User talk:Baronnet

Bienvenue

Bienvenue sur ma page de discussion. Tout commentaire est bienvenu, il suffit d'appuyer sur l'onglet + ci-dessus. Comments in English are welcome.

Image:Public debt percent gdp world map.PNG

I checked and it looks like the CIA must have updated their figures, have now updated the map based on these --Astrokey44 09:42, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

I didn't know how to contact you, but that picture is incorrect. Canada's debt is only 34% of GDP.

Problème de Category

Salut Baronnet,
Après une visite dans ta superbe ville, j'ai créé Category:Art Nouveau architecture in Nancy et la plupart des articles dedans.
Pour parfaire cette catégorie, je suis preneur de toute photo de facade art nouveau dans Nancy (avec l'adresse exacte ;-)).
Je me démerderais pour créer les articles, et catégories d'architecte...

Je voulais te dire que j'ai supprimé de Image:DSCN1686.JPG la catégorie Category:Art Nouveau architecture in Nancy et de Image:DSCN1690.JPG la catéorie Category:Nancy.
En effet, quand une image est dans un article de commons, on doit retirer de la photo les catégories de cet article.
Le but est qu'il n'y ait pas, par exemple dans la catégorie Nancy, les milliers de photos prises à Nancy.
Amitié Liné1 13:08, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

"Categories and/or galleries?

"Note the "and/or" above. Some users are of the opinion that when an image is included in a gallery article, it is sufficient to categorize that article. Others believe that each individual image should be categorized too. The consensus on this issue, as determined by vote, is that both systems are equally valid and should be used concurrently. Do not remove categories just because an image is in a categorized gallery. It is hoped that in the future the software will be updated to merge the functionalities of galleries and categories into one. Automated tools for finding images must dig through categories and gallery articles." Source : Commons:Categories

J'ai lu votre commentaire sur ma page de discussion, merci d'avoir expliqué votre retrait des catégories que j'avais ajoutées. Mais ce § de Wikimedia Commons explique que deux positions existent : gallerie ET catégorie / galerie OU catégorie. Et que, en tout état de cause, il est demandé de "ne pas retirer de catégories", une fois qu'elles sont mises (sauf si elles sont fausses, bien sûr !). C'est du boulot, merci de ne pas le défaire !

Baronnet 14:08, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Je connais et j'adhère à ce système. Mais il s'applique pour des catégories et des articles de même niveau. C'est le cas en biologie quand il existe un article et une catégorie pour une espèce. Les photos doivent être dans les deux.

Mais dans le cas présent, la catégorie est beaucoup plus vaste. Comme le but est d'avoir beaucoup d'images d'art nouveau à nancy, on ne peut les laisser dans Category:Art Nouveau architecture in Nancy ni dans Category:Nancy.

Si vous y tenez, vous pouvez créer category:Villa Majorelle et y mettre les photos...

Amitié Liné1 14:21, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Euh, non, car ces photos ne représentent pas la Villa Majorelle, mais la Brasserie L'Excelsior. Je pense qu'il est préférable d'avoir article + catégorie, même lorsqu'il n'existe pas de catégorie exactement du même niveau. Mais au fond, peu m'importe qu'on change les catégories, pour les affiner, ou les élargir. C'était juste le fait d'avoir ces deux photos précédemment catégorisées, puis décatégorisées, et qui se baladaient dans la nature. Je vous explique pourquoi : je travaille souvent sur Wikipédia (et souvent des Wikipédias étrangers, notamment amharique, arménien, somalien), pour illustrer des articles. Et quand je cherche une illustration, j'utilise les catégories pour les trouver. Si on me retire les catégories, je n'ai plus d'accès (facile du moins) aux images. Mais apparemment, les anglophones nous promettent une évolution logicielle qui devrait permettre de fusionner pages et catégories. Donc tout ce tracas ne devrait être que temporaire. D'où l'idée de la trêve sur les catégories (avec ou sans) ;-) Bien amicalement, Baronnet 18:04, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

TUSC token 63d369dd5cd408fdf5820d74f89dd25b

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Demography of France

Image exists: Kransky (talk) 13:25, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

File:Paul-Bigot-Paris.JPG

File:Paul-Bigot-Paris.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Coyau (talk) 13:56, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Salut,

J'ai copié ta photo ici : wikilivres:Image:Paul-Bigot-Paris.JPG pour qu'elle ne soit pas perdue pour tout le monde. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 23:49, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Merci. Je la remettrai en place le 9 juin 2012... ;-) Baronnet (talk) 08:50, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Atelier-emile-friant-vers-1887.jpg

Obviously this photograph wasn't created by you. Could you please provide the source? Trycatch (talk) 19:04, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Right, where did you obtain the photo? Masterful shot, BTW. Blurpeace 19:36, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

The photograph is anonymous. I own it. Baronnet (talk) 22:53, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

TUSC token ac9a44601349d1cffc0f834f073b3b72

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File tagging File:Chisholm-arms.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Chisholm-arms.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Magog the Ogre (talk) 18:27, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

License change

Hi Marc, I changed the license here because of the now public domain content of the file. Regards --Friechtle (talk) 11:57, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

It's strange that I cannot choose the license of the photos that I publish, but I guess they are too true a likeness of the original painting... I'll take that for a compliment to the photographer. Thanks anyway to have told me of this license change. Baronnet (talk) 09:42, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

You're welcome. Your image was alright (and also right licensed). But now, that the border of the image and everything else three dimensional was removed via image editing, the file only shows the work of an painter who is nearly 100 years dead. And because of this, the image is in the public domain (and it is necessary to license an image correct as PD). Theoretical you could restore the original image and license, and the picture that shows only the painter's work could be uploaded in an extra file, but I don't think that is necessary, is it? Best regards :) --Friechtle (talk) 22:41, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey. Dear Baronnet, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

---

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey! Dear Baronnet, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Réponse

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Blason_Mgr_Jean-Louis_Papin.svg

Bonjour, réponse tardive, mais réponse quand même! Cordialement Mathieu C. (talk) 09:42, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Lorraine

Bonjour Baronnet. Je crois qu'il faut aller plus loin dans la détermination du domaine. J'ajouterais les dates, (1508 -1737), mais aussi la précision "stained glass windows". Il existe en effet d'autres versions de ces armoiries sur Commons, comme par exemple celles-ci. Les deux sont évidemment incomparables entre elles, c'est pourquoi je suggère cette restriction du "scope" au vitrail. Cordialement.--Jebulon (talk) 22:50, 26 October 2015 (UTC) (Par ailleurs, d'un strict point de vue héraldique-et esthétique-, je n'aime pas du tout cette façon de traiter l'azur de France avec des croisillons pour y intercaler les fleurs de lys, mais là, vous n'y pouvez rien !)--Jebulon (talk) 22:50, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Je trouve qu'avec ce niveau de détail on n'est plus vraiment dans le "scope", tellement ça devient précis : cela devient plutôt la description même de l'image. Et j'avoue qu'à titre purement personnel et esthétique, je ne vois pas comment comparer cette photo avec l'horrible File:Armoiries Lorraine-Vaudémont.png - dont il existe une bien meilleure version, vectorielle : File:Lorraine Arms 1538.svg. Mais soit ! J'ai apporté au "scope" les changements demandés... en espérant que ça permette à cette photo (dont je ne suis pas l'auteur !) de franchir l'obstacle :-) Baronnet (talk) 08:00, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stained glass window of the Coat of arms of House of Lorraine used from 1508 to 1737..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Sorry no, only the central escutcheon is of Lorraine, the duchy. All the rest is the CoA of a person, Antoine, Duke of Lorraine and of Bar, titular Duke of Guelders (1489 - 1544), the Good--Jebulon (talk) 20:49, 24 October 2015 (UTC).

