User talk:Crochet.david
Présentation | Discussions | Statistiques |
Archive of User talk:Crochet.david on : | ||||||||
Running | 2008-2011 |
Le tutoriel des premiers pas et la FAQ peuvent énormément vous aider. Ils expliquent comment personnaliser votre interface (pour la langue par exemple), comment importer des fichiers, sans oublier les licences. Des compétences techniques ne sont pas indispensables. Soyez clair et présumez des bonnes intentions des autres. C'est un wiki - rien de très compliqué. Plus d'informations sont disponibles sur le portail communautaire. Vous pouvez posez des questions sur le service d'aide, le Bistro, ou encore sur IRC, au canal #wikimedia-commons. Vous pouvez également contacter un administrateur sur sa page de discussion. |
| |
(P.S. Vous pouvez émettre une critique ou un commentaire sur ce message de bienvenue) |
Yann 19:47, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
TUSC token f09f3805f0a19954df42b4a29b8d8b92
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
File:Dominant Form 1.0 Marquee Title.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 16:15, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Double Negation 1.0 Marquee Title.png
- File:Equational Inference Band Cancel (( )).png
- File:Equational Inference Band Collect p.png
- File:Equational Inference Band Delete p.png
- File:Equational Inference Band QED.png
- File:Equational Inference Band Quit ((q)).png
- File:Equational Inference Bar Cancel (( )).png
- File:Equational Inference Bar Collect ab, ac, bc.png
- File:Equational Inference Bar Delete a, b, c.png
- File:Equational Inference Bar Distribute (abc).png
- File:Equational Inference Bar Quit (a), (b), (c).png
- File:Equational Inference Bar Reflect ab, ac, bc.png
- File:Equational Inference Bar Weed ab, ac, bc.png
- File:Equational Inference Marquee QED.png
- File:Equational Inference QED.png
- File:Equational Inference Rule Cancel (( )).png
- File:Equational Inference Rule Collect p.png
- File:Equational Inference Rule Quit ((q)).png
- File:Equational Inference Rule Quit abcd.png
- File:Equational Inference Rule Reflect ad(bc).png
- File:Equational Inference Rule Reflect b, c.png
- File:Equational Inference Rule Weed a, d.png
- File:Equational Inference Rule Weed bc.png
- File:Generation Theorem 1.0 Marquee Title.png
- File:Generation Theorem Banner Title.png
- File:Hypostatic Abstraction Figure 1.png
- File:Hypostatic Abstraction Figure 2.png
- File:Hypostatic Abstraction Figure 3.png
- File:Hypostatic Abstraction Figure 4.png
- File:Logical Graph Figure 1 Invisible Frame.jpg
- File:Logical Graph Figure 14 Banner.jpg
- File:Logical Graph Figure 2 Invisible Frame.jpg
- File:Two-Thirds Majority 2.0 Eq 1 Pf 1 Storyboard 1.png
- File:Two-Thirds Majority 2.0 Eq 1 Pf 1 Storyboard 2.png
- File:Two-Thirds Majority 2.0 Eq 1 Pf 1 Storyboard 3.png
- File:Two-Thirds Majority 2.0 Eq 1 Pf 1 Storyboard 4.png
- File:Two-Thirds Majority 2.0 Eq 1 Pf 1 Storyboard 5.png
- File:Two-Thirds Majority 2.0 Eq 1 Pf 1 Storyboard 6.png
- File:Two-Thirds Majority 2.0 Eq 1 Pf 1 Storyboard 7.png
- File:Two-Thirds Majority 2.0 Eq 1 Pf 1 Storyboard 8.png
- File:Two-Thirds Majority 2.0 Eq 1 Pf 1 Storyboard 9.png
- File:Two-Thirds Majority Eq 1 Pf 1 Storyboard 1.png
- File:Two-Thirds Majority Eq 1 Pf 1 Storyboard 2.png
- File:Two-Thirds Majority Eq 1 Pf 1 Storyboard 3.png
- File:Two-Thirds Majority Eq 1 Pf 1 Storyboard 4.png
- File:Two-Thirds Majority Eq 1 Pf 1 Storyboard 5.png
- File:Two-Thirds Majority Eq 1 Pf 1 Storyboard 6.png
- File:Two-Thirds Majority Eq 1 Pf 1 Storyboard 7.png
- File:Two-Thirds Majority Eq 1 Pf 1 Storyboard 8.png
- File:Two-Thirds Majority Eq 1 Pf 1 Storyboard 9.png
Yours sincerely Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 05:01, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
Nettoyage de SVG
[edit]Salut,
Je viens de faire un gros coup de nettoyage sur File:Plan des peuples gaulois.svg. Le poids est ainsi passé de 114 à 17 kio. En gros, j’ai mis les textes en mode texte, j’ai groupé les éléments similaires (et ainsi mutualiser les styles) et j’ai donné des noms explicites aux cours d’eau. Anecdotiquement, j’ai changé Riédons en Riedones (la raison initiale de ma venue sur cette image ). J’espère ne rien avoir cassé, dans le cas contraire, n’hésite pas à me contacter.
Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 15:36, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
- Super. Crochet.david (talk) 19:22, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Td7fig2.png
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Td7fig2.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
JuTa 20:17, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Td7fig1.png
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Td7fig1.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
JuTa 20:19, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Td3fig2.png
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Td3fig2.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
JuTa 20:22, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Td3fig1.png
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Td3fig1.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
JuTa 20:23, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Td2fig3.png
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Td2fig3.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
JuTa 20:25, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Td2fig2.png
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Td2fig2.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
JuTa 20:26, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Td2fig1.png
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Td2fig1.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
JuTa 20:28, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Learningcycle.png
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Learningcycle.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
JuTa 21:03, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
File:Picture 3 from betawikiversity.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
ProfessorX (talk) 17:09, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
File:Eglise saint nicolas et tour de bretagne.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Blurred Lines 13:51, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
File:Fontaine et tour de bretagne.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Blurred Lines 13:52, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
File:Fontaine place royale et tour de bretagne 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Blurred Lines 13:54, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
File:Fontaine place royale et tout de bretagne.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Blurred Lines 13:54, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
File:Informatica de gestiune -- 2008-2009 -- info.uvt.ro -- Tutoriale -- MSSQL -- Security -- login1.png
[edit]File:Informatica de gestiune -- 2008-2009 -- info.uvt.ro -- Tutoriale -- MSSQL -- Security -- login1.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 11:24, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Bot de-flagging notification
[edit]Hi Crochet.david, I'm writing to you because your bot Crochet.david.bot (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information) is about to be de-flagged as a result of inactivity for a period longer than two years. If you'd like to keep that account flagged as a bot, please speak up at Commons:Bots/Requests/de-flag 2#Discussion; otherwise, I'll remove the bot flag from that account in a month from now (10 May 2014). Thanks for your understanding, odder (talk) 13:16, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
File:Informatica de gestiune -- 2008-2009 -- info.uvt.ro -- Tutoriale -- MSSQL -- Security -- SQLSecurity.png
[edit]File:Informatica de gestiune -- 2008-2009 -- info.uvt.ro -- Tutoriale -- MSSQL -- Security -- SQLSecurity.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 02:24, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Clocher Saint Sever Calvados 7.jpg
[edit]Bonjour, en parcourant la Catégorie :Plaques in Calvados, j'ai vu trois de vos photos qui pouvaient être assemblées. Voici le résultat, j'espère qu'il vous conviendra. J'ai recopié les autorisations et géolocalisation à partir d'un de vos fichiers sources. Cordialement. François de Dijon (talk) 15:12, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
Schémas de système convergeante
[edit]Merci de votre aide en faisant des schémas SVG ! N'oubliez pas d'ajouter des flèches sur les rayons lumineux et mettre votre nom d'utilisateur dans la description du fichier. Aumars (talk) 19:14, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Église Notre-Dame de Saint-Lô 2009-07-30 006.JPG
- File:Église Notre-Dame de Saint-Lô 2009-07-30 007.JPG
- File:Église Notre-Dame de Saint-Lô 2009-07-30 008.JPG
- File:Église Notre-Dame de Saint-Lô 2009-07-30 009.JPG
- File:Église Notre-Dame de Saint-Lô 2009-07-30 010.JPG
Yours sincerely, AFBorchert (talk) 11:11, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Église Notre-Dame de Saint-Lô 2009-07-30 020.JPG
- File:Église Notre-Dame de Saint-Lô 2009-07-30 021.JPG
- File:Église Notre-Dame de Saint-Lô 2009-07-30 022.JPG
- File:Église Notre-Dame de Saint-Lô 2009-07-30 023.JPG
- File:Église Notre-Dame de Saint-Lô 2009-07-30 033.JPG
- File:Église Notre-Dame de Saint-Lô 2009-07-30 034.JPG
- File:Église Notre-Dame de Saint-Lô 2009-07-30 035.JPG
Yours sincerely, AFBorchert (talk) 11:41, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, AFBorchert (talk) 14:08, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
File:Monument aux morts 39-45 bayeux.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
2A01:CB00:A05:D100:F053:4197:52E:5E3C 21:42, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
Flyer Wikiversité
[edit]Bonjour,
Je souhaite mettre à jour certaines infos du fichier File:Leaflet-WV-fr.pdf en vue d'une distribution papier.
Pourrais-tu s'il te plaît me transmettre le fichier éditable, si tu l'as toujours ?
Bien à toi,
--Hérisson grognon (talk) 06:55, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Hérisson grognon: Je ne l'ai plus. Il faut passer par un site qui transforme les PDF en ODT pour pouvoir l'éditer de nouveau Crochet.david (talk) 11:53, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Pymouss Let’s talk - 12:08, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:11, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!
[edit]Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 1 will end on UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!
[edit]Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.
Round 2 will end at UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!
[edit]Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 1 will end on UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!
[edit]Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.
Round 2 will end at UTC.
If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:13, 16 October 2024 (UTC)