Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Michel Chauvet!


Bonjour Michel Chauvet.
Merci pour les compliments !
D'habitude je suis plutôt photographe, mais retenu chez moi pour des raisons de santé, je me suis mis à fouiner dans Gallica, et j'essaie d'importer des images inédites.
Je ne connaissais pas ce livre d'heures, et naturellement j'ai été ébloui.
Tout d'abord, je dois vous dire que vous pouvez librement, si vous le souhaitez, utiliser mon image pour votre site, évidemment.
Mais je dois aussi vous démentir: Gallica offre au contraire un accès libre à très haute résolution, et c'est depuis Gallica que j'ai importé mes documents du livre d'heures.
Il vous faut simplement utiliser les loupes proposées sur l'écran, plusieurs fois de suite, pour arriver progressivement à cette résolution.
Ensuite, deux possibilités.
Soit un clic droit sur l'image, qui va vous permettre, par copier-coller, d'importer un carré de 256 X 256 px vers le logiciel de votre choix ("GIMP" fait ça très bien, et c'est gratuit). Après, un peu au jugé, importez ainsi toute la succession de carrés, et progressivement, reconstituez le puzzle. Cela demande patience et extrême précision (une seule erreur d'un seul pixel se voit). Une page, c'est à peu près 250 petits carrés à importer au pifomètre et à ajuster...
Soit, plus simplement, faites des copie d'écran successives, et "collez"-les toujours dans tel logiciel de dessin que vous aurez choisi. Là, forcément, ça fait moins à importer, mais l'ajustement méritera aussi toute votre attention, il faut être très méticuleux.
Je vous conseille, l'opération d'import effectuée, de "retravailler" l'image, notamment sur la saturation et les contrastes, et aussi, pensez à "restaurer" un peu (taches, rayures etc...) selon vos connaissances techniques (j'ai fait des essais successifs, je crois que la comparaison entre le fichier d'origine et mon résultat (les deux à voir sur la page de description de l'image) seront pour vous éclairants à cet égard...).
Sacré boulot, si vous voulez importer toutes les enluminures de ces presque 500 pages !
Bon courage, et n'hésitez pas à me recontacter si besoin.--Jebulon (talk) 16:54, 11 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Autopatrol given

edit
 

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 00:11, 4 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Planches du Surinam

edit

Bonjour Michel Chauvet.

Magnifique ! Merci de m'avoir fait découvrir ces merveilles !

D'autres prêchent qu'il vaut mieux un "quelque chose, même petit" plutôt qu'un "rien du tout". Quant à moi, par principe, je trouve dommage de réduire les images quand on a la chance de bénéficier de telles résolutions.

Je conseille donc l'import (selon ma méthode. Oui, je sais, c'est fastidieux et chronophage...) intégral dans la plus haute résolution.

Puis un traitement minimum de l'image: les scans sont très bons, mais pas excellents, car on décèle sur celles-ci de très visibles aberrations chromatiques qu'il convient de réduire (facile).

Là où se ça se complique, c'est qu'il faudrait tenter de redresser les parties courbes dues à la proximité de la reliure, pour obtenir un document visuellement plat à la fin. C'est faisable, mais difficile.

Enfin, il faut sauvegarder le tout en .jpg (rubrique "exporter", en général, dans les logiciels de retouche ou de traitement tels GIMP), ça compresse énormément, et permet une importation dans "Commons" plus rapide.

Pour Anne de Bretagne et son Livre d'Heures, je t'indique tout de suite que je n'en traiterai pas l'intégralité pour "Commons". Comme tu as pu le remarquer, je suis très éclectique dans mes choix, et très "touche-à-tout". ça correspond à ma façon d'être, d'essayer d'intéresser le maximum de gens, et de lancer des défis ("j'ai trouvé çà pour vous, c'est beau, à vous de continuer si ça vous intéresse"). J'ai en stock, par ailleurs, des centaines de photos personnelles que je n'ai pas le temps de travailler, et que je voudrais aussi proposer au regard des utilisateurs de "Commons". Il faudrait plusieurs vies !! Mais j'y reviendrai peut-être...

Bien cordialement

--Jebulon (talk) 10:36, 7 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

PS: et ça, tu connais ? http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b69550869

Taille de fichiers: la réponse est Ici, je pense que tu en sauras plus. Cordialement.--Jebulon (talk) 11:54, 8 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

edit
  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

edit

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

File:Western Soapberry.jpg

edit

Hello!

Thank you for uploading File:Western Soapberry.jpg to the Wikimedia Commons. I noticed that when you uploaded from another Wikimedia project, you left out some important information, or copied it incorrectly. In the future, please consider using CommonsHelper, a tool which automates the process of moving files over. Thank you,

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:51, 12 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Demande d'information sur l'institut Vavilov de Saint Petersbourg.

edit
 
Image utilisé dans sur le wiki
 
Votre photo.

Bonjour, monsieur Chauvet.

