Commons:Requests and votes/Wutsje

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 Support = 28;  Oppose = 0;  Neutral = 0 - 100% Result = successful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wutsje

Vote

Links for Wutsje: Wutsje (talk · contributions · deleted user contributions · recent activity · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)

Dear all, I would like to propose Wutsje as administrator on Commons, not only because he is incredibly active in marking vandalism/testedits/offtopic-pages for speedy-deletion but also because he has all the qualities I expect from good admins: he is friendly, patient, insightful, objective, sensitive and calm (and very modest). Wutsje is already a sysop in three projects: nl.wiki, fy.wiki and nl.wikimedia, furthermore he is a very active member (one of our best) of the small wiki monitoring-team, where he is reverting/removing spam&vandalism cross-wiki and constructively helping small projects wherever he can, which is why he has global rollback-rights and has a splendid overall picture about ongoing cross-wiki-vandalism, which often involves commons too.

In addition Wutsje brings a very useful set of languages and has my full trust!

Because of his knowledge in crosswiki-counter-vandalism and work on commons as active rc-watcher, I believe he would be a great addition to the commons-admin-team, and I hope others agree with that. Thank You, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 18:10, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Acceptance

Thank you Spacebirdy. I think I can use this tool (with which I am already quite familiar) very well on Commons too, so I accept this nomination. Wutsje (talk) 18:16, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Votes

  1.  Support Yes. I have some DR concerns, but as with my nom of Kallerna (archive of Kallerna's req). I share the same view as when I supported Kallerna for adminship. --Kanonkas(talk) 18:21, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    The candidate has not participated in deletion requests, which is something I look for when supporting a candidacy for adminship. --Kanonkas(talk) 18:45, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Support, as proposer, also: not everyone has to be that active in DR to be a good addition to the team, & everything I just said above, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 18:32, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I agree they do not need DR experience to be a good administrator, but one should at least have some, or something else that shows why they are suited for adminship here. This is solely my personal opinion. --Kanonkas(talk) 18:46, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    You have expressed Your opinion already and I respect it, please respect mine too, because as You can see, I do disagree with it, humbly, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 19:03, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, I have and I respect your opinion too. However, I'm just elaborating as to why I voted as such. Nothing with your vote at all. I responded back so you could understand a bit more as to my reasoning. If that makes sense. --Kanonkas(talk) 19:34, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Sure. →Nagy 18:37, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Support. →Diti the penguin — 19:42, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Voor, more Dutch admins! ;-) Multichill (talk) 20:27, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Uiteraard - Lolsimon (talk) 20:32, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Voor, Wutsje is a serious person who has been a good admin on nl.wikipedia for a long time - I trust him - Quistnix (talk) 20:47, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. support —DerHexer (Talk) 21:06, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Support - Yep. –Juliancolton | Talk 23:27, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Support. Wutsje is a trustworthy user on nl-Wikipedia and won his spurs. He's now moving to Commons as well, and his recent activity shows that he'd be a great addition to the team. m:Mark W (Mwpnl) ¦ talk 00:01, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Support Seems to like to warn people a lot (and even template the regulars) but some might say that's good thing, so I won't oppose.. Everything else looks good. Rocket000 (talk) 04:43, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12.  Definitely and not before time. Very valuable cleanup work done. Thanks for helping --Herby talk thyme 06:38, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Support Sure. --Erwin(85) 19:04, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14.  Support That's a really sad thing to see that the list of admins you see to the right still fits in the page. Make it longerrr! odder 21:14, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15.  Support - A excellent user, I'm quite sure he will do a good and responsible use of the tools. Regards, df. (talk) 21:16, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16.  Full support - they know what they're doing in many other places; I have confidence it will be no different here.  — Mike.lifeguard 23:51, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17.  Support NuclearWarfare (talk) 04:47, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18.  Support. WJBscribe (talk) 15:23, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19.  Support. Sure. feydey (talk) 15:30, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20.  automatic Spacebirdy nom support ++Lar: t/c 15:53, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21.  Support Ala z talk 01:31, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22.  Support Definitely. - Rjd0060 (talk) 02:23, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23.  Support --AFBorchert (talk) 04:51, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24.  Support --MichaelMaggs (talk) 07:48, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25.  Support: An admin who prefers to warn uploaders before deleting stuff is always welcome. Sv1xv (talk) 13:41, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26.  Support, seems capable, and also useful set of language skills. Cirt (talk) 16:16, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27.  Support Cross-wiki skills and additional languages are especially useful here, besides all the usual skills. —Willscrlt ( “Talk” • “w:en” • “m” ) 14:22, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  28.  Voor I have seen Wutsje in action, both here and in other wikis, and I consider him a valuable addition to the admin team - Badseed talk 20:32, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Requests_and_votes/Wutsje&oldid=36532730"