Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 06 2019

• 
  • Nomination Nature area De Kraanlânnen of It Fryske Gea. Fixed bridge over the Polderhoofdkanaal.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:50, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support
    Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:58, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse „Tiefer Graben“ in Oberstinkenbrunn (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 04:20, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:45, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse „Tiefer Graben“ in Oberstinkenbrunn (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 04:20, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:44, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aleksanterinkatu, Helsinki. --СССР 04:08, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:47, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Catholic parish church Saint Margaret in Sankt Margarethen #1, Reichenau, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:21, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --СССР 04:10, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Choir with retaining walls at the Roman Catholic parish church Saint Margaret in Sankt Margarethen #1, Reichenau, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:21, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --СССР 04:10, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fresco of Saint Christopher at the Roman Catholic parish church Saint Margaret in Sankt Margarethen #1, Reichenau, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:21, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --СССР 04:10, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fresco of Saint Christopher at the Roman Catholic parish church Saint Margaret in Sankt Margarethen #1, Reichenau, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:21, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --СССР 04:10, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Barred sacristy window at the Roman Catholic parish church Saint Margaret in Sankt Margarethen #1, Reichenau, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:21, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --СССР 04:10, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dun Mountain, Bryant Range --Podzemnik 00:26, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 00:27, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dun shelter, Bryant Range, New Zealand --Podzemnik 00:26, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 00:27, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Power pylon, Bryant Range, New Zealand --Podzemnik 00:26, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:24, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Power pylon, Bryant Range, New Zealand --Podzemnik 00:26, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:24, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A bridge and a stream in Oyster Bay, New Zealand --Podzemnik 00:26, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:24, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stallebach creek from the wooden bridge. --PantheraLeo1359531 20:44, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 04:58, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Huge amount of floating water at waterfall Stallebach in Austria. --PantheraLeo1359531 20:41, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 00:27, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Waterfall section in detail of the waterfall Stallbeach in Austria. --PantheraLeo1359531 20:37, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 04:58, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sale of ice cream "Jeff de Bruges" in street in front of the shop, place du Peuple at Saint-Étienne, France. --Touam 18:28, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:53, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Water feature (Wasserspiel) at the Stallebach waterfall in Austira. --PantheraLeo1359531 18:51, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:53, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:53, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Häderlisbrücke bridge and the Schöllenen railway on the Gotthard Pass street in Switzerland. --Moroder 14:54, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:56, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rocks on the Gotthard Pass street in Switzerland. --Moroder 14:31, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:59, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination North view of the Ellbogen chapel in Silenen in Switzerland. --Moroder 13:18, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good -- Spurzem 13:28, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Ellbogen chapel in Silenen in Switzerland. --Moroder 13:02, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good -- Spurzem 13:28, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gniezno Cathedral by night, Gniezno, Poland --Poco a poco 11:50, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --GRDN711 12:15, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gniezno Cathedral, Gniezno, Poland --Poco a poco 11:50, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 13:03, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Coffin of Adalbert of Prague, Gniezno Cathedral, Gniezno, Poland --Poco a poco 11:50, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 12:14, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bytča Castle --Imehling 09:49, 3 August 2019 (UTC)  CommentNeeds a perspective correction --Moroder 14:56, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:01, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion {{{2}}}
• 
  • Nomination Gable and spire of house no. 10, Wenceslas Square, Prague --JiriMatejicek 09:38, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:01, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mascaron and ornaments above the entrance to house no. 23, Wenceslas Square, Prague --JiriMatejicek 09:38, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Rbrechko 13:43, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Decorations on the corner of house no. 30, Wenceslas Square, Prague --JiriMatejicek 09:38, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:01, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Door in the old town of Bizerte --Kritzolina 09:15, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:09, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Door in the old town of Bizerte --Kritzolina 09:15, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:09, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bell tower of the church in Nuces, commune of Valady, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 06:36, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:01, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Moulin de la Pascalie in Muret-le-Château, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 06:36, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:01, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Motueka Island near Hahei in Waikato Region, North Island of New Zealand. --Tournasol7 06:36, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:01, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Inflorescence of Orchis militaris in Onet l'Église, commune of Sébazac-Concoures, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 06:36, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:48, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Geitvannet near Bekkafjord --Ermell 06:20, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Milseburg 08:05, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination River in the Lebesby region in northern Norway --Ermell 06:20, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:48, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Langfjorddalen, Gamvik --Ermell 06:20, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:01, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lake in the valley between Bekkafjord and Langfjorddalen --Ermell 06:20, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:38, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination River in the Lebesby region in northern Norway --Ermell 06:20, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:38, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Flower bud of a Magnolia covered with raindrops. (After flowering in August).
    --Famberhorst 05:52, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:01, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Motor ship IJZEREN HEIN ENI 02004645 with Kubota - KX080-3 Mini excavator 8 ton crawler excavator Location: Langweerderwielen-Langwarder Wielen.--Famberhorst 05:53, 3 August 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:01, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion {{{2}}}
• 
  • Nomination Nature area De Kraanlânnen of It Fryske Gea. View over the pet holes of the Feanhoop.
    --Famberhorst 05:52, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:02, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Square of the Three Cultures, Mexico City, the first structures are the remains of the ancient aztec temple of Tlatelolco, then catholic temple of Santiago de Tlatelolco. --Cvmontuy 03:49, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
    The photograph needs perspective correction and more sharpness. I think it's made with a lens of an older film camera. These lenses are still wonderful, but not good enough for sharpness requirements of today. --XRay 05:32, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
     Comment Thanks for your review, the lens is a manual focus the Samyang_14mm_f/2.8_IF_ED_UMC_Aspherical, unfortunatelly for this picture I was not abble to use a tripod --Cvmontuy 12:15, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
     Oppose The composition is good, but IMO the photograph is not sharp enough. But you can disagree and set the image to discussion. --XRay 17:56, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Relationships between Kepler-Poinsot solids --Watchduck 00:05, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Majakka (mostly finished) and Loisto (under construction) apartment buildings in Kalasatama, Helsinki, Finland. --Msaynevirta 21:43, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Musée Rath, Geneva. --C messier 08:39, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
  • Review
    The sky is a bit noisy --MB-one 10:56, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lightpainting in an abandoned fort. --ComputerHotline 06:47, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Considering the difficult conditions, I think it's good. --JiriMatejicek 09:44, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lightpainting in an abandoned fort. --ComputerHotline 06:47, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Considering the difficult conditions, I think it's good. --JiriMatejicek 09:44, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lightpainting in an abandoned fort. --ComputerHotline 06:47, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Considering the difficult conditions, I think it's good. --JiriMatejicek 09:44, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Underway of the Kommandantur in Flossenbürg concentration camp. --PantheraLeo1359531 20:52, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
  • Review
    There are several issues. Please try to fix it. The issues: too dark, perspective fix necessary, CAs, sharpness at the top. Thank you. --XRay 05:39, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:Bilderreihe_rund_um_St._Jakob_in_Defereggen_22082018_030.jpg

