Mdd4696
Why have you delete my other pictures?
editHi, you have delete my pictures and I specific the copyright you should be block, the In the Zone dvd is a promotion picture, and the other pictures are from my city and don't have copyright, I WANT MY PICTURES BACK!!! --Tmasjeg 01:52, 27 March 2007 (UTC) AGAIN ME, IF THE PICTURES OF LIVE PERFOMANCES HAVES COPYRIGHT WHY YOU DON'T DELETE THE NEXT PICTURE: Imagen:Madonnact.JPG OR IF YOU LIKE TO DELETE PICTURES OF COVERS OF DVD'S, WHY DON'T YOU DELETE THE NEXT PICS? File:IntheZone-DVD.jpg File:Ghmpdvd.jpg
ARE YOU OKAY?, 'CAUSE YOU ARE DELETING PICTURES WITHOUT COPYRIGHT, I'M A NEW USER AND YOU AND OTHER USERS ARE TAKING ADVANTAGE OF ME --Tmasjeg 02:08, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- Please, please, please read Commons:First steps and Commons:Licensing. These pages will teach you a lot about the way Wikimedia Commons and copyright laws work. I'm sorry that you are getting frustrated—we're not trying to be mean to you. Many people upload files that Wikimedia Commons cannot accept, and we have to be aggressive removing them or else we can't keep up.
- Here are the problems I see with your uploads:
- Image:EscudoSombrerete.jpg - We do not believe that you are the copyright holder of the work. Did you draw this image yourself? If so, is it identical to another existing image? We cannot accept a picture that you did not draw yourself or that is identical to another copyrighted picture.
- Image:Hotel Hidalgo 2.jpg, Image:San Francisco.jpg, Image:Tresfrailes.jpg - User:Bryan deleted these images with the reason "copyvio". I am not sure why he thought they were copyright violations—possibly because you uploaded other files which were copyright violations. I have asked him on his talk page. Just remember that you can only use {{PD-self}} for photographs you have taken yourself.
- Image:Santo Domingoo.JPG, Image:Jamielynnspears.jpg, Image:Britneyonix.jpg, Image:TheOnixHotelTour.jpg, Image:Britneyyoung.jpg, Image:Zoey101.jpg, Image:JamieSpears.jpg, Image:BritneyTheOnixHotelTour.jpg - Deleted since they did not have any source information (information about who took the pictures). Some of them you marked as photos you took yourself, but this was not convincing.
- Image:SanFrancisco.jpg - The source website you provided, http://www.zacatecas.gob.mx/, does not say that the wallpapers are public domain, as you claimed. Instead, it says that they are copyrighted, so we must assume that they have "All Rights Reserved". These images are not allowed.
- Image:LaCopa.jpg, Image:Sierra de Organos 0.JPG - For the same reason as above, except the image is from http://www.mexicodesconocido.com/. Take a look at http://www.terra.com.mx/aviso_legal/.
- Image:IntheZoneDVD.jpg, Image:IntheZone-DVD.jpg - DVD covers are not allowed. DVD covers are (virtually) always copyrighted and are never free use.
