User talk:Anna Anichkova

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Anna Anichkova!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 09:02, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Фотографии

Огромное спасибо за фотографии такого высокого качества--Ymblanter (talk) 18:59, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012! Dear Anna Anichkova, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 19:28, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Подсолнух 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit soft but QI for me. Nice shot. --Kreuzschnabel 19:55, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Коттедж 2007 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:58, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olgin Pond in Peterhof 1512.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:45, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ålesund, panorama from Aksla 3318.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 16:39, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergen Bryggen 2986.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:48, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sunflower 2009 07 25 4436.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 12:22, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puslichevo 2009 07 19 4331.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition and light, though not very sharp. --Tsui 08:13, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monastery 4764.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Haneburger 09:51, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Papaver 0602.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Just about ok. --Mattbuck 19:11, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cyprus 4012-15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 07:51, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puslichevo 4655.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Очень хорошая композиция. Я добавил немного резкости. --Iifar 07:38, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arbatskaya metro 00018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 14:34, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Magnolia grandiflora 3964.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality!! --NorbertNagel 16:31, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Подберёзовики 4604.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Unsharp in full resolution and insufficient categorization. --NorbertNagel 18:16, 7 November 2013 (UTC)  Done Slightly amended, thank you. --Anna Anichkova 21:00, 7 November 2013 (UTC) ok now. --NorbertNagel 22:07, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2009 05 31 3880 Rolls-Royce.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Purple CA at the right, needs category --A.Savin 15:35, 10 November 2013 (UTC)  Done Slightly amended, thank you. --Anna Anichkova 12:05, 11 November 2013 (UTC)  Support OK --A.Savin 14:42, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olea europaea 2810.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:34, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Punica granatum 2524.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --A.Savin 16:40, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2009 05 31 TRIUMPH.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 20:28, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

COM:QIC

Please try not to nominate too much pictures at once. Excerpt from the guidelines "Adding more than a couple of images at once can be considered flooding, which is frowned upon.". In general, people try to limit themselves to 4 or 5 pictures per day. Thank you.

Pleclown (talk) 12:37, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Erythrina fusca 3689.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and nice --Taxiarchos228 08:12, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Almond tree 6310.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support. Good quality. --Ykvach 08:47, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Almond tree 6241.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs CA corrections in the lower part + sharpening --A.Savin 12:55, 17 November 2013 (UTC)  Done -СА, + sharpness, thanks a lot. --Anna Anichkova 10:20, 18 November 2013 (UTC) Ok for QI. --A.Savin 17:04, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2009 05 31 Cadillac Coupe deVille.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The shadows are rather harsh - can you increase low level brightness? Mattbuck 20:28, 17 November 2013 (UTC)  Done +brightness, -contrast, thank you. --Anna Anichkova 08:05, 19 November 2013 (UTC) Better. Mattbuck 21:26, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jacaranda mimosifolia 5334.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:02, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jacaranda mimosifolia 3994.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:06, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hala Sultan Tekke 6040.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 17:05, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delonix regia 4257.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 10:48, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delonix regia 5644.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Let's promote them both : QI ! --JLPC 17:37, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delonix regia 4226.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 11:32, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olea europaea 1782.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI. --NorbertNagel 11:34, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Callistemon citrinus 3589.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 13:05, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Норвегия, Олесунн панорама.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 15:50, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London Eye 5994.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 20:12, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Callistemon citrinus 3588.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 00:42, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Merry Christmas 00197.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A wider shot would probably be better - the slight crop at each side is a bit odd - but ok. Merry Christmas to you too. Mattbuck 10:48, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Paphos harbor 00490-92.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:49, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Nicholas church 00582.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very nice. Good quality IMO--Lmbuga 18:10, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Astronomical clock 0910.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:09, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cape Greco 2006 06 17 0895-99.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:28, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Домик адмирала 2940 БИГ.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 18:25, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Петра и Павла собор 2008 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments CAs visible --DXR 09:52, 11 January 2014 (UTC) Sorry Where? I can't find. ----Anna Anichkova 15:00, 11 January 2014 (UTC)  SupportFor me its QI. I can see some minor CA on the tree only, so its ok. --Uoaei1 18:25, 11 January 2014 (UTC) I will not challenge QI, but I think they are very prominent at the left roof, where I see a clear red halo even in normal size. Lightroom does remove them fairly well --DXR 18:54, 11 January 2014 (UTC) Done corrected: -СА, thank you.--Anna Anichkova 08:20, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Akropolis 2458-60.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 21:37, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cape Greco 2006 06 04 0640-44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 23:11, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

File:2009 05 31 000 START.jpg

File:2009 05 31 000 START.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pibwl (talk) 21:22, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:А.И.Штакеншнейдер.jpg

Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 08:03, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Atlantis The Palm 00776.jpg

File:Atlantis The Palm 00776.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ras67 (talk) 11:40, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Household Cavalry on The Mall, London.jpg

File:Household Cavalry on The Mall, London.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 14:07, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Здравствуйте Анна, это Георгий Гусев, арт-директор московского музыкального фестиваля Мастера Музыки. Пытаюсь выйти с вами на связь. Не могли бы вы скинуть мне ваш e-mail на адрес goshprojectsint@gmail.com Спасибо! Георгий

Goshprojectsint (talk) 17:01, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Astronomical clock 0913.jpg

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:50, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Arbat Street 6920.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Arbat Street 6920.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Arbat Street 6920.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : 46.118.135.162.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 07:36, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

File:Christmas 00444.jpg

File:Christmas 00444.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

SDudley (talk) 21:58, 1 January 2024 (UTC)