• Nomination Four relaxing cows on a meadow. --PantheraLeo1359531 13:10, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose Filename doesn't meet the standards for QIC.--Chianti 16:01, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
  
•  Support I see that there are cows, even though it is not said in the file name. Who does not recognize it, can look in the picture description. -- Spurzem 20:27, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose as mentioned before. --Milseburg 21:01, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Dateiname ist egal. Here isn't QFC (Quality Filename Canditades) --Ralf Roletschek 14:57, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
•  SupportPer Ralf.--Manfred Kuzel 05:17, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
•  Support I don't understand this file name thing. The file name should be somehow meaningful (because describing roughly the location, it is), but does not need to describe every detail. Detailed descriptions belong in the section "Description". Image quality is good enough for QI. --Smial 09:28, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Per my comment above Poco a poco 10:13, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 01:41, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Bilderreihe_rund_um_St._Jakob_in_Defereggen_22082018_031.jpg

• Nomination Two relaxing cows on a field. --PantheraLeo1359531 13:09, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Nice and good quality. Incredible that we eat them. -- Spurzem 14:11, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
• Tecnically okay, but  Oppose for now. It needs a better categorization regarding the animals and also a more meaningful name, i think the other images of this "Bilderreihe" too. --Milseburg 14:37, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Filename doesn't meet the standards for QIC.--Chianti 16:01, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. Und was hat der Filename mit der Bildqualität zu tun?--Manfred Kuzel 05:14, 4 August 2019 (UTC) Voice does not count until properly signed. --Milseburg 07:47, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment Manfred, please read and accept the Image page requirements above Quality images shall have a meaningful file name, be properly categorized...--Milseburg 18:13, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Dateiname ist völlig unwichtig. --Ralf Roletschek 06:18, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Per my comment above Poco a poco 10:13, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 01:41, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Dode_roek._Locatie._Natuurterrein_De_Famberhorst._01-06-2019._(d.j.b)._03.jpg