- If you have any more questions, feel free to leave another message on my talk page. You can also ask a question at Commons:Village pump, where there are many other people willing to help. ~MDD4696 05:22, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- The SanFrancisco picture in the www.zacatecas.gob.mx is a wallpaper for free use, is for turistic promotion of this colonial city, Zacatecas and Jerez. Is a picture of goverment without copyright --Tmasjeg 13:15, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- Where does it say this? Unless you can provide a reference, we can't assume it's not copyrighted. Pictures taken by the Mexican government are not public domain. ~MDD4696 15:04, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pau Casals centenary statue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Image:Hotel Hidalgo 2.jpg and others
editHi, first of all, all the uploader's claims are unbelievable. Furthermore, this image is too low res and has too much visible jpeg artifacts to be not directly taken from the web. At last there is no exif information in the image, which almost for certain means that this is a scaled down, recompressed image. -- Bryan (talk to me) 08:33, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Wrong automatic blok
editHi, my friend just told me that he's blocked on commons. The message he's got is:
- Your user name or IP address has been blocked by Mdd4696. The reason given is this:
- Autoblocked because your IP address has been recently used by "Sheks". The reason given for Sheks's block is: "Continually uploading images with no source/license info" You may contact Mdd4696 or one of the other administrators to discuss the block. Note that you may not use the "email this user" feature unless you have a valid email address registered in your user preferences. Your IP address is 62.108.117.1. Please include this address in any quer
His username is User:BraneJ. Can you please unblock him ? --SasaStefanovic • 07:09, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- I don't understand why there would be a problem. If he is logged in, he should have no problems uploading or editing on Commons. ~MDD4696 13:36, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Responce
editHi, yes i was at those events and took those pictures. Thanks Hctp
Thanks for the report. I don't believe his claims per Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#Abusive_sock, so I have blocked him indefinitely. -- Bryan (talk to me) 16:15, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I have been pulling them from magazine articles in the Making of America project, which collects old magazines, at Cornell University and the University of Michigan. I upload them as I find them in articles I am working on for wikisource. The complete list of magazines is here. Mine were taken from Century Magazine. You can see an example of how I used them here. Hope this helps. Danny 02:18, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:04 001 bilbord.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
--G.dallorto 22:10, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Sarkozy.jpg
edit
Thanks for uploading Image:Sarkozy.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 11:46, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Fotos que borraste
editNo sé por qué me amenazas con bloquear mi cuenta, no es intencional que haya subido fotos que violen el copyright. Yo solo quiero ayudar, y todo ese lío de copyright (bastante innecesario) no lo conozco muy bien. ¿Está claro que no es intencional? NO ME VUELVAS A AMENAZAR, ok? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tina 63 (talk • contribs) at 18:15, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- Hola. Me amenazaste. No voy a hablar en inglés porque no tengo ganas. Subí bastantes fotos sin saber nada del copyright pero no me culpes porque nada más quiero ayudar a que Wikipedia se agrande, y parece que con AMENAZAS echás al demonio todas las ganas de ayudar que puede tener una persona. No sé si tuviste un mal día, pero nada más ten en claro que no hice nada malintencionadamente; sólo quise AYUDAR. No bloquees mi cuenta. Además no me gustó nada tu forma de decir las cosas. ¿Quién te crees que eres? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tina 63 (talk • contribs) at 18:20, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- Album covers are not allowed? Really? Because in some articles there are album covers. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tina 63 (talk • contribs) at 18:26, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- OK, I wont upload more images. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tina 63 (talk • contribs) at 18:30, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Re: Missing vote checkboxes for PotY
editThanks for the message. I fixed it to show first vote link. It was probably not noticed before because nobody else had the problem.. -- Bryan (talk to me) 18:11, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
High resolution is now online
editHi Mdd4696, you asked me if I could put an higher resolution and exif data of one of my picture : [sharon free.jpg] I didn't know if there was an automatic way to display exif data, so I just typed them. bye
George_W._Bush_and_family.jpg
editCould you have a look at File_talk:George_W._Bush_and_family.jpg if you're still active. Whitson and Galinsky (talk) 12:25, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Administrative notice
editDear Mdd4696. I am writing to you to inform you that because of inactivity, you may lose your adminship on Commons.
Commons has a new policy on admin activity, Commons:Administrators/De-adminship, taken into use on June 13, 2007 (after a two-week poll on the proposed policy's talk page).
If you want to keep your adminship, you have to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days. Note that if you don't make 5 admin actions in the following 5 months, you will then lose the adminship anyways.
Thank you — Mike.lifeguard 16:57, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
Copyright
editPlease delete File:Masacre de indigenas en Peru.JPG copyright http://catapa.be/en/north-peru-killings --190.78.24.188 19:16, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you for the notice. I've deleted the image. ~MDD4696 03:48, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Template:Nothanks has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
De-adminship warning
editDear Mdd4696. I am writing to you to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.
If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.
You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.
Thank you – Kwj2772 (msg) 02:46, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
editмалипуси
A kitten for you!
editLeGeKom
A goat for you!
editcabra o oveja
Need your presence at Featured sound candidates
editWe request the honor of your presence at Featured sound candidates | ||
Dear Mdd4696, Featured sound candidates needs your help and you can help by reviewing , nominating your sounds for the FS Tag. You can start reviewing/nominating sounds now. -- 17:53, 28 May 2019 (UTC) |
Commons:Guide to layout/Gallery pages has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |