Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Subway06~commonswiki

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Subway06~commonswiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The files are various transportation-related images, in which they all have a watermark stating that "Photo by 201系", but were cropped out by others. As a result, the files will all need OTRS verification in order to keep them.

廣九直通車 (talk) 07:17, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep These are a collection of 123 valuable in-scope photographs, significantly 121/123 are in-use, all uploaded by the same user with the same watermark on them (translation "201 series", clearly a pseudonym); the user has not been active since 2013 so they are incredibly unlikely to ever see this deletion discussion or be available to write to OTRS, and the photographs have been happily hosted on Commons for more than a decade. Unless there is some evidence that at least one of these photographs has been published elsewhere on a conflicting non-free license, or there is some other reason to doubt that the uploader was lying as releasing these as own work, then this looks like a bad faith nomination. Reasonable assertions of "own work" can be taken in good faith unless there is some rationale to demonstrate that the criteria of "significant doubt" that precautionary principle requires has been broken.
Further analysis: Based on a search of the commonswiki database, there is no prior case where a single one of this account's uploads have been deleted. Consequently, in the last decade, despite significant reuse, nobody has found anything worrying about the copyright of these photographs. -- (talk) 10:51, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
# File Usage Non-core
1 KORAIL EL8500.jpg 7 1
2 KORAIL ITX 36806.jpg 10
3 KORAIL ITX 36808 Special.jpg 7
4 KORAIL 368000 seat.jpg 5
5 KORAIL ITX.jpg 6
6 Uenae Stn Platform.jpg 2 1
7 Uenae Stn.jpg 1
8 KORAIL EMU33103.jpg 4
9 BCC B763ER HS-BIB.jpg 3
10 GapyeongSta.jpg 5
11 KORAIL EMU361000.jpg 6 3
12 KORAIL EMU1000 2nd-First.jpg 11 1
13 CDG B737 B2961.jpg 10
14 AAR B767 HL7516.jpg 15
15 AAR A320 HL7776.jpg 1
16 RKSS Domestic.jpg 26 1
17 OkmaSta.jpg 4
18 YongmunSta.jpg 7
19 ChuncheonSta.jpg 1
20 KORAIL DL7544.jpg 1
21 JNA B738.jpg 12 2
22 ESR B736.jpg 11 2
23 JJA B738.jpg 13 2
24 SMSC EMU3000 VVVF 301.jpg 76 2
25 KORAIL DL7466.jpg 4
26 KORAIL DL7483.jpg 4
27 Ipseok-riSta.jpg 4
28 Air Busan B737-58E (HL7232) after pushback.jpg 9 2
29 SamhwaSta.jpg 4
30 SMSC EMU3000 VVVF.jpg 2
31 A coffin of Stephen Kim Sou-hwan.jpg 2
32 KORAIL EL8000.jpg 15 1
33 KORAIL EMU5000 Bogie.jpg 3 1
34 KORAIL EMU331000.jpg 11 3
35 KNR DL2000.jpg 1
36 KORAIL EMU2030.jpg 11 1
37 SeoulBus272.jpg 3 1
38 KiaBus Granbird SD2.jpg 1 1
39 BanghwaBridge.jpg 9 1
40 KORAIL DL7100.jpg 7
41 AsanSta.jpg 4
42 PyeongnaeSta.jpg 3
43 GoksanSta.jpg 1
44 KiaBus NewGranbird.jpg 9 1
45 SMSC EMU Old1000 2nd.jpg 9 1
46 SiheungStaSign.jpg 2
47 JungnimoncheonSta.jpg 7
48 GimjeSta.jpg 5
49 BuyongSta.jpg 4
50 KORAIL TEC.jpg 13 1
51 AREX EMU2000.jpg 37 5
52 KORAIL EMU321000.jpg 9 2
53 NewOnyangOncheonSta.jpg 2
54 Korean Tilting Train Hanbit200 (TTX, Tilting Train eXpress).jpg 7 2
55 ChonamSta.jpg 3
56 GwangyangSta.jpg 2
57 KORAIL EMU319000.jpg 18 1
58 JeonjuCityBus.jpg 1
59 GaetaesaSta.jpg 4
60 GwanchonSta.jpg 5
61 SongcheonSta.jpg 3
62 BukcheonSta.jpg 1
63 OkgokSta.jpg 1
64 BujeonSta Yard.jpg 4 1
65 KumhoExpBus.jpg 3 1
66 SeoulBus9502.jpg 4
67 GongjeonSta.jpg 4
68 KORAIL DL7400.jpg 9 2
69 DeokyangSta.jpg 4
70 HeungguksaSta.jpg 4
71 SMSC Line1 VVVF 101.jpg 7 2
