Marku1988

Willkommen auf Commons, Marku1988!

Erste Schritte Unser Ratgeber Erste Schritte und unsere FAQ können Dir nach Deiner Anmeldung hilfreich sein. Sie erklären, wie Du die Benutzeroberfläche anpassen und zum Beispiel auf Deine Muttersprache umstellen kannst. Auch erklären sie, wie Du Dateien hochladen kannst. Daneben erläutern sie unsere grundlegende Lizenzpolitik. Du benötigst keine besonderen technischen Kenntnisse, um hier mitzumachen. Sei mutig hier beizutragen und gehe von gutem Willen aus bei den Absichten anderer. Dies ist ein Wiki - es ist wirklich einfach. Hilfe bekommen Mehr Informationen bekommst Du im Gemeinschaftsportal. Du kannst Fragen im Forum oder im IRC-Chat #wikimedia-commons stellen. Du kannst auch einen Administrator auf seiner Diskussionsseite ansprechen. Sofern Du eine spezielle Frage zum Urheberrecht hast, frage auf der Seite Diskussionsseite:Lizenzen.		Tips, Tricks und Spielzeuge Setze Babelvorlagen auf Deine Benutzerseite, so dass andere sehen können, in welcher Sprache sie Dich ansprechen können and indicate your Graphics abilities. Alle Deine hochgeladenen Dateien sind in Deiner persönlichen Benutzergalerie einsehbar. Trage dazu im Feld User Deinen Benutzernamen ein und bestätige mit ENTER. Bitte unterschreibe auf Diskussionsseiten, indem Du ~~~~ tippst. Verwende das CommonSense-Werkzeug, um geeignete Kategorien für Deine Dateien zu finden (damit andere Leute sie ebenfalls auffinden können!). Um auf eine Bildbeschreibungsseite zu verlinken, schreibe dies:[[:Image:Foo.jpg]], so dass dies angezeigt wird: Image:Foo.jpg Sofern Du Dateien aus einem anderen Projekt überträgst, verwende bitte immer das Werkzeug CommonsHelper. Hast Du einen Fehler gemacht? Wolltest Du eine Datei umbenennen oder sie verschieben? Lade sie einfach erneut hoch und markiere die alte Datei mit {{bad name|Richtiger Name}} Ausführliche Informationen findest Du auf der Seite Löschrichtlinien.
(P.S. Möchtest Du diese Nachricht kommentieren?)

Hinweis

Meine Nacharbeiten sind Grafikfastfood. Manchmal umstritten, oft aber ein Gewinn. Wer sie nicht mag setzt die Änderungen einfach zurück.

My work is fastfood. Sometimes it may be contentious, but often it improve the pictures, If you don't like it just undo it.

Programme

Für Panoramafotos gibt es den Klassiker Hugin (Windows Download).

Manchmal erfordert Hugin zeitintensive manuelle Arbeiten oder ein sehr gutes Know How. In diesem Fall kann Autostitch oft helfen. Das Programm ist Freeware und verlangt nur den Hinweis darauf das es zum stitchen benutzt wurde. Dazu steht die Formatvorlage Autostitch zur Verfügung. Download

Aufnahmen aus leicht unterschiedlichen Blickwinkel oder Bilder mit starken Linsenkrümmungen an denen andere Programme scheitern oder umfangreiche Nacharbeiten verlangen können manchmal mit Panorama Perfect zusammengefügt werden. Das Programm hat im Gegensatz zu den beiden ersten keine Motiverkennung. Es "verschmilzt" lediglich in einem frei definierten Bereich zwei oder mehr Fotos. Eine Version für kleine Bildgrössen ist kostenlos erhältlich.

Irfanview zum verlustfreien rotieren (Shift-J) und zum verlustfreien zuschneiden (Menu: Optionen -> Verlustfreies Freistellen)

ShiftN richtet gestürzte Linien auf. Zur manuellen Bearbeitung gibt es eine kostenlose Perspektivenkorrektur als Irfan View fähiges Adobe Plugin.

Aufhellen und zur Farbkorrektur des gesamten Bildes gibt es colorcast

Paint Net und PhotoFiltre, neben den Autokorrekturfunktionen bieten beide umfangreiche Bearbeitungsmöglichkeiten.

UnFREEz ist eine OpenSource Freeware zum erzeugen animierter GIFs.

Für das selektives Aufhellen von partiellen Unterbelichtungen, wie sie gerne bei Fotos mit viel Himmel oder Gegenlicht auftreten, steht das kostenlose Irfan View kompatibele Photoshop Plugin contrastmask zur Verfügung. Gegen ein paar Euros gibt es ACDsee, das u. a. diese Aufgabe in vielen Fällen im automatischen Modus sehr gut löst. (siehe nebenstehendes Beispiel)

Danke!

Hallo Marku(s?), ich wollte mich bei dir einfach mal für das Ergänzen meiner mittlerweile nicht mehr ganz so kleinen Sammlung bedanken, bisher hatte ich das immer wieder vergessen. Und du hast natürlich Recht, Bilder mit den (ehemaligen) Empfangsgebäuden gefallen mir besser. Bahnsteige sehen fast immer gleich aus, doch die Gebäude sind fast immer anders ;-) Was Langendreer angeht, habe ich mittlerweile akzeptiert, dass das Gebäude nur noch Kulturzentrum ist. Hast du eigentlich nicht mal Lust, dir auf de:wp auch ein Benutzerkonto anzulegen? Grüße! --Stefan ■ 14:09, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Danke auch von mir

fürs drehen meines ersten Bildes. Wollte es korrigieren, aber beim re-upload ist etwas schief gelaufen und es wurde eine neue Datei (mit falschem Dateinamen) angelegt. War erst verblüfft, dass das Bild dann plötzlich trotzdem richtig herum war. Dank Deiner Seite weiß ich ja jetzt, was ich mit der "falschen" Datei machen muß. Gruß, Guido Arnold 17:45, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Val 206 incoming.png categories

You surely are fast! Thanks :) Lucasbfr 16:00, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Sadirvanli Sofa Harem Topkapi Istanbul 2007 Pano1.jpg

wow, you really are fast. Thank you for creating that panoramic image, it is good that you uploaded it as a new file, which helps to avoid confusion. keep up the good work and if you need any help let me know. sincerely Gryffindor 17:46, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Wow, thank you for that tip. Please don't forget to sign your message with four tildes (~) so that I know who left the message. Gryffindor 06:12, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Nochmals vielen Dank

Vielen Dank für die neue Panorama (Image:Loyalsock State Forest High Knob Panorama.JPG), es ist viel besser als meinen alten Versuch. Ruhrfisch 13:49, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Image:Westminster Palace 2.jpg