• Nomination This one Dead Rook (Corvus frugilegus ) has had a nasty death, confused between the branches of a Pinus. --Famberhorst 05:53, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose crop of exisitng QI. Charlesjsharp 07:40, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

• @Charlesjsharp:  Comment Thank you for your comment on this photo. However, I do not agree with you. This is a unique photo and not another cut out photo! Too bad for you wrong assumption.--Famberhorst 15:32, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
• Sorry Famberhorst. I've striked my oppose out. I still don't think we should have multiple QIs of the same static scene, but I can't see that it's forbidden by QI rules. It used to be! Charles (talk) 20:13, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

• Thank you for your corrected opinion.--Famberhorst 05:17, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 08:02, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don't think this composition works.--Peulle 08:59, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Composition isn´t working for me too. --Milseburg 09:53, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Nahaufnahme zeigt zusätzliche Details gegenüber den anderen Aufnahmen desselben Motivs. --Smial 10:43, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:19, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 01:39, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Cooking_on_a_fire_2019_G2.jpg

• Nomination Outdoor cooking in boiling oil on a fire (2) -- George Chernilevsky 21:34, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Seven Pandas 22:29, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Question Is it Ok to nominate three virtually identical images? Charlesjsharp 07:48, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
  

• @Charlesjsharp: Yes, it is OK. Please, read our QI rules -- George Chernilevsky 20:22, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

• I'm sure you're right, but I read the rules George & Peulle and it's not covered as far as I can see - I thought it was. But the rules do say "Carefully select your best images to nominate" which surely implies you shouldn't submit to QI lots of nearly identical shots just to get more QIs approved. Are there other rules I've missed? For many images I submit to QIC I have five times as many almost identical shots - all QI standard! I wouldn't dream of uploading them all. What's the point in that? Charlesjsharp 20:24, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

•  Support Yes, it's OK, but if you nominate lots of very similar images, reviewers might not bother reviewing all of them.--Peulle 08:43, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:41, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 01:38, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Großglockner_Hochalpenstraße_21082018_417.jpg

• Nomination A mountain biosphere with trees and rubble. --PantheraLeo1359531 13:23, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Contrast rather low due to weather conditions, but it appears realistic. --Smial 12:56, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose I disagree. Not a QI for me untill without any changes of the contrast. --Ermell 07:59, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Ermell and I miss a more informative description (direction of viewing, some names of the mountains) --Milseburg 09:46, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others. --Basotxerri 17:21, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 01:38, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Chalice,_Christchurch,_New_Zealand_02.jpg

• Nomination Chalice, Christchurch --Podzemnik 02:24, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion  SupportGood quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:20, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
  * Opposethe object is tilted to the left, so I don't think the composition is optimal --Nefronus 10:20, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Perhaps not optimal but good -- Spurzem 16:43, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support good so it is now. --Ralf Roletschek 19:25, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Per others. --Manfred Kuzel 06:17, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
•  Support per Spurzem. --Aristeas 19:14, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 01:37, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Iglesia_de_San_Juan,_Helsinki,_Finlandia,_2012-08-14,_DD_21.JPG

• Nomination St. John's Church, Helsinki, Finnland --Poco a poco 10:26, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion Nice picture but is noisy and with lack of detail --Cvmontuy 16:43, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
  I've denoised it a bit, QI to me, please, let's discuss --Poco a poco 19:47, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Good for me -- Spurzem 16:45, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support OK for me --Llez 07:09, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Per others. --Manfred Kuzel 06:15, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Good. --Aristeas 19:11, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 01:37, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

File:2019-06-05_21-46-30_orage-Belfort.jpg

• Nomination Lightnings seen from Belfort (France). --ComputerHotline 20:53, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Chenspec 05:56, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
• It need a perspective correction. --Tournasol7 06:20, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --大诺史 07:39, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose I disagree. --Tournasol7 04:27, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support good without distortion --Ralf Roletschek 19:27, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Double contours by camera shake, overexposed, not really sharp. --Smial 01:47, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Smial. --Basotxerri 17:23, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, but Smial is right (double contours). --Aristeas 19:12, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 01:34, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Humenné_-_Humenský_zámok_(Kaštieľ_v_Humennom)_001.jpg

• Nomination Manor in Humenné, Slovakia --Milan Bališin 17:45, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
   Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:21, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
   Oppose I disagree. The dark areas are too dark. In fact, if we look at the histogram, 36% of information lies in shadows and about 15% - in deep shadows. And it's not a night shot. --Stoxastikos 20:30, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
   Oppose per Stoxastikos --GRDN711 12:28, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 01:34, 6 August 2019 (UTC)