Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 13 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Sarcophagus king Frederik 4 Roskilde Denmark.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Sarcophagus of king Frederik 4, Roskilde cathedral, Denmark.--Jebulon 07:47, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment too much noise IMHO --Berthold Werner 11:45, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Too noisy and bad light. Körnerbrötchen 13:21, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support I disagree, enough good quality --Christian Ferrer 15:17, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support as Christian. I also always pull the respective situational circumstances into my consideration. --Hubertl 08:44, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
    • I'm really aware that it is not a FP candidate, but I'm sorry, my dear friends, supporters or opposers, I did my best... More denoising, even selected, will result in "soup", and I don't think the light is so bad in this church. Anyway, promoted or not, I thank you all for interest. and comments.--Jebulon 16:19, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 07:35, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Kneipp-Denkmal im Schloßpark von Gersfeld.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination: Kneipp-Monument in Gersfeld.JPG --Verum 19:29, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Support Weak support because of the bottom crop --Hubertl 19:54, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
  • *  Oppose Sorry, the image needs perspective correction. It's leaning out on the right. --XRay 19:12, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Hubertl 07:34, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Corneilla Eglise Saint-Christophe.jpg

[edit]

Yeah, the sky is clean now, but the church still looks oversharpened. Further opinion is appreciated. --A.Savin 10:53, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 07:37, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]