Hello! What did You change in my photo of Westminster Palace? jedyooo განხილვა 15:45, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Now I see Your changes. I won't revert it, I think, your changes are useful. Thank You! jedyooo განხილვა 16:08, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Image:Seebuck Pano.jpg

Der absolute Hammer! Vielen Dank --Flominator 07:17, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Nachtrag: Kriegst du das vielleicht auch mit Image:Feldberg 3986.jpg, Image:Feldberg 3988.jpg und Image:Feldberg 4040.jpg hin? --Flominator 07:19, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, dass ich noch einmal stressen muss, aber ich kenne sonst niemanden, der so tolle Panoramas machen kann. Ich habe gerade noch diese 3 hochgeladen:

• 
  links
• 
  mitte
• 
  rechts

Vielleicht hast du ja Lust, daraus auch ein Panorama zu machen? Vielen Dank schonmal, --Flominator 14:18, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Bochum

Wow. Simplicius 22:29, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Brilon

Hallo Markus, von Brilon hab ich da noch was. Was hälst du davon, deine Meisterwerke auf deiner Benutzerseite zu zeigen? Simplicius 09:14, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Meisterwerke werden die Panoramen dann, wenn der Fotograf diszipliniert in Hinblick auf das Stitching gearbeitet hat. Mein Part ist schlichte Fleißarbeit mit ein paar genialen Programmen die wiederum andere programmiert haben. Bis auf Kleinigkeiten, wie z.B. dem einfachen Himmelfake bei zwei Brilonpanoramen [1] [2], arbeite ich die Fotos nicht nach wie hier [3] deutlich zu sehen ist.--Marku1988 10:58, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Zum einen habe ich mal einen Artikel über Autostitch angefangen.

Um die Funktionsweise zu verstehen, habe ich SIFT angelegt.

Was die Arbeitsschritte und Parameter angeht, versuche ich zunächst mal,

eine Liste anzulegen: Programmeigenschaften.

Daraus würde ich später gerne einen Text im Artikel anlegen.

Bei Brilon hoffe ich noch weiteres Bildmaterial von den anderen Stammtischteilnehmern zu bekommen. Simplicius 11:26, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you so much for removing borders from Palio images. --Elitre 11:53, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Thank you!

One hour after i uploaded an images u turnd it right!! Thanx alot!! How anoying it was to se it "flipped over" and i couldn't find out how to turn it right. So thank you so much for doing it to me!

F.G.Svensson 10:52, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

thank you

hi there, thank you for stitching. I have tried the programme myself, however am never satisfied with my own results. Also the result sometimes look extremely warped. Therefore I prefer to leave the work of creating panoramas to experts. Thank you for your work, I hope you stick around longer this time to help with the backlog of panoramas-in-waiting. sincerely Gryffindor 10:50, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Hi Marku1988,
did you do that Image:KupferbachStauseeAachen.jpg out of my 2 original images? I'm quite impressed. Very nice work! Thanks. -- Túrelio 13:14, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

whish to repair

Hello, Marku1988, trying to set Image:OrquideaAngelo.jpg in the right position, the main - picture is destroyed. The thumbnail here: Cattleya forbesii is correct. Can you help. Thank you very much. Greetings Orchi 19:09, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Alexz Johnson Foto - Vielen Dank!

Ich bin sehr dankbar - jetz kann ich dieses Foto im Artikel benuetzen!

Thanks so much - I didn't know how to solve the rotation problem! I'm new to all this.

I have two others that are sideways and which will also need to be rotated. Would it be possible for you to rotate these at some point - no hurry on this.

Thanks again!

JD Fan 22:48, 25 October 2007 (UTC) (Ottawa, Canada)

Fixing the images

As I have seen, you are now fixing my images (well, that panorama you made simply stunned me :-). Thanks. I can do this next time too (GIMP, better shutter settings - this time I used manual many times). I have bad experience with longer time, so shorter was used. Unfortunately - as can we see - this did not help. Aktron 17:29, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:Downtown Beaver Pennsylvania.jpg

How in the world did you do that? The picture looks far nicer, and the unfortunate tilt is gone! Thanks much; what kind of program is needed to modify pictures like that? Nyttend 16:05, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for your excellent work on the photos of Lowden State Park. It is most appreciated. :) IvoShandor 22:16, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you, I will give it a try sometime, I should be able to figure it out. This picture was especially stunning, thanks again. IvoShandor 22:24, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Stitching

Hi. I have noticed that you have corrected very nicely some of my pictures. Thanks a lot. I have a question. Would you be interested in stitching a few pictures together to make a nice panoramic picture for Wiki-Commons? I have some source files and they are of quite good quality, but I cannot get Hugin to work the way I would like, so I have not uploaded the final result. With your touch I am sure the results would be great. If you are interested, let me know if jpegs or RAWs would be better for processing. I have some pictures from Zion NP (panorama from Observation Point) and Bryce Canyon NP (sunrise over the canyon), that could add to wikipedia. Thanks! Qbek 06:01, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your advice. It was very helpful. I have tried the software and the results look quite good. However, I can only get my computer to process low quality drafts. I believe the problem is the amount of RAM, as my computer only has 0.5Gb of it. I have put one of the drafts online on Picasa. I have not cropped it. Please, have a look and let me know if it is good enough to get you interested in processing a high quality image for Commons. There are 9 source jpeg images and they total ~36Mb. Thanks again! Qbek 08:26, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

I have uploaded the source files to Picassa and you should be able to download them using the link in my prevuous message. Let me know if you have any problems or questions. I appreciate your help. Qbek 14:37, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

I have uploaded the stitched image as Image:Panoramic view from Observation Point, Zion NP.jpg. Please replace with your version. I have also uploaded a draft version of Image:Panoramic view from Inspiration Point in Bryce Canyon NP.jpg. Please have a look to see if you would be willing to help me with that one as well. Thank you! Qbek 17:52, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

OK. I have uploaded the files for the Inspiration Point here. Thank you for helping me out.

I also have one practical question that I hope you would be able to answer for me. Now, I have noticed that source images have quite significant vigeneting in the corners. If I am taking the pictures with the purpose of stitching them together is it useful to use a wide lens (like 17mm, say) to reduce the number of stitches required or is it better to use a regular lens (28-35mm) which will require more stitching, but (?) will have less optical distortions. Do you have an opinion/advice? BTW, I am using this lens for most of my landscapes recently. Would you set the zoom at 17mm or 35mm if taking pictures for stitching? Thanks for all your help! Qbek 18:30, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your patience in answering my questions and for all your help with stitching some of my pictures. It's much appreciated. Qbek 07:34, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Making panorama from my images

Image:GreenwoodCemP.jpg very nice. Perhaps I should learn how to do that. Thank you. Cheers, -- Infrogmation 14:58, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Same topic: Wow! Thanks for the Wiggensbach dome painting. I had no idea this was possible with images so different in size and quality. --AndreasPraefcke 22:08, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

using categories

Hi Marku,

I think it's best that we leave every image in a category[4] even if it was used for a panorama, because otherwise we'll get trouble with not using categories for images. You can see the drive right at the top of the page "Please categorise these media files today. Thank you!". If it gets too confusing, you can create a subcategory for working pictures only, something that happened here Category:Komische Oper Berlin WB. By the way what programme did you use to stitch the Sceptre of Austria? Gryffindor 19:06, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:KKW Brunsbüttel.jpg

Hallo Marku1988,

du fragst, was „was ist gegen eine gerade Variante des Bildes einzuwenden ?“ ist. Natürlich nichts. Du warst nur schneller mit dem Revert als ich mit der Bildbearbeitung :) Ich wollte nämlich das Original löschen (bzw. habe jetzt auch Image:Atomkrafwerk Brunsbüttel.JPG gelöscht), dafür aber vorher das Original als neue/alte Version über deine gerade Variante drübergespeichert, damit ich anschließend eine farbkorrigierte Version drüberspeichern konnte. --Raymond ^Disc. 09:10, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Burg Hochhaus

Danke für das schöne Panorama. Muß ich mir auch mal anschaun. Scheint ja prima zu funktionieren. Gruß----Dark Avenger 13:06, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you to your stitching work on Image:Hong Kong Polytechnic University 200505-p.jpg. It is much better than before :) Baycrest(Talk) 15:33, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Image:Pécsi hegyoldal P.JPG

Wow! Thank u very much! Pilgab 20:58, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you for combining my photos, this is so amazing! Thank you! ^{Talk to ►} Kevin 09:13, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Wanzkaer See

Hallo Marku1988, schönen Dank für die Erstellung des Panoramas . Ich habe allerdings noch mehr Motive von diesem See. Auf die Kompatibilität zueinander habe ich sie jedoch nicht geprüft. Wenn Du möchtest, sehe ich da Material durch und lade die geeigneten Bilder hoch. Wenn es Dir lieber ist, auch die Originalversionen, die sehr blaustichig sind. Vielleicht kannst Du sie besser bearbeiten als ich. Heute mache ich aber nichts mehr. Grüße --Botaurus stellaris 06:31, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Image:Chengde painting.JPG

Looks much better now, thanks!--Ondřej Žváček 11:28, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Platamon

Danke schön. Ich bin begeistert. Habe das Foto im Artikel in der Infobox des Orts eingebaut. --Μυρμηγκάκι 19:33, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Stitch Request

Marku1988, I noticed that you stitched two images that I uploaded earlier this December. I would be grateful if you could do this again with two other images that I just uploded (Image:Sheikh Zayed Road on 27 November 2007 Pict 1.jpg and Image:Sheikh Zayed Road on 27 November 2007 Pict 2.jpg). If you have any questions, just leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. LoverOfDubai 22:46, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

I want to thank you for stitching the image. The problem is that I do not understand Deutsch. Could you please write in English? If you feel more comfortable in español, français, or Esperanto, please feel free to use those languages. Thank you. LoverOfDubai (^talk|_{contributions}) 20:17, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I haven't realized that I have read an english text --Marku1988 09:13, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the stitching information; and for stitching another image. I appreciate it. LoverOfDubai (^talk|_{contributions}) 20:29, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Bonjour

Je te remercie de ton intervention sur certaines de mes photos pour les transformer en vue panoramique. Travail très réussi ! Quel logiciel utilises-tu ? Comme je vois que tu excelles dans le travail sur les photos, je voudrais te poser une question : est-ce que tu pourrais corriger le flou de quelques photos que j'ai faites, entre autres, d'animaux ? Je ne sais si j'ai trop "zoomé" ou si c'est l'évaporation des marais (en tous cas, je ne fais que débuter en photo), mais les images suivantes ne sont pas claires quand on les amène à une résolution plus grande :

• Image:Farol Barra 01.JPG
• Image:RS-833 - 02.JPG
• Image:Taim - cigogne.JPG
• Image:Taim - famille capivara.JPG
• Image:Taim - oiseau.JPG
• Image:Taim - oiseaux.JPG
  

Merci de ton aide, si tu peux apporter une correction (et même si tu ne peux pas). Meilleurs voeux pour 2008. Bien à toi, FrancoBras 13:21, 3 January 2008 (UTC).

Image:Türk liderler (p).jpg

• Thank you so much:)) --Maderibeyza 13:00, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

modifications on a new file

Hi, I've seen that you modified meta-informations about two pictures I have uploaded today (thank you by the way). Just a question, how do you know that there are new files? Do you manually check categories everyday, or do you have a kind of subscription? Eusebius 21:29, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Goya

Hallo,

Leider habe ich keine Bilder mehr von der serie Image:Calatayud - San Juan el Real - Cúpula - Pechinas de Goya0P.jpg. Als ich sie genommen habe, dachte ich nicht an stitchen sonder eher an die Malereien sichtbarer/deutlicher/klarer zu machen. Hat aber nicht funktioniert, ich habe nicht das wissen um so etwas zu erreichen.

Gruß, --Ecelan 17:06, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

das

Ist glaube ich was für dich ;) ^{__ ABF __} ϑ 07:45, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

re Image:4549a - Milano - S. Maria d. Carmine - An. sec. XVII, Crocifissione - Foto Giovanni Dall'Orto, 3-Jan-2008.jpg

Hello Marku. The proper procedure when you modify a file is not overwriting it, but creating a new (derivate) file, and linking the old one to the new, as per this example Image:Palmanova, Chiesa. Foto Giovanni Dall'Orto - luglio 2005 modified.jpg. In our case I'll leave things as you made, but as a rule, overwriting should be used only by the original uploader, or in cases of blatant improvements (e.g. a 180 degrees wrongly rotated image which was uploaded properly rotated). In our case I'll leave things as you left them, since the improvement is not bad and I can agree on it, but as a rule I revert such changes if they have not been discussed previously. Some people have a weird idea of what constitutes an "improvement". Thank you. --User:G.dallorto 10:48, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

The easiest way to start a discussion, is to show the result. This keeps Wiki well arranged and it is faster for me too. If the creator don't like it I accept his revert. In case of revert I decide if the image and/or my changes are worth to load up a second one of the same motif. Addionally I look regular in my contribution to find out if my ideas of quality improvement are accepted. If you don't like this way, I will let your pictures untouched. --Marku1988 17:54, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Wuppertalsperre Damm 19P21.jpg

Danke! -- Ies 15:42, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the link, I'll give a try when I have the chance. The images are glued on to a piece of paper (my parents love to scrapbook and just put the two images together) so I don't know if I'll be able to use the program or not. But if I do, thanks for the help! Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 10:35, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

image:KaffeeMuenchhausen-02P.jpg

Hallo Marku, da warst Du aber schnell mit dem Panorama. Ich hatte die gleiche Idee, habe deshalb schon vom Stativ fotografiert. Jetzt wollte ich aber erstmal den Artikel fertig bekommen und habe mich beim upload gewundert, dass plötzlich drei Innenaufnahmen vorhanden waren. Gut gemacht, habe das Bild gleich eingesetzt. Beste Grüße Godewind 14:31, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

ein neues Panorama lohnt sich vielleicht doch, denn mein Programm hat die Qualität vor allem im rechten Teil etwas reduziert. --Marku1988 15:41, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Shibuya109.jpg

I just wanted to thank you for making my image brighter. I always wondered how I could do that.. thanks again. --Staka 19:04, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

I do have ACDsee actually. I didn't know you could do that.. I'll use it from now on, thanks. --Staka 19:41, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for doing a great job on this image. :-) - Erik Baas 23:05, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Re pano

Hi. If you could help me correct my pano I would appreciate it. I uploaded the originals like you mentioned on my talk page. The are located here: 1,2,3,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16. Thanks, Cacophony 03:50, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

I just took care of #4. Sorry about that! Cacophony 06:34, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Blue Bell Hill and Chatham, Kent

Es hat mir erschockt dass du hat meiner Bilder so schnell gefunden. So, als ein kleiner Dankegeschenk- hier sind [[Image:ChathamSunPier4162.JPG]] und .... Many thanks.ClemRutter 21:58, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Greenwich

Hi Marku!

If you had some time could make some magic with these pictures: Image:Greenwich 1.JPG, Image:Greenwich 2.JPG, Image:Greenwich 3.JPG, Image:Greenwich 4.JPG

They should be stitched together... Thank you very much! Pilgab 17:23, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Gdynia zdjęcia z lotu ptaka - P1.JPG

Thanks. You're great! Joymaster 12:24, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Idem ... Thank, you so much for Image:Imperia Porto Maurizio-Borgo Marina-IMG P.JPG. :-) --「Twice^29.0 · contributi · talk」 10:26, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Morton plant hospital.JPG stitch

Thanks, I wanted to do that so bad. Don't have the software. Cheers, Mikereichold 22:09, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Großauftrag

Hallo Marku, da Du mir dieses Bild so schön gestitcht hast, habe ich nun als Folge eine ganz unverschämte Bitte an Dich. Schaue Dir doch bitte mal die Bilder an, die ich hier geparkt habe. Da sind gleich 11 recht umfangreiche Stitch-Kandidaten. Es muss nicht gleich alles sofort sein. Ich wäre völlig zufrieden, wenn Du die Bilder demnächst mal nach und nach bearbeiten könntest, wenn Du gerade mal Zeit hast. Beste Grüße, -- Ies 17:30, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Herzlichen Dank! -- Ies 17:10, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:Johnson creek SE 41st weir P.jpg

Image:Johnson creek SE 41st weir P.jpg: Awesome! Thanks. EncMstr 07:59, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Bildersatz Skyline von Wuppertal-Unterbarmen

Lust die Bilder "zusammen zu kleben"? --Atamari 21:29, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

super --Atamari 18:59, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Hi, and thanks a lot for stitching together my images. I didn't even know this was possible until you stitched together some pictures i took from Hallgrímskirkja tower. I shot the panorama of Tjörnin in Reykjavík just to try to stitch it together myself but i think your version is much better. I posted it on the Icelandic Wikipedia, you can check out the link here.

[5]

--Jóhann Heiðar Árnason 23:29, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Klinik an der Vogelsangstr

Kann man die zusammen kleben?

• 
  Bleibt auch einzeln
  0013.jpg
• Panorama 0013.jpg
  Panorama
  0013.jpg

• 
  0013a.jpg
• 
  0013b.jpg
• 
  0013c.jpg
• 
  0013d.jpg
• 
  0013e.jpg
• 
  0013f.jpg
• 
  0013g.jpg
• 
  0013h.jpg
• 
  0013i.jpg
• 
  0013j.jpg
• 
  0013k.jpg

--Atamari 23:53, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the panos

I dunno what criteria you use to pick the photos you panoramacize (made that up *grin*), but I'm glad that some of mine make the grade. I can't always pano on my camera when it's sunny, 'cause it washes out the images somewhat. Please to keep up the good work! Cheers! :) -Ebyabe 01:32, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Panorama Nützenberg, Blick auf den Falkenberg

File:Wuppertal Nützenbergpark 0031.jpg Wäre vielleicht etwas zum kleben? --Atamari 13:38, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Danke --Atamari 22:38, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Category:Villa Seyd

erste Serie

zweite Serie

details

51°16′32.3″N 7°8′46.2″E Noch schlimmer kann man nicht um eine Villa bauen - ich konnte nicht weiter zurück. ;-) --Atamari 22:38, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

thank you

hi there Marku1988, as usual you do not cease to amaze me. Do you think you can improve the colours of this image here Image:Topkapi - Detail of the Gate of Felicity.jpg just like you did with Image:Gate Felicity Topkapi painting March 2008.JPG? thank you. Gryffindor 22:08, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Noch'n Großauftrag

Hallo Marku, bei mir haben sich wieder einige zusammenklebbare Bilder angesammelt, zu denen ich Dich um Hilfe bitte. Du findest die Bilder hier. Mache Dir bitte keine Mühe mit Namen und Kategorien, setzte die von Dir zusammengeklebten Bilder bitte einfach mit in die Galerien und ich kümmere mich um den Rest. Danke im Voraus. -- Ies 16:43, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Stitch

Your stitcings of Mardin Photos are very nice. Thankyou. --Nevit Dilmen 19:46, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

360° über Wuppertal

Category:Views from Bismarckturm (Wuppertal) wenn mal Regentage kommen, oder du sofort Spaß dran hast diese zusammen zu kleben. --Atamari 22:11, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Super - ist besser geworden als ich gedacht habe. Es fehlt aber ein kleiner Ausschnitt (Image:Wuppertal Hardt 0227.jpg). Das große 47 m hohe Bürogebäude de:Glanzstoff-Hochhaus ist nur zum Teil drauf. Der markante Schornstein fehlt auch. Trotzdem gut geworden. --Atamari 12:50, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Nur mal so zur Info, ich weis nicht ob du mit der Topographie von Wuppertal auskennst. Wuppertal ist aus den zwei ehemaligen Städten Barmen und Elberfeld entstanden, damit gibt es zwei größere Innenstädte. Die Erhebung Hardt, auf dem sich der Bismarkturm sich befindet liegt auf der Grenze der beiden Stadtteile. Man kann Barmen ganz gut erkennen mit dem Heizkraftwer und seinen markanten Schornstein. Das Tal der Wupper in südlicher Blickrichtung ist Unterbarmen mit der Grenz zu Elberfeld. Das zweite Zentrum, Elberfeld, liegt da wo der Sparkassenturm und das Glanzstoff-Hochhaus zu sehen ist. Die Bergkuppe der Hardt stört hier. Der zweite größer Schonstein, das Heizkraftwerk Elberfeld liegt im Tal genau zwischen den beiden Erhebungen Kiesberg und Nützenberg. Das ist in westlicher Blickrichtung, der Ort wird Westende genannt - weil früher dort die Stadt zu Ende war. --Atamari 12:37, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Der Streit Elberfeld - Barmen ist bekannt, auch wenn es manchen Barmer schmerzt, Elberfeld hat das Rennen als Wuppertaler Innenstadt in der Außenwahrnehmung gemacht. Alle bedeutenden kommunalen Kultureinrichtungen sind hier zu finden, der Hauptbahnhof, die Hochschule und das grössere Geschäftszentrum. Abgesehen von ich einem Gamershop wüsste ich nicht wo Elberfeld Defizite gegenüber Barmen hat, was umgekehrt deutlich anders ist. --Marku1988 13:25, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Image:LouvreArche.jpg

Thank you, it looks so much better now. :-) - Erik Baas (talk) 12:33, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Major Stone Forest central section 02.JPG

Thanks for the adjustments. Can you add a {{retouched|your reason here}} tag to the images you fix up specifying what the subsequent improvements are? Thanks. --BrokenSphere 16:20, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Salinger-Feld-IMG 6943a.jpg

Bist Du sicher, dass das zu Rüdinghausen gehört? --Mbdortmund (talk) 09:35, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

congratulations

		The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
		For your work with retouching and creating panoramic images, I hereby award you a barnstar. Gryffindor (talk)

You're welcome, you deserved it. Don't forget that you may copy+paste your barnstar onto your main user page. Gryffindor (talk) 11:09, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Bildbearbeitung

Hallo,

du hast kürzlich eines meiner Bilder bearbeitet und dabei die Belichtung nur außerhalb des Himmels korrigiert. Meinst du, das könnte mit diesem Bild (Himmel dunkler, Rest heller) auch gehen?

Gruß --MdE ^{Post/talk [de] [com]} 15:51, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Ah, vielen Dank! Gerade das Vorschaubild wirkt jetzt viel besser. Gruß --MdE ^{Post/talk [de] [com]} 17:19, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Panoramabilder

Hallo Marku1988!

Vielen Dank, dass du meine Panoramabilder bearbeitet hast! Könntest du wohl auch noch die Bilder Image:Erlebnisbaum1.JPG und Image:Erlebnisbaum2.JPG zusammenfügen und ebenfalls in der Kategorie Risch-Rotkreuz abspeichern? Danke!

--TimBs (talk) 17:08, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Panorama Kolosseum in Rom (Originalgröße).jpg

I don't know what's wrong with this one, I get nothing but errormessages, while other panorama's look fine... - Erik Baas (talk) 17:51, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Lučice

Nice image. Can you make photos also from Image:Lučice, kostel (2).jpg, Image:Lučice, kostel (3).jpg, Image:Lučice, kostel (4).jpg, Image:Lučice, kostel.jpg. Thank you, --Dezidor (talk) 09:27, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Käina Bay.jpg

Nice work. Thank You!--HendrixEesti (talk) 07:59, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Dobbertiner See

Danke, sieht super aus. --Alma (talk) 13:41, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Danke !

Thank you for creating a panoramic view out of my pictures of Villeneuve Saint Georges's "triage" ! Benjism89 (talk) 18:51, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Bild nachbearbeiten

Hallo, erstmal danke für Deine (schon ein wenig her) nachbearbeitung der Ölbilder von Sichelbein. Ich hätte da noch zwei Bilder, welche gerade gemacht werden sollte....Könntest Du das vielleicht hinbekommen? Image:Deutschesspruchband.jpg und Image:St. Johann2.JPG Danke im voraus!!! --Grüße aus Memmingen (talk) 16:29, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

panoramic

Thank you very much for make this panoramic, I restore also the link to the previous panoramic.

Hi! --Accurimbono (talk) 13:30, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Fort Amherst Panorama

Vielen dank für den Neue Panorama. Diese zwei Bilder sind in ein Sammlung von 8 dass ich kann uploaden wenn du willst. Schreib mal! Ich habe andere Panorama-sammlungen- aber ich verstehe nie wie du kannst meinen Uploads so schnell finde? ClemRutter (talk) 21:45, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

For this [6]. I wonder if HDRising this picture with the original and your lighter version would be nice (in order to keep the nice green of the grass and topiaries).

Thank you anyway :) Nanoxyde (talk) 10:53, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Another thanks ^^

Me too I wanted thank you for the very good work you did on this picture. Although I'm not a specialist, I tried to improve this image before import it, without any good result unfortunately. Congratulations, Totodu74 (talk) 16:24, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Thank you!

For making the panoramic images of some of my Hubei photos. Vmenkov (talk) 11:22, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Crop image

Dear Marku1988, I see that you improved an image I uploaded yesterday--a Woman on a walk. Can you crop this image so that it focuses only on the picture? Image:Portrait of Charlotte Duchesne, Phillippe de Champaigne's wife.jpg Right now there is a bad, grainy reflection on its sides. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:36, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

• Thanks for your help on the Charlotte Duchesne image Marku1988. There is one more image by me which you may wish to adjust. Its up to you: Image:Portrait of Otakar Count Czernin (1823) by Tkadlík.jpg Regards from Canada. --Leoboudv (talk) 10:36, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Hello. You already cropped Image:Kupecký's portrait of Karl Bruni (1709).jpg, but it wasn't the largest one available on Flickr. Would you mind cropping it again? Sorry! Angus McLellan (Talk) 15:13, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice. I'll see if I can get it to work. All the best, Angus McLellan (Talk) 16:56, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

I promise, cross-my-heart-and-hope-to-die, that this will be my last begging letter. I don't think Image:Portrait of Hans Schellenberger nee Ehem (1507).jpg is the largest image available on Flickr. Would it be possible to do your magic stuff again on this? Thanks a million, Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:28, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

3 images

Dear Marku1988 in Germany, If you have time, can you please see if you can improve these images by making them fit the entire screen. Normally, I don't care about paintings but 2 of them are by Rubens himself and one by Kupecky. Before I placed them on Commons, there was no image of thir work here. They are:

• Image:Head of a Bearded Man by Rubens (1611 - 1612).jpg
• Image:St. Augustine by Rubens (1636-1638).jpg and
• Image:Jan Kupecký self portrait (1707).jpg

Thank You from Canada and congratulations on your excellent work here on Commons! Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:24, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

3 images

If you have time, I have 2 more new images by Rubens and 1 by Ceruti. Maybe you can improve it by making the image fit the entire screen? I checked on Commons but the paintings were not there:

• Image:Portrait of a Woman by Rubens (1637).jpg
• Image:Portrait of Peter Paul Rubens' family (late 1630s).jpg
• Image:A Woman with a Dog by G. Ceruti.jpg

Thank You from Canada --Leoboudv (talk) 23:35, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:South Africa-Hankey.jpg

Thanks you, not only for the amazing panorama, but also for introducing me to hugin. --NJR_ZA (talk) 16:10, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Cinemac.JPG

Thanks for your work on my photo. Great job many thanks. Sterkebaktalk 14:33, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Cinema odeon firenze 1.JPG

what you did is amazing!! Thank you so much!!!!! --Sailko (talk) 15:32, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Necho II

Dear Marku, Does your software work with .png format images? Can it be used to make this image brighter: Image:Necho-KnellingStatue BrooklynMuseum.png It is a statue of pharaoh Necho II and is used on English and Deutsch WP here: [7] and here: [8] I thank you for any help you can give here. It is a pity the bronze statue is very dark. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:25, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

• Thanks for your help here Marku. That was an important image. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:51, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Soběšice

Hi Marku, can you make panorama from Image:Výhled z Rozhledny Soběšice (1).jpg, Image:Výhled z Rozhledny Soběšice (2).jpg ... Image:Výhled z Rozhledny Soběšice (11).jpg, Image:Výhled z Rozhledny Soběšice (12).jpg. Thank you, --Dezidor (talk) 11:02, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Uploading new versions of images

Hi, I'd appreciate it if you'd inform me on my talk page next time you upload new versions of my photos. thanks though, the new version is a lot clearer, though I did rather like the blue. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:02, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thank you very much! Image:Dinamovskaya street.jpg - right photo. 7 mb - original. --Vizu (talk) 18:48, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Paseky nad Jizerou – Panorama

Hi Marku. You can make panorama from

• Image:Krkonoše, z Pasek nad Jizerou (05).jpg
• Image:Krkonoše, z Pasek nad Jizerou (06).jpg
• Image:Krkonoše, z Pasek nad Jizerou (07).jpg

Thank you. --ŠJů (talk) 20:49, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Azaditower.jpg

Thanks indeed :) --Mardetanha ^talk 21:24, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

.

Speedy deletion

Hallo, can I remind you that for quick deletion of categories, the procedure consist of inserting {{Badname|Good name}} if another category names exist. Alternatively, {{Speedy|reason}} can be used. Blanking the page makes that the category appears several days later in Special:UncategorizedCategories which we try to keep as empty as possible, but requires significant work as we have to analyse each case if it concerns vandalisme, mistakes, beginners work (that may need assistance) or just a plain categorisation problem. So following the standard procedure saves us all unnecessary work. Thank you and keep up the good work. --Foroa (talk) 18:21, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

rotations

Hi Marku1988, thanks for all the rotations you did on the mills I marked yesterday, much appreciated. Akoopal (talk) 18:51, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

This image

Do you know of a way to make this image sharper...or less fuzzy?

• File:Macy Gray at Live Earth Brazil 2007.jpg

It was taken at a concert and the camera must have been shaking when the picture of Ms Gray was taken. I cropped the original flickr image. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:52, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

• That's OK. Thank you for improving it a little. It was the only legitimate picture available on flickr. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 15:16, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Deanimation

Hi Marku. File:Station Újezdec Uherský Brod.gif is an animated image compound of 4 alternating images. Can You separate it to 4 individual images? --ŠJů (talk) 06:19, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Thank You. --ŠJů (talk) 16:19, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

For improving my images. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 19:42, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

And for the crop and tilt of the Goshen post office mural (I should have thought to do it before uploading). Daniel Case (talk) 21:41, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Musée Grobet-Labadié

Bonjour, Vous avez modifié deux photos de tableaux que j'avais importées, en enlevant les cadres. J'avais constaté effectivement que les tableaux étaient souvent sans le cadre. Est-ce une obligation ? J'aimerais le savoir pur les prochaines photos de tableaux. Personnellement je trouve cela dommage car les cadres mettent en valeur la peinture. J'avais importé d'autres photos de tableaux qu'il faudra alors modifier. Merci de votre aide.Robert Valette (talk) 14:50, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Dortmund-Derne

Nur aus Neugier: Warum hattest Du zu den Bildern aus Derne die Category:Alsike kyrka angefügt? --Mbdortmund (talk) 17:36, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

360° über Wuppertal, der zweite Turm

Category:Views from Toelleturm

Vielleicht hast du Lust und das Material ist gut genug; und kannst wieder ein 360°-Panorama erstellen? ;-) --Atamari (talk) 23:23, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

This image

Can this important and excellent image be straightened out a bit:

• File:Theatre sabratha libya.jpeg

Its looks a bit crooked unfortunately from the angle the picture was taken though it is by far the best picture of this important city. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:43, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

• Thank you Marku. Its much much better now. With kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:24, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Pascal Paoli

Congratulations and thanks for File:Pascal Paoli.jpg! Rama (talk) 08:38, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Muesersiedlung beamtenw.jpg

Hi! Hast du eventuell Interesse, aus den beiden unbearbeiteten Originalbildern (meine hochgeladenen sind geshiftet und etwas verkleinert) ein Pano zu bauen? Möglicherweise ist dann noch etwas bessere Qualität möglich? -- smial (talk) 17:25, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Mont La Plagne (Dec. 2008).jpg

Dear Marku1988,

This photo of Mt. Plagne in France was taken before just before sunset. Is it possible to brighten it a little? It looks rather gloomy. Just curious? Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:31, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

• Thank you, suggestion 3 is great. Much better than the dark and glomy original. With kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:44, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

File:TrinitàMontiAltare-SteO153.JPG

Could you straighten this image Marku1988? It was taken slighlty crooked. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:49, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

•  Comment: Thank you Marku1988. The image is...much much better now. Regards from Canada --Leoboudv (talk) 21:30, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Alfink College

Thanks for the work on the images. Picture more useful now. --Stunteltje (talk) 11:35, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Exposure setting

Can anything be done to reduce the exposure setting of this image:

• File:Bombay22.jpg

Its too bright. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:36, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

• Thank you Marku1988 for all you help! With kind Regards from Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:39, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Silla kingdom

Dear Marku1988, Is there any chance you could remove the people in the image below:

• File:Royal Silla burial mounds 2006c.jpg

I think there is sufficient background to do this. I don't think those 2 people would want to be in an important picture for this world heritage site in Korea. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:45, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

• Thanks Marku1988 for your help. Cheers from Vancouver, Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 02:25, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Question

Can the 4 people at the right hand side of this image here be removed?

• File:Iasi cultural palace.jpg

Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:23, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

• Thank you, Marku. In private places, one often get people in images, but the 4 people were at the front of the photo and distracted from its high quality. With kind Regards from Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:58, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Qattara Depression (March 2007).jpg

Dear Marku1988,

Can the single person in this image be removed.....for privacy reasons? This image is of the famous Qattara Depression which played an important role at El-Alamein in 1942. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 02:11, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

• Thank you Marku1988 for you assistance. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:09, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Star Trek

Is there anything that can be done to increase the sharpness in this blurry image? It looks like it was taken while the camera was being moved:

• File:StarTrekSydneyOperaHousePremiereApr09.jpg

Just curious. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:53, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

•  Comment: I guess the picture quality here is just too bad to improve. (too many dark & bright lights and blurry image). Thanks for looking at it though. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:59, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Ravenna-gallaplacidia03.jpg

Could you make the above meximum resolution image a bit brighter? Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:16, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

• Thansk you Marku for your help in brightening up that beautiful quality image. With kind Regards from Vancouver, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:42, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!

Hi Marku1988,

Thanks for brightening up the image of a church I uploaded today.

It looks far better now, which much more detail visible than before. You did a really good job on that one!

Best Regards,
Benkid77 (talk) 19:46, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Copyvio

Hello,

I'm sorry to tell you but I removed all your speedy tags for copyvios, you claimed copyright on them and told us 2 years that you're the author and the most files are in use therefor I don't think we could speedy delete them.

I would like to ask you to make a DR instead.

Thank you, Huib talk 16:59, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Even if the Picture are in use, the creator found saw picture last week. I am sorry for this, but thats what it is. --Marku1988 (talk) 19:00, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Yes, but you told us that you where the author and you released them under a free license knowing that a free license cant be revoked and now you're asking us to delete them with speed, the only right way to go now is to start a mass deletion request. Huib talk 19:04, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

so and why do you want me to do this work ? You have the tools to do it automaticly --Marku1988 (talk) 19:06, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Lets keep the conversation here, I do not have tools to make a mass deletion request, and you're asking for deletion because you have made a big mistake why should I fix it? Huib talk 19:08, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

I have fixed it, but you have undo it. --Marku1988 (talk) 19:09, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Nope, you made it a user request but that isn't a speedy reason. Huib talk 19:12, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Copyright violation is the same even if i have done it for a long time --Marku1988 (talk) 19:14, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Please do not remove discussion. We had examples that uploaders for some reason wanted their images deleted. When that did not worked they claimed they did not take the images themselves. Therefore this is not a speedy but a ordenary deletion request. --MGA73 (talk) 19:48, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

I will make the DR for you. Please comment when done. --MGA73 (talk) 20:24, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your help --Marku1988 (talk) 18:34, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

@Marku1988, es könnte vielleicht helfen, wenn der tatsächliche Photograph die Beschwerde, die er an dich gerichtet hat, bzw. das Lösch-Verlangen wegen Urheberrechtsverletzung direkt an OTRS mailt. Das sollte er aber persönlich, also von seinem eigenen Emailaccount und unter Angabe seiner offiziellen Anschrift tun. Wie du vielleicht weisst, wird der Inhalt solcher Emailx nicht veröffentlicht, sonderen ist nur den wenigen OTRS-Mitarbeitern zugänglich. Gruß. --Túrelio (talk) 09:05, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Genau das wäre der Weg. -- smial (talk) 10:13, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Marku1988, warum machst du nicht was ich dir geraten habe? --Túrelio (talk) 19:02, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Weil ich da verdammt viel Ärger bekomme. Aber das scheint in Wiki ja keinen zu interessieren. Mein Ansprechpartner hält wohl aus Mitleid bis jetzt noch still, Der wollte eigentlich schon letzten Montag was sagen. --Marku1988 (talk) 15:29, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Ich bezog mich vor allem auf meine Email an dich. --Túrelio (talk) 15:42, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Frage wegen Foto-Nutzung

Posted on 26.11.2009

Hallo "Marku1988", bitte kontaktieren Sie mich unter astupka@interaktion.com bzgl. der Benutzung des Fotos: http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Datei:Abidjan.JPG&filetimestamp=20080306091918. Danke schön!

File:Kraftwerk Westfalen02.jpg

Hi Markus, das oben genannte Bild habe ich unter Category:Datteln-Hamm-Kanal gefunden. Allerdings stellt es nicht wie beschrieben und benannt das Kraftwerk Westfalen in Hamm-Schmehausen, sondern das Kraftwerk Gersteinwerk in Werne-Stockum dar. Ich habe selbst ähnliche Aufnahmen und wohne auch dort in der Nähe. Die Kraftwerke sind mir also bekannt. Paulus11-10 (talk) 18:26, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Bahareque llanos house from Venezuela.JPG

Thank you for the image nivelation. :) --Wilfredo Rodríguez (talk) 15:35, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Montar um panorama

Olá! Uma vez você montou uma imagem panorâmica com três fotos que eu carreguei aqui no Commons (Anfiteatro do Parque da Cidade de Salvador.jpg + Anfiteatro do Parque da Cidade de Salvador 2.jpg + Anfiteatro do Parque da Cidade de Salvador 3.jpg = Anfiteatro do Parque da Cidade de Salvador P.jpg). Eu acabei de carregar outras três imagens (Entrada do Solar do Unhão 2.jpg, Entrada do Solar do Unhão 3.jpg e Entrada do Solar do Unhão 4.jpg). Você consegue montar uma imagem panorâmica a partir dessas fotos? Meus cumprimentos. Łυαη ^fala! 23:43, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Schloss Lüntenbeck

Unter Category:Schloss Lüntenbeck ist von File:Wuppertal Lüntenbecker Weg 0064.jpg bis File:Wuppertal Lüntenbecker Weg 0076.jpg eine Bilderserie, die sich für ein Panoramabild eignen könnte. --Atamari (talk) 16:03, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Pictures wailing wall/dome of the rock