72 JJA Q400.jpg 7 8
73 DosimSta.jpg 8
74 OgeunjangSta.jpg 4
75 JeungpyeongSta.jpg 4
76 KORAIL DL2100.jpg 2
77 KORAIL DEC.jpg 7
78 KORAIL CDC.jpg 13
79 SeoulBus0015.jpg 1
80 NewJanghangSta.jpg 4
81 Saemaeul Exp. Normal Seat.jpg 4 1
82 SeocheonSta.jpg 1
83 NewBusanjinSta.jpg 5
84 KORAIL EMU1000 Last2nd(1x82) OC.jpg 14 1
85 SMSC Line2 Melco253.jpg 6 1
86 KORAIL EL8100.jpg 5
87 KORAIL EMU3000.jpg 18
88 ATS LB.jpg 1
89 KORAIL EMU5000 2nd.jpg 10 2
90 PP-DHC.jpg 14
91 BucheonBus88.jpg 2
92 SeoulBus5615.jpg 1
93 SeoulBus6513.jpg 2
94 SeoulBus260.jpg 6 1
95 SMSC Line1 VVVF Inside.jpg 6
96 KORAIL DL7200.jpg 3
97 KORAIL DL7300.jpg 3
98 SMSC Line2 VVVF.jpg 12 1
99 SeoulBus7018.jpg 1
100 KORAIL EMU5000 6th.jpg 30 1
101 KORAIL EMU5000 1st.jpg 1 1
102 KORAIL EMU5000 7th.jpg 2
103 SMSC Line1 VVVF.jpg 13 1
104 GakgyeStaInside.jpg 2 1
105 GakgyeSta.jpg 4
106 YeongdongSta.jpg 5
107 KTX (Korea Train eXpress).jpg 62
108 한국철도공사 무궁화호 디젤 동차(NDC).jpg 8
109 KORAIL EMU5000 3rd.jpg 11 1
110 KORAIL EMU5000 3rdOC.jpg 5
111 SaninStaSign.jpg 4
112 SaninSta.jpg 4
113 HamanSta.jpg 7 1
114 SeoulBus701.jpg 2 1
115 SMSC Line3.jpg 10 1
116 NahanjeongSta.jpg 3
117 GasuwonStaInside.jpg 2
118 GasuwonStaSign.jpg 3
119 GasuwonSta.jpg 4
120 GanHyeonSta.jpg 4
121 SeoulBus8002.jpg 1
-- (talk) 10:51, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep per Fae.
Also note, ko:특수:기여/Subway06, where they haven't been active since 2014
A watermark "201 series" isn't anything I'm going to worry about unless I have further evidence of these images being sourced other than from the uploader here. We don't require OTRS as a blanket imposition on all editors, I see no reason to impose that on this editor. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:34, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep There seems to be no evidence of a copyright violation in this case. Marking photographs with a watermark should be avoided, but that is not a reason to demand OTRS after so many years of having been on this project. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 12:13, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
ko:사용자:Subway06 info on this page is probably legitimate.--Roy17 (talk) 19:25, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep There is nothing wrong with these photoes. 钉钉 (talk) 09:22, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Cropping of watermarks per the proposed COM:WATERMARK policy (as it was understood then, and commonly followed) is not evidence of anything. If these previously existed on the Internet, there might be an issue, but that was not shown in the DR reasoning. On the contrary, these all appear to have been uploaded by the same user, using the same camera, and some of them were uploaded only hours after being taken. Those are a very strong indications they were uploaded with a valid license by the copyright owner, and probably also validates any that they did previously post anywhere anyways. Carl Lindberg (talk) 17:25, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep, per Fæ and others above. -- Tuválkin 14:36, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  I withdraw my nominationMany thanks to User:Fæ's statistics. I will hereby withdraw my deletion request. I was thinking that with such amount of images with watermarks cropped out is increasingly suspicious, but Fæ's statistics should ground that these images are likely to be original. Thanks for all of your information.廣九直通車 (talk) 13:25, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn. --Gbawden (talk) 09:14, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]