Je cherche des informations pour compléter ou donner des références sur l'institut Vavilov ( https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institut_Vavilov ) que je compte mettre dans Le Saviez Vous du wikipedia francophone pour mettre en valeur l'abnégation de son personnel durant le siège de Leningrand. J'ai utilisé l'une de vos photographies pour illustrer l'article, mais je me demande si la photo utilisée dans l'infobox est celle du bon bâtiment. Il est écrit qu'il y a une station à Pavlovsk, s'agit il de celui ci ou du numéro 13 de la place Saint-Isaac ? L'amateur d'aéroplanes (talk) 19:40, 19 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Ma photo représente bien le 13, place Saint-Isaac, qui est le siège principal de l'Institut Vavilov. La première photo me semble représenter la face de côté de l'autre bâtiment, 85-87, embankment River Moyka, dont l'entrée principale est au 4, place Saint-Isaac. Le problème est que deux bâtiments similaires se font face à face sur la place Saint-Isaac. Avant la révolution, c'était le siège du ministère de l'Agriculture.
le bâtiment du 4, place Saint-Isaac héberge la bibliothèque nationale agricole et des bureaux de l'Institut Vavilov, mais ce n'est pas le siège proprement dit. (J'ai participé à un colloque à l'Institut Vavilov en novmebre 2017).
De toute façon, rien à voir avec la station d'essais de Pavlovsk. Michel Chauvet (talk) 20:21, 19 January 2019 (UTC).Reply
Bon dimanche, merci pour ces précisions, je l'ai retranscrit dans l'article. L'amateur d'aéroplanes (talk) 09:15, 20 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
Bonjour. Est ce que par hasard vous auriez des informations sur le sort de la station d'essais de Pavlovsk ? L'article le plus récent que j'ai trouvé date de 2012. L'amateur d'aéroplanes (talk) 07:51, 21 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
De retour de mon colloque, j'avais posté une note d'actu sur Tela Botanica. J'avais en effet posé la question aux responsables de l'Institut. Pavlovsk est donc sauvé. Michel Chauvet (talk) 08:30, 21 January 2019 (UTC).Reply
Entendu ;) Merci beaucoup, je la retranscrit immédiatement. Vous avez emprunté un TARDIS ? Je signale une inversion dans les dates : En novembre 2107 s’est tenue à Saint-Pétersbourg L'amateur d'aéroplanes (talk) 19:26, 21 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Community Insights Survey

edit

RMaung (WMF) 01:03, 10 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

edit

RMaung (WMF) 15:20, 20 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

edit

RMaung (WMF) 19:59, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Vier81 001 php.jpg

edit
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Vier81 001 php.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Sealle (talk) 20:12, 8 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Concombre piquant Barthélémy 2.jpg

edit
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Concombre piquant Barthélémy 2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Sealle (talk) 20:12, 8 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Concombre piquant Barthélémy 1.jpg

edit
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Concombre piquant Barthélémy 1.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Sealle (talk) 20:13, 8 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Caralluma chung Paris1.jpg

edit
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Caralluma chung Paris1.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Sealle (talk) 20:15, 8 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Caralluma chung Paris 3.jpg

edit
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Caralluma chung Paris 3.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Sealle (talk) 20:16, 8 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Caralluma chung Paris 2.jpg

edit
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Caralluma chung Paris 2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Sealle (talk) 20:16, 8 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Sealle (talk) 20:25, 8 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Please do not remove deletion requests

edit

Bahasa Indonesia  বাংলা  Deutsch  English  español  français  magyar  Nederlands  Nederlands (informeel)‎  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  svenska  Türkçe  suomi  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  עברית  فارسی  +/−


 
Please do not remove deletion request tags from images before an administrator has closed the debate. If you do not agree that the image should be deleted, you can express your opinion on the deletion request page. You can find this page via a link in the deletion request tag or at Commons:Deletion requests. Thank you.

--Sealle (talk) 11:33, 9 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

FYI

edit

As for Georgy Dmitriyevich Karpechenko was executed on July 28, 1941 please read Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Russia#Durations: If the author was subjected to repression and rehabilitated posthumously, countdown of copyright protection began not from the death date, but from the rehabilitation date. Karpechenko's works will become PD on 1 January 2027. Sealle (talk) 13:34, 9 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

couleur des illustrations

edit

Bonjour, oui je suis d'accord. Les teintes sepia me semblent en effet plus agréables que le blanc cru et froid pour les planches anciennes... Anonyme973 (talk) 18:03, 15 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Empetrum acetosum

edit

Bonjour Michel Chauvet, j'ai remarqué le fichier File:Empetrum acetosum Rumphius 1747 Herbarium amboinense 5 169.png illustrant l'article de Wp Begonia_muricata. En effectuant une vérification de routine, je n'arrive pas à retrouver la synonymie entre Empetrum acetosum et Begonia_muricata. Le premier est inconnu de l'IPNI ou de Plant List, et ici ou on l'associe à Begonia tuberosa. Peux-tu m'aider à lever le mystère ? --Salix (talk) 11:21, 19 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Merci. Ok merci, je ne connaissais pas PROSEA, en effet cela parait fiable. Le site semble réservé aux membres. Est-il possible d'ajouter un lien vers la source ? --Salix (talk) 12:40, 19 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Mussklprozz (talk) 13:41, 4 January 2022 (UTC)Reply