Hello Marku, I just saw what you did with two of my pictures of the Dome of the Rock and the Wailing Wall. It's looking very good! Thanks! Sustructu (talk) 13:53, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Hagen Hohenlimburg.jpg

Hallo markus, bei diesem Bild stimmt die angegebene Kameraposition nicht. Kannst du das vielleicht korrigieren? -- H005 19:04, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Marku1988!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 12:47, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

• Image:Arashigh.jpg was uncategorized on 8 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:47, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
• Image:KnifeThrowingShow.jpg was uncategorized on 9 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:52, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Edward S. Curtis Collection People 009.jpg

Außer in der Beschneidung des Rands sehe ich keine Qualitätsverbesserung, das Bild wirkt jetzt gröber, die Weichzeichnung ist verloren gegangen. Grundsätzlich sollte die Farb-Patina nicht entfernt werden, das Bild verliert dadurch ungemein.--Kürschner (talk) 10:48, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Marku wird dir nicht antworten, er ist leider nicht mehr im Projekt tätig. Du hast die Möglichkeit, stumpf auf die alte Version zurückzusetzen, du kannst aber auch die alte Version herunterladen und unter einem anderen Namen wieder hochladen. -- smial (talk) 11:52, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Danke, hatte übersehen, dass das keine aktuelle Änderung war. --Kürschner (talk) 14:30, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Burj_Al_Arab_Interior_on_25_December_2007_Pict_P1.jpg

File:Burj_Al_Arab_Interior_on_25_December_2007_Pict_P1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

84.61.153.119 20:41, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Ojayca2.JPG

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ojayca2.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ojayca2.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

GeorgHH • talk   23:16, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Sicily_-_Favignana_-_Sabrina_at_Cala_Rossa.JPG

File:Sicily_-_Favignana_-_Sabrina_at_Cala_Rossa.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ciaurlec (talk) 11:54, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Photo_wikipédia.jpg

File:Photo_wikipédia.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

AndreasPraefcke (talk) 16:08, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Vilnius_all_saints_escriva.JPG

File:Vilnius_all_saints_escriva.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 09:34, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Ffandiño.jpg

File:Ffandiño.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cholo Aleman (talk) 19:31, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Flag_of_Spain_(1977-1981).svg

File:Flag_of_Spain_(1977-1981).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Antemister (talk) 19:22, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

File:CE2892.jpg

File:CE2892.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kelly (talk) 06:12, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

File:São_Serapião.jpg

File:São_Serapião.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kags (talk) 03:35, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Santuario de zamora.jpg

File:Santuario de zamora.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ices2Csharp (talk) 14:36, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Paseo de los Jerónimos nevado, en Maracena.jpg

File:Paseo de los Jerónimos nevado, en Maracena.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Martin H. (talk) 22:15, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Lublin z lotu ptaka.jpg

File:Lublin z lotu ptaka.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

83.24.160.81 22:15, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Monte dei Paschi building in Colle di Val d'Elsa.JPG

Yours sincerely, Raoli ✉ (talk) 05:39, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Sede Cassa di Risparmio di firenze, P.jpg

Yours sincerely, Raoli ✉ (talk) 05:42, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Erevan - La place de la République P.JPG

File:Erevan - La place de la République P.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Takabeg (talk) 12:38, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:LogoBeijing2008-2.jpg

Yours sincerely, Ecemaml ^{talk to me/habla conmigo} 15:07, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Independence Monument, Phnom Penh.jpg

Yours sincerely, it seems there is no FoP in Cambodia DerFussi 20:21, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Mall of the Emirates on 9 June 2007 Pict P.jpg

File:Mall of the Emirates on 9 June 2007 Pict P.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

LGA _talk^edits 07:05, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Minsk Monument to Hero Cities crop.jpg

File:Minsk Monument to Hero Cities crop.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar ^(t/p) 09:32, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Latvijas Makslas akademija (P).jpg

Yours sincerely, Eleassar ^(t/p) 16:05, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

File:001parizsi.JPG

File:001parizsi.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Gunnex (talk) 20:01, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Hønefoss Senteret 0P.jpg

File:Hønefoss Senteret 0P.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

188.100.206.84 13:09, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Joshua Turner 014.jpg

File:Joshua Turner 014.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Buxtehude (talk) 12:55, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Hatfield Galleria.jpg

File:Hatfield Galleria.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 01:10, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Fuglsang Black Bird.jpg

File:Fuglsang Black Bird.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Discasto _{talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis} 13:36, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Stralsund, Rathaus, Bildnis Carl Heydemann.JPG

File:Stralsund, Rathaus, Bildnis Carl Heydemann.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Artsfriends (talk) 19:49, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Roma-EUR - San Pietro e San Paolo.JPG

Yours sincerely, José Luiz ^disc 23:06, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:6730-6733 - Moscow - Poklonnaya Hill.jpg

Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 07:19, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Gare de l'Est Paris 2007p1.jpg

File:Gare de l'Est Paris 2007p1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 11:18, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Weltliche Schatzkammer Wiena.jpg

File:Weltliche Schatzkammer Wiena.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

116.102.66.11 13:43, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Jab punch.jpeg

File:Jab punch.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:28, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Jumeirah Beach Hotel on 25 December 2007 Pict 2.jpg

File:Jumeirah Beach Hotel on 25 December 2007 Pict 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ras67 (talk) 02:00, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Zoomed in Plaque at Fort Hoskins.jpg

File:Zoomed in Plaque at Fort Hoskins.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Ipoellet (talk) 06:02, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

File:San Miguel de Tucumán.JPG

File:San Miguel de Tucumán.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 21:42, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Azaditower.jpg

Yours sincerely, ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 16:24, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Sheikh Zayed Road on 27 November 2007 Pict 1 2.jpg

File:Sheikh Zayed Road on 27 November 2007 Pict 1 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 18:39, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Azaditower.jpg

Yours sincerely,   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 07:14, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Carlsberg Semper Ardens Christmas Ale.jpg

File:Carlsberg Semper Ardens Christmas Ale.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Racconish^☎ 20:52, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:BrandenburgerTorGold.JPG

Yours sincerely, --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 19:16, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Schilderijmammie.jpg

File:Schilderijmammie.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: The painter died in 1961 Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Ronn (talk) 18:03, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Burj Al Arab on 7 May 2007 Pict 1 2.jpg

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:10, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Times Square NYC 2007.jpg

File:Times Square NYC 2007.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:23, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

File:Arch bridge in Tartu.jpg

File:Arch bridge in Tartu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Wkentaur (talk) 09:04, 7 October 2024 (UTC)