---

Scope changed from Coat of arms of Lorraine to Stained glass window of the Coat of arms of the House of Lorraine used from 1508 to 1737 - In response to the comment of Jebulon (talk) 20:49, 24 October 2015 (UTC), I amended the scope. These arms were used not only by one person, but by all his followers as dukes of Lorraine for over two centuries, until 1737. Baronnet (talk) 22:44, 25 October 2015 (UTC). Amended again Baronnet (talk) 07:56, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support with the new scope.--Jebulon (talk) 18:36, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Grenade escalier Palais Royal 2.jpg

File:Grenade escalier Palais Royal 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

173.55.239.44 19:02, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Coat of arms of Nancy.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  CommentWhile the image is of a sufficient quality, I think that the description could be expanded to explain the meanings of the various elements, or at any rate a reference made to an appropriate authority, for example here. Martinvl (talk) 13:59, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:35, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose The scope does not link to any category. Martinvl (talk) 19:50, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment @Baronnet and Archaeodontosaurus: I have linked the scope to an appropriate category and have improved the description. Are you happy with these changes? Martinvl (talk) 20:37, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment @Martinvl: Thank you. I think the improvements are very good. Baronnet (talk) 19:24, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:47, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

WMF Surveys, 18:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!

WMF Surveys, 01:20, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.

WMF Surveys, 00:30, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Category:Coats of arms in Doubs - "Warning: Category:Coats of arms in Doubs is calling Template:Departments of France with more than one value for the "all" parameter. Only the last value provided will be used."

Could you please repair, --Arnd (talk) 11:11, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Factum est / fait / done. Baronnet (talk) 17:05, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Bonjour

Pour l’article Distribution aux consommateurs , voici un texte source ici qui serait mieux pour l’article, il suffit d’effacer le texte source à l'article, recopier le texte source de mon lien et de le remplacer au texte source de l’article (donc sélectionner, copier, coller), vous constaterez que c’est mieux, le texte source est quasi identique à l’actuel mais actualisé. La section histoire est ajusté à l’article en anglais. Le texte source est peut-être à un drôle d’endroit mais c’est facile de le recopier par le lien. Il faut un compte pour éditer sur l’article, donc je ne peux le faire. Merci.--163.172.159.223 18:12, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

Bonjour, je ne trouve pas de texte source en suivant votre lien. Mais le texte a été sensiblement modifié depuis. Je présume que d'autres personnes ont pu accomplir la modification que vous souhaitiez. Je vous invite à créer un compte, ce qui vous évitera d'avoir à solliciter des intermédiaires pour effectuer les modifications que vous souhaitez, et vous permettra de prendre une part active à l'encyclopédie. Baronnet (talk) 14:56, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Baronnet,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:17, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8310 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !

Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !

Bonne journée,

Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:50, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Baronnet,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:25, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Baronnet,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:07, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Organisation juridictionnelle nationale fr.gif requires updating

Hi Baronnet,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed File:Organisation juridictionnelle nationale fr.gif is out of date. TI and TGI were merged as Tribunal judiciaire in 2020. Could you update it? Thanks again. Baronnet (talk) 12:00, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Birr.JPG

File:Birr.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 14:09, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Ethiopan Birr.jpg

File:Ethiopan Birr.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 14:09, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Guillaume Douarre

Bonjour, la photo de Nouméa pour le premier vicaire apostolique en Nouvelle-Calédonie, représente-t-elle un monument funéraire ou une tombe ? La légende sur Commons n'est pas très parlante. Merci.--RotachZ (talk) 13:09, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Ni l'un ni l'autre : c'est une inscription commémorative sur le parvis de la cathédrale de Nouméa. Baronnet (talk) 13:15, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Plus que quelques jours pour participer à Wiki Loves Monuments France !

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est ouvert pour une semaine encore, jusqu'au 30 septembre. Déjà plus de 6 000 photos ont été importées cette année alors vous aussi rejoignez le concours ! Cette campagne de contribution concerne tous les monuments et objets mobiliers présents dans la base Mérimée et dans la base Palissy. De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la verrière décorative au reliquaire, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Vous pouvez dès à présent mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments et objets du patrimoine français. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:36, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Groupthink Irving L. Janis second edition back cover.jpg

File:Groupthink Irving L. Janis second edition back cover.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: clear copyvio; text & layout owned by the author / publisher, not the uploader. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Tagishsimon (talk) 19:04, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

File:Groupthink Irving L. Janis second edition.jpg

File:Groupthink Irving L. Janis second edition.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: IP for this book cover will be owned by its pubisher, not the uploader. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Tagishsimon (talk) 19:05, 11 February 2023 (UTC)