisa Macy from Hawaii State Archives seems all right, but R. H. Macy turned to be John Bright. That's a bummer since old man's pictures are hard to find. As a consolation, I've downloaded his signature. Best regards, --Taterian (talk) 17:50, 3 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Image without license

edit

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 00:32, 5 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:48, 16 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:James K. Polk, 1847-1849.jpg

edit
 
File:James K. Polk, 1847-1849.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Wehwalt (talk) 19:38, 6 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Cities_and_towns_in_Hawaii

edit
 

Category:Cities_and_towns_in_Hawaii has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Themightyquill (talk) 09:28, 11 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

 Mysterymanblue  00:04, 4 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Watermark removed. PawełMM (talk) 22:33, 1 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Watermark remowed.

Regards PawełMM (talk) 00:01, 12 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

re: David Kahalepouli Piikoi & Victoria Kinoiki Kekaulike

edit

Done as requested. Regards PawełMM (talk) 14:00, 27 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Re: Ratafika and Rahovy

edit

Done as requested.

Regards PawełMM (talk) 06:54, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Re: Watermark removal

edit
 

Done as requested. Rgards PawełMM (talk) 16:36, 25 July 2023 (UTC)Reply